Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label panama canal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label panama canal. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Panama, Not Your Normal Central American Country. Should This Country Be Your "Bug-Out" Location?



Panama has privacy, protection and opportunity

Flag of Panama
This article originally appeared on The Sovereign Investor on Sept. 15.
I’m flying in through Copa Airlines toward one of the busiest travel hubs in the Americas, the Aeropuerto Internacional de Tocumen in the Republic of Panama.
I first visited Panama in 1975, when, during the Carter-Torrijos treaty negotiations, I went there as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on the Panama Canal. I have returned countless times since then, witnessing an amazing transformation over 35 years.
An impoverished military dictatorship resenting domination by a U.S colonial presence has today become one of Latin America’s leading democratic countries. Within Latin America, the country has the fastest economic growth, the lowest unemployment and greatly reduced poverty. And despite our sometimes contentious mutual history, Panamanians welcome and respect Americans.
The Panama Canal has always fascinated me and should be a source of pride for all Americans. Built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and opened a century ago in 1914, it is one of the world’s greatest engineering feats. Although I had opposed surrendering the Canal to Panama, in retrospect I believe that was the right decision, one that has worked very well.
The country has grown and prospered since my first visit nearly 40 years ago. And the current $7 billion expansion of the Canal, combined with a new resident visa program, is bringing more wealth into this tropical paradise, one of the world’s leading and best offshore financial centers.
The financial and personal privacy of Americans has been destroyed by the government. Our rights have been restricted and our financial safety threatened by a debt near $18 trillion and counting. In order to pay for this mess, politicians are threatening a massive wealth confiscation.
The timing couldn’t be better for Americans to consider the Republic of Panama as an offshore haven where they can find a secure future for themselves.
As the U.S. government has continued to tighten its financial control over Americans, Panama has opened its doors even wider, offering real economic opportunities for investments and immediate residency status under a host of visa programs. Unlike the IRS’s onerous worldwide taxation of Americans, Panama’s territorial taxation encompasses only what is earned within the country.

A second home in Panama

china-iran-conduct-war-games-exercises-persian-gulf
In 2012, then-President Ricardo Martinelli signed an order creating a new category of “Immediate Permanent Resident” for foreign nationals. Executive Order 343 established a visa for foreigners from countries “that maintain friendly, professional, economic, and investment relationships with the Republic of Panama,” including the United States.
Rainelda Mata-Kelly — one of the speakers at our 2014 Total Wealth Symposium, a leading Panama immigration attorney and my longtime friend — can assist applicants who qualify for this quick-residence visa category.
And unlike the sluggish U.S. economy, Panama’s is booming. Spurred by the $7 billion modernization of the century-old Panama Canal, the country has enjoyed amazing economic growth with the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent and the GDP up 5.8 percent in the second quarter of 2014.
When I met with Minister of the Presidency Demetrio Papadimitriu last year, he explained that Panama’s open-door policy “seeks both foreign direct investment and skilled international professionals. We are looking for workers in growth sectors such as logistics, tourism, banking and those making Panama a regional hub for multinational companies.”
Under this immigration category, qualified applicants will be able to engage in professional and economic activities, establish businesses and have the right to work in Panama, permissions that in the past have been difficult to obtain. After five years, they will be eligible to apply for full citizenship. And they can bring their spouse and family with them.

Magnet for foreigners

Apart from its enlightened asset protection laws and strict banking privacy, Panama has much to offer frustrated Americans who want government to leave them alone.
Just a two-hour flight from the U.S., Panama is the largest banking center south of Miami. There are 70 banks, about 50 of which are multinational, collectively holding an estimated $100 billion in assets, with liquidity impressively high at an average 30 percent, far better than U.S. banks.
John Gaver, president of Action America, says: “Panama is creating a huge magnet for foreigners with either skill or money to move to Panama and work or start a business at a time when the U.S. government is making it increasingly punitive for those same people to stay in the United States.”
Panama City offers thousands of modern condominiums, more than 100 skyscrapers (including a Trump Tower, of course), first-class hotels and restaurants, excellent high-speed digital Internet and Latin America’s only, brand-new subway transit system.
Downtown Panama City, the balmy, tropical capital on the southern, Pacific end of the Panama Canal, suggests Miami, except arguably more locals speak English here than in many parts of South Florida. Night clubbing and fine dining can be local delights. For first-time visitors, the Panama Canal is a must-see tour.
For those who want to combine pleasure with business, there are multiple vacation retreats on the Pacific side, including Coronado, Contadora Island and, on the Atlantic side, Bocas del Toro, with Boquete and Volcán Barú in the cool western mountains on the Costa Rican border.
This is why the company I write and serve as the legal counsel for, The Sovereign Society, is hosting its annual asset protection conference in Panama City and offering its own confiscation survival kit to assist you in the troubling months to come. The conference represents the values we hold near and dear to our hearts, principles which the United States has long since abandoned.
Faithfully yours,
Bob Bauman, J.D.
Chairman, Freedom Alliance

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Will Obama Allow China To Break The Monroe Doctrine?

