Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Washington State. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Washington State. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Another Fear Tactic That Will Cost Washingtonians A Lot



Washington Governor Claims ‘Just 59 Days’ To Save Children From Global Warming

Washington state’s Democratic Governor Jay Inslee warned there was “just 59 days” to save future generations from “an endless cycle of crop-killing droughts one year, and rivers spilling their banks the next.”
Inslee went on a lengthy Twitter rant in efforts to convince the state legislature to pass legislation to tax carbon dioxide emissions. Washington residents voted down Inslee’s last carbon tax plan by a wide margin in 2016.

The state legislature’s session ends in 59 days, on March 8. Democrats have a slim majority in both state legislative chambers.
Inslee wants lawmakers to pass a tax on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and industrial facilities.
Inslee’s plan would tax carbon dioxide emissions at $20 a ton in 2019, that would gradually rise at 3.5 percent above inflation each following year. Inslee’s office estimates it will raise $3.3 billion over the next four years.
About $950 million would go toward education programs. The rest would go toward green energy programs and research, water infrastructure, wildfire mitigation. Some money would offset taxes or go to poor families.
The plan could raise household electricity prices five percent, and gas prices by about 10 percent, according to official estimates.
Inslee’s first carbon tax plan failed in 2016 after liberal groups couldn’t agree how to spend the revenues it was expected to raise. Inslee also proposed a cap-and-trade program, that both Democrats and Republicans rejected in 2015.
If Inslee’s carbon tax plan passes, the legislation would have no measurable impact on projected future global warming. Indeed, even if the U.S. as a whole stopped emitting, the impact would be extremely small, based on government climate models.
NOW WATCH:

Mute
/
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
NOW WATCH:

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

Another Great Achievement By Texas

Another Proud Achjievment By 'Texas

Texas Gov. Adds State to List of Those With Pro-Israel Investment Laws


(Katie J. Read, Liberty Headlines) When Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed a pro-Israel bill on the nation’s Day of Independence at the Jewish Community Center in Austin, Texas, he signaled the state’s strong support of its ally.

Greg Abbott Photo by Gage Skidmore
Abbott signed House Bill 89 into law Tuesday, an act that forbids state institutions from engaging with any entities that take part in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which originated with Palestinian leaders over a decade ago to apply economic pressure to Israel, in an effort to force its withdrawal from “occupied” territories.
Abbott’s ratification came after the bill passed through the state House uncontested, 131-to-0.
“I am proud to have commemorated Israel’s Independence Day by signing into law anti-BDS legislation in Texas,” Abbott said in a press release. “As Israel’s number one trading partner in the United States, Texas is proud to reaffirm its support for the people of Israel and we will continue to build on our historic partnership.”
The press release specified that, because of the new law, public funds will not be directed toward any group participating with the BDS movement.
“Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies, and we will not tolerate such actions against an important ally,” Abbott said.
According to the website for the BDS movement, the campaign exists to advocate for the human rights of Palestinian citizens encroached upon by Israel.
“Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) is a Palestinian-led movement for freedom, justice and equality,” the Web site says. “BDS upholds the simple principle that Palestinians are entitled to the same rights as the rest of humanity.”
Texas is the eighteenth state to enforce any anti-BDS legislation. According to Palestine Legal, other states with similar laws are Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and South Carolina.
As recently as 2016, legislators attempted to sign anti-BDS bills into law in Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Virginia, and Washington state, but pro-BDS activists prohibited the bills from passing. Activists attempted the same feat in New York in 2016, but New York Governor Andrew Cuomo passed an executive order blacklisting the anti-BDS laws.
“New York stands in solidarity with Israel today and always,” Cuomo said in a press release after signing the order in 2016. “This state will not stand for the politics of discrimination in any form, and we will continue to demonstrate our unwavering support for the people of Israel in the fight for freedom, liberty and democracy. I’m proud to sign this nation’s leading executive order, which will help protect Israel from the threat of divestment.”
Anti-BDS legislation is currently pending in Minnesota and Massachusetts.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

