Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Should Women Be Allowed Into Combat Roles--What Happens When They Get Captured?

Hagel Plan Allows Women Into Navy SEALs

Image: Hagel Plan Allows Women Into Navy SEALs
Female soldiers from 1st Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division train on a firing range at Fort Campbell, Ky.
Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 09:31 AM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Military leaders are ready to begin tearing down the remaining walls that have prevented women from holding thousands of combat and special operations jobs near the front lines.

Under details of the plans obtained by The Associated Press, women could start training as Army Rangers by mid-2015 and as Navy SEALs a year later.

The military services have mapped out a schedule that also will include reviewing and possibly changing the physical and mental standards that men and women will have to meet in order to qualify for certain infantry, armor, commando and other front-line positions across the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Under the plans to be introduced Tuesday, there would be one common standard for men and women for each job.



Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel reviewed the plans and has ordered the services to move ahead.

The move follows revelations of a startling number of sexual assaults in the armed forces. Earlier this year, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said the sexual assaults might be linked to the longstanding ban on women serving in combat because the disparity between the roles of men and women creates separate classes of personnel — male "warriors" versus the rest of the force.

While the sexual assault problem is more complicated than that, he said, the disparity has created a psychology that lends itself to disrespect for women.

Under the schedules military leaders delivered to Hagel, the Army will develop standards by July 2015 to allow women to train and potentially serve as Rangers, and qualified women could begin training as Navy SEALs by March 2016 if senior leaders agree. Military leaders have suggested bringing senior women from the officer and enlisted ranks into special forces units first to ensure that younger, lower-ranking women have a support system to help them get through the transition.

The Navy intends to open up its Riverine force and begin training women next month, with the goal of assigning women to the units by October. While not part of the special operations forces, the coastal Riverine squadrons do close combat and security operations in small boats. The Navy plans to have studies finished by July 2014 on allowing women to serve as SEALs, and has set October 2015 as the date when women could begin Navy boot camp with the expressed intention of becoming SEALs eventually.

U.S. Special Operations Command is coordinating the matter of what commando jobs could be opened to women, what exceptions might be requested and when the transition would take place.

The proposals leave the door open for continued exclusion of women from some jobs if research and testing find that women could not be successful in sufficient numbers. But the services would have to defend such decisions to top Pentagon leaders.

Army officials plan to complete gender-neutral standards for the Ranger course by July 2015. Army Rangers are one of the service's special operations units, but many soldiers who go through Ranger training and wear the coveted tab on their shoulders never actually serve in the 75th Ranger Regiment. To be considered a true Ranger, soldiers must serve in the regiment.

In January, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Dempsey signed an order that wiped away generations of limits on where and how women could fight for their country. At the time, they asked the services to develop plans to set the change in motion.

The decision reflects a reality driven home by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, where battle lines were blurred and women were propelled into jobs as medics, military police and intelligence officers who were sometimes attached, but not formally assigned, to battalions. So even though a woman could not serve officially as a battalion infantryman going out on patrol, she could fly a helicopter supporting the unit or be part of a team supplying medical aid if troops were injured.

Of the more than 6,700 U.S. service members who have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, about 150 have been women.

The order Panetta and Dempsey signed prohibits physical standards from being lowered simply to allow women to qualify for jobs closer to the battlefront. But the services are methodically reviewing and revising the standards for many jobs, including strength and stamina, in order to set minimum requirements for troops to meet regardless of their sex.

The military services are also working to determine the cost of opening certain jobs to women, particularly aboard a variety of Navy ships, including certain submarines, frigates, mine warfare and other smaller warships. Dozens of ships do not have adequate berthing or facilities for women to meet privacy needs, and would require design and construction changes.

Under a 1994 Pentagon policy, women were prohibited from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level. A brigade is roughly 3,500 troops split into several battalions of about 800 soldiers each. Historically, brigades were based further from the front lines, and they often included top command and support staff.

