Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label University of Missouri. Show all posts
Showing posts with label University of Missouri. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

You Can Take The Muslim Out Of Libya But You Can't Take Libya Out Of The Muslim

Benghazi Born Professor at THIS
State University Does the Unthinkable


  • Dec 1, 2015 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN Staff
A professor with an interesting birthplace is in hot water for doing the unspeakable this week:
Youssif Omar saw his teenage female relative walking to Hickman High School in Columbia, Missouri without the traditional Islamic headscarf.
According to the Daily Mail, he assaulted the girl by slapping her across the face, dragged her violently by the hair down a flight of stairs and into his car, and drove away.

Omar was arrested for child abuse the following day and was released on a $4,500 bond.

According to his now defunct LinkedIn page, Omar was an assistant professor at

the University of Missouri and manager of Artifacts Journal at the University

bookstore. The school said that he was a graduate student with an assistantship

that ended in July.

Originally from Benghazi, Libya, Omar was the head of the English department

at the University of Benghazi Wahat Branch from 2003-2007.
Colleges were once fertile breeding ground for the discussion of both experimental and
 foundational western cultural ideals. Now that they've completed their transformation to
 brain scrambling day care facilities for maladjusted milennials, little in the way of culture
 remains. In such a vaccuum, savages run wild.

If this professor would like to live by these particularly heinous, barbaric cultural norms,
 perhaps he should consider going home. 
 Source: AAN
- See more at: http://americanactionnews.com/articles/benghazi-born-professor-at-this-state-university-does-the-unthinkable#sthash.kK2oEDI6.dpuf

Friday, November 20, 2015

Rape And Abortion Are Two Different Things

Mizzou Student Asks Ben Shapiro if Abortion Should Be Legal in Cases of Rape — See the Reply He Gets

A University of Missouri college student asked conservative pundit Ben Shapiro Thursday night if abortion should be permitted in cases of rape — and the New York Times bestselling author had a blunt response to the question.
Shapiro, who said that rapists should either be killed or castrated, said the issue of rape and abortion were “unrelated” to one another.
“Killing babies is wrong. Okay, these are two separate questions,” he told the Mizzou student. “They have nothing to do with one another. Connecting these two things is like saying, ‘I was raped, therefore I get to go shoot an unrelated person.’”
Watch the exchange (remarks around 12:48 mark):
The “Bullies” author argued that the political left often asks about rape while discussing abortion to introduce confusion.
“The two are unrelated. It’s an emotional argument to muddy the waters,” he said. “It’s amazing to me because the same people on the left who say, ‘Well, shouldn’t a raped woman be allowed to abort her baby?’ These are the same people who want to release rapists from prison after five years.”
Shapiro told students that the best way to decrease the frequency of rape would be to implement strict punishment for those found guilty of committing the crime.
“If you really want to stop this from happening, here’s a solution: go prosecute, castrate and kill rapists,” he said. “That’s a really good solution.”
“I have another solution,” Shapiro added. “Let women carry guns and teach them how to use them. So any time they are in a position of rape, they shoot the guy. The left’s solution seems to be to stop the baby, my solution is to stop the rape.”
Shapiro’s talk at the University of Missouri was, in part, sponsored by the conservative Young America’s Foundation.

