Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Office of Personnel Management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Office of Personnel Management. Show all posts

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Hacking Uproar Depends Upon Whose Ox Is Being Gored?



Kellyanne Conway: Where was the uproar when private citizens’ information was hacked under Obama?

 



Kellyanne Conway: Where was the uproar when private citizens’ information was hacked under Obama?
Image source: YouTube





Kellyanne Conway, special adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, appeared on “The O’Reilly Factor” Friday and reminded guest host Eric Bolling that there were data breaches under President Barack Obama’s watch — of private citizens’ information.
The bulk of the discussion centered on the report Trump received Friday from the intelligence community regarding the role of Russia in the 2016 election and their alleged attempt to influence the outcome of the election.
Conway told Bolling there was no clear evidence in the report that even one vote was “moved” away from Hillary Clinton to Trump as a result of any hacking, and agreed with Bolling that the pressure from the left to investigate the Russian “hacking” was largely political.
Conway also questioned why there was no “uproar” when the confidential information of private citizens was released following a hack of the Office of Personnel Management under Obama’s watch in 2015.
“It’s been talked about how the DNC was hacked, the Pentagon was hacked, the White House was hacked. Why wasn’t everybody in this uproar when 21 million records were hacked in our Office of Personnel Management, basically a government organ?” Conway pushed. “Twenty-one million private, confidential records of Americans, what was the punishment then? How many operatives were expelled? You know, who was up in arms?”
Watch the entire interview below:

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Oh Oh, White House Just Added More Fuel Under Hillary's Feet. Timing Is Interesting, This Comes Out Just Before She Is To Testify In Congress!

BREAKING: Obama’s White House Drops Bombshell Report Exposing Hillary… THIS IS WAR

President Barack Obama has made it clear recently that he isn’t a fan of Hillary Clinton’s bid for the White House. Most recently, the White House released a report that is sure to cause damage to Clinton’s campaign.
The U.K. Daily Mail reported that recent audit and reviews of the government found that out of all the government departments, the State Department under Hillary Clinton was the worst at protecting its computer network.
An annual report card created by the White House shows that under Clinton, the State Department was constantly below average in terms of compliance with federal cybersecurity standards.
It’s the latest sign of tension between the Obama White House and Clinton’s presidential ambition. Almost from the beginning, there have been questions about the role the Obama White House played in the Clinton email scandal. If Obama really wanted Clinton to become president, that report card would probably never have seen the light of day.
Instead, he is throwing more fuel on the fire that is quickly consuming Clinton’s reputation.

Just remember … Hillary wants to control the entire government, but she can’t even manage the State Department correctly.
“State scored a 42 out of 100 on the federal government’s latest cybersecurity report card, earning far lower marks than the Office of Personnel Management, which suffered a devastating breach last year,” the Daily Mail reported.
The State Department has pushed back against these reports, claiming that its security methods are improving.
“We have a strong cybersecurity program, successfully defeating almost 100 per cent of the 4 billion attempted intrusions we experience each year,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner said.
Almost isn’t good enough.
Emails from Clinton’s private server show that she was aware that the State Department was vastly outdated, yet she did nothing about it.
“State’s technology is so antiquated that NO ONE uses a State-issued laptop and even high officials routinely end up using their home email accounts to be able to get their work done quickly and effectively,” Ann-Marie Slaughter, a top Clinton aide, wrote in an email to Clinton on June 3, 2011.
Time and time again Hillary Clinton has proved that she is completely incapable of running the government correctly. We cannot let her become president.

Friday, July 10, 2015

At Least Ms. Archuleta Has Some Integrity! If Only Lois Lerner Would Have Been As Honorable.

Photo
Katherine Archuleta, the director of the Office of Personnel Management, at a Senate hearing last month. Ms. Archuleta resigned the post on Friday. CreditChip Somodevilla/Getty Images North America
WASHINGTON — Katherine Archuleta, the director of the Office of Personnel Management, will resign effective Friday, according to a White House official, one day after it was revealed that sweeping cyberintrusions at the agency resulted in the theft of the personal information of more than 25 million people.
Ms. Archuleta went to the White House on Friday morning to personally inform Mr. Obama of her decision, saying that she felt new leadership was needed at the federal personnel agency to enable it to “move beyond the current challenges,” the official said. The president accepted her resignation.
Beth Cobert, the deputy director of management at the Office of Management and Budget, will step in to temporarily replace Ms. Archuleta while a permanent replacement is found.
Ms. Archuleta, who assumed her post in November 2013, had been under pressure to resign since last month, when she announced the first of two separate but related computer intrusions that compromised the personal information of 4.2 million current and former federal workers, including Social Security numbers, addresses, health and financial histories and other private details.
On Thursday, she divulged the breach had also led to the theft of personal data of 21.5 million people who had applied for government background checks, likely affecting anyone subjected to such an investigation since 2000.
On a conference call detailing the scope of the intrusion late Thursday afternoon, Ms. Archuleta, the first Latina director of the agency, insisted she would not step down despite calls from members of Congress in both parties that she do so.
She served in the Clinton administration, and later under Mr. Obama as the chief of staff of the Labor Department. When she started at the personnel agency in 2013, she unveiled a plan of action that included technology upgrades to its antiquated computer systems and bolstering protections against cyber intrusions.
“We have a very aggressive push to enhance our cyber security and modernize our systems, and we will continue to do so,” she said Thursday. “I am committed to the work that I am doing at O.P.M.”