The Negative Effects Of Doing What You Think Is Good For Everyone


Massachusetts feels the impact of having highest state minimum wage

 


Massachusetts feels the impact of having highest state minimum wage
A shopper passes "Store Closing Sale" and "Entire Store on Sale" signs in the window of a Loehmann's clothing store Jan. 9, 2014 in New York. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)



Massachusetts is finding out the hard way that merely raising the state’s minimum wage does not automatically make life better for minimum wage workers — in fact, it could have the opposite impact.
On Jan. 1, Massachusetts’ minimum wage rose from $10 per hour to $11 per hour —  that’s up $3 per hour from as recently as January 2014, the Boston Globe reported.
The Bay State was among 19 states that voted in November to give minimum wage workers a raise, as ABC News noted. Oregon, Washington, D.C., and Maryland are all expected to raise the minimum wage later this year.
“Living wage” advocates aren’t stopping there. Raise Up Massachusetts is a nonprofit organization that helped catapult Massachusetts’ minimum wage to the highest in the country, along with Washington state, which also raised its minimum wage to $11 per hour. In a Facebook post on Sunday, the group vowed to “keep fighting for $15.”
But the “Fight for 15” movement is not without consequence for the very workers it was designed to help.
The Globe spoke with one Massachusetts business owner who has cut her staff from 50 to 20 in the past two years alone, telling the newspaper she just couldn’t afford to pay all those workers the ever-rising, state-mandated amount.
Marc Wallerce, another Massachusetts business owner, said his payroll has gone up nearly $100,000 in the past three years, with most of the extra money going to teenagers he employs, since most of his older workers already earn above minimum wage. Unlike the first business owner the Globe spoke to, Wallerce hasn’t cut any jobs, but his own take-home pay is less than it used to be.
“Are we feeling the pinch? Absolutely. Every day,” Wallerce said.
To add insult to injury, Wallerce is mandated by Massachusetts to pay his employees time and a half on holidays and Sundays. To date, only Massachusetts and Rhode Island force businesses to pay workers extra on those days.
Liberal firebrands like Massachusetts’ own Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren as well as one-time Democratic presidential candidate Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an avowed socialist, have been strong supporters of the “Fight for 15” movement. Sanders took to Twitter on Saturday to praise the “huge progress” made by “living wage” advocates in just three years.

The  started only 4 years ago. But huge progress has already been made because people everywhere see the justice of that idea.

It remains to be seen whether President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for labor secretary, restaurant executive Andrew Puzder, will push back against the move for a higher federal minimum wage, which is currently $7.25 per hour. Puzder has been an outspoken critic of raising the federal minimum wage to $15, which is the ultimate goal of the “Fight for 15” movement.

Friday, December 23, 2016

Political Correctness Never Gets It Right



Corrections officers asked to leave Cheesecake Factory — for carrying guns

 



Corrections officers asked to leave Cheesecake Factory — for carrying guns
Image source: YouTube screen cap




Six Washington state corrections officers met up for lunch at the Cheesecake Factory in the Tacoma Mall on Tuesday. And as you’d expect, their uniforms and badges were visible.
But three of them were also carrying guns — and that became an issue.
“They had seated us in the back area,” Miriam Nichols, who’s worked three years for the department of corrections, told KIRO-FM. “Shortly after the rest of our party arrived, we were asked to leave because we were carrying our firearms with us. They said they did not allow firearms in their establishment.”
The officers showed their badges and law enforcement IDs to restaurant’s managers. They explained why they were armed — but no dice.
“They said it didn’t matter, and they asked us to leave,” Nichols told KIRO. “We left quietly and tried not to make more of a scene than it already was.”
Cheesecake Factory staffers were polite about the whole thing, she added to the station: “There are only so many ways to politely kick someone out of an establishment, though.”
“I was a little floored that it was even happening,” Nichols added to KIRO. “This wasn’t the first place that my colleagues and I have gone to lunch … having contact with clients, offenders, the general public, while on duty. This is the first time we had this reaction.”
But once Nichols posted about her experience on Facebook, a lot of people were outraged.

