UN Human Rights Council Has Nothing To Do With Human Rights. Their Only Interest Is Bashing Israel

Furious, US Boycotts UN Cabal Bashing Israel Over 'Human Rights'

By Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz March 20, 2017 , 5:17 pm

9 2

0 0Email 11Share

“Lying lips are an abomination to Hashem; but they that deal truly are His delight.” Proverbs 12:22 (The Israel Bible™)

image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/UN-Knotted-Gun.jpg

Knotted Gun Sculpture at the United Nations (Photo by Shutterstock)

On Monday, the United States State Department announced they will boycott an upcoming session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) session slated to deal with violations by Israel, deepening the conflict over Israel between the Trump administration and the UN.

Mark Toner, the department’s spokesman, posted a statement on the department’s website, saying that not only will the US boycott the meeting, but it intends to vote against all five the council intends to pass this week.

The statement said that the US specifically objected to a particularly egregious example of the anti-Israel bias displayed in the UNHRC, known as Agenda Item Seven.

“The United States strongly and unequivocally opposes the existence of the UN Human Rights Council’s Agenda Item Seven: ‘Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories,” the announcement read.

The agenda item requires the council to discuss Israel’s human rights abuses against Palestinians at every session. There is no corresponding requirement pertaining to any other country.

“As an expression of our deeply-held conviction that this bias must be addressed in order for the Council to realize its legitimate purpose, the United States decided not to attend the Council’s Item Seven General Debate session,” the statement continued.

“It does not serve the interests of the Council to single out one country in an unbalanced matter. Later this week, the United States will vote against every resolution put forth under this agenda item and is encouraging other countries to do the same.”

image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/useful_banner_manager_banners/499-BIN-FightMediaBias-600WIDE%20(1).jpg

This comes in marked contrast to the previous administration. In his final weeks in office, President Obama overturned a long time US policy by not vetoing UN Security Council Resolution 2334 condemning Israeli settlements.

The UNHRC was another forum in which President Obama reversed policy concerning Israel. Due to its anti-Israel stance, President George W. Bush initially refused to join the UNHRC, and boycotted it when it was established in 2006. In 2009, President Obama applied for membership, and under his administration, the US took a leading role in the council.

image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/dannon-rex.jpg

Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon (left) with U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. (Permanent Mission of Israel to the United Nations)

The US’s relationship to the UNHRC is currently under scrutiny by Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, who is considering withdrawing from the Council.  In a letter to the UN, Tillerson questioned its effectiveness given the presence on the Council of countries with histories of human rights violations. In his letter, Tillerson said the US will “reiterate our strong principled objection to the Human Rights Council’s biased agenda against Israel.”

“We may not share a common view on this, given the makeup of the membership,” Tillerson wrote. “While it may be the only such organization devoted to human rights, the Human Rights Council requires considerable reform in order for us to continue to participate.”

image: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/haley.png

US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley speaks after her first Security Council meeting, February 16, 2017. (Screenshot)

This current confrontation comes in the context of ongoing criticism by the new Trump administration against the UN for anti-Israel bias. A recent anti-Israel report by the UN’s Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) was rescinded after Nikki Haley, US Ambassador to the UN, expressing “outrage”, demanded that the UN withdraw the report, which declared Israel to be an apartheid state. Rima Khalaf, head of the Beirut-based commision, resigned in protest.

Read more at https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/85340/fed-un-bodys-virulent-anti-israel-bias-us-boycotts-human-rights-council/#O7DpfTARTymDGkFt.99

Hillary Had Better Fess Up Quickly Or She Will Be Fitted With An Orange Jumpsuit!

'Huma to Hillary' Email Offers Clues to FBI Probe

Huma Abedin, left, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2011. (Jonathan Ernst/Getty Images)

Friday, 21 Aug 2015 06:47 AM

Short URL|

Email Article|

Comment|

Contact|

Print|

    A   A

• 0
  inShare

The email painted a vivid picture of a fast-deteriorating situation in Libya’s bloody civil war, complete with snipers shooting people, armed forces on the move and diplomatic personnel preparing to evacuate.
The message, dated April 10, 2011, was forwarded to "H," for Hillary Clinton, then the secretary of state. It came from one of her closest aides, Huma Abedin, who is now vice chairman of her presidential campaign.
And a U.S. government review of its seven terse paragraphs has led to a probe of how sensitive information got to personal email accounts used by Clinton and some of her top aides and housed on a server at her New York home, according to two officials with knowledge of the inquiry who asked for anonymity.

