Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Sunday, March 31, 2013

How Is Gay Marriage Going To Effect Freedom of Religion

We usually think that Charles Krauthammer is on target and today we think so doubly. The gay marriage debate and how that will effect religion was brought to the fore in a recent television interview. In the following post, the political commentator asserts that the current cases in front of the Supreme Court are just the first step against religion.
We agree, however, we would take it several steps further.


Krauthammer uses the example of married student housing at Georgetown University, a Catholic institution. Should  gay marriage proponents win, it is conceivable that the University would be sued to allow all gay and non-heterosexual "couples" the ability to live in these apartments. In this case,  the proponents would win. That is true as far as that goes.

This attack on religion, if the proponents of gay marriage win at the Supreme Court, will go further. What would happen if a certain church, minister, rabbi, imam, pastor or sect decided that they would NOT marry non-heterosexuals?  Could they be legally forced to do so? The State does license religious leaders to do marriages, could it take away that right if the individual or religion would not allow gay marriage?

Where do the rights of the religion end and the rights of the individuals begin?  Are there rights that are limited to individuals (marrying for example) and those that are reserved to the institutions (setting rules, policies for the practitioners of  the religion? .Where does the public welfare come into this discussion? Could a member of the clergy be sent to jail for not performing a gay wedding? Lots of questions, few answers.

Does  freedom of religion apply ONLY to individuals and not the institutions to which they belong? Such is the argument the Obama Administration is using in regard to ObamaCrapCare.  It is saying that the individual has the right to determine if they want to use contraceptives and abortions, however, the company or church (as in Hobby Lobby or the Catholic Church) must pay for them through their health insurance  regardless of the teachings of the religion the owners follow.

We are very concerned that should this ruling go the wrong way that we will see religions and their members prosecuted for following their beliefs. This is not good and it does not bode well for the United States as the only place in the world where you can practice your religion without fear of government intervention.  

Conservative Tom



KRAUTHAMMER WARNS: GAY MARRIAGE CASE COULD LEAD TO ALL-OUT ‘ASSAULT ON RELIGION’

Syndicated columnist and political commentator Charles Krauthammer said this week that the gay marriage case before the Supreme Court could be the first step to an “assault on religion.”
“It gets really sticky,” Krauthammer said on “Inside Washington.” “If the court were to decide that to deny same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, then you got Georgetown University – a Jesuit university [that has] married student housing. It’s a Catholic university. So it says it’s only going to allow heterosexuals, it will get sued. It will become an assault on religion. And the religions, which I think are sincere in their beliefs, are going to be under assault and under attack.”
After it was pointed out that same-sex marriage is already legal in Washington, D.C., where Georgetown is located, Krauthammer said the issue would be national.
“It will be sued everywhere in the country if it’s declared to be a constitutional right, because it would imply that anybody who opposes it does it only out of bigotry, for no other reason,” he said.

Mummies Also Have Plaque In Their Arteries

From Science Daily, we get news that we might not be totally responsible for our clogged arteries. In a study reported in the English medical journal,  The Lancet,  researchers in England did a study on ancient mummies and found that atherosclerotic vascular disease was prevalent even then. This lead the researchers to believe that it is part of the aging process rather than our "junk food" and couch potato habits.This idea runs contrary to most current medical advice. 

We are sure that the study will cause many to rethink  the issues.

Conservative Tom

P.S. Here is another link from USC:  http://www.usc.edu/uscnews/newsroom/news_release.php?id=2977


