Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Weather Underground. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weather Underground. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Antifa IS NOT The Benign Grass Roots Organization It Has Painted As Being

Left Wing Oakland 

Radicals Worked 

With ISIS, New

 Book Reports

Timothy Meads
|
Posted: Oct 29, 2017 6:20 PM
Left Wing Oakland Radicals Worked With ISIS, New Book Reports
Former Editor in Chief of the New 
York Times Magazine Edward
 Klein has a new book that will be
 released tomorrow October 30th.
Destroy Trump, Klein reveals an FBI investigation proving 
coordination between American college campus far left radicals 
and Islamic terrorists from groups such as ISIS and Al Qaeda.
What started as a secret investigation in to the “resistance” 
movement spurred by college socialists and anarchists in response
 to Trump's political rise, led to the discovery of what the FBI is calling 
the “the greatest challenge to law enforcement since the Weather Underground and the Black Panther Party.”
“There is clearly overwhelming evidence that there are growing

ties between U.S. radicals and the Islamic State, as well as

several [ISIS] offshoots and splinter groups,' stated the FBI field report, which was delivered to Acting Director Andrew McCabe

on July 11, 2017, and which is being published for the first

Last summer the FBI began investigating international radical 
groups such as ANTIFA and other anarchist groups. However, 
activity from organizations in Oakland piqued the interest of authorities.
Klein’s book details the revelations.
“Now that the bureau has determined they have followers in the radical U.S. resistance movement in the United States, it is clear there will be additional violence in the attacks on law enforcement and U.S. institutions, including banks.
“Ties between three key leaders of the Oakland group [names redacted] met in Hamburg with a leader of the AQAP [Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula] and the AQIM [Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb],' the report continued. 'The leader from AQAP is an Egyptian-born male [name redacted] who is known to be in charge of finances and recruiting for the group.
“There is evidence from informants that he is helping the Oakland group acquire the weapons they are seeking, primarily bomb making equipment and toxic chemicals and gasses.
"One of the men from Oakland traveled to Syria to meet with ISIS; the purpose was for training in tactics, but was thought to be primarily a bonding visit to discuss possible massive disruptive attacks in the U.S.
"While in Hamburg, several of the Oakland-based criminals were photographed throwing Molotov cocktails and wielding iron bars, which have been their weapons of choice, though they are almost certainly on the verge of upping the caliber of their weaponry for use in the U.S.
"Despite having their faces covered by masks, they were positively identified.
"This group and their connections with the radical Islamic groups must be disrupted and destroyed."
Klein also claims that under Barack Obama’s watch, anti-American groups were able to coordinate and foment insurrection because these groups were largely ignored by the FBI during his administration.
“The FBI is really playing catchup ball, because the Obama administration refused to give the bureau the resources it needed to effectively infiltrate and surveil the radical groups on college campuses,' the source continued.
“Any talk of a connection between radical Islam—a phrase the Obama people wouldn't even use—and American extremists was pretty much laughed off. [Former Attorney General] Loretta Lynch would have blown a gasket if she heard that the FBI was surveilling so-called college political organizations.
"All that has changed under the Trump administration. Everyone's aware that the resistance movement, with its effort to get rid of Trump by any means necessary, has created fertile soil for ISIS and al Qaeda to establish a beachhead in America.”
In other words, the far left and radical Islam are united in their hate for the American way of life. They are willing to work together and to be violent to accomplish their goals.
 This is nothing new. As mentioned in the FBI report, since the 1960s, radical liberal, anarchist, and socialist groups have regularly used violence as a means to their collective end; the destruction of the United States and implementation of communism or socialism.
The aforementioned group “Weather Underground” is probably the most well known left-wing domestic terrorism organization in the history of the United States. That group was founded by Bill Ayers. Ayers, alongside his girlfriend and several other colleagues, utilized homemade bombs to target American institutions of law enforcement. They successfully detonated several bombs at places such as the Pentagon, the U.S. Capitol, and a wide range of police stations. His group never killed anybody, but not for lack of trying. They wanted to place explosives at a Fort Dix Army dance, but were stopped by the feds. But, due to a legal misstep by the FBI, Ayers was never charged with domestic terrorism. In fact, Ayers is an unrepentant anti-American, Anti-capitalist. In 2000, he told the New York Times that he did not regret the violent actions his group took. "I don't regret setting bombs…I don’t feel we did enough.” 
 If you are wondering what happened to his girlfriend that he co-founded Weather Underground with, well, she died during a bomb cooking experiment gone wrong. Ayers later married Bernadhine Dorn, who was also a member of the domestic terror group. Bill Ayers is also infamous for acting as quasi-mentor to President Barack Obama. Obama launched his political career from Ayers house in 1995.
In 2013, I had an opportunity to protest and speak with Bill Ayers after my college invited him to speak in an academic setting. Ayers now works as an educational reformer and  is a professor of education theory at the University of Illinois in Chicago. He was at my school to speak to our education department and education majors. Myself and several other Conservatives were rightfully outraged that our college had invited him in the first place. But rather than shout him down as current college students do to voices they disagree with, we printed flyers and passed out pamphlets informing students who he was. We also gained a few hundred signatures to show our dissatisfaction. It was rather successful. I was somehow blessed with a largely conservative student body where I attended. But, this led to an opportunity to speak with the man.
I asked him if he had any remorse for his actions. Ayers did not. He even seemed adamant that he was morally correct to place the explosives. "The United States was illegally killings thousands of Vietnamese each week, what would you do in that situation," I remember him telling me. 
Ayers also told me that his goal was, and still is, the destruction of capitalism and the United States. But, as an activist, he realized he could be more effective in the educational realm. At the end our conversation, Ayers asked if there was a place to get coffee nearby. "Boy, I hate capitalism but love Starbucks," he remarked.
This anecdote is important, because as Klein's book shows, modern college left wing radicals are following in Ayers' footsteps and are undoubtedly inspired by him. They are just as violent, just as committed, and unless are stopped by the FBI, will continue to try and fundamentally change the USA by whatever means necessary.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Could This Be Obama's Ultimate Plan Or Just Another Conspiracy Theory

