Boris Johnson's Victory Heralds a Golden Era in US-UK Relations
Boris Johnson has only been back in Downing Street a few days following his stunning victory in Britain's general election, but there are already early signs that his premiership will preside over a dramatic revival in transatlantic relations not seen since the heyday of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. First and foremost, the British prime minister has made it abundantly clear that his first priority will be to break the Brexit deadlock that has effectively paralysed British politics, and the country's ability to make its voice heard on the international stage, at the earliest possible opportunity, thus opening the way for a trade deal with Washington. As a start, Mr Johnson has committed his new government to fulfil its election pledge to complete Britain's withdrawal from the European Union by the end of January. Furthermore, he will enshrine in law his promise that the complicated trade negotiations that are due to take place next year to finalise Britain's future trading relationship with the EU bloc will be completed by the end of 2020. Critics of Mr Johnson's ambitious programme to free Britain from the EU's shackles and negotiate a new network of global trade deals have argued that completing the process of establishing a new trading framework with the EU will take much longer than a year, especially in view of the EU's notoriously slow approach to completing such transactions. The critics point out, for example, that the Canada-EU trade deal took seven years to negotiate and was 22 years in the making. By enshrining Britain's ultimate departure date in law, Mr Johnson has effectively silenced those critics, as well as sending a clear declaration of intent to Brussels that Britain aims to complete the withdrawal process by the end of next year, with or without a deal. The fact, moreover, that Mr Johnson now enjoys a comfortable majority of 80 seats in the newly-constituted House of Commons means that he will no longer be subjected to procedural legislative obstructions from die-hard Remainers, as was very much in evidence during the death throes of the last parliament. Thus Mr Johnson's reinvigorated Conservative Party finds itself in a position to shape Britain's destiny for the foreseeable future, with rebuilding relations between Washington and London seen as being one of Mr Johnson's first priorities. During the tenure of Theresa May, Mr Johnson's hapless predecessor as prime minister, relations between Downing Street and the White House became strained, to say the least. As one senior former member of Donald Trump's foreign policy team recently told me, "By the end of Mrs May's premiership relations with the US had fallen to an all-time low". The first indication of a revival in relations between Washington and London came when Mr Trump was one of the first world leaders to congratulate Mr Johnson on his historic win -- he secured the largest Conservative majority since Mrs Thatcher's third election victory in 1987 -- and immediately promised to strike a "massive" new trade deal with the UK post-Brexit. The US president said a future US-UK trade agreement has "the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative" than any deal that could have been made with the EU. Indeed, with Mr Johnson assured of being Britain's prime minister for the next five years, and Mr Trump well-placed to secure re-election in next year's presidential election contest, there is every prospect that the two leaders could herald a new golden era of transatlantic relations not seen since the alliance of Mrs Thatcher and US President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. There will, of course, be numerous political obstacles that will have to be overcome regarding issues where the two men have opposing views, such as the controversial nuclear deal with Iran. While Mr Trump is determined to pressure Tehran with punitive economic sanctions, Mr Johnson still remains committed to working with other European powers, such as France and Germany, to save the nuclear deal. Yet, compared with the calamitous impact a victory for Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, whose politics is defined by his visceral anti-Americanism, would have had on transatlantic relations, Mr Johnson's return to Downing Street will have been greeted with enormous relief in the White House, as it means Washington now has a firm ally in London, someone who is committed to breathing new life into the vital and long-standing partnership between Britain and America. Con Coughlin is the Telegraph's Defence and Foreign Affairs Editor and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute. |
BOMBSHELL REPORT: George Soros behind Trump impeachment
by Frank Holmes, reporter
Over the last few weeks, Congressional Democrats have televised hearings and drawn up Articles of Impeachment against President Donald Trump — but a new report shows that the entire impeach Trump effort is being led and bankrolled by someone whose face is never seen.
All roads to impeachment lead back to billionaire George Soros. He literally paid the bills for the man browbeating Trump’s defenders in front of the cameras.
House Democrats picked Norm Eisen to cross-examine Republican witnesses during the first week of impeachment hearings — and to lie about Trump.
Eisen faked up a video of the president to make him look like he’s above the law. The video shows Trump saying that the Constitution “allows me to do whatever I want.”
Trump actually said Article II “would allow me to fire” corrupt functionaries like Robert Mueller… and it does.
But where does Eisen get his funding?
It should come as no surprise that Eisen is a major recipient of funding by the shadowy billionaire George Soros and his network of political patronage.
Eisen realized that investigative watchdog groups like Judicial Watch destroyed Bill Clinton and other Democrats by bringing their deep corruption to light.
So in 2003, Eisen founded a group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to target Republicans…and the funding came from the most powerful globalist in U.S. politics.
CREW has brought in millions from George Soros over the years. Soros donated $1.35 million in 2017 alone through his “charity,” the Open Society Foundations.
CREW also rakes in cash from the Democracy Alliance, a secretive political slush fund that Soros founded to launder donations from himself and fellow elites to hard-left organizations who will do their bidding, without leaving fingerprints.
Eisen’s group got paid to file complaints that Republican officials had committed “ethics violations.” But critics say when it comes to the worst Democratic abuses of power, CREW sees no evil.
CREW is a “one-eyed watchdog,” according to Scott Walter of the Capital Research Center. “The right eye doesn’t work. Just the left.”
Still, the liberal media report CREW’s most far-fetched allegations 24/7.
“Before ‘fake news’ there was CREW,” wrote Richard Berman in The Washington Times.
CREW’s leaders let the cat out of the bag in secret documents obtained by The Horn.
Eisen left CREW for a few years to work for the Democrats directly: He was President Barack Obama’s “ethics czar” and a foreign ambassador. Then, in 2016, Eisen rejoined CREW as its chairman of the board.
In the meantime, CREW was led by David Brock, one of Soros’ and the Clintons’ favorite political tools.
Although Brock officially stepped aside—so CREW wouldn’t look so partisan—Brock presented CREW as one of the groups he led in a secret memo intended only to be seen by his high-rolling donors.
Brock said, if donors would just open up their wallets, CREW would pepper the Trump administration with lawsuits and charges of “possible conflicts of interest and ethical problems on an unprecedented scale.”
After CREW wages political war on the White House, “Trump will be afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information, new revelations, and an inability to avoid conflicts issues.”
Eisen and CREW led the charge publicly. But even fellow liberals said that, when he accused Trump of violating the Constitution’s Emolument Clause by maintaining his vast business holdings, his attacks were petty and off-base.
“People thought we were smoking something,” Eisen has admitted.
So did a federal judge, who threw Eisen’s lawsuit out of court last year… but Eisen only doubled-down on trying to impeach Trump.
George Soros has his own reasons to bankroll the effort: revenge.
Soros believed that Trump would destroy the U.S. economy and stacked his investments heavily on a recession.
Instead, the stock market has broken records year after year, and the unemployment level is the lowest in 50 years.
Soros’ bet wrong, and it cost him $1 billion in the first month of Trump’s presidency.
He wants to get back at Trump, and CREW wants to keep cashing Soros’ checks.
The fact that Democrats turned to Eisen shows who’s really pulling the strings on the Trump impeachment.
Frank Holmes is a veteran journalist and an outspoken conservative that talks about the news that was in his weekly article, “On The Holmes Front.”





W