Thursday, July 9, 2015

Government Is NOT Protecting Our Identities. What Should We Do? Do We Have Redress? Have You Been Hacked?




Photo

Katherine Archuleta, director of the Office of Personnel Management, right, at hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last month. CreditMark Wilson/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Office of Personnel Management revealed on Thursday that “sensitive information” about 21.5 million people was obtained last year by hackers who intruded into its computer networks.
The agency said the incident was separate from, but related to, a previous breach that compromised the personnel data of 4.2 million federal employees.
The extent of the breach announced on Thursday included 19.7 million people who had applied for background investigations and 1.8 million others who were mostly their spouses or cohabitants.
The agency said in a statement that a forensic investigation had concluded “with high confidence” that the individuals’ information, including Social Security numbers, was stolen from background investigation databases. Some of the records included material from interviews conducted by background checkers, and about 1.1 million of them included fingerprints.
In a blog post on Thursday, Katherine Archuleta, the agency’s director, said she was taking a series of steps in response to the hacking, including creating a cybersecurity adviser position at the agency, consulting with private-sector experts on technological threats and establishing an online cybersecurity incident resource center. She also said the office would offer credit and identity theft monitoring and protection services to those whose information was compromised.
“It is critical that all of O.P.M.’s constituents – most importantly, those who are directly impacted by these breaches – receive information in a timely, transparent and accurate manner,” Ms. Archuleta wrote. “As I have said before, we take these incidents extremely seriously and, accordingly, are taking a number of steps to address both our cybersecurity and our process going forward.”

Thursday, June 25, 2015

You Expect The White House To Tell The Truth? Of Course They Lie About Everything. It's The Old Saying "If Their Lips Are Moving, They Are Lying."

WSJ: White House Knowingly Minimized Scope of Suspected Chinese Hack

By Newsmax Wires   |   Wednesday, 24 Jun 2015 12:16 PM
The White House made a tactical decision to define a cyber attack on the Office of Personnel Management as two distinct breaches, which allowed the administration to publicly deny that many more millions of highly-sensitive employee documents were taken,The Wall Street Journal reports.

The FBI has been investigating the hack, which multiple officials believe was carried out by the Chinese, and have long known that both personnel files and security clearance forms were stolen. The latter contain sensitive information about government employees and contractors -- information that foreign spy agencies could use to target U.S. intelligence operations, the Journal reports.

The White House house at first said some four million employees were affected but as of this week, that numbered has ballooned to as many as 18 million unique social security numbers, OPM Director Katherine Archuleta  said on Wednesday during testimony at the Capitol, though she cautioned that the numbers were unverified and preliminary.

The administration decision to define the hack as two breaches has significant implications, according to the Journal:

"That had major implications for the initial description of damage. Rather than saying the hack implicated the private details of an estimated 18 million people—and potentially millions more if you count the relatives and close friends listed on the security clearance forms—the agency said about four million people were potentially affected."

Senators said they doubt the government’s personnel office understands the breadth of a computer hack that exposed the records of more than 4 million federal workers, or that the agency can stop another breach.“OPM is having a difficult time completing its forensics work to determine exactly” how many people were affected, Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, said after the briefing. “I would wager that in the end it’s going to be significantly more than the 4.2 million.”
OPM has taken 23 steps, including installing more firewalls and mandating cybersecurity training, to shore up its networks since Archuleta became director, the agency said in a report released Wednesday. Going forward, OPM will hire a new cybersecurity adviser and consider encrypting more data to guard against hackers, the report said.
Federal officials familiar with the breach first announced June 4 have said that hackers connected to the Chinese government are believed to be responsible, but the Obama administration has declined to publicly blame any nation. The hack, in which intruders gained access to forms recording personal information about people who apply for security clearances, is one of the largest and most serious in the government’s history.
“If there’s a smoking gun, it appears to be held in the arms of our Chinese friends,” Senator Tom Carper, a Delaware Democrat, said after the briefing.
Senators Compromised
Among the employees whose records may have been accessed are U.S. senators, Collins said. She said she and at least three colleagues she declined to name had received letters from OPM warning that their personal data were compromised.
Collins said she followed the agency’s instructions and signed up online for identity theft and credit monitoring.
“It’s like, ’Boy, I hope they bothered to encrypt this one,’” she said. “I don’t know whether I’ve added to my problem or whether I’ve solved it.”
Senators exiting the meeting declined to assign blame to Archuleta or other federal officials for the hack. Stephanie O’Sullivan, principal deputy director of national intelligence, and Jeh Johnson, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, also briefed the senators.
Director’s Fate
Former Florida governor Jeb Bush, a Republican presidential candidate, said Tuesday on Twitter that he would have fired Archuleta. The breach wasn’t discovered for months after hackers first gained access to OPM data.
Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Maryland Democrat, said after the briefing she didn’t believe Archuleta should be asked to resign.
Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, said earlier on Tuesday that the hack underscores the need for legislation to boost the government’s online defenses.
“My concern is to get cybersecurity legislation through,” Feinstein said, adding that she was “hopeful” the Senate could consider such a measure following next week’s July 4 break.