Mummy CT Scans Show Preindustrial Hunter Gatherers Had Clogged Arteries
Mar. 10, 2013 — Like nearly 4.6 million Americans, ancient hunter-gatherers also suffered from clogged arteries, revealing that the plaque build-up causing blood clots, heart attacks and strokes is not just a result of fatty diets or couch potato habits, according to new research in the journal The Lancet.
The researchers performed CT scans of 137 mummies from across four continents and found artery plaque in every single population studied, from preagricultual hunter-gatherers in the Aleutian Islands to the ancient Puebloans of southwestern United States.
Their findings provide an important twist to our understanding of atherosclerotic vascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in the developed world: while modern lifestyles can accelerate the development of plaque on our arteries, the prevalence of the disease across human history shows it may have a more basic connection to inflammation and aging.
"This is not a disease only of modern circumstance but a basic feature of human aging in all populations," said Caleb Finch, USC University Professor, ARCO/ Kieschnick Professor of Gerontology at the USC Davis School of Gerontology, and a senior author of the study. "Turns out even a Bronze Age guy from 5,000 years ago had calcified, carotid arteries," Finch said, referring to Otzi the Iceman, a natural mummy who lived around 3200 BCE and was discovered frozen in a glacier in the Italian Alps in 1991.
With Gregory Thomas of Long Beach Memorial, Finch was part of a team that previously showed Egyptian mummies had calcified patches on their arteries indicative of advanced atherosclerosis (from the Greek arthero, meaning "gruel" and scler, meaning "hard").
But ancient Egyptians tended to mummify only royalty or those who had privileged lives. The new study led by Thomas and Randall Thompson of Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute examined mummies from four drastically different climates and diets -- and from cultures that mummified regular people, including ancient Peruvians, Ancestral Puebloans, the Unangans of the Aleutian Islands and ancient Egyptians.
"Our research shows that we are all at risk for atherosclerosis, the disease that causes heart attacks and strokes -- all races, diets and lifestyles," said Thomas, medical director of the MemorialCare Heart & Vascular Institute, Long Beach Memorial. "Because of this we all need to be cautious of our diet, weight and exercise to minimize its impact. The data gathered about individuals from the pre-historic cultures of ancient Peru and the Native Americans living along the Colorado River and the Unangan of the Aleutian Islands is forcing us to think outside the box and look for other factors that may cause heart disease."
Overall, the researchers found probable or definite atherosclerosis in 34 percent of the mummies studied, with calcification of arteries more pronounced in the mummies that were older at time of death. Artherosclerosis was equally common in mummies identified as male or female.
"We found that heart disease is a serial killer that has been stalking mankind for thousands of years," Thompson said. "In the last century, atherosclerotic vascular disease has replaced infectious disease as the leading cause of death across the developed world. A common assumption is that the rise in levels of atherosclerosis is predominantly lifestyle-related, and that if modern humans could emulate pre-industrial or even pre-agricultural lifestyles, that atherosclerosis, or at least its clinical manifestations, would be avoided. Our findings seem to cast doubt on that assumption, and at the very least, we think they suggest that our understanding of the causes of atherosclerosis is incomplete, and that it might be somehow inherent to the process of human aging."
The international team of researchers will next seek to biopsy ancient mummies to get a better understanding of the role chronic infection, inflammation and genetics in promoting the prevalence of atherosclerosis.
"Atherosclerosis starts very early in life. In the United States, most kids have little bumps on their arteries. Even stillbirths have little tiny nests of inflammatory cells. But environmental factors can accelerate this process," Finch said, pointing to studies that show larger plaques in children exposed to household tobacco smoking or who are obese.

Birth Control Mandate Gets Hearing

Bravo!  At least the anti-mandatory birth control forces are getting a hearing on the un-constitutional ObamaCrapCare. We hope that an enlightened judiciary will find its way to void this controversial part of the law and that it is the first of many parts that will be ruled against.

Conservative Tom

Appeals Court Grants Hobby Lobby Full Hearing

Friday, 29 Mar 2013 09:59 PM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
OKLAHOMA CITY — A federal appeals court has granted Hobby Lobby's request for the entire court to hear its challenge of a federal requirement that it provide insurance coverage for the morning-after pill and similar emergency contraceptives.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced its decision Friday. Appeals are usually decided by a three-judge panel, but a total of nine judges will hear the appeal from the Oklahoma City-based arts and crafts chain.
Hobby Lobby is challenging a requirement in the new federal health care law that says the company must provide and pay for emergency contraceptives. The company says the requirement violates the beliefs of its Christian owners.
The Denver-based court also said it would hear Hobby Lobby's appeal on an expedited basis, with oral arguments expected this spring.
© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/US/Hobby-Lobby-Birth-Control/2013/03/29/id/497012?s=al&promo_code=12FB2-1#ixzz2P8mwKcUG
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Bank Accounts No Longer Safe Havens

We said it last week and will say it again--no bank deposit is safe since the bank crisis in Cyprus. Having your money under the mattress might be a better spot than your local bank!  Jim Rogers agrees with those sentiments and said so on CNBC.

