Our goal is to have intelligent discussion of the topics of the day. We realize everyone has their opinion and they should be allowed to express it in a discussion forum without calling each other names. We learn from discussion and not from name calling or argument.We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. See details
Contact Form
Showing posts with label Chicago Tribune. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chicago Tribune. Show all posts
Adolf Hitler hosted Hungarian Premier Miklos Kallay, right, at his wooded headquarters on June 23, 1942 — a photo obtained by the Associated Press under its arrangement with the Nazis. (AP Photo)
At the height of World War II, the Associated Press made secret arrangements with an SS officer to obtain pictures taken by Nazi photographers that were distributed to American newspapers — a deal authorized by senior U.S. officials.
The extraordinary arrangement, which began in 1941 and ended with Hitler’s fall, is detailed in a lengthy internal report the AP released Wednesday morning. It comes several months after Norman Domeier, a German historian, discovered a letter describing the deal in the papers of AP’s then-bureau chief.
The report includes documents recently declassified at the request of AP’s management, including letters of approval from a wartime censorship office run by an ex-AP editor who reported to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. As part of the arrangement, AP shared pictures of U.S. war operations and Allied advances, which were reviewed by
Hitler and published in Nazi publications.
ADVERTISING
“With one known exception, the AP images that appeared in German publications through this arrangement were unaltered by the Germans, “ the report said, “but captions were rewritten by the Germans to conform to official Nazi views.”
U.S. counterintelligence agents unaware of the approval found “definite proof” that the AP was “engaged in operations coming within the purview of the Trading with the Enemy Act,” according to a document referenced in AP’s report. The case wasn’t pursued.
In an interview this week, AP officials strongly defended the arrangement, saying it was conducted in neutral countries, and that there was tremendous news value in offering its newspaper customers photos of Hitler and German military activities — even if the photos were taken by Nazis, who were expert propagandists.
John Daniszewski, AP’s vice president for standards and editor at large, said that the organization’s journalists “were doing their best to get out information that the world needed.” He defended the photos — they are still available for purchase on an AP website — by noting that blatantly staged propaganda was excluded and that AP’s captions made the Nazi origins clear.
But a review of photos published in American newspapers shows that wasn’t always the case.
The June 30, 1942, edition of The Washington Post carried a photo of Hitler shaking hands with ex-German officials, including one wearing a Nazi navy uniform. The photo credit is “Associated Press WIREPHOTO.” The photo was also published by Nazi magazine Berlin Rom Tokio, crediting Helmut Laux, the Waffen SS officer who made the deal with AP.
With his right hand out of action after an attempted assassination, Adolf Hitler, center, gives Italian dictator Benito Mussolini a left-handed shake. This photo was obtained by AP in its arrangement with the Nazis. (AP Photo)
In 1944, American newspapers ran a photo from the same Nazi magazine, this time of Hitler shaking Mussolini’s hand shortly after an assassination attempt on German leaders. The caption in the New York Herald Tribune described the handshake as “according to the German caption accompanying this photo.” The photo credit is, “Associated Press radiophoto.”
There are hundreds, likely thousands, more.
In the Chicago Tribune: Hitler drawing on a map. The caption says it arrived “via Lisbon.” The photo credit is, “Associated Press wirephoto.”
In the New York Times: Hitler at a conference. The caption says, “This photo, received from Lisbon, is described as.…” The credit is “Associated Press.”
In the Boston Sunday Globe: Hitler chatting with a blinded soldier. The caption says: “Der Fuehrer is seen chatting with some of his warriors, including the man in black, blinded in combat. The photo comes from Germany via Lisbon.”
A photo received via the AP deal with Nazis published in The Washington Post.
Daniszewski, the AP vice president, said that given the time period — a war, with censors on both sides — readers would have known that Nazis had taken the photos, even if those origins weren’t specifically described.
Asked why the captions distributed with the photos didn’t include references to Nazi or SS photographers, Daniszewski said, “It is easy to second-guess eight decades later, but we do not believe and did not find in our research any intention to deceive anyone about the German origins of these photos depicting scenes from the German side of the battle lines and inside Germany itself.”
But Nicholas O’Shaughnessy, a communications professor at Queen Mary, University of London and the author of a book on Nazi propaganda, said it was plainly apparent that the Germans had succeeded in finding a “direct route into the Allied consciousness through their propaganda.”
“It was extremely cynical of the AP to use these photos,” he added. “One tries to justify these things by saying the camera doesn’t lie. But Nazi
cameras always lied. They were a colossal kind of fairy tale. None of these images are real. This is how Hitler wanted to be seen.”
The story of AP’s deal to swap photos with the Nazis began to emerge only recently, after Domeier’s visit earlier this year to the Wisconsin Historical Society, where the papers of Louis P. Lochner, the AP’s Pulitzer Prize-winning Berlin bureau chief, are collected. Domeier found a 1946 letter to him from a former German employee named Willy Brandt (not the former German chancellor).
“I have a confession to make, Chief,” Brandt wrote, “but don’t get a shock.”
