Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label american flag. Show all posts
Showing posts with label american flag. Show all posts

Thursday, July 5, 2018

Facebook Reluctanlty Corrects Banning Of Patriotic Unifying Message

FACEBOOK BLOCKS COUNTRY BAND FROM PROMOTING SONG CELEBRATING AMERICAN FLAG

‘I Stand for the Flag’ blocked due to ‘political content’

0
0
A country music band says a patriotic song they created which celebrates the American flag was censored by Facebook.
The Nashville-based Wes Cook Band on Monday wrote that the social media giant had prevented them from promoting their song, “I Stand for the Flag,” using the platform’s paid ads tool due to its political message.
“Our paid FB ads were denied and our reach thereby censored because this video contains ‘political content’. We believe Patriotism is not Political!” the band said in a Facebook post.
The song’s lyrics rally people of all walks of life to unite behind Old Glory, stating, “Don’t care if you’re black or white or who you love, I stand for the Flag, and the Flag stands for all of us.”
Other lyrics encourage unity: “You ain’t gotta pick a side. You can love your fellow man and still have pride,” and the video also shows people of all races celebrating America.
Screenshots showed Facebook rejected the band’s request to boost the post, significantly reducing the song’s circulation.
In a message to Fox News, Facebook claimed the band’s paid ad rejection was a mistake.
“We recently announced anyone running ads about political or other major national issues must include a ‘paid for’ label,” a Facebook spokesperson stated.
“After looking again, we determined that this ad doesn’t need that label. While this is a new policy, and while we won’t ever be perfect, we think knowing who is behind an ad is important, and we’ll continue to work on improving as we roll it out.”
Despite acknowledging the error, Breitbart notes Facebook has yet to rectify the situation.
“…[I]t remains to be seen if Facebook has actually fixed the problem or if the social media giant has been in touch with the band at all,” reports Warner Todd Huston. “Sources close to the matter say Facebook still has not rectified the issue despite its statement admitting it made a mistake and claiming it would reverse that mistake.”

Monday, June 25, 2018

Tribute To The Flag And Anthem

Take a listen, it sums up how people who served their country feel about the USA.  It also reflects the opinions of  those who honor those who did.

http://www.break.com/video/anti-nfl-song-called-take-a-knee-my-ass-3137583

Conservative Tom

Friday, December 15, 2017

Finally Someone Speaks Clearly On NFLI (NFL Idiots)