Things are "a changin" in international banking and they will be effecting everyone of us sooner or later. It is better to be prepared rather than to be surprised.

Have you given any thought to your situation?  

Conservative Tom

Jim Rogers: Depositors Globally Should ‘Run for the Hills’

Friday, 29 Mar 2013 08:35 AM
By Dan Weil
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The losses imposed on Cyprus bank depositors by the European Union, European Central Bank (ECB) and International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout should be a warning shot to bank depositors around the world, says investment legend Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings.

“What more do you need to know? Please, you better hurry, you better run for the hills. I’m doing it anyway,” Rogers tells CNBC.

“I want to make sure that I don’t get trapped. Think of all the poor souls that just thought they had a simple bank account. Now they find out that they are making a ‘contribution’ to the stability of Cyprus. The gall of these politicians.”


Rogers’ idea is that the risk of a confiscation of bank deposits now exists anyplace on the globe.

“I, for one, am making sure I don’t have too much money in any one specific bank account anywhere in the world, because now there is a precedent,” he says.

The IMF and European Union have told Cyprus, “loot the bank accounts,’” Rogers adds. “So you can be sure that other countries when problems come, are going to say, ‘well, it’s condoned by the EU, it’s condoned by the IMF, so let’s do it too.’”

As for what is a good investment right now, Rogers said he owns Swiss francs and some other long-term European investments, but has been investing in Russia and Japan recently, not the United States.

“I’m certainly not investing in the U.S., because the U.S. is making all-time highs based on money printing,” he explains.

“If you give me a trillion dollars, I’ll show you a good time too and a lot of people are having a good time. I’m somewhat skeptical because I know it’s going to end badly.”

The Cyprus crisis could ultimately affect the United States by infecting broader Europe, David Sterman, senior market analyst at StreetAuthority.com, tells Newsmax TV in an exclusive interview.

“The real threat to the U.S. is concern that things like Cyprus start to impact bigger and bigger dominoes in Europe, whether it’s Italy or Spain, and messes up all the financing mechanisms we’re desperately trying to arrange to keep things moving forward there,” he explains.

“So it’s really what Cyprus means for Europe and what Europe means for the U.S.”


© 2013 Moneynews. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.moneynews.com/FinanceNews/Rogers-Cyprus-depositors-banks/2013/03/29/id/496906?s=al&promo_code=12FB2-1#ixzz2P8poveps
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Will There Be War On The Korean Peninsula

Will the new dictator of North Korea make good on his threat to start a war with the South?  Will he launch a rocket toward the US with a nuke on it? Is this all bluster with the intent on making him look strong?  Kim Jung-on, the now sub 30 year old despot of North Korea, has certainly looked like he is trying to get into a fight, but will he?  

All of these are great questions and we think that no one really knows except for Kim himself.  We would hope that cooler heads would prevail, however, this guy has not had any military or other experience other than being his father's son.  He might want to start a war, just to prove that he cannot be pushed around. He might also have to prove to the military and any one who might want to challenge his leadership, that he is not one to be trifled with.

The next few weeks will be pivotal. Obama has already shown that he would send B-2 bombers to the South and drop dud bombs, as a measure of support for them.  Will that be viewed as a provocation by the North? Or will it give them second thoughts? We wish we knew.

As things come up, we will continue to bring stories about this potential hotspot.

Conservative Tom

U.S. Says it Takes North Korea Threats Seriously

Saturday, 30 Mar 2013 08:35 AM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
WASHINGTON -- The White House said on Saturday that it takes North Korea's latest saber-rattling threats seriously while cautioning that Pyongyang has a long history of bellicose rhetoric.
North Korea's latest bout of angry rhetoric included a vow that it is entering a "state of war" with South Korea a day after North Korean leader Kim Jong-un signed off on an order putting its missile units on standby to attack U.S. military bases in the South.
"We've seen reports of a new and unconstructive statement from North Korea. We take these threats seriously and remain in close contact with our South Korean allies," said Caitlin Hayden, spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council.
Urgent: Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? Vote Here in Urgent National Poll.
"But, we would also note that North Korea has a long history of bellicose rhetoric and threats and today's announcement follows that familiar pattern," she said.

Rhetoric or not, North Korea has taken a series of steps that have escalated tensions with its southern neighor and the United States.