Urgent: Should Women Be in Combat? Vote Here 

Last year the military opened up about 14,500 combat positions to women, most of them in the Army, by allowing them to serve in many jobs at the battalion level. The January order lifted the last barrier to women serving in combat, but allows the services to argue to keep some jobs closed.

The bulk of the nearly 240,000 jobs currently closed to women are in the Army, including those in infantry, armor, combat engineer and artillery units that are often close to the battlefront. Similar jobs in the Marine Corps are also closed.

Army officials have laid out a rolling schedule of dates in 2015 to develop gender-neutral standards for specific jobs, beginning with July for engineers, followed by field artillery in March and the infantry and armor jobs no later than September.

Women make up about 14 percent of the 1.4 million active U.S. military personnel. More than 280,000 women have been sent to Iraq, Afghanistan or neighboring nations in support of the wars.
© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Seals-rangers-women-hagel/2013/06/18/id/510470?s=al&promo_code=13DEA-1#ixzz2WcvGeEFU
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Is Abortion The Base Of Country's Problems

Limbaugh: Abortion at Root of Much of America's Ills

Monday, 17 Jun 2013 06:39 PM
By Greg Richter

Much of the cultural and economic decay facing America can be traced to the more than 50 million abortions performed since the 1972 Roe v. Wade decision, Rush Limbaugh says.


And the current push for legal status for illegal immigrants is a result of needing to replace the aborted, Limbaugh said.

"Fifty-two million taxpayers haven't been born, is the way Washington looks at it," Limbaugh said on his radio show on Friday. "They don't look at it morally. They don't look at it in any kind of cultural way or any kind of cultural impact. They just say … we have 52 million fewer people paying taxes. We gotta replace 'em. Hello, amnesty."

But beyond that, abortion has had a role in destroying society, Limbaugh said.

Most people see abortion simply as a woman's right to choose, he said, but the impact has been much wider. "It's had an impact on crime. It's had a profound impact on our politics. It is at the root of our cultural rot and decay."

Limbaugh said no one wants to accept responsibility for his or her actions anymore. "And I'm not talking about the women," he said. "I'm talking the overall effect of a society having literally no problem with eliminating 52 million of its citizens. That can't be good."

Limbaugh noted that Americans still feel guilt over slavery, yet aren't bothered by abortion.


"I think it is the cause of so much that seems to be inexplicable to people," he said. "Why are 10-year-olds shooting each other to death in Chicago? Why is our society so permissive, anything goes, the more ribald, the better? The more honorable, the more boring it is said to be."



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rush-limbaugh-abortion-impact/2013/06/17/id/510393?s=al&promo_code=13DC2-1#ixzz2WZrkQQGz
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Did NSA Stop 50 Plots Or Is This Smoke

NSA Chief: Wall Street Terror Plot Among Dozens Foiled by Surveillance

Image: NSA Chief: Wall Street Terror Plot Among Dozens Foiled by Surveillance
Gen. Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency, testifies June 18 before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 11:44 AM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The director of the National Security Agency said Tuesday the government's sweeping surveillance programs have foiled some 50 terrorist plots worldwide, including one directed at the New York Stock Exchange, in a forceful defense of spy operations echoed by leaders of the House Intelligence Committee.
Army Gen. Keith Alexander said the two recently disclosed programs — one that gathers U.S. phone records and another that is designed to track the use of U.S.-based Internet servers by foreigners with possible links to terrorism — are critical in the terrorism fight.

