Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Spicer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spicer. Show all posts

Thursday, April 13, 2017

You Can Always Depend On Democratic Over The Top Reaction!



Sean Spicer made a serious mistake when he compared Bashar Al-Assad to Hitler, and to make matters worse, he got his facts wrong. He quickly and fully apologized. There was no hint of anti-Semitism in his historical mistake and his apology should have ended the matter. But his political enemies decided to exploit his mistake by pandering to Jews. In doing so, it is they who are exploiting the memory of the six million during the Passover Holiday.
The Democratic National Committee issued a rebuke with the headline "We will not stand for anti-Semitism." Its content included the following: "Denying the atrocities committed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime is a tried and true tactic used by Neo-Nazis and white supremacist groups that have become emboldened since Donald Trump first announced his campaign for president." By placing Hitler and Trump in the same sentence, the DNC committed a mistake similar to that for which they justly criticized Spicer. Moreover, the DNC itself, is co-chaired by a man who for many years did "stand for anti-Semitism" -- namely Keith Ellison who stood by the notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, while denying that he was aware of Farrakhan's very public Jew-hatred. It is the epitome of Chutzpah for the DNC to falsely accuse Spicer of standing by anti-Semitism while it is they who are co-chaired by a man who committed that sin.
Nancy Pelosi, the House Minority leaders, falsely accused Spicer of "downplaying the horror of the Holocaust." But by leveling that false accusation, Pelosi herself is exploiting the tragedy.
Steven Goldstein, a hard-left radical who heads a phony organization that calls itself "The Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect," accused Spicer of "engage[ing] in Holocaust denial." He called Spicer's mistake a "most evil slur" against the Jewish people. Goldstein claims to speak for the Jewish people, but he represents only himself and a few handfuls of radical followers who are not in any way representative of the mainstream Jewish community. He repeatedly exploits the Holocaust in order to gain publicity for him and his tiny group of followers. Shame on them!
These over the top reactions to a historical mistake made by Spicer that was not motivated by anti-Semitism represents political exploitation of the Holocaust. Spicer was wrong in seeking to bolster his argument against Assad by referring to Hitler, and his political opponents are wrong in exploiting the tragedy of the Holocaust to score partisan points against him.
The difference is that Spicer gaffe was not in any way pre-meditated, whereas the exploitation by his enemies was carefully calculated for political gain. All sides must stop using references to Hitler and the Holocaust in political dialogue. Historical analogies are by their nature generally flawed. Analogies to the Holocaust are always misguided, and often offensive, even if not so intended.
On CNN the other night, Don Lemon asked me if I was "offended as a Jew" by what Spicer had said. The truth is that I was offended as someone who cares about historical accuracy by Spicer's apparent lack of knowledge regarding the Nazi's use of chemicals such as Zyklon B to murder Jews during the Holocaust. But it never occurred to me that Spicer's misstatements were motivated by anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial or an intent to "slur" the Jewish people. Nor do I believe that those who have accused him of such evil motivations actually believe it. They deliberately attributed an evil motive to him in order to pander to Jewish listeners. That offends me more than anything Spicer did.
Extreme right wing anti-Semitism continues to be a problem in many parts of Europe and among a relatively small group of "alt-right" Americans. But hard left and Muslim extremist anti-Semitism is a far greater problem in America today, especially on university campuses. So those of us who hate all forms of anti-Semitism and bigotry, regardless of its source, must fight this evil on a non-partisan basis. We must get our priorities straight, focusing on the greatest dangers regardless of whether they come from the right or the left, from Republicans or Democrats. The fight against bigotry is a bi-partisan issue and must not be exploited for partisan gain.
Follow Alan Dershowitz on
Facebook: @AlanMDershowitz

  • Follow Alan M. Dershowitz on Twitter

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

Saturday, April 1, 2017

Spicer Fact Checked By CNN On Russian Dressing. Isn't This Becoming Crazy?

How Desperate Is CNN To Bash Trump? This Desperate.

30578726221
CNN makes no bones about being anti-Trump in every way. The cable news
channel that many know as the Clinton News Network was all about Hillary
 throughout the election – and even though Trump trounced her, the network
 execs have decided to target the president at every turn.
They've covered non-stories galore while ignoring huge Hillary scandals.
And they absolutely love fact-checking through the use of chyrons, like this
and this and this.
So the other day, when a White House reporter was busy acting unprofessional
and childish, rolling her eyes and shaking her head as Press Secretary
 Sean Spicer answered her inane questions, the Trump spokesman dropped
 a little joke.
"If the President puts Russian salad dressing on his salad tonight, somehow
 that's a Russia connection," Spicer said.