Enough with the Victimhood: Millionaire Athletes and Their Lost Cause

avatar
by Sylvia Thompson on 1 October, 2017
I must admit I have never in my life purchased a ticket to a sports event. I am not a sports enthusiast. But I am an American black citizen, and I have had it up to the gills with black people who embrace victimhood. I also highly resent my being expected to do the same in order to affirm my “blackness.”
Black victims these days, for the most part, are the product of decades of Black Americans being used primarily by white progressive leftists to advance an anti-American agenda.
The current brouhaha surrounding the despicable behavior of NFL athletes toward the National Anthem and the American flag is a prime example of what the Left has done to my race.
One must assume these players and their guilt-conflicted white coaches and owners (and victimhood-inflicted black coaches) are being manipulated by the Left, because no intelligent, thinking people would deliberately cut themselves off at the knees. Essentially, what these young misguided mostly black men are doing is ensuring the demise of their lucrative paychecks. Further, I would wager that if these teams consisted of all white athletes, none of this idiocy would be allowed. We are witnessing this travesty because the vast majority of players are black and can whine “oppression” if appropriate action is taken against them for their unconscionable behavior.
The twisted reasoning that claims these protests are to highlight “injustice” and “police brutality” is a laughable crock. What they do in fact is dishonor valued symbols of this nation’s heritage and cover over truth about black crime.
Black males bear the brunt of police encounters because black males commit disproportionately more crimes. Police encounters with black men are so often confrontational because so many of these men, especially the young, don’t think “compliance” applies to them. They foolishly assume they are above the law and disrespect for police officers is an act of honor.
These young blacks, sadly, took much of their direction from racists Barack Obama and Eric Holder during Obama’s destructive, eight-year regime and Holder’s corruption of the Justice Department. These two men, abusing their federal powers, gave young blacks the impression they need not heed the law, because laws are somehow unjust when they are applied to black Americans. The NFL lot, and any other athletes taking a similar stance, are also influenced by Obama’s and Holder’s disdain for law and law enforcement.
I am not familiar with one case where a black suspect to a crime was not proven legally to have caused the behavior against him, particularly in cases where the police officer involved was exonerated by facts. Michael Brown of “hands up, don’t shoot” infamy is one good example. Blatant lies were spread to cloud the truth about Brown’s case.
Back in the day when I was growing up in the racially segregated South, the opposite prevailed in many cases. There was much injustice particularly toward black men, but not today. Today, too many blacks have been fed the notion that it is now “pay-back” time, and they can flaunt their lawlessness because some whites flaunted theirs during an earlier time in our nation’s history.
Although Obama and Holder no longer wield power in this country, some of their minions continue on the pernicious path of “paying back” American whites for wrongs, real or imagined. But as the saying goes, there is a new Sheriff in town and he is not guilt-conflicted. He expects fair play under law and tolerating pay-back is not part of his agenda. Black Americans, when they break the law, can no longer claim victim status simply because they are black. Those days are over.
American laws and law enforcement personnel will be respected in America, again; our traditions and values will not be impugned in America without consequences, again. Anybody unsettled about this turn of events is welcome to leave this country. I suggest all the black players try a country in Africa, and see how successful they will be at making millions playing games. They will all soon learn what oppression really means.
Some self-directed, independent-thinking blacks (and there are many of us) have offered that if these millionaire protestors want to tackle some real problems, they might consider the thousands of black children killed in abortions annually (by the progressive Left), or perhaps the many, many young blacks murdered routinely on inner-city streets by other young blacks (in cities run by progressive, leftist Democrats), or the downright criminal state of education of black inner-city children, orchestrated by the progressive leftist National Education Association (NEA). The NEA’s aim is to produce unintelligent pawns to feed the cause of progressivism.
I am annoyed by the expressions of “sincerity” gracing the faces of the NFL protestors—as if to convey the “hallowedness” of their cause. In actuality, they provide a picture of grown men allowing themselves to be made fools of by the progressive Left. I don’t doubt, however, that some of these men have been coerced into compliance with this lost cause, either through threats of violence or shunning (from coaches and players). Alejandro Villanueva of the Pittsburgh Steelers and former Army ranger is very likely a victim of such threats. He was publicly castigated by his leftist coach for his patriotism. The coach demanded unity behind an ignorant cause.
And finally, this issue has nothing to do with First Amendment rights. President Trump’s speaking out against the clownish behavior of the athletes, on behalf of the majority of American citizens, does not mean he can or would stop any of these misguided people from making fools of themselves. To restrict them, as a government entity, would indeed be a violation of the First Amendment. But their employers, if they were to develop even a modicum of testicular fortitude, could and should fire them for doing major damage to the bottom line of the business. The rest of us non-millionaire “Joes” would certainly be pink-slipped by an employer if we dared to be so clueless about the necessity of profits and so disdainful of the sensibilities of customers.
I will wait patiently for the true sports enthusiasts to vent their rage by simply boycotting the games. It will be sweet revenge to witness the slain goose cease producing its golden eggs.
© Sylvia Thompson
9/30/2017



Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal, leftist spin on issues pertaining to race and culture. Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve as long as the voices of many are stifled by intimidation from the few. She believes the nation needs resounding voices of opposition from true patriots and Bible-oriented Christians, to stem the forces that would transform this nation into something it was never intended to be.


Friday, February 24, 2017

Its Now A "Safety" Concern To Fly The American Flag. Sick Lefties!



Students Flock to Campus With American Pride After School Tells Students He Can’t Have American Flag


 Print

There are an unfortunate number of people in this country who seem to think that expressions of patriotism, such as flying the American flag, shouldn’t be allowed because it might offend some thin-skinned people.
An assistant principal of Dinwiddie High School, located in Dinwiddie County, Virginia, appears to be one of those people. Dinwiddle student Daniel Nunnally Jr. was asked by the assistant principal, who was not named, to remove the American flag he had flying on his truck, WRIC reported.
“I was in the middle of my second period weight training class and my assistant principal came in and pulled me out of class and told me that I had to go outside to take both flags off my truck so there is no controversy or anything,” Nunnally told the television station.

Nunnally, who is considering joining the Army Reserves, asked the assistant principal if he should remove the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag he had flying. The assistant principal insisted that both that flag — known as the Gadsden flag — and the American flag should be removed.
The assistant principal soon learned what a stupid decision that was when roughly a dozen students showed up with flags on their cars the next day in protest.
Soon, the order was rescinded. The administration claimed that the assistant principal had asked the student to remove the flags for safety because they might be blocking his view while driving.

Check out the WRIC report here:
Nunnally’s father supported the student.
“My entire family fought and died under that flag,” Nunnally Sr. stated.

If this was indeed all about safe driving, the assistant principal wouldn’t have used the word “controversy.” Clearly, the school was worried about some delicate snowflake being offended by the red white and blue.
Instead of forcing patriotic Americans like Nunnally to change their way of life to suit a small fraction of the population, people like this assistant principal should teach those who hate this country to either love it, or leave it.
H/T TheBlaze
Share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you would have done if this had been your son and his school’s assistant principle.
Do you support this high school student flying the American flag? 