A number of commenters vowed to boycott the restaurant, which just opened Dec. 6, the News Tribune reported. Others were angry that the action took place so soon after a Tacoma police officer was fatally shot in the line of duty.
“It’s kind of given that law enforcement carry firearms,” Nichols told KIRO.
Soon after, Cheesecake Factory corporate released a statement: “Our policy is to allow uniformed and identified law enforcement officials to possess their service weapons on our premises. To the extent that there was a miscommunication of our policy, we sincerely apologize.”
Apparently a shift manager miscommunicated or misunderstood the policy, the News Tribune reported.
But among many who indicated support for the officers carrying their guns into the restaurant, at least one person who replied to Nichols’ original Facebook post on the matter didn’t see it that way.
“Sorry, but any place that has a strict no-gun policy and follows it to the letter is awesome,” the commenter said. “With no disrespect to the awesome men and women in law enforcement, if you’re on break and want to go to a restaurant…why bring your gun with you? I know I am uncomfortable around anyone with a gun, and I mean anyone, so if I am enjoying a meal at a restaurant…I’d like to not be rendered uncomfortable….”
That got a few folks riled up.
“Who cares about your comfortability?” one poster shot back. “Law enforcement carry all the time on and off duty because so many of them are shot to death while eating breakfast. That’s why they carry their firearms. Use common sense before posting something like this.”
“They carry when on break because they are still on duty,” another added. “I would rather eat with a cop then a snowflake like you. At least they have my 6 and I can eat in peace.”
“Have fun in your gun free zones when you are a sitting duck for an active shooter,” another poster said. “Why do you think that mass shootings take place in gun free zones?”

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Soros Might Be In Trouble If Washington State Bill Becomes Law


Lawmaker Set to Issue BRUTAL Justice to Rioters Who Block Traffic and Damage Property

 Print











A Republican state senator in Washington, where violent riots broke out after the election of President-elect Donald Trump last week, has begun crafting a bill that would allow prosecutors to drop the hammer on protesters and rioters who engage in what he described as “economic terrorism.”
In a news brief published Wednesday, state Sen. Doug Ericksen explained that the bill would permit the felony prosecution for “economic terrorism” that would target “those who intentionally break the law in an attempt to intimidate or coerce private citizens or the government by obstructing economic activity,” as reported by KCPQ.
“I respect the right to protest, but when it endangers people’s lives and property, it goes too far,” he continued. “Fear, intimidation and vandalism are not a legitimate form of political expression. Those who employ it must be called to account.”

Those who “fund, organize, sponsor or encourage others to commit acts of economic terrorism” would also be liable, he added.
“We are not just going after the people who commit these acts of terrorism,”  Ericksen said. “We are going after the people who fund them. Wealthy donors should not feel safe in disrupting middle class jobs.”
Billionaire rabble-rouser George Soros might want to keep this in mind the next time he considers encouraging disenchanted liberals to riot like barn animals.


To learn more about the bill, watch the video below:
Note that Ericksen’s proposal would not apply to Americans who engage in peaceful protests but rather to thugs who attempt to block traffic and/or place the public’s safety at risk.
According to The Seattle Times, misdemeanor trespassing laws already apply to protest-related disturbances such as blocking railroads, but Ericksen’s proposal would make it a felony.

The likelihood of his bill actually making it into law is unfortunately slim — due both to the state’s divided legislature and to the interference of the American Civil Liberties Union, whose representatives have called it inflammatory and unnecessary.
If someone in the Republican-controlled Congress were to take up such a bill on the national level, however, then Ericksen’s efforts would not have been in vain.
Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about Washington state Sen. Doug Ericksen’s brutal proposal for how to deal with out-of-control rioters!
What do you think about this bill?