Friday, November 13, 2015

Is A New Mao Revolution Starting On Campuses

The Cultural Revolution Comes to America’s Campuses

by Roger L Simon
NOVEMBER 13, 2015 - 5:10 AM
melissa_click_mao_ivy_wall_11-12-15-2
Today’s undergraduates probably know little, if anything, about the cataclysmic movement in China known as the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. It began in 1966 before all of them (and even a great number of their professors) were born. This massive national crusade, instigated by Chairman Mao Zedong, was intended to create a pure communist man and woman, devoid of the constraints of materialism and personal ambition.
It started with the closing of the schools and the re-education of intellectuals and the bourgeoisie and ended up with years of incredible violence, taking millions of lives. The actual statistics are still a state secret, but a recent biography of Mao states “at least 3 million people died violent deaths and post-Mao leaders acknowledged that 100 million people, one-ninth of the entire population, suffered in one way or another.”
I got a personal look at the remnants of the Cultural Revolution in 1979 when on an “activist’s” tour of China. The country was still extraordinarily impoverished and primitive. Propagandistic thought control was everywhere, broadcast on loudspeakers and splayed out on ubiquitous billboards urging the masses to “Criticize Lin Biao and Confucius” (Lin Biao was a former ally, then competitor, of Mao’s who died in a mysterious plane crash) or “Smash the Gang of Four,” one of whom was Mao’s wife, then in disrepute. Whenever you asked a question of your interpreters, even a bland one, you got a rote response. Everyone was too timid to say anything the slightest bit controversial. Newspeak reigned. It was like living in Orwell’s 1984 five years early.
So you will excuse me if, from the outset, when I heard how our college campuses were being overtaken with these new-fangled “trigger warnings” and “microagressions,” perfect Maoist terminology for our computerized times, it immediately gave me the heebie-jeebies. Thought control, via political correctness, had come to America in the very spot it had begun in China — the schools.
Recent events at the University of Missouri and Yale (where I attended graduate school), plus now other institutions, have only increased my apprehension. It’s not  at the level of the Cultural Revolution — professors haven’t been asked to wear dunce caps yet and no one (to my knowledge) has been killed — but the portents are not reassuring.
Mob rule, not anything close to democracy, is at play. The so-called SJWs (Social Justice Warriors) seem to be functioning as early avatars of the infamous Red Guard, bullying and then threatening violence to anyone whose thoughts run outside what is deemed to be correct.
College professors and administrators quiver in their path. In the case of Mizzou, the president resignedbefore any concrete evidence of racism was made manifest. It still hasn’t been days later. At dear old Yale, it’s even more bizarre because there were no imputations of racism in the first place, only that there might have been or might be. Forget Bull Connor and the KKK, inappropriate Halloween costumes were the new danger. It was all about having a “safe space” so  feelings wouldn’t be hurt, as if the world could be perfect and the human species remade for an extraordinarily fragile generation of coddled students.
Some people ridicule these students as “snowflakes” unable to stand up to the slightest discomfiting words or images. But it is far worse than that. These so-called “snowflakes” are the potential shock troops of the aforementioned Red Guard, American style. There is a fine line between the extreme entitlement that demands to be warned before reading Ovid’s Metamorphoses (as happened recently at Columbia) and a kind of narcissistic rage acting out against any presumed enemy in its path. How do you think the CR actually happened in China? Yes, the country was significantly poorer, but the psychological evolution was strikingly similar.
So think twice if you don’t think it could happen here. Who would have thought the president of one of our great public universities would lose his job in part because someone said he saw a swastika written in feces on one of the bathroom walls, which now, suddenly, no one can find and might have been a photograph in the first place, if it ever existed?
As we say in Hollywood, it’s “The Crucible Meets Animal Farm,” the Salem witch trials meets four legs good, two legs bad.  But the professors who teach those anti-fascist masterworks aren’t doing anything to defend against it. Lobotomized by political correctness they attempt to be even-handed, in the way many did with Mao and Stalin.  The same results await them.
And we citizens sit outside our great universities and watch the conflagration.  It’s only just begun.

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Mizzou Professor Says It Like It Is!