Brandt describes the chaotic moments after Hitler declared war on the United States in December 1941. Lochner and other American reporters were arrested and held for five months by the Germans. Brandt was also taken in by German authorities, several of whom were vying to get hold of the AP bureau and especially its photo operation.
Laux, described in U.S. Army documents as a “violent Nazi,” took control of what became known as the Bureau Laux. Photos were traded in Lisbon via diplomatic pouch with the help of another AP correspondent. A route through Sweden later emerged.
At least 10,000 photos went back and forth. Domeier was astonished.
“They had dealings every day with the Nazis,” he said. “That is
something that needs to be explained.”
German Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels (left) and Louis P. Lochner, AP foreign correspondent. (Wisconsin Historical Society).
AP officials had already turned up
evidence of the arrangement after Harriet Scharnberg, another
German researcher, published a
paper last year on an AP subsidiary’s
employment — before 1941 — of a
photographer with known SS ties.
As Domeier presented his findings
in March to the German Historical
Institute, the AP was preparing to release its own investigation.
Its findings turned up details that further startled Domeier.
What Brandt apparently didn’t know when he wrote his letter is that
Lochner, the very person to whom he was describing the deal, had
been a central player in it all along.
The AP’s investigation found that Laux was somehow aboard a train Lochner rode when he was deported from Germany.
“He had a proposition to make,” the AP report said of Laux. Lochner was receptive to the idea, telling him whom to contact within the Associated Press.
AP officials notified the U.S. censorship office of the deal on July 13, 1942. The office was run by Byron Price, a formerAP executive editor, recruited personally by Roosevelt, according to the AP report. The report does not detail the Americans’ rationale for approving the deal, except to indicate that there might be “information value” to the backdoor relationship.
After the war, Price sent a letter to AP General Manager Kent Cooper praising the wire service and expressing “deep appreciation” for its “patriotic cooperation.”
In the years after the war, Lochner wrote several books about Germany, including his experiences covering Hitler, Germany and the war. A 525-page collection of his letters to his family was published in 1961.
Cooper also wrote a memoir of his time with the Associated Press, billed as “a history of the world’s greatest news agency and of the exciting career of the man who made it so.”
Neither of them mentioned the deal with the Nazis.
LOL: Police Arresting Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters Who Won’t Leave
Photo by Stephen Yang/Getty Image
100 protesters left voluntarily, but there were still between 25 to 50 protesters remaining in the Oceti Sakowin camp site; if they refuse to leave they will also be arrested. Oceti Sakowin was the camp closest to where the Dakota pipeline will plunge underneath the Missouri River. 10,000 people were gathered at the camp at one point. Protesters burned wooden structures at the camp before they left.
The Chicago Tribune reported, “Eighteen National Guardsmen and dozens of law officers entered the camp from two directions shortly before midday Thursday, along with several law enforcement and military vehicles. A helicopter and airplane flew overhead.”
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum stated, "Anybody that's there is trespassing, so anybody that's there is breaking the law. Anyone who obstructs our ability to do cleanup will be subject to arrest. You know that our big ask for tomorrow is anyone remaining in the camp, we want to make sure that they know they have an opportunity to voluntarily leave. Take your belongings, remove anything that may be culturally significant and we'll help you get on your way if you need to do that."
North Dakota Highway Patrol spokesman Lt. Tom Iverson said that the protesters were given two extra hours to leave on Wednesday; he added that law enforcement officials were approached by "agitators" who approached the law enforcement line "provoking them." North Dakota officials even offered to bus protesters to a travel assistance center, where they could stay and be fed.
The Seattle Times reported, “Police also had a SWAT vehicle on hand Thursday in case of what Highway Patrol Lt. Tom Iverson described as a worst-case “SWAT scenario” — an armed person barricading themselves in a structure in the camp.”
Iverson stated, "We knew this day was going to come.”
Ellison has spoken at a convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Yet ISNA has actually admitted its ties to Hamas, which styles itself the Palestinian arm of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Justice Department actually classified ISNA among entities “who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood.”
It gets worse. In 2008, Ellison accepted $13,350 from the Muslim American Society (MAS) to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca. The Muslim American Society is a Muslim Brotherhood organization: “In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation’s major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members.” That’s from the Chicago Tribune in 2004, in an article that is now carried on the Muslim Brotherhood’s English-language website, Ikhwanweb.
Also, the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) raised large amounts of for Ellison’s first campaign, and he has spoken at numerous CAIR events. Yet CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refusedtodenounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups.
This is today’s Democratic Party.
“Keith Ellison’s Saudi Arabia Trip Included Meetings With Radical Cleric, Bank That Funds Suicide Bombings,” by Brent Scher, Washington Free Beacon, November 29, 2016:
Rep. Keith Ellison (D., Minn.) during a 2008 trip to Saudi Arabia met with a radical Muslim cleric who endorsed killing U.S. soldiers and with the president of a bank used to pay the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.
