Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, March 28, 2019

What Happenned To The Rule In Congress For Freshmen To Come In Sit Down And Shut UPU

Freshman Representative Introduces Trump Impeachment Resolution

  • 2019-03-28 
  • Source: TTN
  •  
  • by: TTN Staff
6 4 0  20
image: https://structurecms-staging-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/trumptrain/media/picture/5c61/de19/6970/2d5a/7dea/0900/content_1024px-Rashida_Tlaib_on_Voice_of_America.jpg?1549917721
Freshman Representative Introduces Trump Impeachment Resolution


Freshman Representative Rashida Tlaib has introduced a measure in Congress asking the House Judiciary Committee to investigate whether President Trump committed an impeachable offense.

According to Fox News:
Freshman Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib unveiled a resolution Wednesday pushing for the potential impeachment of President Trump -- pressing ahead despite the findings of the Robert Mueller probe.

Rep. Tlaib, D-Mich., submitted the resolution which calls on the House Judiciary Committee to probe whether or not the president committed any offenses that rise to the level of impeachment.

The resolution’s text states it is, “Inquiring whether the House of Representatives should impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America.”

The controversial freshman’s measure included the support of just one other Democrat, Texas Rep. Al Green.
This runs counter to the majority of Democrats attempting to distance themselves from impeachment talk now that the Mueller report has been submitted and collusion seems unlikely.

Read more at http://trumptrainnews.com/articles/freshman-representative-introduces-trump-impeachment-resolution#mCcJK7FVm25XzpBS.99

How Long Will Schiff We In Congress?

 Michael Ramirez for 3/27/2019

And Some Want Israel To Negotiate With This?

Democrats Will Never Give Up On Trump Collusion

Has the Trump 2020 Collusion Investigation Started Yet?

Larry Elder
|
Posted: Mar 28, 2019 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
Has the Trump 2020 Collusion Investigation Started Yet?
Source: AP Photo/Cliff Owen
  
The two-year-in-the-making Mueller report has finally concluded. The main takeaways: no further indictments, no allegations of interference with the investigation and no finding of collusion with Russia. So, let's go to the videotape.
Before Robert Mueller's report:
"The bombshell revelation that U.S. officials have information that suggests Trump associates may have colluded with the Russians means we must pause the entire Trump agenda. We may have an illegitimate President of the United States." -- Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., March 23, 2017.
"Here you have a President who, I can tell you and guarantee you, is in collusion with the Russians to undermine our democracy." -- Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., Sept. 21, 2017.
"I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight." -- Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Aug. 5, 2018
On television, Schiff, who early on claimed evidence of collusion, became quite the workhorse. According to the Washington Free Beacon, during the first six months of Donald Trump's presidency, Schiff had "done 123 national television interviews totaling more than 14 hours of air time since January, according to a tracking report provided to the White House. ... The vast majority of them have been on cable networks CNN and MSNBC, although Schiff has also done interviews on Fox News, ABC, CBS, NBC, Comedy Central, and HBO."
After the Mueller report:
"There was a big difference between whether there was evidence of collusion -- and I think that evidence is in plain sight -- and whether you can establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a criminal conspiracy." -- Schiff, March 25, 2019.
"Given the lengthy redactions in many of the pleadings of the special counsel eluding to other investigations, I think it's entirely possible if not likely that there will be other indictments." -- Schiff, March 22, 2019.
"We don't know much. I'm just going to go by what we do know, and I must say, I don't think it looks good. No further indictments. ... Did the Democrats put too much trust in the Mueller report? Because I don't need the Mueller report to know he's a traitor. I have a TV." -- HBO host Bill Maher, March 22, 2019.
"You have a President who, in my opinion, beyond a shadow of a doubt, sought to, however ham-handedly, collude with the Russian government or foreign power to undermine and influence our elections." Presidential candidate Rep. Beto O'Rourke, D-Texas, March 23, 2019.
The Democrats now demand that the Mueller report be made public. Trump said he wants it made public, too. As to whether it will be made public, and how much, former special prosecutor Ken Starr outlined what happens next:
"Under the regulations that governed his appointment and now guide his final acts, Mueller is to provide a confidential report to one person only: the attorney general. The regulations, which were promulgated during the final months of the Clinton administration, do not contemplate any sort of report sent directly from the special counsel to Congress or the general public. To the contrary, the regulations call upon the attorney general, William Barr, to receive the confidential report and then do two things: First, to notify Congress of the investigation's completion and, second, to provide an explanation for certain specifically enumerated actions. There is no requirement for a Barr-edited version of the Mueller report. ...
"The attorney general also has the raw power to jettison the regulations entirely. Unlike a statute, the regulations may be dispatched by the stroke of a pen, and new ones put in place. He may determine that the public interest requires maximum transparency, as long as grand-jury secrecy is scrupulously maintained. But unless and until the attorney general takes that bold action, the current regulations stand and have the force of law."
In sum, for anti-Trumpers, hope appears to have run out on the Mueller team, which, at one time, was perhaps the only mostly all-white, mostly all-male group that today's Democrats could love and embrace. Now, in fairness, not all liberal Trump critics got it wrong about the Mueller report. CNN host Van Jones, in June 2017, was approached in the street by a man working with Project Veritas, who secretly taped their conversation. The man, after claiming the two met a few years earlier, asked Jones what he thought of the Russian collusion investigation. Jones, unaware he was being taped, replied: "The Russia thing is just a big nothing burger. There's nothing there you can do."
Will Trump haters and semi-haters see the Mueller report as the President's vindication? Not likely. An Economist/YouGov poll from last November found 67 percent of Democrats believe that Russia, despite a complete and total lack of evidence, "definitely" or "probably" not only interfered with the election but changed vote tallies.
Now that the report found no collusion, we can expect the Democrats and much of the media to get back to basics: calling the President racist, fascist, sexist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic, homophobic, anti-Hispanic, etc. It's going to be a long two years, and likely, thanks to the Mueller report, a long six years.