Former FBI agent explains how and why Obama could send 50 million Americans to concentration camps

Concentration camps

2,499
Delicious
diaspora
Print
Email
Share
(NaturalNews) Little-discussed in the run-up to Barack Obama's first presidential campaign in 2008 (or since) were some facts about his earlier life that were otherwise well-known in his hometown of Chicago -- namely, that he was a student of Communist radical Saul Alinsky and "revolutionary" Bill Ayers.

For those who are unfamiliar with these men, Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, was a prominent "community organizer" (likeObama used to be) who, according to theChicago Sun-Times, influenced generations of organizers, "including the church-based group" that hired "a young Obama to work on Chicago's South Side in the 1980s."

Ayers, meanwhile, was a co-founder of the Weather Underground, a domestic terrorist group that conducted a series of bombings during the 1960s and early 1970s. In October 2013, Ayers admitted holding Obama's initial fundraiser, and even "uncharacteristically" donated some money to his campaign.

They were planning "to eliminate 25 million people"

Ayers, in particular, is noteworthy, because of plans he and his organization developed during their "revolutionary" period which smacked of something right out of Nazi Germany: Namely, that their goal was not just the overthrow of the constitutional republic of the United States, but the mass elimination of tens of millions of Americans who he and other members of his group believed would never go along with them.

This was discussed in some detail by former FBI undercover agent Larry Grathwohl, now deceased, in a 1982 documentary called No Place to Hide.

And it is why now, in the context of the coming Jade Helm 15 exercises, in which scores of U.S. military special operations forces will be operating among the general public in several South and Southwestern states for eight weeks beginning in mid-July, the commander-in-chief's personal history is especially important.

