Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Armed Services Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Armed Services Committee. Show all posts

Friday, March 24, 2017

We Can Expect More Terror Attacks In Europe


U.S. General: More ‘Terror Streams’ in Europe than Anywhere Else Except War Zones

6

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The top U.S. military commander in Europe said Thursday at a Senate hearing that the terrorist threat is higher in Europe than anywhere on the globe, with the exception of current war zones.

“The number of threat streams that we have of this type within Europe, it’s probably higher in Europe than in any other part of the globe with the exception of the places where we’re actually physically fighting in, like Syria and Afghanistan and Iraq,” said U.S. Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti.
The four-star Army general told senators on the Senate Armed Services Committee that a terrorist attack in London the day before underscores “the dynamic environment in Europe.”
“Europe is challenged by both the flow of terrorists returning from Syria and other places. They’re challenged by an internal threat by those inspired by ISIS or directed by ISIS and this is another, an example of the attacks that we’ve seen in Europe in the past year. It’s a difficult challenge.”
Scaparotti, who is dual-hatted as NATO Supreme Allied Commander, said the U.S. would remain “solid and stand shoulder-to-shoulder with our allies in NATO to defeat this threat.”
When asked by committee Chairman John McCain (R-AZ) whether there is a “connection” between the increased threat stream and refugees, Scaparotti responded:
The flow of refugees and those who move them, particularly criminal activities that will help move them, they also are more than willing to move both equipment, personnel, weapons, and people.
So far, eight have been arrested in connection with the London terror attack, the deadliest there in 12 years.
The attack underscores the difficulties Europe is facing from homegrown Islamic terrorism, while it handles an influx of refugees from war-torn countries.
Prime Minister Theresa May said the attacker was British-born and once linked to violent extremism. She said he had been investigated by security services but was regarded as a “peripheral figure.”
An ISIS-affiliated news agency has claimed the attacker was a “soldier” of ISIS inspired by its message, though direct evidence has not yet emerged.
Four people have died in the attack so far, including the attacker, who plowed a car into crowds of people, injuring over 40 and killing two people. He then stabbed a police officer dead at the gates of the UK Parliament.
“The likelihood of further actions like this, particularly by some that are self-indoctrinated, are very hard to stop,” McCain said.

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Will Congress Make Any Headway Investigating "The King"?


BREAKING: U.S. Lawmakers Make Stunning Move To Investigate Obama For Helping ISIS


 Print

Three committees in the House of Representatives announced Friday that they were launching concurrent investigations into allegations that President Barack Obama deliberately manipulated intelligence reports from Syria and Iraq, allowing the Islamic State group to thrive.
According to the Washington Examiner, Republican Reps. Ken Calvert of California, Mike Pompeo of Kansas and Brad Wenstrup of Ohio will lead the investigations for the Armed Services Committee, Intelligence Committee and the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, respectively.
“In addition to looking into the specific allegations, the Joint Task Force will examine whether these allegations reflect systemic problems across the intelligence enterprise in CENTCOM or any other pertinent intelligence organizations,” read a joint statement from Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and Defense Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Rodney Freylinghuysen, R-N.J.
A
The investigations by the House committees joined an investigation by the Pentagon’s inspector general’s office in relation to the Obama administration’s alleged manipulation of Islamic State group intelligence at U.S. Central Command.
A September report said that 50 intelligence officials at CENTCOM had signed a letter claiming intelligence on the Islamic State group had been doctored.
The report claimed that the Obama administration would deliberately punish any intelligence official who gave accurate assessments of terror group strength and didn’t doctor the information to make it look like the United States was winning the battle against them.
Even Democrats have gotten on the president and the administration about the intelligence doctoring, including one of the ranking Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jackie Speier of California.
“More recently the intelligence community, I think, has provided much more accurate assessments. But CENTCOM, which is the area that is responsible for the Middle East, has, for whatever reasons, we don’t know yet why, has dumbed down the intelligence, has sweetened it, has made it seem like we are being more successful there than we are,” Speier said.
“I’m deeply troubled by what I believe is doctoring that has taken place and has created an impression that we are doing better there than we actually are.”
Rep. Speier may claim “we don’t know yet why” intelligence reports were doctored, but we’re pretty sure we understand why.

And pretty soon, these congressional investigations will reveal officially put the “why” out there for the world to see.
Do you think this deriliction of duty by Obama has helped the Islamic State group to thrive? Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Do You Really Think That Obama CARES About Violating Federal Law?