OK, pretty lame for late-night TV, but not bad for Spicer.
Enter CNN. The network actually did a fact check on the joke, and broke a
huge scandal that will no doubt shake the very foundation of power in
 Washington.
"Thing is, Russian dressing isn't Russian," Michelle Krupa wrote. "(Also,
 it's really not for salads, but more of a sandwich spread – usually a Reuben.)
The mayo and ketchup concoction – often dressed up with horseradish and spices – was created in Nashua, New Hampshire.
It was grocer James E. Colburn who invented the spread in 1924, according to "New Hampshire Resources, Attractions and Its People, a History," by Hobart Pillsbury. The Washington Post cites the 1927 text, which says Colburn sold the condiment to "retailers and hotels across the country, earning 'wealth on which he was enabled to retire.'"
So what's with the Russian connection? Some say it's because Colburn liked to mix in caviar, or perhaps because it sometimes was added to the Russian-inspired Salad Olivier.
So, the former Secretary of State deleting 30,000 official emails doesn't
 interest CNN, but whether Russian dressing is really Russian does.
And they wonder why they're ratings are in the cellar. 

Thursday, March 30, 2017



MSNBC Puts Spotlight On Kaine, Then Takes It Away Before He Can Talk

"That's the story of my life ..."

 Print
Kaine, who was Hillary Clinton’s running mate in last year’s presidential election, made a flurry of news Wednesday when he announced that due to Judge Neil Gorsuch’s track record on abortion and contraceptives, he would oppose Gorsuch’s nomination.
“After meeting with Judge Gorsuch and reviewing his testimony and past decisions, I’ve observed that he has repeatedly taken an activist approach to cases involving a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her health,” Kaine said in his statement.

“He has made the astounding argument that bosses have an individual right to prevent their company’s female employees from using their own health insurance to buy contraception,” he added.
Later Wednesday, Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC tracked Kaine down for an interview.
She began by noting that Kaine was not among the relatively few number of Democrats to attend Tuesday night’s bipartisan reception for senators hosted by President Donald Trump.
Kaine said he had a prior commitment he had already rescheduled once and was unable to attend.
“There was a shout-out to Chuck Schumer and a call form the president to start working with Democrats,” she said as the image on the screen shifted away from Mitchell and Kaine and to the White House press room where White House press secretary Sean Spicer was taking his place behind the podium.
“Senator, I apologize to you,” Mitchell told Kaine. “We have to go to the White House now.”
“That’s the story of my life, Andrea,” Kaine quipped.

“No, not the story of your life. That’s the story of my life, senator,” she replied.
Spicer began his briefing with the same issue that brought Kaine to the media forefront — Gorsuch’s nomination.
“I want to speak about Judge Gorsuch and the blatantly political obstruction of his nomination to the Supreme Court by Senate Democrats. Yesterday, the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that next Friday the Senate will vote to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. We welcome this news,” Spicer said.
“Unfortunately, Senate Democrats have begun justifying their opposition to Judge Gorsuch by claiming a 60-vote standard for his confirmation. That standard doesn’t exist and these claims continue to be false. A party-line filibuster by the Senate minority is not a fair up-or-down vote,” Spicer added.
Spicer then quoted comments from Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., made in 2013.
“Some of us may disagree with Justice Scalia on judicial philosophy, but he was a qualified nominee. He received an up-or-down vote and he was unanimously confirmed,” Spicer quoted Udall as saying then.
“Likewise, he said, Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg was considered a liberal. The former ACLU general counsel, many on the other side may have disagreed with her views but there was no filibuster. She was confirmed by a vote of 96-3,” Spicer added, quoting Udall.
Spicer noted that Udall, not a foe of Gorsuch, concluded, “A minority in the Senate should not be able to block qualified nominees.”
“We could not agree more with Sen. Udall,” Spicer said.
What do you think?

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

Trump Was Trying To Get A Deal. Made A Mistake Not Pressing For The Right Bill!



SPICER: Trump Thought House Health Bill Was ‘Bad Deal’


