Every American Should Vote For Trump If They Want To Recapture What Used To Be America. If NOT, They Are Part Of The Problem And Not The Solution

Paris terror attack proves Trump was right

Posted on November 19, 2015 by Wayne Allyn Root

Hello. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. I’m here today to talk about two controversial, high-profile, bigger-than-life subjects: the ISIS terrorist attack in Paris and Donald Trump.

Let’s start with Donald.

Donald Trump is brilliant. Trump is a chess master. His instincts about immigration and the border were 100 percent on the money. Unfortunately, it took a terrible ISIS terrorist attack to prove it.

Because of the events from last week in Paris, immigration and our open border with Mexico just became the No. 1 issue in America. All the presidential candidates are now playing on Trump’s home turf. Trump is in command of the most important issue in America. This is what keeps mothers up at night.

And ironically, all the negatives that Trump’s critics and enemies say about him make him perfect to lead the fight against ISIS and other radical Islamic terrorist groups. They say that Trump’s mean, vicious, combative, offensive and bombastic; that he doesn’t care about political correctness; that he doesn’t care about hurting people’s feelings; that he takes no prisoners. Great! We’ve found the right man for the job. That’s who I want leading the fight versus ISIS.

Most importantly, I want someone who:

• Doesn’t worry about offending anyone by saying the words “terrorism” and “radical Muslim” in the same sentence. Poor babies.
• Doesn’t worry about offending anyone by saying we need to investigate mosques and, if proven to have ties to radical Islam, close them.
• Doesn’t worry about offending anyone by saying we cannot take Syrian refugees into our country because some of them are ticking time bombs.
• And doesn’t worry about offending anyone when he says we must deport all illegal aliens out of this country.

Always remember Trump wrote the book on negotiation. It’s called “The Art of the Deal.” His new book should be called “The Art of the Immigration Deal.” Will Trump ever get the chance to deport 12 million to 15 million illegal aliens? Maybe not. But Trump understands this is all a negotiation. Just the threat of deporting millions of illegal aliens puts Trump in the driver’s seat to get what he really wants.

So what does he really want? What’s realistic for a conservative president with a Republican Senate and House? My educated guess is Trump wants the following four things. And with the threat of deportation of millions hanging in the air, he’ll negotiate to get what he really wants.

First and foremost, Trump wants to build a wall. We must gain control of our own border. What was the first thing the Socialist president of France did after a terrorist attack? He closed the borders. Even a Socialist just proved how important it is to control your borders. It’s how you keep your citizens safe from terror. It’s literally the difference between life and death.

Walls work. Ask Israel. After it built its wall, terrorist attacks were stopped cold in their tracks. If America wants to keep ISIS out of America, we must seal and control our border. Democrats will be playing on defense with President Trump in the White House. They’ll be so busy fighting mass deportation that Trump will easily get his wall. Under President Trump, the days of America being stupid are over.

Brilliant. 

Second, if Trump “compromises” and agrees not to deport every single illegal alien, there is something very valuable to negotiate. If he allows these lawbreakers to stay, they’ve won the lottery; they should kiss the ground of the great United States. But there’s a catch. They can stay only if they’re here to work. They will not be allowed to collect welfare, food stamps or other entitlements ever again. That’s the penalty. That’s the very fair price they have to pay to not be deported. If they agree to work, pay taxes and pay their own bills, they can stay.

It’s a new dawn in America under President Trump. You can’t break into our home and then expect us to pay your bills. You can work; you won’t be deported; you’re in. That’s the American dream. Welfare is not the American dream. You can never collect welfare, food stamps, housing allowances, aid to dependent children or all the hundreds of other entitlements available to citizens. You get a work permit, but you’ll never be a citizen. That’s the deal under President Trump. Take it, or leave.

Oh, and one other concession by illegal aliens: They must give up the right to ever vote. That would be a terrible conflict of interest. You committed a crime. Now, you’re in. But you’ll never get the privilege of voting. That’s reserved for American citizens. Under President Trump, the days of America being stupid are over.

Brilliant.

Third, Trump may never get approval to deport every single illegal alien, but his compromise position should be the instant deportation of every illegal alien in American prisons. Most of them are Mexican nationals. Why are we paying for their prison costs? Are we stupid? President Trump will demand Mexico reimburse us for every single dollar, or we’ll immediately deport every Mexican criminal back to Mexico. Just drop them off on the Mexican side of the border. And with our shiny new wall in place, they won’t ever get back in.

