Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label UN Security Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN Security Council. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

We Love Nikki!

Nikki Haley Sets UN on Fire: If You Don’t Move, Our Military Will

Nikki Haley Sets UN on Fire: If You Don't Move, Our Military Will
 
 Print
One of the pleasantly surprising bright spots of President Donald Trump’s administration has been the appointment of Nikki Haley as the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, who has taken a decidedly blunt and no-nonsense, call-it-like-we-see-it American attitude to the international organization.
Haley delivered yet another fiery speech to the U.N. Security Council on Monday, in which she placed the council on notice for its utter failure to maintain a temporary cease-fire agreement in Syria. She explicitly called out Russia and Syria, as well as Iran, for their roles in the continued fighting in violation of a recent Security Council resolution, according to TheBlaze.
Her eight-minute speech boiled down to one pointed message: If the U.N. doesn’t do anything to address the contempt with which the Security Council resolution was treated by Russia and Syria, the U.S. military will.
As Haley began, she noted all of the promises made by Russia in regard to enforcing the resolution which imposed a 30-day cease-fire in the area of Ghouta, a suburb of Damascus, and pointed out how fighting and bombing was still ongoing in spite of the agreement that Russia claimed to support.
She further noted that Russia and Syria had taken advantage of a “loophole” in the agreement that allowed for military action against terrorist organizations like al-Qaida and the Islamic State group by essentially declaring all opposition groups and civilians in Ghouta to be “terrorists” and open to attack.

Conservative Tribune Daily Email

Facebook
 
“This is no cease-fire,” Haley asserted. “This is the Assad regime, Iran and Russia continuing to wage war against their political opponents.”
“If we can’t save families that haven’t seen the sun for weeks because they have been hiding underground to escape barrel bombs,” she continued, “then the Security Council is as impotent as its worst critics say it is.”
“When the international community consistently fails to act, there are times when states are compelled to take their own action,” Haley said, as she reminded the council of the U.S. missile strikes in April 2017 in response to Syrian chemical attacks on civilians.
“We warn any nation that is determined to impose its will through chemical attacks and inhuman suffering, most especially the outlaw Syrian regime, the United States remains prepared to act if we must,” she added. “It is not the path we prefer, but it is a path we have demonstrated we will take, and we are prepared to take again.”
You can watch Haley’s tough speech right here. Take note of the tone and occasional sharp side-eye toward the Russian and Syrian representatives as she calls them out for their duplicity in front of the spineless council.
UN Security Council Meeting On The Ceasefire In Syria
 
According to The Hill, Haley’s warning to the U.N. Security Council came amid reports heavy fighting and bombings in and around Ghouta — which were preventing the delivery of humanitarian aid and evacuation of sick and wounded civilians from the besieged city — as well as allegations of chemical attacks using chlorine gas in the area.

Do you approve of the job Nikki Haley has done as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.?

   
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It is worth noting that Haley was not entirely alone in her threat to the U.N. that the U.S. would take military action to enforce the cease-fire if necessary. Defense Secretary James Mattis informed the Syrian government that “it would be unwise for them to use weaponized gas” in response to the alleged chemical attacks, and added that Trump had “full political maneuver room” to take any sort of action he deemed necessary to bring peace to the war-torn region.
RELATED: Trump Just Revealed Why He Uses Marines in His Admin, and We Couldn’t Agree More
Haley was also backed up by none other than French President Emmanuel Macron, who stated recently at a news conference in India in response to the alleged chemical attacks in Ghouta that France was prepared to carry out airstrikes and other military action to halt the travesty and enforce the cease-fire.
Haley, on behalf of Trump, has made it crystal clear to the U.N. that the era of “strategic patience” and leading from behind are over and done with, and if the international community doesn’t see fit to do what must be done to obtain peace and stability, America has no problem rolling up her sleeves to do what is necessary.
Please share this on Facebook so everyone can see how Nikki Haley just put Russia, Syria, Iran and the rest of the U.N. Security Council on notice for their failure to uphold an agreed-upon temporary cease-fire in Syria.
What do you think of what Nikki Haley had to say?

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Trump's Strong Position Forces "Little Kim" To Back Down.