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Muslims Infiltrate Societies One Step After Another Until They Reach 10%, Then They Demand More


Screen Shot 2016-01-29 at 3.18.09 PM

HERE’S WHERE MUSLIMS ARE MAKING AMERICANS TEAR DOWN THEIR FLAGS


Think that the Muslims aren’t winning?
Well this little story will be the newsflash you need to see they are winning, and it’s not good for Americans.
One of the worst ways this is exemplified is in how they treat the American flag. Sure, they come over here and set up mosques and get their religion taught to our students (despite our protest).
But they also force us to take down our flags
Check this story out.
A man just outside of Houston was told by his apartment complex that he needed to remove his American flag from his balcony, because it might offend Muslims. Duy Tran had just moved into a new apartment and wanted to put a flag out. To him it means a lot because he has friends who have served and he wanted to honor them.
When he was told that his flag display couldn’t remain, because it would offend Muslims, he was bewildered.
“It’s not a threat to anyone,” he said.
tran
Whatever happened to “It’s the emblem of the land I love. The home of the free and the brave. Every heart beats true for the red, white and blue?”
Americans should never have to apologize for being proud of their country inside their own borders. What kind of self-loathing person wouldn’t allow an American flag to be displayed in the first place?
Tran says,

“I’m gonna leave my flag there, as an American, until she shows me proof that I don’t have the right to leave my flag there.”

The apartment management may be against Tran right now, this is still America and we still have our rights.
Of course it’s not just the Muslims who are against the flag…there are many other groups across the U.S. who are against the flag flying, or being adorned on public viewable fixtures.
There are immigrants from Mexico who claim the flag is offensive.
There are even homegrown Americans, people who were born here who hate it.
The reason why?
Because some people hate freedom, pure and simple. If they can’t tell another person what to do then they are going to do everything in their power to make sure that other person is left unable to be free.
What’s your take on this story? Tell us below.

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Banning Flag Shirts At Schools Upheld By Ninth Circuit Court! Why Don't We Remove The Flag From All Buildings So That We Will Not Insult The World?

Ninth Circuit Upholds Ban on American Flag Shirts in a California High School

Live Oak StudentsToday, the Ninth Circuit affirmed a decision by a lower federal court in San Francisco that upheld a school district’s ban on the wearing of American flag shirts on a California high school campus in 2010 during Cinco de Mayo (May 5th)—a Mexican holiday.
AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel Robert Muise, who argued the case before the Ninth Circuit, commented:
“It is truly a sad day when government officials are permitted to ban the American flag on a public high school campus for any reason.  Here, school officials feared that our clients would offend ‘Mexican’ students if they wore their flag shirts to school on Cinco de Mayo, so they ordered the students to either remove their shirts or leave school in direct violation of their First Amendment rights.”
On May 5, 2010, school officials from Live Oak High School in the Morgan Hill Unified School District, California, prevented five students from wearing American flag t-shirts because the officials did not want to offend “Mexican” students on “their day.”  That day, some students at the school were celebrating the Mexican holiday known as Cinco de Mayo.  School officials approved the Cinco de Mayo celebration, which was co-sponsored by M.E.Ch.A, a school-sanctioned student group.  While school officials claimed that they were concerned about racial tension and potential threats of violence in light of an altercation that occurred between Mexican and American students on campus during a 2009 Cinco de Mayo celebration, the officials nonetheless approved the 2010 Mexican celebration, demonstrating that their fear of violence was nothing short of a pretext.
Moreover, despite banning the American flag, school officials permitted the Mexican students participating in the Cinco de Mayo celebration to wear clothing that had the colors of the Mexican flag.  The Ninth Circuit held that this was permissible because school officials were not concerned about any of the American students engaging in violence against the Mexican-flag wearing students.  The Ninth Circuit stated, “As the district court noted, the students offered no evidence ‘demonstrating that students wearing the colors of the Mexican flag were targeted for violence.’  The students offered no evidence that students at a similar risk of danger were treated differently, and therefore no evidence of impermissible viewpoint discrimination.”
The students wearing the American flag shirts had been on campus for over 3 hours when they were approached by an assistant principal and ordered to turn their shirts inside out.  When the students refused to disrespect the American flag, the school official directed them to the principal’s office where they were lectured on the importance of Cinco de Mayo and given the option of either removing their shirts or leaving school.  The students refused to remove the shirts, so they left school and then filed this civil rights lawsuit.
AFLC Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi commented:
“These students and their parents should be commended for standing up and exercising their rights under the First Amendment.  Our rights will only have meaning if we are willing to fight for them.  That is what the American Freedom Law Center is doing every day, but it also takes courageous citizens, such as our clients in this case, to join us in the fight.”
During the discovery phase of the lawsuit, the evidence overwhelmingly showed that school officials intentionally restricted the students’ speech on May 5, 2010, because they believed that the pro-America message conveyed by the students’ patriotic clothing would offend some Mexican students since it was Cinco de Mayo—“their day,” as one school official testified.  School officials enforced the clothing restriction even though they had no objective evidence that the students were causing any disruption—let alone a material and substantial one—to the operation of the school by wearing the American flag shirts.
Despite this uncontested evidence, the lower federal court ruled in favor of the school district, stating, “Upon review, the Court finds that based on these undisputed facts, the school officials reasonably forecast that Plaintiffs’ clothing could cause a substantial disruption with school activities, and therefore did not violate [the First Amendment].”  The Ninth Circuit affirmed this ruling.
AFLC intends to file a petition for full court review, which must be filed within 14 days.

