Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Judiciary Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judiciary Committee. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Democrat Proposes Impeachement

And so it begins… Dem impeachment effort proposed

A California House Democrat on Monday unveiled an article of impeachment proposal against President Donald Trump, arguing that he “acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President” in firing former FBI Director James Comey.
Rep. Brad Sherman sent a letter to his legislative colleagues Monday announcing that he plans to force a floor vote on his measure.
“I would hope that the Article, once submitted, would receive expeditious consideration by the Judiciary Committee. However, if it becomes clear that such consideration is not forthcoming, I (after consultation with colleagues and leadership) will make a privileged motion that the entire House of Representatives immediately debate the Article,” he said.
House Democrats have used such “privileged” motions almost every week since Trump’s election to for votes on resolutions which would force the president to release his tax returns.
Sherman’s current article of impeachment states that Trump “has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.”
The lawmaker believes there is currently evidence enough to bring an obstruction charge against the president, but says he may file further articles as investigations continue.
“As the investigations move forward, additional evidence supporting additional Articles of Impeachment may emerge. However, as to Obstruction of Justice… the evidence we have is sufficient to move forward now. And the national interest requires that we do so,” Sherman wrote.
Despite Sherman’s claims, the Democratic leadership is currently distancing itself from calls for impeachment and his legislation isn’t likely to get formal attention in the GOP controlled House.
Still, if an impeachment effort begins to gain traction, some watchers say Trump may not have the legislative support to pull through.
As Axios’s Mike Allen noted Monday: “Beyond his base voters, Trump has an even bigger potential problem looming with his base in Congress. While Republican lawmakers won’t say it publicly, it’s widely known if they could pick between President Pence and President Trump, the Vice President would win 90% of the vote among the GOP.”

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Dems Might Get Tough On Senator Sessions But They Don't Have The Votes Unless There Are Some RINOs Who Will Cave

Schumer vows 'tough vetting' for Sessions

   
Incoming Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) is promising a "tough vetting" of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), President-elect Donald Trump's pick to be attorney general.
Schumer, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, declined in an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press" to offer any "quick judgements" on Trump's nominees.
"It's premature to make any decisions but, except to say a very thorough and tough vetting for a Senate colleague, as well as for anybody else," he said.
Schumer indicated he has questions for his Senate colleague regarding Sessions's plans for the Justice Department's civil rights division, among others.
Senate Democrats have pledged to fight Sessions's nomination to be attorney general, questioning whether he would be able to provide equal protections for Americans.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Friday called on Trump to rescind Sessions's nomination, while other Democrats voiced concerns about decades-old accusations of racism against the Alabama lawmaker.
Several Democrats on the Judiciary Committee have pledged to give Sessions a fair but thorough vetting as party members continue to voice opposition to his nomination.
"You want to make sure that they are qualified, that they will do the right thing," Schumer told NBC. "I think you have to be really careful, and particularly in a new administration with an untested president."

Friday, April 29, 2016

Democrats Actively Support Abnormal Behavior

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/04/Pelosi-CSPAN.jpg
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., at an April 28, 2016, press conference at the Capitol pushing HR 3185, known as the Equality Act
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., at an April 28, 2016, press conference at the Capitol pushing HR 3185, known as the Equality Act
What are Democrats to do when they can’t make same-sex marriage the law of the land in America by going through the legislative process?
Count on the U.S. courts and president to do it for them, of course.
At least that’s according to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who declared Thursday that the Supreme Court handed America a victory on same-sex marriage that Democrats “couldn’t get legislatively” but had to be achieved through “the courts.”
“Just to place where we are in context from the standpoint of Congress, when we came into the majority we had four points, it was a four-legged stool of what we wanted to accomplish,” Pelosi said at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol that promoted HR 3185, known as the Equality Act, legislation that amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include sex, sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes from “discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation.”
As the first item on the four-point agenda, Pelosi said her party desired a “fully inclusive hate crimes legislation,” and the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act was pushed through in 2009 and signed by President Obama.

Secondly, she said, “The next leg of the stool would not have happened without the president’s leadership and courage, and that is the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,'” the U.S. military’s policy barring service members from being open about their homosexuality while serving in the armed forces. That policy was repealed by President Obama in 2011 after a federal court judge issued an injunction banning its enforcement.
Third on the list was same-sex marriage.
“Another piece of our agenda was to promote marriage equality in our country. Legislatively, we couldn’t really succeed,” Pelosi lamented.
Rather, she said, U.S. courts and the Supreme Court handed them that “victory” in 2015.
“But the courts and the rest, and public opinion, of course, in the actual courts and in the court of the public opinion, that victory has been won,” she declared.
Watch Pelosi’s comments:
00:26
01:52
 
Finally, Pelosi said, there’s the fourth goal in the Democrats’ plan.
“There’s one other piece, which is ENDA [Employment Non-Discrimination Act, precursor to HR 3185], ending discrimination in the workplace, which is really a very important piece of the agenda,” she said. “But as we were seeing the successes and the momentum, especially of the marriage equality, we saw the opportunity to do something bigger.”
Pelosi said she and her colleagues have sent a letter urging Rep. Robert Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, to begin hearings on the Equality Act.
Copyright 2016 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/pelosi-unveils-democrats-4-point-plan-for-gay-agenda/#wYEBOXbx2EZTXA2R.99

Sunday, March 27, 2016

The Corrupted, Leaderless, Spineless, Senate Republicans. They Talk Big But Fold Like A 50 Cent Umbrella

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/03/Merrick-Garland-TW.jpg
Judge Merrick Garland is President Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court (Photo: Twitter)
Judge Merrick Garland is President Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court (Photo: Twitter)
WASHINGTON – Signaling a potential crack in the Senate GOP roadblock against considering Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court, Senator Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has indicated he would accept submission from the White House of the standard questionnaire for nominees.

On Friday, Grassley’s spokesperson, Beth Levine, told BuzzFeed News that the Republicans “assume the administration will fill out the standard questionnaire submitted for judicial nominations.” Levine reiterated, reported Buzzfeed, Republican leadership’s position that “a majority of the Senate has made clear that the American people should have an opportunity to weigh in on this vacancy.”
It was welcomed as a breakthrough by the White House.

“It appears that Chairman Grassley is prepared to accept a questionnaire from Judge Garland,” White House spokesperson Brandi Hoffine told BuzzFeed News Saturday. “We are heartened by this development and look forward to the Committee making this request directly to the nominee as well as to the White House, as is standard practice.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said, unequivocally, that no nominee of Obama’s to replace Justice Antonin Scalia will receive a vote. And both McConnell and Grassley have said there will not be hearings for Garland’s nomination.

Yet on Tuesday, Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois is scheduled to be the first Republican senator to meet with Garland, the senator’s office announced Friday. A day earlier, Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran said that, while he doesn’t support Garland, he believes Obama’s nominee deserves a hearing. And, for her part, Maine Sen. Susan Collins has said she will meet with Garland — and has been pushing colleagues to do so and hold hearings as well.
Copyright 2016 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/senate-republicans-begin-dance-with-garland/#sIpLTP5uUxHDCB6J.99