House Armed Services Committee: Obama Violated Federal Law with Bergdahl Exchange


FILE - This undated file image provided by the U.S. Army shows Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. A U.S. official says Bergdahl, who abandoned his post in Afghanistan and was held by the Taliban for five years, will be court martialed on charges of desertion and avoiding military service. (AP Photo/U.S. Army, file)
A House Armed Services Committee report set to be released Thursday accuses the Obama administration of misleading Congress and violating federal law during a controversial prisoner exchange.
The report compiled by the GOP majority charges that the administration did so when it bypassed Congress in negotiating the exchange of five Taliban prisoners for U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was being held in Afghanistan. They suggested that the White House had put politics and expediency ahead of proper procedure in making the deal.
This is the same administration that put politics and expediency ahead of common sense when "ending" the war in Iraq, so this is really no surprise. This president puts politics ahead of everything. If the Republicans are against it, national security be damned. The quickest way to get rid of Obamacare may be to have every Republican in Congress embrace it.
As this entire weird story played out, it always did seem that the administration's interest in Bergdahl was motivated solely by a need to stick it to Republicans. The timing and the rush to get it done never made sense. It was almost as if the president got bored.
Anyway, there's no reason to worry, right? After all, nothing bad ever comes of those poor souls released from Gitmo, after all.

Friday, September 11, 2015

Women Prove They Are The Weaker Sex When It Comes To Marine Corps Requirements

Marine Corps Study: Male Infantry Units Outperform Units With Females

Image: Marine Corps Study: Male Infantry Units Outperform Units With FemalesA woman Marine on an obstacle course. (Newsmax File Photo)
By Greg Richter   |   Thursday, 10 Sep 2015 10:42 PM
A Marine Corps study has found that ground units made up only of men perform better than units with men and women.

According to the study released Thursday, women were injured twice as often as men, aren't as accurate at shooting and have a harder time removing wounded troops from the battlefield.

The study found that women who had been through infantry target school were less accurate at hitting targets with M4 rifles than men who had not had the schooling.

Men hit targets 44 percent of the time, while women hit targets only 28 percent of the time.

Men were able to move faster carrying gear than women and could throw their packs over a wall, whereas women had to have help getting their gear over.

The study didn't only compare men to women individually, but also compared how units made up only of men compared to units integrated with men and women.

The all-male units beat the mixed units on 69 percent of the 134 tasks studied. The integrated teams were better at two machine gun-related tasks, while all units fared equally in the rest of the tasks.
Latest News Update

The males' rate of injury to muscles, tendons and ligaments was 18.8 percent. It was 40.5 percent for females.

The Marine Corps has the lowest percentage of women of all the armed services at 7 percent.

Under an Obama administration order, all the armed services are supposed to be fully integrated by 2016 unless waivers for certain jobs have been sought and granted.

"If you were to turn down a request for a waiver like that I guess the political machine in the White House would be saying we don’t care about the effectiveness of the ground combat units," California Rep. Duncan Hunter, a member of the Armed Services Committee, told USA Today.

Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Dems Not Totally Behind Prez

Top Armed Services Dem cautions against Syria military strike

By Jeremy Herb - 08/28/13 10:20 AM ET
The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday warned military strikes on Syria may not improve the crisis there and could drag the United States deeper into the conflict.
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said he was concerned about the effectiveness of a military strike against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s forces as a response to accusations his regime used chemical weapons in an attack that killed hundreds last week.
“Simply lashing out with military force under the banner of ‘doing something’ will not secure our interests in Syria,” Smith said in a statement after visiting the Syria-Jordan border.
“Military action could have significant consequences and there is no guarantee that it would improve the situation or promote a positive outcome. Any potential use of military force will have long-term costs and will put our troops in harm’s way,” he said.
Smith also highlighted the presence of al Qaeda-affiliated groups within the Syrian opposition, a frequent issue raised by opponents of U.S. intervention in Syria.
He called for an increase in both non-military and military aid to moderate elements within the Syrian opposition, but cautioned: “We should be under no illusion that such aid will significantly influence the outcome of the struggle against Assad.”
Smith’s comments take a more skeptical approach to possible military action in Syria than other Democratic leaders, such as Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (Mich.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), who have only said they are consulting with the administration and not weighed in on a possible strike.


Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/operations/319129-top-armed-services-dem-cautions-against-syria-strike-#ixzz2dHCyLqbj 
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Hagel Unfortunately Passes First Hurdle

We told you he would become our Pentagon chief and he has passed the first hurdle. Now it is onto the full Senate where if the Armed Services Committee is any indication, he will  approved along party lines. 

