Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Pataki. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pataki. Show all posts

Sunday, December 6, 2015

Who Should Loretta Lynch Prosecute First? She Effectively Ends Freedom Of Speech.

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/02/loretta-lynch.jpg
Loretta Lynch
Loretta Lynch
If Attorney General Loretta Lynch plans to keep her promise made to a Muslim legal group to prosecute “anti-Muslim” speech – a promise delivered the night following the massacre of 14 Americans in San Bernardino by Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik – she may want to begin with two Republican former office holders.
Both are delivering online rants against Islam and are daring Lynch to charge them.
As WND reported, Lynch, speaking at a dinner held by the Muslim Advocates, a national legal advocacy group, did not directly address the San Bernardino shootings at the event, but said there had been a “very disturbing rise in anti-Muslim rhetoric” across America since the Paris shootings three weeks before.
Assuring the pro-Muslim group that “we stand with you,” Lynch said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination and vowed to prosecute anyone guilty of what she described as violence-inspiring speech.
“The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence,” she said. “My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.”
She continued, “When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

That threat against the First Amendment is not sitting well with former Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh, a Republican who served in Congress from 2011 to 2013 and who now hosts a radio program.
In a video posted to his Facebook page, Walsh slammed both Islam and Lynch.
“I think Islam has a real freaking problem, alright? There is a cancer in Islam, and if they’re not going to learn to assimilate, I don’t want them in this country,” he said.
“You got a problem, Loretta Lynch, with me saying that? Then throw me in jail. I think Islam is evil. I think Islam has a huge problem. I think most Muslims around the world are not compatible with American values. I don’t want them here.”
View Walsh’s video here:
Walsh continued his challenge to Lynch in comments posted to his Facebook page.
"Muslims are killing us in the streets. I am unafraid to tell the truth. C'mon Loretta Lynch, ARREST ME!
"The day after Muslim terrorists killed 14 Americans, Attorney General Loretta Lynch vowed to prosecute anyone who uses 'anti-Muslim rhetoric' that 'edges toward violence.'
"What the hell does that mean? I have a 1st Amendment right, Ms Lynch, to say whatever I want about Muslims.
You want to try and prosecute me for what I say? I dare you. Here goes:
"Most Muslims around the world are terrorists, support terrorism, and/or support Shariah law. They are our enemy. I don't want them in America. Any Muslim that won't assimilate should get the hell out of America. Any Muslim that is a terrorist or supports terrorism should be killed. If 'moderate' Muslims don't speak out against terrorism, they are our enemy and we should call them out and kick them out of this country. I hope there is a backlash against Muslims because Islam, as practiced by most Muslims, is not a religion of peace, and all of us who do live in peace should do whatever we can to defeat Islam.
"There Ms. Lynch. As an American, I have a right to say everything I just did. And I will continue to speak the truth about Islam in the hopes that others will wake up to this truth and do what we can to defeat this evil in our midst.
"Is that 'anti-Muslim rhetoric' that 'edges toward violence'? Go ahead and prosecute me. I dare you."
Former New York Gov. George Pataki, a 2016 Republican candidate for president, upped the ante with a tweet calling for the death of Islamic radicals.
"We must declare war on radical Islam. @LorettaLynch I'm not edging toward violent speech, I'm declaring we kill them. Go ahead, arrest me."
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/12/pataki_tweet_islam.jpg
pataki_tweet_islam
It remains to see if Walsh or Pataki have crossed Lynch's line in the sand.
Since Lynch gave assurances to the Muslim group, president Obama has acknowledged "acts of terror" were committed in San Bernardino and has scheduled an address to the nation to be broadcast from the Oval Office Sunday evening.
Copyright 2015 WND

