Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Democrats Will Disagree But They Could Be In Big Trouble For The Fall

Red State Dems' Approval 

Ratings PLUMMET

  • 01/24/2018 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: Remington Strelivo
41 28 2  114
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/59e6/5bac/6970/2d6c/692c/0200/Slideshow_640px-Elephant_in_Nagarhole_National_Park.jpg?1516820012
Red State Dems' Approval Ratings PLUMMET
By Dhruvaraj S - originally posted to Flickr as Elephant in Nagarhole National Park, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7677792
Could the Democrats' so-called blue wave in 2018 be giving way to a Republican crimson tide?

According to new polls, nine of the most vulnerable Democratic senators up for re-election in 2018 in states won by President Donald Trump have seen their approval ratings plummet in the last year.

Leading the way is Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) who saw his net approval rating collapse by 18 points. At the stat of 2017, Tester's net approval rating was +25 – meaning that his approval rating was 25 percentage points higher than his disapproval rating. Now, it's just +7.

Other Senators received almost as lousy news: Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) dropped 11 points over the same period, from +28 to +17. Sen. Bob Casey in Pennsylvania recorded a 9 point drop, from +20 to +11.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) dipped by 8 points each. Manchin's approval rating declined from +24 to +16 over 2017, and McCaskill's has gone from +8 in the first quarter to zero.

Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Indiana) and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) each saw 6 point drops. Donnelly went from +20 to +14 while Baldwin went from +6 to zero.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) declined 4 points, from +22 to +18, and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Florida) dropped 2 points, from +27 to +25.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan), also regarded as highly vulnerable, managed to buck the trend, but only barely: her net approval rating didn't budge, staying at +9.

Red state Democrats seem more vulnerable than ever, but one politician from a surprising state recorded the sharpest drop of 2017 –Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), who faces renewed charges of public corruption by the Justice Department after his case ended in a mistrial last year. Menendez saw his approval plunge by 20 points, from +4 to -16.

While Democrats remain confident in their ability to win seats in the House, it's clear that the unfavorable Senate map and the tanking approval ratings of incumbent Democrats could result in an even stronger Republican majority in the U.S. Senate.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/red-state-dems-approval-ratings-plummet#TG0oB1G93wvwvphG.99

This Is Going To Awaken A Lot Of Snowflakes

Pro-life bill will get a vote in the Senate after Trump demanded it at March for Life

Pro-life bill will get a vote in the Senate after Trump demanded it at March for Life
President Donald Trump's demand that the Senate take up a vote on a bill banning abortions after 20 weeks will be answered by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). (Image Source: YouTube screenshot)

President Donald Trump called for a vote in the Senate to pass the pro-life bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) appears to be fulfilling the request.
“Now Congress has an opportunity to take a step forward,” McConnell said. “I’m pleased to have filed cloture on this bill to protect unborn children who are capable of feeling pain.
“I look forward to voting for it early next week,” he concluded.

What did Trump say?

The president addressed the massive pro-life March for Life demonstration from the White House Rose Garden through a satellite video connection.
“I call upon the Senate to pass this important law and send it to my desk for signing,” he declared.
“Under my administration, we will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence and that is the right to life,” Trump added. “We are protecting the sanctity of life and the family as the foundation of our society.”

A test for the Senate

The 20-week abortion ban passed the House of Representatives last year but will be difficult to pass in the Senate because Republicans only have a slim majority and some moderate Republicans may balk at the increasing restrictions on abortion services.
The bill also needs 60 votes to pass, while the Republicans only have 51 votes in the Senate. The bill is sponsored by 45 Republicans.

Here are Trump’s comments to the March for Life:


The bill contains exceptions for rape in the cases of rape and incest. Under the bill,women getting illegal abortions could be fined and face 5 years in prison.
Prior to Trump’s March for Life comments, Vice President Mike Pence declared the president the “most pro-life president in American history” despite previously held positions that were much less restrictive.

Will They Ever Give Up?