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Sheeple Sign Petition To Ban American Flag And To Remove Washington Memorial. Are They Brain Dead?

U.S. CITIZENS SIGN PETITION TO BAN AMERICAN FLAG

....and replace it with a pyramid to "signify the new world order".
by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON | JUNE 29, 2015


In the aftermath of calls to ban the Confederate flag following the Charleston shooting, some Americans signed a petition to ban the stars and stripes itself.
Media analyst Mark Dice’s latest stunt illustrates the stunning level of ignorance surrounding the issue and how easily led Americans are when told to support anything in the name of putting a stop to racism.
Although some refused to sign, when told that Old Glory has a history of “imperialism and racism,” numerous San Diegans agreed, with one man commenting, “It sounds like a great idea.”
“A lot of people are offended by the American flag,” says Dice, to which another individual enthusiastically responds, “I’ll sign this shit man!”
“Support issuing a new American flag for the new world order,” Dice tells the man, to which he agrees, “F**k yeah man!”
“Basically ban the American flag, we’re gonna put up a new American flag over the capital to signify the new world order,” Dice tells another man who signs the petition.
When a woman asks what the new flag will look like, Dice tells her it will include a pyramid and a rainbow for gay pride and to “signify the unity in the new world order.”
“Interesting,” she responds as she signs the petition.
In signing the petition, these individuals sided with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, who last weekcalled for the American flag to be banned due to its links with racism.
“I don’t know what the hell the fight is about over the Confederate flag! We need to put the American flag down because we’ve caught as much hell under that as the Confederate flag!” said Farrakhan.
Radio host Laura Ingraham also expressed fears that the American flag would be the next symbol to be targeted by liberals, stating, “[They’re] moving on from the flag to statues, memorials, perhaps Civil War reenactments, until what else? What else becomes an untouchable or unshowable in our society?”
The hashtag #LiberalsNextBan also began trending on Twitter last week, suggesting innumerable other examples of “offensive” symbols of America that leftists will try to censor next.
As Infowars reported last week, students at the University of Texas signed a petition to remove a statue of George Washington and memorials to other founding fathers in another illustration of the politically correct insanity that has emerged in the wake of the Charleston massacre.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

First There Was The Confederate Battle Flag. What's Next? US Flag, Jefferson Memorial, Washington Memorial Or Other Not PC Buildings Or Artifacts?

Louis Farrakhan: ‘We Need to Put the American Flag Down’

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan expressed contempt for the American flag Wednesday, telling hundreds gathered in a D.C. church that it is a symbol of racism and needs to be brought down.
The controversial figure spoke at the Metropolitan AME Church, just one week after a white male shot and killed nine individuals at a historically black church in Charleston, South Carolina.
Louis Farrakhan. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Louis Farrakhan. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)
“White folks march with you because they don’t want you upset in the city,” Farrakhan said during his speech, a portion which was published online by WMAL. “They don’t give a damn about them nine. When they arrested that skunk …. they took him to the Burger King.”
Farrakhan: ”We need to put the American flag down…”
Share:
“Man just killed nine human beings, and you know what they were saying? ‘You did a good job. Kill all them n******!’” he added.
Farrakhan then took aim at the American flag.
“I don’t know what the hell the fight is about over the Confederate flag! We need to put the American flag down because we’ve caught as much hell under that as the Confederate flag!” he said.
“Who are we fighting today? It’s the people that carry the American flag,” Farrakhan continued. “What flag do the police have? What flag flies over the non-Justice Department? What flag flies over the White House?”
The Nation of Islam leader said that taking the Confederate flag is “easy,” but not enough.
On Tuesday, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh made a prediction that the American flag would “come under assault” after the Confederate flag. At the time he said, “Do not doubt me.”