In February, North Korea conducted an underground nuclear bomb test. It also has launched several missile tests, including one last year that went awry. Subsequent tests have been successful and North Korea also has claimed to have developed a missile that can hit the U.S. mainland.

On Friday, North Korean released a photograph of leader Kim Jong Un reviewing plans to attack U.S. targets, including Washington D.C., Los Angeles -- and, oddly, Austin, Texas.

North Korea also has cut off its "hotline" with South Korea and on Saturday threatened to shut down a border factory complex that's the last major symbol of inter-Korean cooperation.

The escalating tensions have captured attentions worldwide.

Mongolia called for six-party talks to be resumed after North Korea's “state of war” declaration.

“Mongolia would like to extend its relationship with North Korea,” Prime Minister Norovyn Altankhuyag said at a press conference in Ulaanbaatar with his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe. “Mongolia can contribute if they initiate any meetings.”

Six-party talks have continued, on and off, for years between South Korea, North Korea, China, the U.S., Russia and Japan. Mongolia has maintained good relations with North Korea for decades.

Moscow on Saturday urged restraint in the Korean peninsular. Russia warned that the heightened military activity was slipping into a "vicious cycle" that could get out of control.

"We hope that all parties will exercise maximum responsibility and restraint and no one will cross the point of no return," senior Russian Foreign Ministry official Grigory Logvinov told Interfax news agency.

The United States flew two nuclear-capable stealth bombers over the Korean peninsula as part of a military exercise this week in a show of force to reassure U.S. allies in the region.
The Pentagon has also been beefing up U.S. missile defense capabilities on the West Coast. The United States has been stressing that it has the capability and willingness to protect itself and U.S. allies in the region.
"We remain fully prepared and capable of defending and protecting the United States and our allies," said Hayden. "We continue to take additional measures against the North Korean threat, including our plan to increase the U.S. ground-based interceptors and early warning and tracking radar," and the recent signing of a South Korean-U.S. counter-provocation plan.

© 2013 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/north-korea-white-house/2013/03/30/id/497020?s=al&promo_code=12FB2-1#ixzz2P8qOhOib
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

The End Of America As We Know It

In the following post by David A.Stockman, he takes us through the causes of our present financial problems, a prediction of the future and a suggestion on how to solve them.  Although a bit long, he hits on many of the topics we have discussed here.

We wish that we could disagree with him, however, he is saying many of the same things that we have espoused.  As far as we are concerned, he hits the nail on the head. If you read nothing else this week, this article is one of best we have ever read  that anyone (present company excluded) has written.

Conservative Tom

Sundown in America

by DAVID A. STOCKMAN, mobile.nytimes.com
March 31st 2013

GREENWICH, Conn.

The Dow Jones and Standard & Poor's 500 indexes reached record highs on Thursday, having completely erased the losses since the stock market's last peak, in 2007. But instead of cheering, we should be very afraid.

Over the last 13 years, the stock market has twice crashed and touched off a recession: American households lost $5 trillion in the 2000 dot-com bust and more than $7 trillion in the 2007 housing crash. Sooner or later - within a few years, I predict - this latest Wall Street bubble, inflated by an egregious flood of phony money from the Federal Reserve rather than real economic gains, will explode, too.

Since the S.&;P. 500 first reached its current level, in March 2000, the mad money printers at the Federal Reserve have expanded their balance sheet sixfold (to $3.2 trillion from $500 billion). Yet during that stretch, economic output has grown by an average of 1.7 percent a year (the slowest since the Civil War); real business investment has crawled forward at only 0.8 percent per year; and the payroll job count has crept up at a negligible 0.1 percent annually. Real median family income growth has dropped 8 percent, and the number of full-time middle class jobs, 6 percent. The real net worth of the "bottom" 90 percent has dropped by one-fourth. The number of food stamp and disability aid recipients has more than doubled, to 59 million, about one in five Americans.

So the Main Street economy is failing while Washington is piling a soaring debt burden on our descendants, unable to rein in either the warfare state or the welfare state or raise the taxes needed to pay the nation's bills. By default, the Fed has resorted to a radical, uncharted spree of money printing. But the flood of liquidity, instead of spurring banks to lend and corporations to spend, has stayed trapped in the canyons of Wall Street, where it is inflating yet another unsustainable bubble.