See the Email Mizzou Professor Sent to Students That Resulted in Him Turning in His Resignation

A popular professor at the University of Missouri turned in his resignation Wednesday after igniting controversy when he refused to cancel class for students who claimed to feel unsafe visiting campus.
Image source: University of Missouri via NBC News
Image source: University of Missouri via NBC News
Dale Brigham, an associate professor of nutrition and exercise physiology, wrote in an email to his students that a previously scheduled exam would be held as planned.
“If you don’t feel safe coming to class, then don’t come to class,” Brigham wrote his students in an emailobtained by Campus Reform. “I will be there, and there will be an exam administered in our class,” he continued, imploring his students to stand up to the bullies on campus. “If you give into bullies, they win. The only way bullies are defeated is by standing up to them.”
Image source: Campus Reform
Image source: Campus Reform
Many students have said they don’t feel safe visiting campus as racial tension increases following the resignation of the university president.
After sending the message to his students, Brigham faced intense backlash on social media. Students hurled insults at him while others called for him to be fired.
Facing pressure, Brigham sent a followup email to students notifying them that the exam had been canceled and he would resign his position.
Image source: Campus Reform
Image source: Campus Reform
A spokesperson for the university, however, told KOMU-TV that the school would not accept his resignation.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Colleges Descend Into PC Chaos

University of Missouri and 

Yale Show What Mob Rule 

Looks Like in Higher Education

Students gather on the University of Missouri campus to show support for Jonathan L. Butler, a 25-year-old graduate student who held a hunger strike for seven days, until his university president resigned. (Photo: Bill Greenbklatt/UPI/Newscom)
America’s universities are supposed to be places 
where students can get an education. The vast 
majority of students want that. Some, however, 
do not. They want a “safe space” where their 
strange ideas about society can be aired 
without criticism, and where they can 
unilaterally punish other students for failing to toe the mass line. These student activists want blood.
At Yale University, last week, a number of 
members of the Black Student Alliance physically surrounded an administrator and 
berated him for standing up for free speech 
and are now demanding his resignation. 
Caught on camera, one can easily see 
how dangerous the situation was.
In another example, the president of the 
University of Missouri, Tim Wolfe, has resigned. 
His resignation comes after more than 
30 members of the football team threatened
 not to play unless he was forced out. Their claim 
was that, in unspecified ways, Wolfe failed to 
eradicate “structural racism” on campus.
These situations have much in common, and
 the story is becoming a familiar on
First, both situations involve student activists 
disrupting education, allegedly on behalf of 
education. At Yale, the activists claimed that 
allowing free discourse and debate and 
challenging their assumptions threatened the
 “safe space” they thought Yale was.
At Mizzou, activists claimed that failing to deal 
with “structural racism” was harming their 
education. Both groups of students listed not
 specific harms, but rather vague interests in 
feeling good at their university.
Second, both situations involve administrators
 being asked to clamp down on the free expression
 of other students. At Yale, students were upset 
that Yale administrators were not clamping 
down on Halloween costumes. At Mizzou, students wanted more unspecified action against perceived
 racism on campus.
Third, both situations involve menacing groups 
of students that come very close to physical 
violence. At Yale, for example, students physically encircled the administrator, shouted him 
down, and got very close to him in a 
threatening manner. At Mizzou, students 
physically surrounded the car of Wolfe 
and demanded he exit the vehicle into the mob.
This pattern is becoming more prevalent on 
American campuses. In the name of education, 
education is being disrupted by intolerant 
student activists, harming the experience for
 everyone else. At my alma mater, New York
 University Law School, a small cadre of 
students is complaining about Halloween
decorations that included a man hanging 
from a noose, because such a decoration was
These students, complaining about harmless 
decorations at an optional fall party, are 
attempting to assert disruptive political 
control over all aspects of educational life.
If one accepted all of the claims and agreed
 with the political aims of the student activists,
 one might think it advisable to close such
 unrepentantly bigoted universities down.
A more moderate response by university 
officials, however, would be to take their job 
as educators seriously. If a student seeks to 
disrupt the safety or education of another 
student, punish the disruptor.
If that were to happen, colleges would once 
again become “safe spaces” for free thought and expression.
This piece has been updated to state that 
Jonathan L. Butler’s hunger strike was for 7 days.