Either way, Mexico can pay the bill. Under President Trump, the days of America being stupid are over.

Brilliant.

Finally, here is the last thing Trump should demand. On the first day of a Trump administration, Donald Trump will overturn the Obama-Kerry plan to import tens of thousands of Syrian refugees into America. It’s insanity to allow thousands of potential terrorists into America. It’s self-destructive. It can lead only to the decline or death of America and our Judeo-Christian values.

Why aren’t wealthy Muslim countries taking them in? Why isn’t Saudi Arabia or Kuwait taking them in? After what just happened in Paris, it’s clear to any sane American that we cannot let any Syrian refugees — or any other Muslim refugees, for that matter — into our country. The risk is immense, and there is no upside. Who’d be dumb enough to let a bunch of strangers into your house around your children if there was a chance some of them were murderers? Only a dumb, mentally ill liberal. But they’re not coming near my family. Donald Trump will restore sanity to America.

Brilliant.

Millions of American mothers now understand that we need someone like Donald Trump to keep their children safe at night. That’s what a president is for: to keep our children safe. His job is protect American children — not Muslim refugees from a dangerous land, who are raised to hate us, terrorize us and murder us in the name of their religion.

Let Muslim nations worry about Muslim refugees. Let them risk terrorist attacks. Let them risk violence, rioting, neighborhoods too dangerous for police to enter, soaring poverty, women not allowed to go to school and 90 percent rates of government dependency.

Now even mothers who ordinarily vote Democrat understand the value of Donald Trump. And that folks is what you call “the art of the deal.”

Now some of you may be saying, “But this is Wayne’s plan. How do we know Donald agrees?” Well he does. I know because I sent this entire commentary to him. Donald Trump replied personally with a handwritten note, saying: “Thanks Wayne. This is AMAZING. Donald.”

So this isn’t my interpretation of Donald’s plan. This is Donald’s plan!

I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.

A Small Victory Against Obama's Executive Order On Illegal Immigrant Citizenship, However, This Is Not Over By A Long Way.

US Won't Seek High Court Review in Immigration Case

Wednesday, 27 May 2015 06:37 PM

Short URL|

Email Article|

Comment|

Contact|

Print|

    A   A

The government will not ask the Supreme Court to review a judge's decision that put on hold President Barack Obama's executive action on immigration, the Justice Department said Wednesday.
The decision came one day after a federal appeals court panel refused to lift a Texas judge's injunction that kept the sweeping immigration plan from taking effect.
U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen issued a preliminary injunction on Feb. 16 that halted Obama's executive action, which could spare from deportation as many as 5 million people who are in the U.S. illegally. More than two dozen states sought the injunction, arguing that Obama's executive action was unconstitutional.
The U.S. government on Feb. 23 asked Hanen to lift his injunction while it appealed his ruling against the executive action to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. Hanen denied the request, and the U.S. government appealed. That appeal was denied on Tuesday.

Spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said the Justice Department would not seek a stay of Tuesday's decision. Instead, he said, the Justice Department will now focus on defending the merits of the executive action itself in an appeal that will be argued the week of July 6 before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
"The Department of Justice is committed to taking steps that will resolve the immigration litigation as quickly as possible in order to bring greater accountability to our immigration system by prioritizing deporting the worst offenders, not people who have long ties to the United States and who are raising American children," Rodenbush said in a statement. "The department believes the best way to achieve this goal is to focus on the ongoing appeal on the merits of the preliminary injunction itself."

Latest News Update

Get Newsmax TV At Home »

The Obama administration plan has been denounced by Republicans as an example of executive overreach. Obama has argued that the action was necessary because of inaction by Congress.

The executive action announced in November remains on hold after the appeals court panel on Tuesday refused to allow it to take effect immediately.
Along with Texas, the states seeking to block Obama's action are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

© Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Upcoming Battle Over Obama's Legalization Could It Give Dems A Fall Victory? Hopefully Not!

Obama Crafting Legal Rationale for Sweeping Legalization Action

Wednesday, 27 Aug 2014 06:21 PM

Share:

  Get Short Link |

  Email Article |

  Comment  |

   Contact Us  |

  Print  

|  A   A  

• inShare

The White House is crafting a blame-it-on-Congress legal justification to back up President Barack Obama's impending executive actions on immigration.

Facing an expect onslaught of opposition, the administration plans to argue that Congress failed to provide enough resources to fully enforce U.S. laws, thereby ceding wide latitude to White House to prioritize deportations of the 11.5 million people who are in the country illegally, administration officials and legal experts said. But Republicans, too, are exploring their legal options for stopping Obama from what they've deemed egregious presidential overreaching.