Kim Jong Un Backs Down In Showdown With Trump


(Ryan Pickrell, Daily Caller News Foundation) North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un decided Tuesday not to fire ballistic missiles at Guam, reserving the right to change his mind if “the Yankees persist in their extremely dangerous reckless actions,” according to North Korean state media.
Kim Jong-un  photo
Photo by driver Photographer (CC)
Kim appears to be attempting to de-escalate tensions to prevent conflict between the U.S. and North Korea. After the U.N. Security Council approved tougher sanctions against North Korea for its intercontinental ballistic missile tests, the North warned Wednesday that it was considering launching a salvo of ballistic missiles into waters around Guam in a show of force demonstrating an ability to surround the island with “enveloping fire.” That same day, President Donald Trump stressedthat North Korean threats will be met with “fire and fury like nothing the world has ever seen.” For a week, the two sides hurled threats and warnings at each other repeatedly, leading some observers to conclude that the two sides were close to nuclear war.
But, Kim blinked.
Kim, according to North Korean state media, told the North Korean strategic rocket force that he “would watch a little more the foolish and stupid conduct of the Yankees,” giving the U.S. time to reassess the situation. “He said that he wants to advise the U.S. to take into full account gains and losses with clear head whether the prevailing situation is more unfavorable for any party.”
“In order to defuse the tensions and prevent the dangerous military conflict on the Korean peninsula, it is necessary for the U.S. to make a proper option first and show it through action,” North Korean state media explained Tuesday. “The U.S. should stop at once arrogant provocations against the DPRK and unilateral demands and not provoke it any longer,” it added. North Korea often presents the cessation of hostilities against it as the terms for de-escalation.
While lowering his sword, the young North Korean dictator stressed that he may still carry out his plan if the U.S. does not change its approach to his country.
Kim stated “that if the Yankees persist in their extremely dangerous reckless actions on the Korean peninsula and in its vicinity, testing the self-restraint of the DPRK, the latter will make an important decision as it already declared, warning the U.S. that it should think reasonably and judge properly not to suffer shame that it is hit by the DPRK.”
Amid the bluster and threats, a norm for North Korea, it is quite clear Pyongyang is taking a step back from its initial warnings while maintaining the right to change course and follow through on the original plan if deemed necessary.
Kim, having reviewed the plans and decided against immediate action, may be signaling that he is open to a diplomatic resolution, which the Trump administration has been adamantly pursuing in hopes of avoiding a very costly military alternative.
Republished with permission from the Daily Caller News Foundation via iCopyright license

Friday, April 14, 2017

So Much For Trump Being Owned By The Russians


Tillerson Says Relations Between US And Russia Have Reached ‘New Low’

"The world's two foremost nuclear powers cannot have..."

 Print

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson told Russian President Vladimir Putin “the current state of U.S.-Russia relations is at a low point” at a two-hour meeting in Moscow Wednesday. 
The pronouncement was highlighted by the Russian’s decision to veto a U.S. backed UN Security Council resolution condemning the Assad regime for last week’s chemical weapon attack.
“There is a low level of trust between our two countries. The world’s two foremost nuclear powers cannot have this kind of relationship,” Tillerson said in a news conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. 

Tillerson stated the issue of Syria was discussed in his meetings with both Lavrov and Putin.
Russia called the United States cruise missile strike against a Syria air base “a disgraceful act” and a “significant blow” to U.S./Russian relations last week.
Moscow vowed at the time that further military strikes against the Assad regime by the United States would not go unchallenged militarily.
00:00
00:39
On Wednesday, Tillerson said Russia and the United States plan to establish a “working group” to rehabilitate relations between the two nations.
“We had a lengthy exchange of views regarding the situation in Syria and shared perspectives on possible ways forward,” Tillerson said. 
The secretary of state defended Trump’s characterization of Assad as “an animal,” saying “it is one that President Assad has brought upon himself.”
Lavrov did not share this assessment calling instead for an investigation into whether the Assad regime truly conducted the chemical weapon attack.

TRENDING STORIES
He stated at the joint press conference: “The negotiations have proven to be substantial and very frank. They have comprised a whole gamut of issues, bilateral relations as well as our interaction in the international arena.”
On Wednesday, Russia vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning the sarin gas strike that killed at least 80 civilians including women and children.



Breaking News: Russia blocks UN Security Council resolution condemning Syria chemical attack; China abstains in vote.

Russian Deputy U.N. Ambassador Vladimir Safronkov said the Western draft resolution “does not serve a useful purpose.”
What do you think?