Democrats say Russian bots are now interfering with Mueller investigation – here’s how

Democrats say Russian bots are now interfering with Mueller investigation – here’s how
California Democrats Rep. Adam Schiff and Senator Dianne Feinstein said that they believed a social media campaign from the right was being pushed by Russian bots in order to undermine Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russian investigations. (Image Source: YouTube screenshot composite)
Democrats Rep. Adam Schiff and Senator Dianne Feinstein of California have requested that Twitter and Facebook investigate whether Russian bots are helping push a social media campaign on the right to “release the memo” written by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.).
What is the “release the memo” campaign?
After Republican members of Congress began talking about a bombshell memo outlining alleged outrages at the FBI and the Department of Justice, many took it on themselves to tweet “release the memo” in a social media campaign.
Almost immediately, some accused the campaign of being hijacked and aided by Russian bots. The hashtag “ReleaseTheMemo” quickly became a top trending issue in the United States.
Some have alleged that the accusations in the memo were so serious that they would end Mueller’s investigations into Russian collusion and interference into the 2016 election.

Here’s what the Dems said:
Schiff and Feinstein sent a letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey about the claims, and asked them to “counter” the efforts from Russia.
“It is critically important that the Special Counsel’s investigation be allowed to proceed without interference from inside or outside the United States,” the members of Congress wrote.
“That is why we seek your assistance in our efforts to counter Russia’s continuing efforts to manipulate public opinion and undermine American democracy and the rule of law,” the statement continued.
“If these reports are accurate, we are witnessing an ongoing attack by the Russian government through Kremlin-linked social media actors directly acting to intervene and influence our democratic process,” Schiff and Feinstein said.
“This should be disconcerting to all Americans, but especially your companies as, once again, it appears the vast majority of their efforts are concentrated on your platforms,” they concluded.
What did Twitter say?
A spokesman for the social media platform responded, saying they would cooperate with the Democrats to uncover whether the campaign was influenced by Russian social media bot farms.
“Twitter is committed to addressing malicious activity on our platform, and we take any assertions of such activity very seriously,” the spokesperson said.
“We look forward to working closely with Senator Feinstein and Congressman Schiff to address their questions,” the statement concluded.
Here’s a report from Fox News about their demands:

Trump indicated Wednesday that he would be happy to submit to questioning from Mueller under oath.

Clinton Crime Family Under More Scrutiny

The ‘Clinton Foundation’ isn’t a real charity: Only 6% went to charitable grants in 2014

January 24, 2018
The ‘Clinton Foundation’ isn’t a real charity: Only 6% went to charitable grants in 2014Michael Candelori / Shutterstock.com
With the FBI pursuing an investigation into the Clinton Foundation, a report about the organization’s expenditures has taken on newfound significance.
In 2016, The Federalist reported that the Clinton “charity” spent less than 6 percent of its money on charitable grants in 2014.The FBI is more aggressively investigating alleged “pay-to-play” politics by the Clinton Foundation.
Meanwhile, the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe is coming under intense scrutiny from Republicans as evidence mounts of pro-Clinton bias at the Bureau.

Clinton Foundation hardly charitable

An analysis of IRS documents by the Federalist’s Sean Davis shows that the Clinton Foundation spent a paltry amount of its budget, less than 6 percent, on charitable grants in 2014.
Of the $91.2 million spent in 2014, only $5.2 million went to charitable grants, a 40 percent decline from the $8.8 million spent in 2013. The decline came despite an increase in revenue of 20 percent.
What did the Clintons spend more on than charitable grants in 2014?
$7.9 million went to air and travel expenses. $6.6 million went to rent and office supplies.
Its biggest charitable grant that year gave $2 million to the Alliance for a Healthier Generation, a group formed jointly between the Clinton Foundation and the American Heart Association to fight childhood obesity. A Clinton Foundation board member served on AHG’s board in 2014; just $349,022, 2.1 percent, of the $16.3 million spent that year by the organization went to charitable grants.
The Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) was the recipient of the biggest individual program expenditure from the Foundation. Described by the New York Times as “glitzy annual gathering of chief executives, heads of state, and celebrities.” the annual event hosted by CGI was part of what led to it’s $23,000,000 receipt.
Continuing from The Federalist report:
The Clinton Foundation’s three largest charitable “program service accomplishments,” according to its tax reports, are the Clinton Global Initiative ($23.2 million), the Clinton Presidential Library ($12.3 million), and the Clinton Climate Initiative ($8.3 million).
The Foundation also has a less-than-stellar record when it comes to reporting donations. The Hill reports:
[T]he Clinton Foundation only disclosed cash contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative and not any of the pro-bono and in-kind contributions the initiative received from donors.
As a result, the Foundation’s disclosure records showed $50,000 in cash donations from the lobbying firm APCO Worldwide but none of the hundreds of thousands of dollars the firm donated in pro-bono services.
Ultimately, the Clinton Foundation failed to disclose millions of dollars in donations.
 