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

GOP Candidates With Low Numbers Should Drop Out

See Which GOP Candidate Has Run Out Of Money

Screen Shot 2015-08-12 at 4.56.59 PMThe race towards the Oval Office is an expensive endeavor.
It’s estimated billions of dollars are going to be spent in order to determine who becomes the commander in chief come 2016.
Personal finances can help power a campaign… i.e. Donald Trump and his refusal to accept donations, but most have to fund their campaigns via donors.
Well it looks like one of the leading nominees has plum run out of money. He’s gong to keep running, he’ll just stop paying his campaign staff is what the reports tells us.
IJ Review writes:
Rick Perry, the former Texas governor now seeking the GOP nomination for president in 2016, is no longer paying his campaign staffers in South Carolina, National Journal reported on Monday evening.
The move to stop paying campaign staff raises serious funding concerns in an already crowded and financially scarce Republican field. Perry’s South Carolina state director Katon Dawson alluded to the status of the campaign in an interview:
“Pay is only one reason people do this… We’ll be able to live off the land for a while.” pay,” Dawson said staffers have been paid as recently as two weeks ago.
But the report of a compensation freeze remains daunting. The campaign has raised only $1.07 million, a far cry from GOP juggernauts like former Florida governor Jeb Bush and Texas Senator Ted Cruz.
At the time of the financial report detailing Perry’s first haul of 2015, campaign manager Jeff Miller said:
“Governor Perry is well positioned and between the campaign and independent sources, the necessary funds will be in place to run a competitive, successful campaign.”
In addition to the more than $1 million raised, Perry-supporting super PACs, which are not directly affiliated with the campaign, have reported much larger numbers.
According to a senior advisor for the super PACs, the two groups raised a combined $17 million in support of Perry.
Perry has been struggling in the major polls as of late, failing to clinch the number ten spot, which would have placed him in the primetime debate last Thursday. Instead, Ohio governor John Kasich squeezed into the bout, relegating Perry to the “happy hour” debate that took place earlier in the evening.
Many argue men like Perry, Petaki, Graham etc. should just drop out now so they can help narrow the field of candidates.
And for Perry to press on even though his campaign is on life support really does beg the question of why he’d want to continue?
As one commenter on IJ Reviews article wrote “Perry needs to drop out and put his support behind his fellow Texan Cruz”
The truth of the matter is so long as the GOP field remains solidly conservative then the U.S. looks to be in good hands.
Hillary’s campaign seems to be de-stabilizing in front of us, Bernie Sanders will never gain the kind of momentum needed to mount a serious campaign…so now it’s just a waiting game to see who becomes the front runner.
Who do you think it’s going to be?

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Hillary And Staff Played Quick And Loose With The Lies About Benghazi. This Should Disqualify Her From The Presidency.

Emails Show Clinton's Aides Ran Interference During Benghazi

Saturday, 07 Mar 2015 09:41 AM
By Newsmax Wires
Two of Hillary Clinton's top aides ran interference while the 2012 Benghazi terrorism attacks were going on, the former secretary of state's emails, obtained through a Judicial Watch federal lawsuit, reveal.

The aides named were Clinton's main gatekeeper, Philippe Reines, and Cheryl Mills, who has worked with Clinton for years, reports Fox News. They mainly show Mills' role in how the events rolled out publicly.

"Cheryl Mills was instrumental in making sure the big lie was put out there," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

While the assault was happening that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and several other embassy staff, Mills told then-State Department Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland to quit answering reporters' questions about Stevens' status, the emails show.

Further, the emails contained references to a "Benghazi Group," which a diplomatic source told Fox News was a inside code name for Mills' task force, which handled damage control.

Judicial Watch has not received emails to or from Clinton herself from the night of the attack, Fitton said.

“You have to wonder whether these aides went offline and were using secret accounts to communicate with her about the Benghazi attack," he said.

The emails are emerging while Clinton, the frontrunner among potential 2016 Democratic nominee candidates, is being criticized over revelations that she used a personal email account through a private server during her entire tenure as secretary of state.

She has asked State to make thousands of emails she has turned over to the department public, reports Fox.

The State Department said Friday it will review the emails but denied being pressured to remove politically damaging revelations ahead of her likely presidential run. Clinton, the presumed Democratic frontrunner for 2016, found herself in a political furor this week when it was revealed she conducted her official email business from a personal account on a private email server connected to her New York home.
Latest News Update

Pressure has mounted, particularly from Republican adversaries, for Clinton to release the entirety of her email correspondence.
Deputy State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf acknowledged the agency was reviewing the emails "for public release," in accordance with the guidelines of formal US Freedom of Information Act requests.
Harf was vague about whether reviewers intended to report sensitive but unclassified material in their findings should they come across such detail in the emails.
"I'm not going to speculate on what might happen in that situation," she said.
"I'm not going to prejudge the outcome of the review for release of the 55,000 pages."
Asked whether there was political pressure from the White House, or those in Clinton's orbit, to scrub information that could potentially damage a Clinton campaign, Harf said: "No. No."
Team Clinton has been barraged by Republican accusations that she set up the private system to prevent politically sensitive material from going public.
Former New York governor George Pataki, a potential 2016 Clinton rival, called it "outrageous" behavior and poor judgment from a national figure.
"We don't know what sort of classified information that Clinton may have... shared with others," Pataki told CNN.

Harf declined to provide details when pressed whether the State Department made efforts to improve the security of Clinton's email server at her home, or provided strict guidance to Clinton for keeping her emails secure.
On Wednesday, the House of Representatives panel investigating the deadly attacks in Benghazi announced it had issued subpoenas for Clinton's emails, prompting accusations by Democrats that Republican leaders were "targeting secretary Clinton for political reasons."


Related Stories:
© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.