A self-imposed, end-of-summer deadline to act on immigration is rapidly approaching. While Obama has yet to receive the formal recommendations he's requested from Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, administration officials said the president is intimately familiar with the universe of options and won't spend much time deliberating once Johnson delivers his recommendations.

After resisting calls to act alone in hopes Congress would pass a comprehensive immigration fix, Obama in June bowed to immigration activists and said that "if Congress will not do their job, at least we can do ours." The most sweeping, controversial step under consideration involves halting deportation for millions, a major expansion of a 2012 Obama program that deferred prosecutions for those brought here illegally as children.

Roughly half a million have benefited from that program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA.

But while prosecutors are routinely expected to use their discretion on a case-by-case basis, such blanket exempting of entire categories of people has never been done on the scale of what Obama is considering — potentially involving many millions of people if he extends relief to parents of DACA children, close relatives of U.S. citizens or immigrants with clean criminal records.

"The question is how broadly can the president extend the categories and still stay on the side of spectrum of ensuring the laws are faithfully executed?" said Cristina Rodriguez, who left the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel in 2013 to teach at Yale Law School.

Other options under consideration, such as changes to how green cards are distributed and counted, might be less controversial because of the support they enjoy from the business community and other influential groups. But Derrick Morgan, a former adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney and a scholar at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said Obama will still face staunch opposition as long as he attempts an end run around Congress.

Obama's goal had been to announce his decision around Labor Day, before leaving on a trip next week to Estonia and Wales. But a host of national security crises have pushed the announcement back, likely until after Obama returns, said the officials, who weren't authorized to comment by name and demanded anonymity.

Obama's actions will almost surely be challenged in court.

"Any potential executive action the president takes will be rooted in a solid legal foundation," White House spokesman Shawn Turner said.

What's more, Obama may have undermined his case because he has insisted time and again that he's the president, not the king, and "can't just make the laws up by myself." In a 2012 interview with Telemundo, Obama defended his decision to defer deportations for children but said he couldn't go any bigger.

"If we start broadening that, then essentially I would be ignoring the law in a way that I think would be very difficult to defend legally. So that's not an option," he said then.

Republicans are already hinting that they'll consider legal action to thwart what they've denounced as a violation of the separation of powers. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, in a conference call this month with GOP House members, accused Obama of "threatening to rewrite our immigration laws unilaterally."

"If the president fails to faithfully execute the laws of our country, we will hold him accountable," Boehner said, according to an individual who participated in the call.

The House already has passed legislation to block Obama from expanding DACA and, through its power of the purse, could attempt to cut off the funds that would be needed to implement the expansion. House Republicans could also consider widening or amending their existing lawsuit against Obama over his health care law, a case that both parties have suggested could be a prelude to impeachment proceedings.
© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Endangered With Little Support Or Duties, Border Agents Are Endangered.

Border Patrol Union VP: 'Handcuffed' Agents' Lives in Danger

Thursday, 07 Aug 2014 08:53 PM

By Greg Richter

Share:

  Get Short Link |

  Email Article |

  Comment  |

   Contact Us  |

  Print  

|  A   A  

• 0
  inShare

Lack of immigration enforcement is putting the lives of Border Patrol agents in danger, as evidenced by the recent killing of off-duty agent Javier Vega Jr., says a Border Patrol union official.

"Agents are upset, and rightfully so. One of our brothers has been murdered by people that shouldn't have been in this country in the first place," National Border Patrol Council Vice President Shawn Moran said Thursday on Fox News Channel's "On the Record with Greta Van Susteren." "And it shows that it's a failure of our immigration system."



Two illegal immigrants have been charged in the killing of Vega, who was shot to death Sunday night as his wife, two children, and his parents looked on. The family was on a fishing trip when the suspects allegedly attempted to rob him.

Gustavo Tijerina, 30, and Ismael Hernandez Vallejo, 40, are charged in the killing.

Moran said the two had been deported multiple times.

"That's indicative of what has happened under this administration [and] the previous administration," he told Van Susteren. "Some of us die doing this job. And now we're dying … off-duty as well."

Moran said the government has a "catch-and-release" policy with illegals, and in the last 15 years, every type of border operation has been restricted.

"We have handcuffed the Border Patrol at every turn," he said.

Related Stories:

• Border Patrol Union Rep: It's 'Open Season' on Agents
• Border Patrol Morale at an All-Time Low

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.