Intelligence officials have disclosed some details on two thwarted attacks, and Alexander offered some information on other attempts.
He said the NSA was monitoring a known extremist in Yemen who was in contact with an individual in the United States. Identifying that person and other individuals, Alexander said, officials "were able to detect a nascent plot to bomb the New York Stock Exchange. ... The FBI disrupted and arrested these individuals."
The programs "assist the intelligence community to connect the dots," Alexander told the committee in a rare, open Capitol Hill hearing.
Alexander got no disagreement from the leaders of the panel, who have been outspoken in backing the programs since Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former contractor with Booz Allen Hamilton, disclosed information to The Washington Post and Britain's Guardian newspapers.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., chairman of the committee, and Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger of Maryland, the panel's top Democrat, said the programs were vital to the intelligence community and assailed Snowden's actions as criminal.
"It is at times like these where our enemies within become almost as damaging as our enemies on the outside," Rogers said.
Ruppersberger said the "brazen disclosures" put the United States and its allies at risk.
The general counsel for the intelligence community said the NSA cannot target phone conversations between callers inside the United States — even if one of those callers was someone they were targeting for surveillance when outside the country.
The director of national intelligence's legal chief, Robert S. Litt, said if the NSA finds it has accidentally gathered a phone call by a target who had traveled into the United States without their knowledge, they have to "purge" that from their system. The same goes for an accidental collection of any conversation because of an error.
Litt said those incidents are then reported to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which "pushes back" and asks how it happened, and what the NSA is doing to fix the problem so it doesn't happen again.
The hearing came the morning after President Barack Obama, who is attending the G-8 summit in Ireland, vigorously defended the surveillance programs in a lengthy interview Monday, calling them transparent — even though they are authorized in secret.
"It is transparent," Obama told PBS' Charlie Rose in an interview. "That's why we set up the FISA court," the president added, referring to the secret court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that authorizes two recently disclosed programs: one that gathers U.S. phone records and another that is designed to track the use of U.S.-based Internet servers by foreigners with possible links to terrorism.
Obama said he has named representatives to a privacy and civil liberties oversight board to help in the debate over just how far government data gathering should be allowed to go, a discussion that is complicated by the secrecy surrounding the FISA court, with hearings held at undisclosed locations and with only government lawyers present. The orders that result are all highly classified.
"We're going to have to find ways where the public has an assurance that there are checks and balances in place ... that their phone calls aren't being listened into, their text messages aren't being monitored, their emails are not being read by some big brother somewhere," the president said.
A senior administration official said Obama had asked Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to determine what more information about the two programs could be made public, to help better explain them. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly.
Snowden on Monday accused members of Congress and administration officials of exaggerating their claims about the success of the data gathering programs, including pointing to the arrest of the would-be New York subway bomber, Najibullah Zazi, in 2009.

In an online interview with The Guardian in which he posted answers to questions, Snowden said Zazi could have been caught with narrower, targeted surveillance programs — a point Obama conceded in his interview without mentioning Snowden.
"We might have caught him some other way," Obama said. "We might have disrupted it because a New York cop saw he was suspicious. Maybe he turned out to be incompetent and the bomb didn't go off. But, at the margins, we are increasing our chances of preventing a catastrophe like that through these programs."
Obama repeated earlier assertions that the NSA programs were a legitimate counterterror tool and that they were completely noninvasive to people with no terror ties — something he hoped to discuss with the privacy and civil liberties board he'd formed. The senior administration official said the president would be meeting with the new privacy board in the coming days.


© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/nsa-surveillance-wall-street/2013/06/18/id/510504?s=al&promo_code=13DEA-1#ixzz2Wcrcan1q
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Insanity Government Style--Thousands of Data Requests

THIS IS HOW MANY DATA REQUESTS YAHOO HAS RECEIVED FROM THE GOV’T (HINT: IT’S A LOT)