When it bursts, there will be no new round of bailouts like the ones the banks got in 2008. Instead, America will descend into an era of zero-sum austerity and virulent political conflict, extinguishing even today's feeble remnants of economic growth.

THIS dyspeptic prospect results from the fact that we are now state-wrecked. With only brief interruptions, we've had eight decades of increasingly frenetic fiscal and monetary policy activism intended to counter the cyclical bumps and grinds of the free market and its purported tendency to underproduce jobs and economic output. The toll has been heavy.

As the federal government and its central-bank sidekick, the Fed, have groped for one goal after another - smoothing out the business cycle, minimizing inflation and unemployment at the same time, rolling out a giant social insurance blanket, promoting homeownership, subsidizing medical care, propping up old industries (agriculture, automobiles) and fostering new ones ("clean" energy, biotechnology) and, above all, bailing out Wall Street - they have now succumbed to overload, overreach and outside capture by powerful interests. The modern Keynesian state is broke, paralyzed and mired in empty ritual incantations about stimulating "demand," even as it fosters a mutant crony capitalism that periodically lavishes the top 1 percent with speculative windfalls.

The culprits are bipartisan, though you'd never guess that from the blather that passes for political discourse these days. The state-wreck originated in 1933, when Franklin D. Roosevelt opted for fiat money (currency not fundamentally backed by gold), economic nationalism and capitalist cartels in agriculture and industry.

Under the exigencies of World War II (which did far more to end the Depression than the New Deal did), the state got hugely bloated, but remarkably, the bloat was put into brief remission during a midcentury golden era of sound money and fiscal rectitude with Dwight D. Eisenhower in the White House and William McChesney Martin Jr. at the Fed.

Then came Lyndon B. Johnson's "guns and butter" excesses, which were intensified over one perfidious weekend at Camp David, Md., in 1971, when Richard M. Nixon essentially defaulted on the nation's debt obligations by finally ending the convertibility of gold to the dollar. That one act - arguably a sin graver than Watergate - meant the end of national financial discipline and the start of a four-decade spree during which we have lived high on the hog, running a cumulative $8 trillion current-account deficit. In effect, America underwent an internal leveraged buyout, raising our ratio of total debt (public and private) to economic output to about 3.6 from its historic level of about 1.6. Hence the $30 trillion in excess debt (more than half the total debt, $56 trillion) that hangs over the American economy today.

This explosion of borrowing was the stepchild of the floating-money contraption deposited in the Nixon White House by Milton Friedman, the supposed hero of free-market economics who in fact sowed the seed for a never-ending expansion of the money supply. The Fed, which celebrates its centenary this year, fueled a roaring inflation in goods and commodities during the 1970s that was brought under control only by the iron resolve of Paul A. Volcker, its chairman from 1979 to 1987.

Under his successor, the lapsed hero Alan Greenspan, the Fed dropped Friedman's penurious rules for monetary expansion, keeping interest rates too low for too long and flooding Wall Street with freshly minted cash. What became known as the "Greenspan put" - the implicit assumption that the Fed would step in if asset prices dropped, as they did after the 1987 stock-market crash - was reinforced by the Fed's unforgivable 1998 bailout of the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management.

That Mr. Greenspan's loose monetary policies didn't set off inflation was only because domestic prices for goods and labor were crushed by the huge flow of imports from the factories of Asia. By offshoring America's tradable-goods sector, the Fed kept the Consumer Price Index contained, but also permitted the excess liquidity to foster a roaring inflation in financial assets. Mr. Greenspan's pandering incited the greatest equity boom in history, with the stock market rising fivefold between the 1987 crash and the 2000 dot-com bust.

Soon Americans stopped saving and consumed everything they earned and all they could borrow. The Asians, burned by their own 1997 financial crisis, were happy to oblige us. They - China and Japan above all - accumulated huge dollar reserves, transforming their central banks into a string of monetary roach motels where sovereign debt goes in but never comes out. We've been living on borrowed time - and spending Asians' borrowed dimes.