So much for the Democrats really examining his record!

Conservative Tom

Senate panel endorses Hagel for Pentagon in rare party-line vote

Unknown - FoxNews.com,  February 12th, 2013

Jan. 31, 2013: Republican Chuck Hagel testifies before the Senate Armed Services Committee during his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill. (AP)
A Senate panel narrowly endorsed Chuck Hagel to lead the Pentagon Tuesday, in a rare party-line vote that underscored intense Republican opposition to his nomination while nevertheless advancing Hagel to the floor for a final verdict.
The Senate Armed Services Committee voted 14-11 to advance Hagel's nomination.
All Republicans present voted against Hagel, himself a Republican and former Nebraska senator. Supporters lauded his service in the Vietnam War, and claimed the nominee had been forthcoming throughout his confirmation process.
But critics pointed to Hagel's history of controversial votes and statements regarding Iran, Israel, terror groups, the Iraq war and other issues.
Further, they panned what was widely regarded as a rocky performance by Hagel during his recent confirmation hearing. It is rare for the Senate to be this divided on a Cabinet nomination of this magnitude.
“His performance before this committee was the worst that I have seen for any nominee for office,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said, before voting against Hagel.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., another senator opposing Hagel, said “there are very few people who have been this wrong about so many things.”
Saying the next secretary of Defense will deal with “a world on fire,” Graham said Hagel's testimony was “not reassuring.”
Republican lawmakers had various reasons for opposing Hagel or trying to hold up his nomination. Some wanted him to provide more financial background information. Others voiced interest in holding up the nomination until the administration provides more information about the Benghazi terror attack, while voicing concerns about Hagel's background as well.
Democratic Chairman Carl Levin, though, pushed forward on a vote just hours before President Obama was set to deliver his State of the Union address.
“The time has come for the committee to act on this nomination,” Levin said.
Obama tapped Hagel, 66, a former Republican senator and twice-wounded Vietnam War combat veteran to succeed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who is stepping down after four years as CIA director and Pentagon chief.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, is pressing for a full Senate vote later this week, most likely on Thursday.
McCain cited Hagel's opposition to an increase in U.S. forces in Iraq that McCain backed in 2007, as well as Hagel's halting performance at his confirmation hearing.
During the final committee meeting Tuesday, a dispute broke out between Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Democrats over complaints Cruz had about Hagel not revealing certain personal compensation — Cruz questioned whether Hagel had gotten paid at any point by radical groups.
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said Cruz had “gone over the line” and “impugned the patriotism” of Hagel, a claim Cruz denied.
Committee Republicans had forced a delay in the expected vote last week when they pressed Hagel for further data on his personal finances.
Levin said the Republican demands were beyond the scope of those traditionally asked of previous nominees, Republican and Democrat — a point echoed by McCain.
Hagel now faces Republican delaying tactics in the full Senate, with the panel's top Republican, Sen. Jim Inhofe, insisting that any confirmation be based on 60 votes rather than a majority of the 100-member Senate.
But that effort has divided Republicans, with several longtime members opposed to the unprecedented step of stalling, or filibustering, a president's Cabinet nominee for Defense secretary.
Late Monday, McCain met privately with several committee Republicans and urged them not to filibuster the Hagel nomination, pointing out that the roles could be reversed someday with a Republican president and Republican-controlled Senate.
“I'm encouraging my colleagues if they want to vote against Sen. Hagel that's one thing and that's a principled stand,” McCain told a group of reporters. “We do not want to filibuster. We have not filibustered a Cabinet appointee in the past and I believe that we should move forward with his nomination, bring it to the floor and vote up or down.”
All 55 Democrats are expected to back Hagel, and two Republicans — Sens. Thad Cochran and Mike Johanns — have said they will vote for the nominee. At least five Republicans, including McCain, have said they oppose a filibuster despite their reservations or opposition toward the nominee.
More than a dozen Republicans have said they will oppose their former colleague, and several others have indicated they are likely to vote no. Sen. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican member of the Armed Services Committee, said Tuesday she would vote against the nominee, citing his performance at his confirmation hearing.
Hagel seemed ill-prepared under withering cross-examination from committee Republicans in nearly eight hours of testimony on Jan. 31. He was repeatedly pressed about past statements and votes on Israel, Iran and nuclear weapons, with Republican lawmakers suggesting he wasn't sufficiently supportive of Israel or anti-Iran.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.