Ellison, now a leading candidate to head the Democratic National Committee, was brought to Saudi Arabia for a two-week trip by the Muslim American Society (MAS), a group founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood to act as its “overt arm” in the United States.
Details of Ellison’s religious pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia are scarce, but photographs discovered by the Washington Free Beacon show that Ellison met with controversial figures during the trip.
A photo album of Ellison’s hajj trip posted by MAS’s Minnesota chapter includes a picture of the congressman meeting with Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, who was vice president of a Muslim Brotherhood-created group that in 2004 issued a fatwa urging “jihad” against U.S. troops in Iraq and supported the Palestinians’ Second Intifada against Israel.
“The Jihad-waging Iraqi people’s resistance to the foreign occupation … is a Shari’a duty incumbent upon anyone belonging to the Muslim nation,” the fatwa said, according to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute.
Bin Bayyah’s group, the International Association of Muslim Scholars, issued the fatwa after a conference in Beirut, Lebanon.
The group was founded by Yusuf Qaradawi, a Muslim Brotherhood leader who was banned from visiting the United States because of his calls to kill Jews and Americans.
Bin Biyyah issued an additional fatwa in 2009, shortly after his meeting with Ellison, “barring all forms of normalization with Israel.”
Ellison also took time on his trip to meet with Dr. Ahmad Mohamed Ali, the president of a Saudi Arabia-based bank that funnels millions of dollars to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel.
Ali’s bank, the Islamic Development Bank, maintains the Al-Quds Intifada Fund and the Al-Aqsa Fund, which were established in 2000 to fund Palestinian terrorism and provide money to the families of Palestinian “martyrs.” The funds were established with an initial investment of $200 million.
Ali said his bank—which is referred to as the “Bank of the Intifada” by Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro College Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust—is responsible “for the smooth functioning of the two funds” and that there is “no delay” in paying families of “martyrs.”
“There was no delay in paying financial assistance to the families of Palestinian martyrs,” Ali said in 2001. “We have started paying them soon after receiving the money.”
Ellison’s congressional office has not responded to numerous requests for comment on his trip.
Ellison told congressional investigators on the House Ethics Committee that he did not have any “meetings of an official nature” on his trip and “instead undertook only the more personal itinerary scheduled by the Muslim American Society.”…
Kyle Shideler, director of the Center for Security Policy’s threat information office, expressed alarm when told of Ellison’s meetings.
“The notion that a sitting congressman would meet with a man whose organization only four years earlier had issued a fatwa calling for fighting Americans in Iraq once again illustrates the truly outrageous depth of Rep. Ellison’s affiliation with Islamist groups,” Shideler said….
Even the Chicago Tribune, which had been a staunch conservative paper for roughly 160 years before it took a hard swing to the left in 2008, when it endorsed a Democratic candidate for president (Barack Obama) for the first time, then reiterated that endorsement in 2012, somehow came down on the side of conservative Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro after DePaul University threatened his arrest if he set foot on campus.
On Thursday, the Tribune issued an editorial decrying DePaul’s actions. The editorial started by reciting the events that occurred leading up to Wednesday night’s confrontation between Shapiro and security officers mandated with keeping him off campus. The Tribune then reported:
VIDEO: 5 TOP TIPS FOR INTERIM PARENTING
The video could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.
Shapiro knew how to respond outside the event hall as a video camera rolled: "If I attempt to enter that hall, right there, just to hear somebody speak, or if I attempt to ask a question or engage in free speech, you will have me arrested?" he asked a security official. "I'm glad in a city that has some 4,000 shootings to this date, you have 30 members of security just for a 5-9,165 (pound) Jewish guy."
Bystanders laughed at his self-deprecating remark. Shapiro certainly can play to a crowd and make a point. It's a shame he wasn't permitted to perform for a full audience. Why couldn't he? Because DePaul remained tied up in knots over the question of how to manage speaker events that may offend some members of the school community.
The Tribune noted that Shapiro is no fan of Stephen Bannon, executive chairman of Breitbart News, the new White House counselor, adding, “Hmm, maybe there is something serious to explore in the political clash between right and left. Shapiro, no fan of Bannon, would have been a very interesting lecturer for engaged students to hear a week after the election. But nope, too risky for DePaul.”
The Tribune acknowledged that DePaul, as a private university, “controls campus access and can approve or refuse guests as it sees fit. This isn't a First Amendment right to assembly issue; it's an issue of academic exploration … In this case, DePaul had a few days' notice and could have allowed Shapiro to appear with adequate security on hand. That would have served the interests of students and made a powerful statement about a university as a marketplace of ideas. Students would have heard Shapiro, engaged him and reached their own conclusions about the values and merits of the conservatism in the era of Trump."
"This isn't a First Amendment right to assembly issue; it's an issue of academic exploration."
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
The Tribune concluded:
True, there is a lot of confusion today about the country's political direction. There is polarization, there are hard feelings. That's part of life in a democracy. Learning how to confront political differences in a civilized manner is a tough lesson to embrace. Unfortunately, DePaul missed another chance to play the role of enlightened teacher.