In his interview, Grathwohl laid out the sinister plan of Ayers and his Weather Underground:

I brought up the subject of what's going to happen after we take over the government. You know, we -- we -- become responsible, then, for administrating, you know, 250 millionpeople. And there was no answer. No one had given any thought to economics, how are you gonna clothe and feed these people.

The only thing that I could get was that they expected that the Cubans and the North Vietnamese and the Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different portions of the United States.

They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the "counter-revolution." And, they felt that this counter-revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing reeducation centers in the Southwest
[our emphasis]... where we would take all of the people who needed to be reeducated into the new way of thinking, and teach them how things were going to be.

I asked, "Well, what is going to happen to those people we can't reeducate -- that are diehard capitalists?" And the reply was that they would have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean 
kill. Twenty-five million people.

Now, I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people -- most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia 
[University in New York] and other well-known education centers -- and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.

And they were dead serious.


Two peas in a pod - and here comes another one

In their heyday, members of the Weather Underground, who included Ayers' wife, Bernadine Dohrn, stayed extensively in the communist enclaves of Vietnam, Russia (then the USSR) and Cuba, according to this 1976 report by the FBI.[PDF]

All old news, right? Maybe -- and maybe not. Obama's recent overtures to still-communist Cuba and the authoritarian Iranian regime belie his stated allegiance to the U.S.

One other thing. As noted on the back cover of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, the master revolutionary also "impressed a young [Hillary] Clinton, who was growing up in Park Ridge at the time Alinsky was the director of the Industrial Areas Foundation in Chicago."

Clinton announced her own bid for the White House April 12.

Sources:

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com

http://www.nytimes.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.washingtonpost.com

http://blogs.suntimes.com


camps_Jade_Helm_15_Obama_administration.html#ixzz3xLIHJsVJ

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Another Obama Lie--He Never Wrote His First Book, It Was Written By Bill Ayers!

Bill Ayers' Role in Obama Book Questioned Again

Image: Bill Ayers' Role in Obama Book Questioned Again
Wednesday, 27 Nov 2013 02:37 PM
By Lisa Barron
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Questions are being raised again about the role Bill Ayers, a former radical activist turned elementary-education theorist, played in the writing of President Barack Obama's bestselling memoir, "Dreams From My Father."

Ayers, a 1969 co-founder of the self-described communist revolutionary group Weather Underground, is now promoting his new book, "Public Enemy," and his publisher is using suggestions that Ayers wrote the president's book in its publicity material, Investor's Business Daily reports.



Beacon Press wrote in a blurb on Amazon.com that in the book, Ayers "reveals how he has navigated the challenges and triumphs of this public life with steadfastness and a dash of good humor — from the red carpet at the Oscars, to prison vigils and airports (where he is often detained and where he finally "confesses" that he did write Dreams from My Father)."

In March 2011, Ayers touched on the issue after giving a speech at Montclair State University in New Jersey.

When a student asked him to comment on a Time magazine review of "Dreams From My Father," calling it "the "best memoir ever written by an American politician," Ayers said he thought it was very good.

"The second one was more of a political hack book, but the first book's quite good," he said, adding, "Did you know I wrote it?"

After an astonished reaction, Ayers said, "Yes, I wrote that, and if you can help me prove it, I'll split the royalties with you."

Ayers was in Washington, D.C., last Friday promoting his new book. At a signing, he said that although he and Obama had crossed paths many times through their community activism in Chicago, he never regarded the president as a dedicated "leftist" like himself,Mediaite reports.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Ayers: Try Obama For War Crimes

Want to read a strange interview, look the following post by Greg Richter. In it Bill Ayers of Chicago and Weather Underground fame says that he admires Obama but believes that he should be tried at the Hague for war crimes.


Has Ayers lost it or is just a crackpot?