This dynamic reinforced the Reaganite shibboleth that "deficits don't matter" and the fact that nearly $5 trillion of the nation's $12 trillion in "publicly held" debt is actually sequestered in the vaults of central banks. The destruction of fiscal rectitude under Ronald Reagan - one reason I resigned as his budget chief in 1985 - was the greatest of his many dramatic acts. It created a template for the Republicans' utter abandonment of the balanced-budget policies of Calvin Coolidge and allowed George W. Bush to dive into the deep end, bankrupting the nation through two misbegotten and unfinanced wars, a giant expansion of Medicare and a tax-cutting spree for the wealthy that turned K Street lobbyists into the de facto office of national tax policy. In effect, the G.O.P. embraced Keynesianism - for the wealthy.

The explosion of the housing market, abetted by phony credit ratings, securitization shenanigans and willful malpractice by mortgage lenders, originators and brokers, has been well documented. Less known is the balance-sheet explosion among the top 10 Wall Street banks during the eight years ending in 2008. Though their tiny sliver of equity capital hardly grew, their dependence on unstable "hot money" soared as the regulatory harness the Glass-Steagall Act had wisely imposed during the Depression was totally dismantled.

Within weeks of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September 2008, Washington, with Wall Street's gun to its head, propped up the remnants of this financial mess in a panic-stricken melee of bailouts and money-printing that is the single most shameful chapter in American financial history.

There was never a remote threat of a Great Depression 2.0 or of a financial nuclear winter, contrary to the dire warnings of Ben S. Bernanke, the Fed chairman since 2006. The Great Fear - manifested by the stock market plunge when the House voted down the TARP bailout before caving and passing it - was purely another Wall Street concoction. Had President Bush and his Goldman Sachs adviser (a k a Treasury Secretary) Henry M. Paulson Jr. stood firm, the crisis would have burned out on its own and meted out to speculators the losses they so richly deserved. The Main Street banking system was never in serious jeopardy, ATMs were not going dark and the money market industry was not imploding.

Instead, the White House, Congress and the Fed, under Mr. Bush and then President Obama, made a series of desperate, reckless maneuvers that were not only unnecessary but ruinous. The auto bailouts, for example, simply shifted jobs around - particularly to the aging, electorally vital Rust Belt - rather than saving them. The "green energy" component of Mr. Obama's stimulus was mainly a nearly $1 billion giveaway to crony capitalists, like the venture capitalist John Doerr and the self-proclaimed outer-space visionary Elon Musk, to make new toys for the affluent.

Less than 5 percent of the $800 billion Obama stimulus went to the truly needy for food stamps, earned-income tax credits and other forms of poverty relief. The preponderant share ended up in money dumps to state and local governments, pork-barrel infrastructure projects, business tax loopholes and indiscriminate middle-class tax cuts. The Democratic Keynesians, as intellectually bankrupt as their Republican counterparts (though less hypocritical), had no solution beyond handing out borrowed money to consumers, hoping they would buy a lawn mower, a flat-screen TV or, at least, dinner at Red Lobster.

But even Mr. Obama's hopelessly glib policies could not match the audacity of the Fed, which dropped interest rates to zero and then digitally printed new money at the astounding rate of $600 million per hour. Fast-money speculators have been "purchasing" giant piles of Treasury debt and mortgage-backed securities, almost entirely by using short-term overnight money borrowed at essentially zero cost, thanks to the Fed. Uncle Ben has lined their pockets.

If and when the Fed - which now promises to get unemployment below 6.5 percent as long as inflation doesn't exceed 2.5 percent - even hints at shrinking its balance sheet, it will elicit a tidal wave of sell orders, because even a modest drop in bond prices would destroy the arbitrageurs' profits. Notwithstanding Mr. Bernanke's assurances about eventually, gradually making a smooth exit, the Fed is domiciled in a monetary prison of its own making.

While the Fed fiddles, Congress burns. Self-titled fiscal hawks like Paul D. Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, are terrified of telling the truth: that the 10-year deficit is actually $15 trillion to $20 trillion, far larger than the Congressional Budget Office's estimate of $7 trillion. Its latest forecast, which imagines 16.4 million new jobs in the next decade, compared with only 2.5 million in the last 10 years, is only one of the more extreme examples of Washington's delusions.

Even a supposedly "bold" measure - linking the cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security payments to a different kind of inflation index - would save just $200 billion over a decade, amounting to hardly 1 percent of the problem. Mr. Ryan's latest budget shamelessly gives Social Security and Medicare a 10-year pass, notwithstanding that a fair portion of their nearly $19 trillion cost over that decade would go to the affluent elderly. At the same time, his proposal for draconian 30 percent cuts over a decade on the $7 trillion safety net - Medicaid, food stamps and the earned-income tax credit - is another front in the G.O.P.'s war against the 99 percent.