Information from Bloomberg was used in this report.

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Tuesday, October 21, 2014

What A Country! Federal Works Paid NOT To Work.


Feds paid thousands of workers to stay home

Over the course of three years, the federal government paid workers about $775 million to stay home, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office.
The GAO report reveals that 57,000 federal workers were paid not to work for a month or longer between October 2010 and September 2013. Aside from receiving pay, the sidelined workers continued to accrue pensions, time off and opportunities for pay scale increases.
Via The Washington Post, which originally obtained the forthcoming GAO report:
The GAO report almost certainly understates the extent and cost of administrative leave because the figures examined by the auditors were incomplete. Not all government agencies keep track of the practice, and those reviewed account for only about three-fifths of the federal workforce.
The Office of Personnel Management rule book lists dozens of reasons for allowing paid leave, such as donating an organ, house-hunting before a job transfer, and attending the funeral of a relative in the military. Snow days also are permitted.
But these require only a few hours or days — not the months and years that GAO discovered are common at more than 100 federal agencies including the Defense and Treasury departments.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Once Again Lack Of Government Supervision

The government at its very worst. The inspector general of the Office of Personnel Management has decided that the firm that did Snowden's background investigation has been misleading the government for years. In other words, how many other Snowden's are out there that have not found their way into the news?


This government malfeasance must be rooted out and destroyed.  If the watchdogs are not watching the hen house, why pay for them?

Conservative Tom


Inspector General: Snowden Background Check Firm Misled Government

Friday, 28 Jun 2013 10:51 AM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
USIS, the federal contractor which screened National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden for top-secret clearance, has misled the government for years about how it performs background checks, federal investigators claim.

Now the inspector general of the Office of Personnel Management is working with the Justice Department to determine if USIS failed to meet agreements to conduct thorough reviews of all investigations, reports The Washington Post.

The Virginia-based company was required to conduct an initial background check for candidates for employment, and then to do a second review to make sure no details were missed. However, the inspector general found that from 2008-2011, USIS may have skipped the second review in up to half the cases, even though it claimed to federal officials the reviews were made.

The allegations are serious enough that a federal watchdog plans to recommend OPM cut all ties with USIS unless it can prove it performs responsibly.

Because USIS is the largest private provider, this could present problems for government security clearances and result in a logjam, the Post reported.

Investigators said the USIS shortcut made the company appear to be even more efficient, and may have brought the company some incentive awards.

USIS last week said it got a subpoena from the inspector general in January 2012, and "has cooperated fully with the government's investigative effort." However, it has not commented on the Snowden case.

USIS says it has 100 contracts to provide services for at least 95 federal agencies, including the departments of Justice, State, Homeland Security, and Defense, along with about a dozen intelligence agencies, including NSA and the National Reconnaissance Office.

The company checked Snowden's background in 2011, and cleared him to work at NSA contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, the company that employed him when he obtained the agency's documents. Office of Personnel Management Inspector General Patrick McFarland said in a Congressional hearing on June 20 that he has concerns about Snowden's background check, and revealed an investigation was underway.

The concerns about background checks aren't only hitting USIS. McFarland's office reports it has 47 open investigations into several backgrounds checks providers.

Since 2006, the watchdog office has won convictions in 18 cases after employees said they verified information that turned out to be false or not checked at all, reports The Post.

"There is an alarmingly insufficient level of oversight of the federal investigative-services program," McFarland told the congressional hearing. "A lack of independent verification of the organization that conducts these important background investigations is a clear threat to national security."

Democratic Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill has claimed USIS is under a criminal probe. Her spokesman said Thursday she is standing by that statement.

Meanwhile Democratic Sen. John Tester of Montana, the chair of a Homeland Security subcommittee plans to introduce legislation to increase oversight of the security clearance process.

"I cannot believe that this is handled in such a shoddy and cavalier manner," Tester said Thursday. "We have spent hundreds of billions in this country trying to keep classified information classified and to keep people from outside coming in. And what we see here is that we have a problem from the inside."



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/snowden-background-check-misled/2013/06/28/id/512493?s=al&promo_code=14016-1#ixzz2XXna5qqx
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!