(WND.com) Despite his support for the failed House health-care bill, President Trump knew when to walk away from a “bad deal,” according to White House spokesman Sean Spicer.
Spicer's Epic Defense of Wire Tapping Evidence to White House Press CorpAt the daily briefing Monday, Spicer was asked if the president could still work with the conservative House Freedom Caucus, which led the opposition to the American Health Care Act.
On Sunday, Trump pinned blame on the Freedom Caucus for the bill’s failure, tweeting: “Democrats are smiling in D.C. that the Freedom Caucus, with the help of Club For Growth and Heritage, have saved Planned Parenthood & Ocare!”
But Spicer said Monday that working with the caucus in the future depends on the legislation, then offered new insight into the president’s thinking about the bill House Speaker Paul Ryan promoted as a repeal of Obamacare.
“The president also recognizes that when there’s not a deal to be made, when to walk away,” Spicer told reporters. “It’s not just about making deals. It’s knowing when to walk away from deals and knowing [that] when there’s a bad deal, that’s the only solution.”
While Trump praised the bill after it was withdrawn Friday, though acknowledging it could be improved, Spicer seemed to suggest passing it would not be consistent with the president’s “vision.”
“I think the president understood that where we were, that while you can get a deal at the time, that sometimes a bad deal is worse than getting a deal,” Spicer said. “And I think he smartly recognized that what was on the table was not going to be keeping with the vision that he had, and so he decided that this was not the time and that a deal was not at hand.”
Asked if repealing Obamacare was dead, Spicer said he believed the failure of President Obama’s signature legislation will bring some Democrats to the negotiating table, and the administration is willing to consider working with them.
“It is an abysmal failure,” he said of Obamacare. “If they [Democrats] want to come back to the table and recognize how we can do it in a more responsible way, we are willing to have that discussion. We have to figure out how we get to 216, 218 that day. That doesn’t mean we need the entire Democratic Caucus, and I think there may be a few of them who are willing to do that. Based on the calls that have come in, I think there might be some room to have a conversation. Let’s see how that evolves.
“I don’t think we’ve seen the end of health care.”
White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, in an interview with “Fox News Sunday,” criticized Republicans who opposed the Ryan bill of allowing the “perfect” to be the enemy of the “good.”
Reacting to Priebus, Freedom Caucus member Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” the bill “wasn’t even good.”
“When no one likes the legislation, you have to do it different,” he said.
Jordan said the Ryan bill would not bring down premiums and had “a host of problems.”
“And frankly, the key promise we made the American people in the 2010, 2014, and 2016 election was we would repeal Obamacare,” he said. “This legislation didn’t do that. And that was the fundamental flaw in this entire process. So let’s get back to work and let’s do what we said we would do.”
He added: “Remember, the lesson here is don’t try to pass a bill that only 17 percent of the country approves of. That’s a problem.”
Priebus told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace the president’s tweet about the Freedom Caucus “is 100 percent correct.”
“At the end of the day, I believe that it’s time for the party to start governing. And I think that’s important,” he said.
Some White House staffers blamed Trump’s politically moderate son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, Politico reported.
Suspicious that Kushner was working to defeat the repeal effort, their concerns only increased when he invited Obamacare architect Ezekiel Emanuel to address staffers. Then, with the legislation in jeopardy, Kushner left town for a two-day ski trip to Aspen.
GOP: ‘Are we capable of governing?’
A new Gallup Poll released Monday after the bill’s failure showed President Trump’s job approval rating fell five points to 36 percent for the three-day period of March 24-26.
White House Budget Director Mick Mulvaney said the Trump White House wondered how a Republican Congress and president could not come together.
“We’re asking the same questions. We really are,” Mulvaney said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” ”Is the Republican Party capable of governing?”
Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y., who supported Trump’s 2016 campaign, criticized opponents of the bill in his party.
“I can tell you right now there’s bitterness within our conference, it’s going to take time to heal that,” Collins said.
Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, who supported the bill, announced his resignation Sunday from the Freedom Caucus.
“Saying no is easy, leading is hard but that is what we were elected to do,” said Poe in a statement.
The House Freedom Caucus, chaired by Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., criticized the Ryan bill as “Obamacare Lite” because it was not a full repeal of the Affordable Health Care Act. They contended it would continue to drive up costs by maintaining a penalty for not purchasing health care, a tax-credit “entitlement,” regulations that dampen competition and other restrictive measures. Joined by Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Mike Lee, R-Utah; and others in the Senate, they argued for a “clean repeal” through the reissuing of a 2015 bill that passed Congress but was vetoed by President Obama.
Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, tweeted support for 2015 bill after the failure of the House leadership’s bill: “Now then bring to the House floor HR 175, the FULL ObamaCare repeal. Rip it ALL out by the roots!”
Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., filed a one-sentence bill Friday he’s calling the “Obamacare Repeal Act.”
It reads: “Effective as of Dec. 31, 2017, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted,”
Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., charged Monday on MSNBC’s “Live with Stephanie Ruhle” that the House Freedom Caucus is torpedoing the GOP’s ability to govern. He urged the party to work with Democrats to get things done on Capitol Hill.
Kinzinger said the Freedom Caucus members typically are “never, ever, ever going to get to ‘yes.’”
However, Reihan Salam, a columnist for the left-leaning news site Slate, wrote that despite the criticism, the House Freedom Caucus “has actually acted quite reasonably.”
He said that when Meadows told reporters Thursday night that he was “desperately trying to get to ‘yes,’” he was “telling the truth.”
Salam said Freedom Caucus members were willing to allow the bill’s new refundable tax credits, which they described as a “a new entitlement program,” in exchange for lifting regulations that curb competition.
“Ryan has steadfastly refused to budge on making big regulatory changes, on the grounds that you couldn’t get that done under the rules of budget reconciliation,” Salam wrote.
“Well, lo and behold, the Senate parliamentarian has made it clear that there really is scope to make sweeping regulatory changes under reconciliation rules. That news infuriated HFC members, and it sent Ryan scrambling to see if he could push through some last-minute changes to his bill, which got uglier and uglier by the hour.”
Meadows received a hero’s welcome upon his return to his western North Carolina district, Politico reported
“This is the face of leadership!” declared a flier posted by the local tea party urging supporters to turn out for a rally celebrating Meadows.
“What’s happening now is no longer the Trump plan. It is the Obama plan,” Ralph Slaughter, the GOP chairman in North Carolina’s Jackson County, said of House Republican leaders’ three-step proposal to replace Obamacare. “They thought perhaps that they could just force it through, and I really think to a certain point President Trump was sold a bill of goods that it would carry. That all they would have to do is present it.”
Columnist and former Republican presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan wrote that a case can be made that the Freedom Caucus just pulled the Republican Party “back off the ledge, before it jumped to its death.”
He argued that with the support of only 17 percent of Americans, the bill probably would have faced defeat in the Senate. Had it survived there, to be signed by President Trump, it would have meant 14 million Americans losing their health insurance in 2018.
Foremost among the losers, he said would have been “white working-class folks who delivered the Rust Belt states to President Trump.”
Politically, the biggest losers, Buchanan said, are Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans “who, having voted 50 times over seven years to repeal Obamacare, we learned, had no consensus plan ready to replace it.”
Republished with permission from WND.com via iCopyright license.

