Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Internal Revenue Service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internal Revenue Service. Show all posts

Monday, July 31, 2017

Newspaper Cannot Understand The Use Of A Very Precise Term


Newspaper Hurt By Term 'Illegal Alien'

8 4 0 18
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/
aanews/media/picture/597f/467f/6970/2d7b/e91b/
0000/content_Jeff_Sessions_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg?1501513360
SNOWFLAKE ALERT Chicago Newspaper Hurt By Term 'Illegal Alien'
Gage Skidmore
DailyHealthPulse
image: http://t.newsmaxfeednetwork.com/im.gif?data=NDI5MDliN2M3N2NhYjFlM2MxNzQwOTk5YmNjOGM3N2FjNTZjMzAyYmZkZWVlNzhhZjlkOTQ0ODEyZDIyOTYwNDM4ZjVmZjQxZGY3MTY2MDJkYjVmYWY1NmQz

The Chicago Tribune is offended by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and 
Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ use the term “illegal alien” when discussing
 sanctuary cities.

“In a democracy that values the rule of law, word choice is important, 
especially when those words come from voices of authority,” the Chicago 
Tribune wrote.

The Tribune is correct in what they said, but not in what they meant. Word 
choice is important, which is why the DOJ and the attorney general use the 
most legally accurate term when discussing illegal immigration and sanctuary
 cities.

“Alien” is a term used by the federal government to designate a person in
 the United States from a foreign country. The Internal Revenue Service 
defines an alien as “an individual who is not a U.S. citizen or U.S. national.” 
The same document defines “immigrant,” “nonimmigrant,” and “illegal alien.”
 Their definition for illegal alien is “an alien who has entered the United States
 illegally and is deportable if apprehended or an alien who entered the United
 States legally but now has fallen ‘out of status’ and is deportable.”

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/snowflake-alert-chicago-newspaper-hurt-by-term-illegal-alien#1bOzU3FpMVTQqugO.99

Monday, May 1, 2017

Will Trump Protect The Man Who Helped Him Achieve His White House Goal?

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT

MAY 01, 2017 6:00 AM

Billionaire Robert Mercer did Trump a huge favor. Will he get a payback?

Saturday, January 23, 2016

The IRS Is An Out Of Control Agency

IRS Once Again Called Out for Erasing Hard Drives in Violation of a Court Order

A federal judge had ruled that the IRS was required to preserve a hard drive that was involved in a lawsuit, but the agency destroyed it anyway. Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) and committee member Jim Jordan (R-OH) Chairman wrote a scathing letter to the agency’s head in response.
The details of the case, unrelated to the years-long scandal involving former IRS staffer Lois Lerner and the government’s treatment of the non-profit status of tea party groups, have to do with a lawsuit brought against the government by Microsoft.
The software giant asserted that the tax agency acted improperly and sued in response. They then requested documents, as part of a Freedom of Information Act request, and the judge involved required the IRS to preserve the hard drive on which they were stored.
They didn’t.
Chaffetz and Jordan wrote the letter to John Koskinen, the IRS Commissioner, to require documentation of current processes to preserve documents and anything related to the hard drive in question for the case.
They also said this:
“The destruction of evidence subject to preservation orders and subpoenas has been an ongoing problem under your leadership at the IRS. It is stunning to see that the IRS does not take reasonable care to preserve documents that it is legally required to protect.”
Chaffetz had called for Koskinen’s impeachment last fall for destroying information and giving false testimony during the tea party scandal. Ultimately, the Justice Department declined to bring charges against Lerner or anyone else involved.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

New ObamaCrapCare Tax Payments Explained--Still Like It?

Conscripted Benevolence: IRS Enforcing Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Under ‘Shared Responsibility’ Tax Payments

February 27, 2014 by  
 17 4
 
 0 41
Conscripted Benevolence: IRS Enforcing Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Under ‘Shared Responsibility’ Tax Payments
PHOTOS.COM

The Internal Revenue Service published an update to its tax-season guidelines Tuesday that makes it clear the agency will be taking an Obamacare penalty from Americans’ Federal tax returns in 2015 if they don’t demonstrate proof of coverage under an eligible health plan.
That the Administration of Barack Obama, already fully involved in selectively enforcing his signature accomplishment, is moving forward with the individual mandate isn’t a surprise to anyone who’s been following Obamacare’s á la carte implementation.
But the IRS’s language in delineating its Health Care Tax Tips this week bears a sinister, groupthink Orwellian tone. As Americans for Tax Reform observed Tuesday, the agency “employs [the] Orwellian term ‘Shared Responsibility Payment’ to describe [the] Obamacare individual mandate tax.”
President Obama’s Internal Revenue Service today quietly released a series of Obamacare “Health Care Tax Tips” warning Americans that they must obtain “qualifying” health insurance — as defined by the federal government — or face a “shared responsibility payment” when filing their tax returns in 2015. The term “shared responsibility payment” refers to the Obamacare individual mandate tax, one of at least seven tax hikes in the healthcare law that directly hit families making less than $250,000 per year.
…Once fully phased in, the Obamacare individual mandate tax will rise steeply, to a maximum of 2.5 percent of Adjusted Gross Income or $2,085 — whichever is higher.
Here’s how the IRS phrases its directions for reporting proof of coverage:
4. Your 2014 tax return will ask if you had insurance coverage or qualified for an exemption. If not, you may owe a shared responsibility payment when you file in 2015.
This admonishment to help share the cost of a healthcare subsidy for which we are all responsible is preceded by three other “tips” — two of which amount to an IRS-sponsored sales pitch for Obamacare:
There are a few basic tips to keep in mind about the new health care law. Health insurance choices you make now may affect the income tax return you file in 2015.
1. Most people already have qualified health insurance coverage and will not need to do anything more than maintain qualified coverage throughout 2014.
2. If you do not have health insurance through your job or a government plan, you can buy it through the Health Insurance Marketplace.
3. If you buy your insurance through the Marketplace, you may be eligible for an advance premium tax credit to lower your out-of-pocket monthly premiums.
Elsewhere, the IRS explains the “shared responsibility” payment more fully, assuring taxpayers that the agency will not confiscate more than $285 from most families who file in 2014 for the Obamacare subsidy pool (although a few wealthy stragglers with bad financial planning skills are, in theory, exposed to “sharing” even higher amounts).
If you (or any of your dependents) do not maintain coverage and do not qualify for an exemption, you will need to make an individual shared responsibility payment with your return. In general, the payment amount is either a percentage of your income or a flat dollar amount, whichever is greater. You will owe 1/12th of the annual payment for each month you (or your dependents) do not have coverage and are not exempt. The annual payment amount for 2014 is the greater of:
  • 1 percent of your household income that is above the tax return threshold for your filing status, such as Married Filing Jointly or single, or
  • Your family’s flat dollar amount, which is $95 per adult and $47.50 per child, limited to a maximum of $285.
The individual shared responsibility payment is capped at the cost of the national average premium for the bronze level health plan available through the Marketplace in 2014. You will make the payment when you file your 2014 federal income tax return in 2015.
These tax tips apply to the 2014 calendar year, the first year the Obamacare penalty will be assessed. As noted earlier, anyone who’s not able to prove he’s covered will soon be forced to begin “sharing” much more than $285 a year — up to $2,085 per household or 2.5 percent of their adjusted income (whichever is higher) once the law is operating at full steam in 2016.