Rep. Mike Rogers: White House 'Took too Long' on Syria Decision
Thursday, 13 Jun 2013 07:47 PM
"They tried to outsource it to the United Nations," Rogers, the Michigan Republican who is chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Bret Baier on Fox News. "There's no substitute. You cannot outsource U.S. leadership. It just doesn’t work.
"Our Arab League partners wanted U.S. leadership on this — and, again, this is not about boots on the ground and military action," Rogers added. "There's a whole host of things that U.S. credibility brings to very hard decisions that are being made in a place like Syria. None of that really happened.
"We lost credibility with our Arab League partners. We lost credibility with the opposition, which is why the Secretary of State [John Kerry] is having a difficult time trying to get some agreement on a diplomatic solution.
"You have to show that leadership role in order to corral all the forces on the ground in Syria into a difficult agreement. We don’t have that yet."
The Obama administration said on Thursday that it had definitive evidence that Assad’s regime had used sarin and other chemical weapons against opposition forces.
"The Assad regime has used chemical weapons, including Sarin, on a small scale multiple times in the last year," Ben Rhodes, Obama's deputy national security adviser, said in a late-afternoon news conference with reporters. "We have a high degree of confidence in this information.
"This is a high-confidence assessment," Rhodes said, adding: "The use of chemical weapons crosses a red line. This is a clearly evolving situation is Syria."
Rhodes, who said that as many as 100 to 150 people had died from chemical weapons use, said that the U.S. was increasing military support to the main Syrian rebel group in light of the revelation.
"The president has made a decision about providing more support to the opposition, that will involve providing direct support to the [Supreme Military Council], that includes military support," he said. "This is going to be different in both scope and scale in terms of what we are providing to the SMC than what we have provided before."
The Supreme Military Council is the military wing of the main civilian opposition group.
In March, Rogers said there was a "high probability" that chemical weapons had been used by Assad's regime.
"Many have said that there's clear evidence that chemical weapons have been used, maybe as long as a year or a year and a half ago," he told Fox. "This thing is deteriorating to a regional conflict, which is dangerous to the national security of the United States.
"The problem is, the announcement comes today; we still don’t have a plan."
He added that White House officials have been asked to meet with the Intelligence Committee to detail its plans for Syria.
"The Arab League is looking for leadership — not necessarily boots on the ground — but leadership," Rogers said. "We can bring unique capability to the situation.
"This is important. They have chemical weapons. Clearly, we've now seen that they've used them. We know that every flavor of terrorist in the world is in Syria right now, fighting and gaining experience, and they want to get their hands on those chemical weapons.
"We need to make sure that those groups do not get armed with something that causes a world-wide crisis."
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rogers-syria-decision-obama/2013/06/13/id/509886?s=al&promo_code=13D36-1#ixzz2WCDZTse3
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
War-mongers like Rogers and McCain would have us in perpetual war. Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq. Every one of these interventionist wars have been a disaster for our country. If we get into a war in Syria or Iran, it will be more of the same, if not worse. The American people are sick of these damn wars. We desperately need a non-interventionist president who will stand up to the military brass and say, "No!" That would be Rand Paul.
ReplyDelete--David
No Ron Paul?? Well, I agree that we do not need to be involved in Syria--that is NOT in our nation's interests.
ReplyDeleteI do like Rand Paul but still do not know enough about his foreign affairs stands to make a comment on his Presidential hopes.
Do you realize that we have agreed on two things today.
"In the past, senior leaders in both the Supreme Military Council and the Syrian Opposition Coalition have professed support for the Al Nusrah Front for the People of the Levant, al Qaeda's affiliate in Syria. Elements of the Free Syrian Army, which falls under the command of the Supreme Military Council, fight alongside and often under the command of the Al Nusrah Front, which was estimated by the US government at the beginning of this year to have over 10,000 fighters. More than 3,000 fighters from the Free Syrian Army are estimated to have defected to the Al Nusrah Front as of mid-May."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2013/06/us_to_arm_syrian_reb.php
These are the "rebels" we're supporting in Syria.
--David