Ads by Revcontent

Clinton investigations heat up

Reports from earlier this month indicate that the FBI was picking up its investigation into alleged “pay-to-play” politics by the Clinton Foundation after months of stagnation.
Republicans, led by Trump, have accused the Foundation of exchanging favorable policy decisions for donations to the organization while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State.
Ads by Revcontent
Simultaneously, the Clinton email probe is coming under escalating scrutiny, with Republicans calling for an independent probe of the FBI’s handling of that investigation.
The Clintons might soon have some serious legal issues with which to contend.

Must Be Caused By Global Warming!!

Freezing Tokyo sees most ambulance calls for 80 years

Tokyo residents have been battling through snow and ice as the mercury drops (AFP Photo/Toshifumi KITAMURA)
Tokyo's ambulance service has experienced its busiest day in more than 80 years, officials said Thursday, amid icy conditions as the Japanese capital shivers through its coldest temperatures in decades.
The Tokyo fire department, which runs the ambulance service, said it had responded to 2,826 calls on Wednesday following rare and heavy snow that sparked chaos in one of the world's most populous cities.
"Generally, we receive more calls in winter. But we think the combination of influenza, heavy snow and cold weather contributed to the record high number," a fire department spokesman told AFP.
The number of emergency call-outs was the highest since the service began in 1936 and well above the average of around 2,000.
The annual number of emergency calls has been on the rise for the past eight years in Tokyo, the spokesman added.
As a cold snap grips Japan, the mercury in Tokyo dropped to minus four degrees Celsius (25 degrees Fahrenheit), the coldest in 48 years, according to Japan's Meteorological Agency.
And the government warned the glacial conditions in Tokyo would continue.
"The weather agency has issued a low temperature warning for Tokyo for the first time in 33 years ... The cold weather will continue until Saturday," deputy government spokesman Kotaro Nogami told reporters.
A rare heavy blanket of snow in Tokyo on Tuesday left thousands of travellers stranded and scores injured.
Japan's weather agency recorded as much as 23 centimetres (9.2 inches) of snow in some parts of Tokyo, the biggest snowfall since February 2014.
The weather paralysed Monday evening's commute as millions of workers battled to get home on the city's famously crowded transport system.

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Is The "S" About To Hit The Fan?

Evidence suggests a massive scandal is brewing at the FBI


During the financial crisis, the federal government bailed out banks it declared “too big to fail.” Fearing their bankruptcy might trigger economic Armageddon, the feds propped them up with taxpayer cash.
Something similar is happening now at the FBI, with the Washington wagons circling the agency to protect it from charges of corruption. This time, the appropriate tag line is “too big to believe.”
Yet each day brings credible reports suggesting there is a massive scandal involving the top ranks of America’s premier law enforcement agency. The reports, which feature talk among agents of a “secret society” and suddenly missing text messages, point to the existence both of a cabal dedicated to defeating Donald Trump in 2016 and of a plan to let Hillary Clinton skate free in the classified email probe.
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
learn more

