Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label right to bear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label right to bear. Show all posts

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Second Amendment WILL NOT Be Attacked Directly. Obama Will Take Executive Action To Ban Sale Of Ammunition To Civilians!

The recent executive action on illegal immigrants by Obama only shows the means he will take to institute his opinions. However, this is not the end, rather it is the beginning of many actions he will take against the will of the people.

In the following story, we read about actions being taken by the states,  Kentucky in this case, to counteract Obama Administration moves against the Second Amendment. This preemptive attempt to stop government attacks on gun rights will eventually be circumvented.

We believe that Obama will take executive action to limit  or eliminate the purchase  of ammunition to civilians.  They will argue that they are not preventing any citizen from "Owning or Using" any gun.  It is a classic Obama lie! It will please gun haters and might even be sustained by the Supreme Court!

You might disagree but don't put anything past the Dictator!

Conservative Tom





From Right To Bear Blog:

If All Goes as Planned, This State Will No Longer Enforce Federal Gun Laws

KYlegAll over the country, Conservatives are reacting to the aggressive efforts of anti-gun proponents to pass federal legislation that conflicts with the Second Amendment rights of American citizens. In Kentucky, one politician is listening to her constituents and offering a solution. She has authored a bill that would nullify federal gun control laws for Kentuckians.
Kentucky State Representatives Diane St. Onge has filedHouse Bill 13 (HB13). Its language instructs the Kentucky House “to take all appropriate action to safeguard Kentuckian’s rights to possess firearms in accordance with the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Section 1 of the Constitution of Kentucky.”
Representative St. Onge’s bill is constructed on the anti-commandeering doctrine, a legal rationale underlying several Supreme Court cases to refuse assistance to the federal government in enforcement of federal laws deemed to be unconstitutional. This type of legislation claims the right of Americans to keep and bear arms, and the right of states to make law for their own citizens, without federal intrusion.
Texas will soon be considering similar legislation.
Here is the text of the Kentucky Bill:
The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky finds and declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules and regulations regarding firearms, present orfuture, are a violation of the sections and amendments to the Constitution of the United States specified in Section 1 of this Act and are:
(a) Invalid in this Commonwealth;
(b) Not recognized by the Commonwealth;
(c) Considered null and void by the Commonwealth; and
(d) Of no effect in this Commonwealth
In other words, Representative St. Onge’s proposed legislation would force the state of Kentucky to take any action necessary to stop federal gun control laws intended to applyin the states. The bill will be introduced in the January session. If it is successful, the next step will be the filing of a Second Amendment Preservation Act.
The proposed Second Amendment Preservation Act would terminate cooperation by any Kentucky state agencies in enforcement of federal gun laws. Such action would certainly cripple attempts by the federal government to enforce its will in this matter on Kentuckians.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

No Knock Raid Goes Horribly Wrong. Is Homeowner Responsible For Deaths That Occur? Killen Texas Man Will Find Out.

From The Right To Bear  blog:


Man Charged with Murder After Killing Police Officer in No-Knock Raid



.
 
9694920_sPolice in Killeen, TX lost one of their police officers this past Friday after serving a “no-knock warrant” on possible narcotics charges.
No-knock warrants have been used with greater frequency by police over the past few decades.
These military style raids of private homes and businesses are meant to surprise occupants so possible offending parties don’t have time to dispose of evidence before the warrant is served.
No-knock warrants are different than standard search warrants in that they allow law enforcement to force entry into private property without advanced notification.
Often times the only requirement is that the police identify themselves upon entering the premises — and not a moment sooner.
Obviously, the main risk of no-knock warrants is violent confrontation. Since police are forcing entry into homes in the same way criminals would, residents often panic and fire on the intruders. Thus, the risk of casualties is much higher.
This appears to be what happened to now-deceased officer Charles Dinwiddie who was met with gunfire instead of surrender when he forcibly entered the home of Marvin Louis Guy last week.
The details of the night haven’t all been pieced together, but according to the official report, it does not look like officers gave Guy any advance notice of the search warrant.
When officers arrived at the 1100 block of Circle M Dr. to serve their no-knock search warrant at 5:30 in the morning, they forced entry and didn’t give Guy or an unidentified female time to prepare for the officers’ arrival.
Once the officers entered into his home through the window, Guy opened fire on the intruding officers, striking Dinwiddie in the face and hitting three other officers in the process.
Dinwiddie later succumbed to his injuries at the hospital and was pronounced dead on Sunday.
Even though police entered Guy’s home unannounced (like any common criminal)… and even though Guy was reacting in self defense… it hasn’t stopped prosecutors from issuing a three million dollar bond for his release.
He now faces charges of three counts of attempted capital murder.