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Media, Still Bloodied By Election Fiasco, Trying With All Its Intensity To Make Trump Look Bad. However, They Forget, That Is NOT Their Role.

Shapiro at 'National Review': Memo To Media: It's Not About You

Alex Wong/Getty Images
JANUARY 25, 2017
839318 Comments4633
On Saturday, Trump press secretary Sean Spicer created a media firestorm by
 fibbing about sizes of inauguration crowds. After calling a press conference to
 claim that Trump’s inauguration had the largest audience in history, both “in 
person and around the globe,” Spicer tore into the media for their supposed 
falsehoods; Spicer specifically referenced D.C. Metro figures, fencing and 
magnetometer placement, and floor coverings that highlighted empty spaces
 on the National Mall. None of his claims were true.
NBC’s Chuck Todd asked Trump top adviser Kellyanne Conway about Spicer’s 
routine. “I’m curious,” he said, “why President Trump chose yesterday to send 
out his press secretary to essentially litigate a provable falsehood when it comes
 to a small and petty thing like inaugural crowd size. I guess my question to you 
is, Why do that?” Conway futzed about for an answer, variously misdirecting to
 the press’s willingness to ignore President Obama’s widespread lies, Trump’s 
executive actions, and a New York Times reporter’s quickly retracted tweet 
about a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. being removed from the Oval Office.
VIDEOThere is 'no excuse' for confirmation delays: Trump spokesman


Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time0:00
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
Todd’s question is the right one: What would drive President Trump to spend 
mental energy on a question as silly and meaningless as inaugural crowd 
size? There are dozens of excellent reasons his crowd size didn’t match
 Obama’s; the best reason is that the inauguration takes place in a 
Democratic stronghold, Washington, D.C. (Trump won 4.1 percent of the
 vote there.) Nonetheless, Trump chose to glom on to media coverage of
 crowd size. Why bother? But Todd’s question wasn’t that of the media at
large. Their question quickly turned from one of presidential focus and
 temperament to a far more self-centered one: Why would Trump send
 out his press secretary to lie to them? Why would Trump want to establish
 such an adversarial relationship with the press? Why would Spicer attack
the media?
That personal umbrage from the media drove the coverage throughout the
weekend. On CNN with Brian Stelter, former Hillary Clinton press secretary
 Brian Fallon called Spicer’s comments “an affront to anybody who is on
 our side of the wall and works in this business.” CBS’s Major Garrett
complained, “I’ve never seen anything like this, where it was so intense,
so harsh and passionate right off the beginning.”
This is why Trump wins every time he attacks the media: because the
media are so consumed with themselves, they don’t seem to care about
the public interest. When Spicer returned to the podium on Monday, he
gave the first question to the New York Post rather than the Associated
Press. This sent the collective media into spasms of apoplexy — how dare
 Spicer violate protocol this way? Why did he give questions to the Christian
Broadcasting Network before CNN?