If either one is true — and I believe both probably are — it would mean FBI leaders betrayed the nation by abusing their powers in a bid to pick the president.
More support for this view involves the FBI’s use of the Russian dossier on Trump that was paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. It is almost certain that the FBI used the dossier to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump associates, meaning it used the opposition research of the party in power to convince a court to let it spy on the candidate of the other party — likely without telling the court of the dossier’s political link.
Even worse, there is growing reason to believe someone in President Barack Obama’s administration turned over classified information about Trump to the Clinton campaign.
As one former federal prosecutor put it, “It doesn’t get worse than that.” That prosecutor, Joseph ­diGenova, believes Trump was correct when he claimed Obama aides wiretapped his phones at Trump Tower.
These and other elements combine to make a toxic brew that smells to high heaven, but most Americans don’t know much about it. Mainstream media coverage has been sparse and dismissive and there’s a blackout from the same Democrats obsessed with Russia, Russia, Russia.
Partisan motives aside, it’s as if a scandal of this magnitude is more than America can bear — so let’s pretend there’s nothing to see and move along.
But, thankfully the disgraceful episode won’t be washed away, thanks to a handful of congressional Republicans, led by California Rep. Devin Nunes, chairman of the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. After he accused the FBI of stonewalling in turning over records, the bureau relented, at least partially.
The result was clear evidence of bias against Trump by officials charged with investigating him and Clinton. Those same agents appear to have acted on that bias to tilt the election to Clinton.
In one text message, an agent suggests that Attorney General Loretta Lynch knew while the investigation was still going on that the FBI would not recommend charges against Clinton.
How could she know unless the fix was in?
All roads in the explosive developments lead to James Comey, whose Boy Scout image belied a sinister belief that he, like his infamous predecessor J. Edgar Hoover, was above the law.
It is why I named him J. Edgar Comey last year and wrote that he was “adept at using innuendo and leaks” to let everybody in Washington know they could be the next to be investigated.
It was in the office of Comey’s top deputy, Andrew McCabe, where agents discussed an “insurance policy” in the event that Trump won. Reports indicated that the Russia-collusion probe was that insurance policy.
The text was from Peter Strzok, the top investigator on the Trump case, and was sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and also his mistress.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 . . . ” Strzok wrote.
It is frightening that Strzok, who called Trump “an idiot,” was the lead investigator on both the Clinton and Trump cases.
After these messages surfaced, special counsel Robert Mueller removed Strzok and Page from his probe, though both still work at the FBI.
Strzok, despite his talk of an “insurance policy” in 2016, wrote in May of 2017 that he was skeptical Mueller’s probe would find anything on Trump because “there’s no big there there.”
Talk about irony. While Dems and the left-wing media already found Trump guilty of collusion before Mueller was appointed, the real scandal might be the conduct of the probers themselves.
Suspicions are hardly allayed by the fact that the FBI says it can’t find five months of messages between Strzok and Page, who exchanged an estimated 50,000 messages overall. The missing period — Dec. 14, 2016 through May 17, 2017 — was a crucial time in Washington.
There were numerous leaks of classified material just before and after Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20.
And the president fired Comey last May 9, provoking an intense lobbying effort for a special counsel, which led to Mueller’s appointment on May 19.
Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, has emerged from his hidey hole to notice that the FBI has run amok, and said Monday he would “leave no stone unturned” to find the five months of missing texts.
Fine, but the House is racing ahead of him. Nunes has prepared a four-page memo, based on classified material that purportedly lays out what the FBI and others did to corrupt the election.
A movement to release the memo is gaining steam, but Congress says it might take weeks. Why wait? Americans can handle the truth, no matter how big it is.

Pence, star of David

Vice President Pence’s speech in the Israeli Knesset was a masterpiece that deserves a wide audience.
Pence draws on the biblical Abraham to help explain America’s resolve to stand with Israel.
Naturally, Arab members of the legislative body protested and were ejected.
Count that, along with the refusal of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas to meet Pence, as another missed opportunity for peace.

It’s become a sad ‘reality’

Headline: Parents in California torture house had reality-TV aspirations.
Of course they did. Doesn’t everybody?

Mayor’s ‘poor’ service

Mayor Putz has the touch. Every city agency that deals with the poor is so badly managed that they suffer even more.
The latest example is the Housing Authority, where de Blasio keeps firing top deputies to shelter the boss, Shola Olatoye, from accountability.
After Olatoye signed a document saying the city did lead-paint inspections when it hadn’t, de Blasio fired two of her aides and demoted a third.
Another top deputy got canned Monday in a shake-up over shoddy maintenance.
The mayor talks about inequality but pays no attention to the needy until disaster grabs the headlines.
Then he fires people and waits for it to happen again. The buck never stops on his desk.