Spicer's Mistake and the Democrat's Over-Reaction
Sean Spicer made a serious mistake when he compared Bashar Al-Assad to Hitler, and to make matters worse, he got his facts wrong. He quickly and fully apologized. There was no hint of anti-Semitism in his historical mistake and his apology should have ended the matter. But his political enemies decided to exploit his mistake by pandering to Jews. In doing so, it is they who are exploiting the memory of the six million during the Passover Holiday.
The Democratic National Committee issued a rebuke with the headline "We will not stand for anti-Semitism." Its content included the following: "Denying the atrocities committed by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime is a tried and true tactic used by Neo-Nazis and white supremacist groups that have become emboldened since Donald Trump first announced his campaign for president." By placing Hitler and Trump in the same sentence, the DNC committed a mistake similar to that for which they justly criticized Spicer. Moreover, the DNC itself, is co-chaired by a man who for many years did "stand for anti-Semitism" -- namely Keith Ellison who stood by the notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan, while denying that he was aware of Farrakhan's very public Jew-hatred. It is the epitome of Chutzpah for the DNC to falsely accuse Spicer of standing by anti-Semitism while it is they who are co-chaired by a man who committed that sin. Nancy Pelosi, the House Minority leaders, falsely accused Spicer of "downplaying the horror of the Holocaust." But by leveling that false accusation, Pelosi herself is exploiting the tragedy. Steven Goldstein, a hard-left radical who heads a phony organization that calls itself "The Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect," accused Spicer of "engage[ing] in Holocaust denial." He called Spicer's mistake a "most evil slur" against the Jewish people. Goldstein claims to speak for the Jewish people, but he represents only himself and a few handfuls of radical followers who are not in any way representative of the mainstream Jewish community. He repeatedly exploits the Holocaust in order to gain publicity for him and his tiny group of followers. Shame on them! These over the top reactions to a historical mistake made by Spicer that was not motivated by anti-Semitism represents political exploitation of the Holocaust. Spicer was wrong in seeking to bolster his argument against Assad by referring to Hitler, and his political opponents are wrong in exploiting the tragedy of the Holocaust to score partisan points against him. The difference is that Spicer gaffe was not in any way pre-meditated, whereas the exploitation by his enemies was carefully calculated for political gain. All sides must stop using references to Hitler and the Holocaust in political dialogue. Historical analogies are by their nature generally flawed. Analogies to the Holocaust are always misguided, and often offensive, even if not so intended. On CNN the other night, Don Lemon asked me if I was "offended as a Jew" by what Spicer had said. The truth is that I was offended as someone who cares about historical accuracy by Spicer's apparent lack of knowledge regarding the Nazi's use of chemicals such as Zyklon B to murder Jews during the Holocaust. But it never occurred to me that Spicer's misstatements were motivated by anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial or an intent to "slur" the Jewish people. Nor do I believe that those who have accused him of such evil motivations actually believe it. They deliberately attributed an evil motive to him in order to pander to Jewish listeners. That offends me more than anything Spicer did. Extreme right wing anti-Semitism continues to be a problem in many parts of Europe and among a relatively small group of "alt-right" Americans. But hard left and Muslim extremist anti-Semitism is a far greater problem in America today, especially on university campuses. So those of us who hate all forms of anti-Semitism and bigotry, regardless of its source, must fight this evil on a non-partisan basis. We must get our priorities straight, focusing on the greatest dangers regardless of whether they come from the right or the left, from Republicans or Democrats. The fight against bigotry is a bi-partisan issue and must not be exploited for partisan gain. Follow Alan Dershowitz on Facebook: @AlanMDershowitz
© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.
|
CNN makes no bones about being anti-Trump in every way. The cable news
channel that many know as the Clinton News Network was all about Hillary
throughout the election – and even though Trump trounced her, the network
execs have decided to target the president at every turn.
channel that many know as the Clinton News Network was all about Hillary
throughout the election – and even though Trump trounced her, the network
execs have decided to target the president at every turn.
They've covered non-stories galore while ignoring huge Hillary scandals.
And they absolutely love fact-checking through the use of chyrons, like this
and this and this.
And they absolutely love fact-checking through the use of chyrons, like this
and this and this.
So the other day, when a White House reporter was busy acting unprofessional
and childish, rolling her eyes and shaking her head as Press Secretary
Sean Spicer answered her inane questions, the Trump spokesman dropped
a little joke.
and childish, rolling her eyes and shaking her head as Press Secretary
Sean Spicer answered her inane questions, the Trump spokesman dropped
a little joke.
"If the President puts Russian salad dressing on his salad tonight, somehow
that's a Russia connection," Spicer said.
that's a Russia connection," Spicer said.
OK, pretty lame for late-night TV, but not bad for Spicer.
Enter CNN. The network actually did a fact check on the joke, and broke a
huge scandal that will no doubt shake the very foundation of power in
Washington.
huge scandal that will no doubt shake the very foundation of power in
Washington.
"Thing is, Russian dressing isn't Russian," Michelle Krupa wrote. "(Also,
it's really not for salads, but more of a sandwich spread – usually a Reuben.)
it's really not for salads, but more of a sandwich spread – usually a Reuben.)
The mayo and ketchup concoction – often dressed up with horseradish and spices – was created in Nashua, New Hampshire.It was grocer James E. Colburn who invented the spread in 1924, according to "New Hampshire Resources, Attractions and Its People, a History," by Hobart Pillsbury. The Washington Post cites the 1927 text, which says Colburn sold the condiment to "retailers and hotels across the country, earning 'wealth on which he was enabled to retire.'"So what's with the Russian connection? Some say it's because Colburn liked to mix in caviar, or perhaps because it sometimes was added to the Russian-inspired Salad Olivier.
So, the former Secretary of State deleting 30,000 official emails doesn't
interest CNN, but whether Russian dressing is really Russian does.
interest CNN, but whether Russian dressing is really Russian does.
And they wonder why they're ratings are in the cellar.


At the daily briefing Monday, Spicer was asked if the president could still work with the conservative House Freedom Caucus, which led the opposition to the American Health Care Act.