The Real Collusion!

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Greek Tragedy Or Just Rewards?

The Rise, Fall and Crushing Defeat of Stormy Daniels and Her Lawyer

 9  0  1  6  16 
 
 
  0
Porn star Stormy Daniels and her lawyer Michael Avenatti dominated the gossip columns and fake news media with titillating headlines about an illicit affair with the president. But in the big scheme of things, their rise to prominence lasted about a minute. After being roundly defeated in court by President Donald Trump and his team of lawyers, the fall of Stormy and her recently arrested attorney plays like a Greek tragedy.
In a good Greek tragedy, people bring about their own demise by a particular character flaw. Even a casual observer could see that the B-list porn actress and her lawyer were motivated by greed.
According to reports, before taking on her stage name, Stephanie Gregory grew up in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where she worked answering phones at a stable before trying her skills as a 17-year-old stripper. Believe it or not, Gregory — who later took an ex-husband’s last name of Clifford — had aspirations of becoming a journalist after graduating from the Scotlandville Magnet High School in 1997. But the lure of easy money apparently drew her to the Gold Club, where she dropped her clothes and made contacts in the adult film industry. By 2002, Stormy was fully immersed in taking cash for sex in porn movies.
In 2006, Stormy had some contact with then-business mogul Donald Trump. The details may never be known due to a non-disclosure agreement she signed before the 2016 election. But what is well known is that Stormy had her hand out for a payoff as the election neared. Even with Trump trailing in the national polls, the president’s long-time fixer Michael Cohen doled out $130,000 in hush money.
The deal is widely viewed as a dirty payoff to a cheap harlot. But after Trump won the election, greed got the best of Stormy Daniels. She wanted more money and hired now disgraced attorney Avenatti.
When it was all said and done, the pair were crushed in court. The case was thrown out. Stormy was ordered to pay President Trump nearly $300,000 in legal fees, and she may have to pay Cohen back the original $130,000 as well.
“The court’s order, along with the court’s prior order dismissing Stormy Daniels’ defamation case against the president, together constitute a total victory for the president, and a total defeat for Stormy Daniels in this case,” President Trump’s attorney Charles Harder said.
Avenatti later dumped Stormy on Twitter. Ouch!
But that is only half the tragedy. Things have gone far worse for Avenatti since tweeting the President of the United States to “buckle up, buttercup” and being a star guest on CNN nearly 60 times in two months during the height of the scandal. In fact, Avenatti garnered such popularity among liberal outlets that he publicly announced he might run for the president.
But the biased media’s love affair with the porn lawyer who wanted to be president was nothing if not short-lived. A California judge slapped him with a fine of nearly $5 million, upwards of $10 million in money owed to a former associate and others who sued him for unpaid debts and “fraud.” Reports also indicate he may owe the IRS back taxes. And, right on the heels of those defeats, a property owner evicted Avenatti from his Orange County offices. These days, Avenatti may wish that’s all that went sideways.
The seemingly unscrupulous lawyer reared his ugly head during the Brett Kavanaugh U.S. Supreme Court hearings claiming to have damaging sexual misconduct allegations. Claiming to represent an alleged victim, Avenatti upped his media exposure. However, the so-called client — Julie Swetnick — denied the lawyer’s publicity stunt.
“She stated she was clear and consistent ‘from day one’ with Mr. Avenatti that those claims were not true. And she said Mr. Avenatti ‘twisted (her) words.’ When reporters pressed him on these discrepancies, Mr. Avenatti attempted to deceive them in an apparent effort to thwart the truth coming out,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley reportedly stated. “The law prohibits such false statements to Congress and obstruction of congressional committee investigations.”
Rather than emerge as a leader of the resistance to bring down Pres. Trump’s SCOTUS nominee, Avenatti was referred to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. And the epic fall ends with justice.
Michael Avenatti was recently arrested and charged with trying to extort Nike to the tune of $20 million. He reportedly threatened the sportswear company over inappropriate interactions with high school athletes. Prosecutors from the Southern District of New York formerly charged the disgraced lawyer and another co-conspirator before releasing him on $300,000 bail bond.
“A suit and tie does not mask that fact that, at its core, this was an old-fashioned shakedown,” U.S. attorney Geoffrey Berman said.
Apparently, running for president is no longer on the table.
~ Conservative Zone