Conservative Tom


Bill Ayers: Try Obama for War Crimes

Tuesday, 18 Jun 2013 09:20 PM
By Greg Richter
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Former Weather Underground leader Bill Ayers, who was involved in bombing the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol building in the early 1970s, says President Barack Obama should be tried for war crimes.

Appearing on Real Clear Politics' "Morning Commute,"Ayers said every president enters "an office dripping with blood and then adds to it."

Ayers had been asked by co-host Charlie Stone if Obama, as the sole authority for Drone use, was engaged in terrorist activity.

"Absolutely," Ayers answered.

"Do you think Barack Obama should be put on trial for war crimes?" Stone asked.

"Absolutely," Ayers responded. "Every president in this century should be put on trial" for war crimes in The Hague.

"Yes, I think these are war crimes," Ayers said. "I think they're acts of terror."

Ayers, who also is a retired professor of education, gave Obama a failing grade.

"I don't at all feel like Obama's let anybody down," Ayers said, explaining that throughout the 2008 campaign Obama consistently said "I am a middle-of-the-road, pragmatic politician."

Still, Ayers likes his former Chicago neighbor personally.

"He's a curious person," Ayers said. "One of the things I like about him is he's curious. He wants to know things. He asks questions. He's not just charming, he's also interested. He reads. … And I liked him personally. I mean, he's a really good guy."

During his race for the White House in 2008, Obama's associations with Ayers were questioned. GOP vice presidental nominee Sarah Palin accused Obama of "palling around with terrorists," for his connections to Ayers.

Obama denied any close ties with Ayers, calling him "just a guy who lived in my neighborhood."

Ayers admitted in an interview with The Daily Beast  that some of the things said about him and Obama, such as serving on boards together and Ayers holding a fundraiser for Obama in his living room, are true.

"Today, I wish I knew him better and he was listening to me," Ayers told The Daily Beast.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/bill-ayers-obama-war/2013/06/18/id/510633?s=al&promo_code=13DF7-1#ixzz2WffAOdoC
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Terror In Any Mode is Terror Even If You Are A Friend of Obama

The friend, financier, and strong supporter of President Obama (Bill Ayers) tells us that his bombings were not like Boston because he went after buildings only, not people. Seems like a difference without a difference. Ayers got lucky that no one other than one of his co-conspirators ever was blown up. A terrorist who only blows up buildings or a terrorist who blows up people, both are terrorists!

It also seems that age has not tempered Bill Ayers opinions. He still is a 60's radical who finds nothing wrong with what he did.  Instead of rubbing shoulders with the President, he should be wearing an orange jump suit and serving a 100 year sentence. The damage he did during his rein of terror, is no different than those of the Tsarnaev brothers.  Terror is terror.

Conservative Tom

Bill Ayers: Weather Underground Bombings Nothing Like Boston Attack

Image: Bill Ayers: Weather Underground Bombings Nothing Like Boston Attack
Weather Underground members Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn with lawyer Michael Kennedy outside Federal Court in New York, May 18, 1982.
Monday, 06 May 2013 05:57 PM
By Greg Richter
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Weather Underground founder Bill Ayers says the bombings of government buildings by his 1960s radical group cannot be compared to the Boston Marathon bombings.

Speaking at the annual commemoration of the Kent State shootings over the weekend,Ohio.com reports that Ayers said the the two have no more in common than a shooting at a firing range has to the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School that left more than two dozen children and staff members dead.

"Just because they use the same thing, there’s no relationship at all," Ayers said.

Ayers co-founded the Weather Underground to protest the Vietnam War. The group bombed the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon, among other targets in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Ayers later became a professor of education at the University of Illinois-Chicago.

After giving the keynote address at Kent State, Ayers was asked by a reporter to compare his Weather Underground actions with the Boston Bombings.

"There's no equivalence," he said. "Property damage. That’s what we did."

Ayers mentioned in his speech that he lost three friends, including his lover, in the Weather Underground, but didn't say that they had died when a bomb they were building blew up. Asked afterward why he didn't, he told a reporter that to have done so would have been "inappropriate."