Without any changes, over the next decade or so, the gross federal debt, now nearly $17 trillion, will hurtle toward $30 trillion and soar to 150 percent of gross domestic product from around 105 percent today. Since our constitutional stasis rules out any prospect of a "grand bargain," the nation's fiscal collapse will play out incrementally, like a Greek/Cypriot tragedy, in carefully choreographed crises over debt ceilings, continuing resolutions and temporary budgetary patches.

The future is bleak. The greatest construction boom in recorded history - China's money dump on infrastructure over the last 15 years - is slowing. Brazil, India, Russia, Turkey, South Africa and all the other growing middle-income nations cannot make up for the shortfall in demand. The American machinery of monetary and fiscal stimulus has reached its limits. Japan is sinking into old-age bankruptcy and Europe into welfare-state senescence. The new rulers enthroned in Beijing last year know that after two decades of wild lending, speculation and building, even they will face a day of reckoning, too.

THE state-wreck ahead is a far cry from the "Great Moderation" proclaimed in 2004 by Mr. Bernanke, who predicted that prosperity would be everlasting because the Fed had tamed the business cycle and, as late as March 2007, testified that the impact of the subprime meltdown "seems likely to be contained." Instead of moderation, what's at hand is a Great Deformation, arising from a rogue central bank that has abetted the Wall Street casino, crucified savers on a cross of zero interest rates and fueled a global commodity bubble that erodes Main Street living standards through rising food and energy prices - a form of inflation that the Fed fecklessly disregards in calculating inflation.

These policies have brought America to an end-stage metastasis. The way out would be so radical it can't happen. It would necessitate a sweeping divorce of the state and the market economy. It would require a renunciation of crony capitalism and its first cousin: Keynesian economics in all its forms. The state would need to get out of the business of imperial hubris, economic uplift and social insurance and shift its focus to managing and financing an effective, affordable, means-tested safety net.

All this would require drastic deflation of the realm of politics and the abolition of incumbency itself, because the machinery of the state and the machinery of re-election have become conterminous. Prying them apart would entail sweeping constitutional surgery: amendments to give the president and members of Congress a single six-year term, with no re-election; providing 100 percent public financing for candidates; strictly limiting the duration of campaigns (say, to eight weeks); and prohibiting, for life, lobbying by anyone who has been on a legislative or executive payroll. It would also require overturning Citizens United and mandating that Congress pass a balanced budget, or face an automatic sequester of spending.

It would also require purging the corrosive financialization that has turned the economy into a giant casino since the 1970s. This would mean putting the great Wall Street banks out in the cold to compete as at-risk free enterprises, without access to cheap Fed loans or deposit insurance. Banks would be able to take deposits and make commercial loans, but be banned from trading, underwriting and money management in all its forms.

It would require, finally, benching the Fed's central planners, and restoring the central bank's original mission: to provide liquidity in times of crisis but never to buy government debt or try to micromanage the economy. Getting the Fed out of the financial markets is the only way to put free markets and genuine wealth creation back into capitalism.

That, of course, will never happen because there are trillions of dollars of assets, from Shanghai skyscrapers to Fortune 1000 stocks to the latest housing market "recovery," artificially propped up by the Fed's interest-rate repression. The United States is broke - fiscally, morally, intellectually - and the Fed has incited a global currency war (Japan just signed up, the Brazilians and Chinese are angry, and the German-dominated euro zone is crumbling) that will soon overwhelm it. When the latest bubble pops, there will be nothing to stop the collapse. If this sounds like advice to get out of the markets and hide out in cash, it is.

David A. Stockman is a former Republican congressman from Michigan, President Ronald Reagan's budget director from 1981 to 1985 and the author, most recently, of "The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America."

© 2013 The New York Times Company.

The content you have chosen to save (which may include videos, articles, images and other copyrighted materials) is intended for your personal, noncommercial use. Such content is owned or controlled by The New York Times Company or the party credited as the content provider. Please refer to nytimes.com and the Terms of Service available on its website for information and restrictions related to the content.

Original Page: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/sundown-in-america.xml