China to build Panama Canal rival

A Chinese tycoon has managed to push through Nicaragua's congress a bill granting his company the rights to build the country's largest-ever development project. However, experts see huge challenges ahead.
Two cargo ship sail through Miraflores locks on the Panama Canal in Panama City, Thursday, Dec. 30, 2010. (Photo: AP)
According to media reports, the legislation approved in the National Assembly dominated by President Daniel Ortega's Sandinista Front contains no specific route for the canal and virtually no details of its financing or economic viability. It simply grants the Hong Kong-based HKND Group, owned by Beijing-based entrepreneur Wang Jing, 50 years of exclusive rights to study the plan, build and operate a canal linking the Pacific and Caribbean in exchange for Nicaragua receiving a minority share of any profits. The projected cost of the canal is 40 billions dollars.
However, despite the expected business opportunities, the project bears plenty of risks for both the environment and international relations, said Karl-Dieter Hoffmann, head of the Latin American Studies Institute at the Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt in a DW interview.
DW: Why is Nicaragua attempting to build this canal?
Karl-Dieter Hoffmann: There are mainly economic reasons behind this. Nicaragua is one of Latin America's poorest countries. Initially, the project had been turned down because of its enormous costs. However, Nicaraguan President Ortega now seems to have found in Wang Jing a wealthy investor backed the Chinese government. This has allowed him to push the controversial deal through the Nicaraguan congress and start the search for much-needed income sources.
Dr. Karl-Dieter Hoffmann, head of the Latin American Studies Institute at the Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (Photo: private)
Hoffmann believes there are geopolitical reasons behind China's decision to finance the canal's construction
With the income generated by the canal, the government expects state finances to swell. It says it will then be in a stronger position to improve the standard of living in the country and tackle its development problems. And I think these expectations are not unjustified. Since the US handed over control of the canal more than a decade ago, Panama has been registering the highest economic growth rate in all of Latin America. The country's GDP grew by ten percent last year and thousands of jobs have been created.
How would China profit from the project?
At the moment, China is the second-largest user of the Panama Canal which is being expanded because of an increase in trade between Asia and the nations in the Western Hemisphere.
I believe there are not only economic but only geopolitical motives behind Beijing's backing of the Nicaraguan project. China is currently investing more in Latin America than any other country. It has even overtaken the US and Europe as South America's largest trading partner.
So it appears that the Chinese are now extending their economic might into Central America, where some of the countries still have diplomatic relations with Taipei instead of Beijing. So far, the Taiwanese government has managed to maintain such ties by investing heavily in development and infrastructure projects in the region. But Beijing's growing influence might cause this to change, just as in the case of Nicaragua's neighbor Costa Rica.
What effects would this have on global trade?
The viability of the canal project will depend on how maritime transportation develops over the next years. In the case of a global recession the new canal could trigger a cut-throat competition with the Panama Canal, since both of them would be vying to offer the lowest transit fees. Such a development would, in turn, have drastic repercussions on Chinese investment.
On the other hand, a Nicaraguan canal would also have an immediate impact on other forms of transportation such as rail freight, and even drive some companies out of business.
What are the risks involved?
The project bears all sorts of risks. First of all, no studies have been released neither on the feasibility of the canal, nor on its possible environmental impact. There is, for instance, no data on how construction would affect water supply in the region or even on how many locks the canal will have.
But there might also be political consequences. In order to build the canal, engineers would make partial use of Lake Nicaragua, but tapping the outflowing San Juan River could lead to a diplomatic dispute with Costa Rica. The Nicaraguan government seems to have been caught off guard by the project. This hasn't been a transparent process.
Map (Photo: DW)
Hoffmann believes tapping the San Juan river could lead to a diplomatic dispute between Nicaragua and Costa Rica
The Panama Canal was completed by the United States. What political message would a Chinese-built canal sent to the world?
Chinese President Xi Jinping returned from a Latin America tour a few days ago, but no word on the construction of the canal had been made public. So far, there has been no official reaction from the US government on the issue, but I believe that particularly members of the Republican Party will be alarmed by the Chinese constructing a canal so close to the US mainland, possibly affecting American interests in the region. For the first time in history, the United States would have a global competitor directly at its doorstep.
The interview was conducted by DW editor Gabriel Domínguez.