The bombs were to have been set off at a dance at Fort Dix Army base, authorities have said.

"No one knows for sure, but I think they were," Ayers said. "And had they carried it out it would have been a catastrophe. But they didn’t, and it didn’t happen. But what did happen is, on that same day John McCain murdered civilians. Do we have any responsibility for that? Should there be any reconciliation for that? Should he tell the truth about it?"

McCain, now a Republican U.S. senator from Arizona, was a Navy pilot in Vietnam. He was captured by the North Vietnamese and held as prisoner of war between 1967 and 1973.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ayers-weather-underground-bombings/2013/05/06/id/503058?s=al&promo_code=13655-1#ixzz2Sc9mwZaE
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

A Terrorist By Any Philosophy Is A Terrorist

There are many who will try to use the Norway Terrorist as an example of what is wrong with the conservative point of view and incorrectly try to equate "right-wing" terrorism with Islamic terrorism as if they were equals.  It avoids one basic difference that being the number of events and participants.

 As I count there were two involved in Oklahoma City and one in Norway for a grand total of three.  Please remind me, how many were involved in 9/11 alone?  Islamic terrorism wins hands down when you count up the numbers.

However, in this column, we are equal opportunity condemners.  We condemn all those who use terrorism as a way of winning the day.

Whether it was the Weather Underground, the Black Panthers or the SDS of yesteryear or Al Queda, Timothy McVeigh or the Norway bomber of today, their attempts to disrupt society and to remake it in their vision should be resisted by all.  A win by these anti-social criminals (even if they later become friends of the President of the United States) would end up being a loss to all civilized society.  They might have ideas which would improve how we live, however, their methods have to be condemned regardless of political philosophy. They should be arrested, tried and if convicted, subjected to the same sentence as their victims.

We must send a strong message that these actions will not be allowed in our country (or any other country). Unless we speak with a strong and clear voice, these miscreants will continue their vicious ways.

So if one of your "friends" tries to lay the blame on Norway at the feet of Conservatives, tell him that you condemn all terrorism regardless of political orientation. Hopefully, it will make them think a bit more.

What follows is an article which will give you more ammunition. Hope you enjoy it.


The Norway Terrorist

Bruce Thornton - FrontPage Magazine, July 25th, 2011


A year or two ago I was at a dinner party where a gentleman and his wife confronted me about my writing on Islamic terrorism. “Why is it,” he asked irritably, “that terrorism is always called ‘Islamic’? What about ‘Christian’ terrorists?”

“Well, name a Christian terrorist,” I replied. I wasn’t being combative; I was genuinely curious to know whom they considered to be someone committing politically-driven murder and mayhem in the name of Jesus. The sentence was barely out of my mouth before the wife shot back, “Timothy McVeigh.”

McVeigh’s bombing of a federal building in Oklahoma City took place sixteen years ago. Unlike Muslim fundamentalists who theologically justify their acts of terrorism, McVeigh can not rightly be characterized as a “Christian terrorist,” because he was, by his own admission, not a committed Christian, and he carried out the attack not because God or the Bible commanded him to, but because he hated the U.S. government. And yet after all these years his name remains virtually the sole flimsy example that people have at the ready to challenge what they consider to be the stereotype of Islamic terrorism.

No more. Now a new McVeigh has arisen, a symbol that the Left and Islamic supremacists themselves will use to bludgeon Christian conservatives and critics of jihad for the next sixteen years – Anders Behring Breivik. Breivik is in police custody for carrying out what some are calling Norway’s “Oklahoma City,” a reference to McVeigh’s 1995 bombing, of course. Breivik, who claims to have acted alone, set off a massive bomb that devastated an Oslo government building and killed seven, then traveled to a nearby youth camp for hundreds of teen children of Labour Party politicians, where he proceeded to massacre as many as 90 of them with ruthless, methodical gunfire.