Yahoo! jumped on the bandwagon of tech companies disclosing the number of requests law enforcement makes for user data this week.
In a post on Tumblr, Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer and General Counsel Ron Bell led off stating that it has “worked hard over the years to earn our users’ trust and we fight hard to preserve it.”
Yahoo data requests
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer speaks about the company’s acquisition of Tumblr at a press conference in Times Square on May 20, 2013 in New York City. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
From December 1, 2012, to May 31, 2013, law enforcement made between 12,000 and 13,000 requests for Yahoo! user data, most frequently pertaining to cases of ”fraud, homicides, kidnappings and other criminal investigations,” according to the post. Of these, Yahoo! does not detail how many requests it was legally compelled to comply with, some of which were made through the  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that companies cannot reveal numbers for yet. Yahoo!, like Google recently, stated that it hopes the government will soon allow companies to disclose these numbers.
Following the lead that Google established for several years now, the Yahoo! executives stated that the company would begin issuing a biannual transparency report starting this summer.
“As always, we will continually evaluate whether further actions can be taken to protect the privacy of our users and our ability to defend it.  We appreciate—and do not take for granted—the trust you place in us,” the post stated.
Apple revealed the number of requests it has received from law enforcement this year on Monday — it was between 4,000 to 5,000 requests. Facebook last week let users in on how often their information was requested — in the last six months of 2012, it was between 9,000 and 10,000 requests made for between 18,000 to 19,000 user accounts.
data requestsxon
The Facebook “like” symbol is illuminated on a sign outside the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. , Friday, June 7, 2013. A leaked document has laid bare the monumental scope of the government’s surveillance of Americans’ phone records hundreds of millions of calls in the first hard evidence of a massive data collection program aimed at combating terrorism under powers granted by Congress after the 9/11 attacks. The companies include Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube and Apple. (Photo: AP/Marcio Jose Sanchez)
In the last six months of 2012, Google saw 8,438 requests from the U.S. Google announced a compliance rate of 88 percent at the time, which was down from previous reports.

Kids Destroy House-Parents Back Them

We are always amazed at today's parents who cannot believe their little darlings could ever do something bad. In the following story two kids destroy a house and their parents bring charges against the homeowner who caught the kids.  

Years ago, parents would tell their kids, "if you get in trouble, it won't be half as bad as when you get home." Now, parents blindly follow what their kids say.

My suggestion for Jessee Daniels is to bring charges against the parents for failing to supervise their kids and to ask for damages for the house and for them bringing charges against him.  These parents must be taught a lesson. Eight and ten year olds do cause damage and their parents must step up when it occurs.  Otherwise, we will read about these same kids in eight to ten years, killing someone. Small crimes lead to bigger crimes when there is little or no punishment or the kids feel that their parents will always bail them out.