The matter could form the basis for a criminal probe of whether laws for handling classified material were broken.
The investigation, led by the FBI, comes after the inspector general for U.S. intelligence agencies determined that seven emails on Clinton’s server, including the April 2011 one, contained classified information at the time they were sent. The State Department and intelligence agencies now are trying to determine if other material in the emails was classified when sent.

 

As the controversy has grown around Clinton’s campaign, the question of how — and in what form — classified information may have been mishandled has moved front and center.
The Huma-to-Hillary email gives a clue.
Classified Documents
In this case, and the others known to be in dispute, it isn’t necessarily a question of a Clinton staff member sending classified documents in whole, or large passages attached to emails. Abedin’s email contains information from multiple sources, distilled into a digestible situation report sent to Clinton on a Sunday morning.
There are other examples that suggest Clinton aides drew upon a variety of classified information to produce updates of events in Libya and elsewhere and sent them via email, according to the officials familiar with the investigation, who weren’t authorized to publicly discuss a current probe.
Anybody who knowingly emailed classified material to Clinton or her top aides when she was secretary of state could face criminal prosecution, according to current and former U.S. national security officials. Those who inadvertently send or receive classified data could be prosecuted for gross negligence. Clinton, the leading Democratic presidential candidate, isn’t a target of the investigation.
"There’s a responsibility to safeguard classified information," Michael Hayden, former director of the National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency, said in a phone interview. Failing to protect such data "could get to a level of negligence that criminal penalties would kick in."

Latest News Update

Get Newsmax TV At Home »

Classified Imagery
Hayden acknowledged the blending of material can be difficult to prevent. However, he said Clinton shouldn’t have used a private email server that didn’t have government security protections. Hayden, who was named by then-President Bill Clinton to head the NSA, is an adviser to Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush.
The Clinton campaign points out that the 2011 email, made public as part of a Republican-led House committee’s probe into an attack on the U.S. mission at Benghazi, was labeled sensitive but unclassified. The inspector general, however, has concluded that some of the details were classified and shouldn’t have been included. An attorney for Abedin, Karen Dunn of Boies, Schiller & Flexner in Washington, declined to comment.

One of the U.S. officials said information in the email came from secret imagery and should still be classified. Because the email was released by the State Department by mistake it is now effectively declassified, the official said.
Data Compiled
The email illustrates the challenges that investigators now must sort through in determining what was classified, when it was sent, how was the data complied and who sent it.
Mark Toner, a State Department spokesman, told reporters on Aug. 12 that it’s not always "black and white" what should be classified and what shouldn’t.
Clinton and her aides have said material in her emails wasn’t marked as being classified at the time it was sent and received through her server. Law enforcement officials are examining e-mails that contained material known to be classified when sent.
Clinton used the private email system set up in her Chappaqua, New York, home while she was secretary of state from 2009 until February 2013. Emails sent and received by her and top aides that used the system were stored on a server. The Federal Bureau of Investigation took possession of the server on Aug. 12 as part of its probe.
Adviser Hacked
Clinton’s server could have been vulnerable after a Romanian hacker accessed the personal email of Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal in March 2013, according to one of the officials familiar with the probe. Blumenthal frequently emailed Clinton, and although the hack could have exposed the domain name of her server and her IP address, the State Department never conducted a security survey of her server, said the official.
Clinton said she turned over paper copies of 30,490 emails relating to government business from her tenure. Government screeners have flagged 305 of those documents for further review by U.S. intelligence agencies to see if they contained classified material.
Blending Material
There are several scenarios in which known classified material could have been improperly transferred, according to Hayden and one of the U.S. officials who asked for anonymity.
The most egregious way would be to knowingly strip classification markings from documents or other data, a move that would clearly be a criminal act.
A potentially more probable scenario is that those sending emails blended data from multiple sources that ultimately included or referenced some classified content.

 

"What you’re probably talking about is someone typing a message based on multiple sources in their head," Hayden said.
Moving a message from a classified system to an unclassified one, known within intelligence circles as going from the high side to the low side, requires two officials to certify that it contains no classified material, said the official.
The first is the sender; the second is an information management officer. It’s possible two people missed the classification markings, the official said.
Clinton faced a barrage of questions during a news conference on Aug. 18 in the Las Vegas area about the matter. When pressed about whether she wiped the server clean, Clinton replied, "What, like with a cloth or something?" She added, "I don’t know how it works digitally at all."
Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s communications director, said in an interview on Wednesday that Clinton "didn’t really think it through" when setting up the server for convenience. Given the chance for a do-over, she would do it differently, Palmieri said.

© Copyright 2015 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.