As the news began leaking out about Europe’s deadliest terror attack since the 2003 Madrid train bombing, there was a predictable – and perfectly reasonable – assumption on the part of terrorism experts, the media, and possibly anyone who follows the Clash of Civilizations, that the perpetrators were Islamists. After all, there were plenty of reasons to suspect initially that these were acts of Islamic terrorism: at least one Islamist group initially claimed responsibility (but later retracted it); Muslim extremists cheered the attacks in online chatrooms; Norway is still a target of Islamists burning to avenge the Muhammad cartoons; legal action was finally taken against the radical Mullah Krekar whom Norway has been sheltering for years, and he threatened retaliation; al Qaeda tried to attack Oslo last year; and, frankly, most terrorism carried out worldwide today is at the hands of jihadists.

But the truth was a stunning reversal. Not only is the perpetrator a well-educated, boyishly blond, ethnic Norwegian, he is a self-described Christian conservative bent on sparking a Pan-European resistance movement to oppose – by violence if necessary – the corrosive forces of multiculturalism, Islamic immigration, and “cultural Marxism” that are destroying the fabric of European society and culture. It’s too soon to have all the facts –speculation, as usual, began flying at light-speed over the rumor-mongering internet, including the mystery of a fake Facebook page and the musing that Breivik is himself a jihadist posing as a Christian conservative. But as of this writing, the coldly rational Breivik has apparently confessed to what he described in a 1500-page manifesto as the “systematical and organized executions of multiculturalist traitors.”

But the tragedy won’t end at the lives lost in Norway. Bruce Bawer, the author of Surrender: Appeasing Islam, Sacrificing Freedom who lives in Norway, notes the broader concern that “legitimate criticism of Islam, which remains a very real threat to freedom in Norway and the West, has been profoundly discredited by association with this murderous lunatic.” As the European anti-jihad blogger Fjordman puts it,

"Breivik has scored a major victory for his opponents. An agent provocateur seeking to discredit the right-wing conservative sliver of the European political spectrum would have a hard time doing a better job… It is the perfect excuse to persecute and silence opposing voices… We’re heading for dark days."

The Left – including the mainstream media, and stealth jihadists themselves, like the ubiquitous Muslim Brotherhood legacy group CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations – won’t even bother to contain its collective glee over the fact that Breivik is a “right-wing Christian.” The narrative is already being constructed that will use him to tar everyone on the Right, particularly vocal critics of Islamic fundamentalism. This is the same Left that hijacks any and all discussions of Islamic terrorism by jumping up to insist that all Muslims must not be smeared because of the actions of a “tiny minority of extremists,” that not all terrorism is committed by Muslims and not all Muslims are terrorists. Of course, no responsible anti-jihadist has ever made such claims, but the Left never bothers to concede this. By contrast, instead of living by the standards they demand of the Right, Leftists will now be perfectly happy to politicize Breivik’s terrorism and use him to tar everyone on the Right – Christians, conservatives, anti-jihadists, the Tea Party – everyone. And in fact, they have already begun attempting to link the Norway terrorist to Sarah Palin, of all people.

Breivik is a terrorist. His targeting of helpless schoolchildren makes him no better than the slaughterers at Beslan. But that doesn’t make everyone concerned about unfettered Islamic immigration, jihad, or the rapid disintegration of Europe’s cultural heritage a terrorist or even a sympathizer. There is no connection between the legitimate, courageous, lawful work of notable anti-jihadists and such evil. No true Christian, conservative, or responsible critic of jihad would condone Breivik’s despicable, cowardly acts or deem them to be in accordance with our beliefs and values. Much less would we celebrate those acts, unlike our Islamist counterparts. But denouncements of Breivik will be purposefully ignored by the Left.

Nor does it make Islamic terrorism any less of a threat. But the Left will use Breivik to divert attention from worldwide jihad, to advance their cultural Marxism, and to demonize the defenders of freedom. To echo Fjordman, we are facing dark days. We must face them with the truth.