Conservative Tom

KIDS BRUTALLY VANDALIZE MAN’S FAMILY HOME — BUT NOW HE’S THE ONE FACING JAIL TIME

Jesse Daniels, 53, is accused of endangering the welfare of children for the actions he took after catching four boys in the act of vandalizing his father-in-law’s home over the weekend. With extensive damage done to the inside of the house, Daniels and his wife called 911 — and he went inside of the residence to confront the boys.
But that’s not all: Daniels put the kids inside of a closet while he waited for authorities to arrive. It was this latter action that created an even bigger legal conundrum.
The vandalism unfolded in Clyde, New York, a small town between between Rochester and Syracuse. Daniels lives next door to the home — his father-in-law’s residence that is under continued renovation — and when he heard noises and saw the lights on, he knew something was wrong.
Jesse Daniels Locks Boys in a Closet After Catching Them Vandalizing Home    and Now He Faces Jail Time
Damage inside the home (Photo Credit: WHAM-TV)
WHAM-TV has more about how the incident unfolded:
The incident unfolded around 9 p.m. Saturday when Jesse Daniels said he told his wife to call 911 after he heard loud noises coming from the home next door and saw an individual striking a wall with a hammer.
Daniels tells 13WHAM News he ran next door and found four children, ages eight and ten, doing damage to the property.  Daniels said he took a hammer from one of the kids and corralled them into a closet while he waited for police to arrive.  Daniels estimated that the damage to his father-in-law’s property exceeds $40,000.
Clyde Village Police took the children back to their parents and filed felony criminal charges of Burglary 2nd Degree and Criminal Mischief 2nd Degree.  Those cases will be handled in Family Court and the results of each case is likely to remain sealed.
Now, here’s where the details take a turn. Two days after this debacle, the police went back to Daniels’ home and arrested him. The parents of the children, claiming that the man threatened the kids with the hammer and was rough with them, insisted that charges be filed. So, Daniels faces four counts of endangering the welfare of a child.
The local man could face up to one year in county jail for each offense, meaning that a total of four years of detention, pending Daniels receives the max penalty, could be his ultimate ramification.
The children’s motivation for the attack on the home isn’t known, however WHAM-TV reports that Daniels claims that the boys were riding ATVs earlier in the evening on Saturday and that his wife told them to get off of their property. The home attack may have been a retaliatory act, he contends.
Accounts of what unfolded that night differ greatly. While Daniels says he merely put the children in the closet and told them to “be cool” until authorities arrived, the parents of the kids claim that Daniels went as far as to grab one of them by the throat; the boys, they claim, are traumatized by what unfolded.
Jesse Daniels Locks Boys in a Closet After Catching Them Vandalizing Home    and Now He Faces Jail Time
Damage inside the home (Photo Credit: WHAM-TV)
Regardless of the exact details, the home is severely damaged. And after spending years renovating it for and with his father-in-law, Daniels isn’t happy.
“It just looked like a bomb went off it really did I can’t believe the power that it took to send (electrical) outlets six-inches into the wall,” he told WHAM-TV. “I’m very happy the children didn’t get hurt because porcelain shatters any one time they could’ve been blinded, they could’ve been slashed in the throat with a piece of porcelain.”
At least one of the parents is calling for increased charges against Daniels, despite admitting that the children’s actions were unacceptable.
(H/T: Daily Mail)

Monday, June 17, 2013

Obama The Hypocrite

If your kid played with a gun as your President does in the accompanying piece, he would be kicked out of school for who knows how long. If Obama was consistent, he would not allow guns of any type around his kids. He would not be running around the pool with a water gun. But he is not consistent because he is a dictator who answers to no one but himself!

There are few things that really upset us, but hypocrisy is one of those.   When people say one thing and do another is a real deal breaker for us.  It is the environmentalist who drives a big car, lives in a big house without any modifications and flies around the world in his private jet while demanding that the "little people"  drive small cars, live in small houses and not travel.  Yes, I am talking about Obama and  his mentor Al Gore.

And on the issue of guns. Obama is surrounded by armed men, many carrying assault weapons. He even fired shotguns at Camp David. His Department of Homeland Security has ordered millions of bullets, AR-15s and armored  vehicles for no declared reason. Yet he wants to limit or eliminate the  guns we, "the little people", can own, purchase and sell. Isn't it wonderful that he can have all the guns he wants but not us! That is the definition of a hypocrite.

Obama is the example of the worst type of leader. We hope that he will leave when his term expires. We are not sure he will.

Conservative Tom




‘YOU SHOULD BE SUSPENDED’: OBAMA SKEWERED FOR PLAYING WITH AN OBJECT THAT’S SPELLED TROUBLE FOR MANY SCHOOL KIDS

Considering the flurry of punitive measures taken against youngsters lately who dare:
And it’s no surprise that President Obama is getting roundly ridiculed for the photo of him brandishing a pretty lethal-looking water gun during daughter Sasha’s birthday party at Camp David.
The 2011 photo is part of a White House web site gallery that shows Obama just “being a dad” in honor of Father’s Day:
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
Most prominent of the mockers was Laura Ingraham, who tweeted:
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
She was joined by a chorus of fellow “isn’t this ironic” revelers:
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
And the hoots and hollers continued:
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
And not to be outdone…
Obama Ridiculed for Photo of Him Playing with Water Gun
(Credit: Twitter via Twitchy)
(H/T: Twitchy)