Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Debbie Stabenow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debbie Stabenow. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Stabenow Doesn't Like Her Words Recorded. Is There No Longer Freedom Of The Press? You Won't See This On The Evening News

“For Dem Eyes Only”

Senator Stabenow Kicks Out Tracker for Simply Showing Up
LANSING, Mich., March 28, 2018 – In case you missed it, today United States Senator Debbie Stabenow had a tracker for the independent watchdog group ‘America Rising’ forcibly removed from a public press conference she was holding at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit. The tracker was not asking questions or causing a disturbance. He was simply attempting to film the Senator’s remarks on prescription drugs. The event was open to the general public and he was thrown out simply for working for a group that the Senator does not like.
When asked for comment Michigan Republican Party Deputy Chief of Staff Sarah Anderson said the following: “A public servant such as Senator Stabenow should have nothing to hide when it comes to her remarks. Tactics such as these have no place in a free society and are unbecoming of a U.S. Senator.  Debbie Stabenow needs to apologize immediately.”
Audio of the exchange can be found here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgeUm3d-ai0&feature=youtu.be

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Idiots Who Threaten People Should Be Jailed


ARRESTED! Trump Jr.’s alleged attacker jailed!

A Massachusetts man was arrested Thursday and charged with sending letters with white powder to five people, including one to Donald Trump Jr. that landed his wife, Vanessa, in the hospital.
Daniel Frisiello, of Beverly, is accused of mailing five envelopes earlier this month with threatening messages and a white substance, which was opened by Trump, Jr.’s wife.

“These kind of hoaxes may not cause physical harm, but they scare the heck out of people,” said Andrew Lelling, U.S. attorney for Massachusetts.
Hoax attacks using white powder play on fears that date to 2001, when letters containing deadly anthrax were mailed to news organizations and the offices of two U.S. senators. Those letters killed five people.
Frisiello was expected to appear in federal court in Worcester later Thursday. It could not immediately be determined if he had a lawyer. A voice message left at his home was not immediately returned.
Authorities say Frisiello sent five envelopes early last month that included threatening messages often containing profanities and white substances. The envelopes were postmarked in Boston.

Federal authorities said one of the letters containing powder was sent to Antonio Sabato Jr., the Republican former underwear model and soap opera actor who is running for a U.S. House seat in California.
Other recipients were Debbie Stabenow, a U.S. senator from Michigan; Nicola Hanna, an interim U.S. attorney in California; and Michele Dauber, a Stanford University law professor who has promoted the effort to recall the judge who presided over the Brock Turner sexual assault case.
The letter to the president’s son was opened by Vanessa Trump on Feb. 12. She called 911 and reported she was coughing and felt nauseous. She was hospitalized briefly.
The substance in the letter turned out to be nontoxic.

The envelope sent to Trump included a typed message calling him an “awful, awful person,” according to court documents.
“I am surprised that your father lets you speak on TV,” the message said. “You make the family idiot, Eric, look smart.”
Authorities described in an affidavit now they were led to Frisiello.
A “glitter bomb” sent to Dauber contained a message similar to the message contained in the white powder envelope she was sent, the affidavit said.
A “glitter bomb” is a joke in which someone sends an envelope containing glitter to someone else that then spills out and creates a mess upon opening. The bomb sent to Dauber was sent by a company called shipyourenemiesglitter.com. The owner of the company confirmed that the person who ordered the glitter bomb to Dauber was named Daniel Frisello.

It was later determined that it was paid for with Frisiello’s credit card.
Investigators also went through Frisiello’s trash and found discarded paper that still had some similar typewritten threats on it.
The Associated Press contributed to this article

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Democrats Will Disagree But They Could Be In Big Trouble For The Fall

Red State Dems' Approval 

Ratings PLUMMET

  • 01/24/2018 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: Remington Strelivo
41 28 2  114
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/59e6/5bac/6970/2d6c/692c/0200/Slideshow_640px-Elephant_in_Nagarhole_National_Park.jpg?1516820012
Red State Dems' Approval Ratings PLUMMET
By Dhruvaraj S - originally posted to Flickr as Elephant in Nagarhole National Park, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7677792
Could the Democrats' so-called blue wave in 2018 be giving way to a Republican crimson tide?

According to new polls, nine of the most vulnerable Democratic senators up for re-election in 2018 in states won by President Donald Trump have seen their approval ratings plummet in the last year.

Leading the way is Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) who saw his net approval rating collapse by 18 points. At the stat of 2017, Tester's net approval rating was +25 – meaning that his approval rating was 25 percentage points higher than his disapproval rating. Now, it's just +7.

Other Senators received almost as lousy news: Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) dropped 11 points over the same period, from +28 to +17. Sen. Bob Casey in Pennsylvania recorded a 9 point drop, from +20 to +11.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) dipped by 8 points each. Manchin's approval rating declined from +24 to +16 over 2017, and McCaskill's has gone from +8 in the first quarter to zero.

Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Indiana) and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) each saw 6 point drops. Donnelly went from +20 to +14 while Baldwin went from +6 to zero.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) declined 4 points, from +22 to +18, and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Florida) dropped 2 points, from +27 to +25.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan), also regarded as highly vulnerable, managed to buck the trend, but only barely: her net approval rating didn't budge, staying at +9.

Red state Democrats seem more vulnerable than ever, but one politician from a surprising state recorded the sharpest drop of 2017 –Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), who faces renewed charges of public corruption by the Justice Department after his case ended in a mistrial last year. Menendez saw his approval plunge by 20 points, from +4 to -16.

While Democrats remain confident in their ability to win seats in the House, it's clear that the unfavorable Senate map and the tanking approval ratings of incumbent Democrats could result in an even stronger Republican majority in the U.S. Senate.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/red-state-dems-approval-ratings-plummet#TG0oB1G93wvwvphG.99

Thursday, January 26, 2017

At One Time They Thought The Wall Was A Good Idea. How Come Not Now?

There was a time when the Democratic Party struck a far more populist 
tone. Back during the "Blue Dog" era, when Democrats were trying to 
convince middle Americans that they shared their values and cared 
about protecting their gun rights, their jobs, and their faith. Then 
President Obama got elected, and they forgot all about that.

But it's worth revisiting now. Why? Because President Trump is 
likely going to go to Congress to get funding for his wall, and he's 
going to be the subject of a lot of criticism. Which is hilarious,
 because a lot of the key Democrats who will be opposing him 
once thought a wall was a pretty terrific idea. As the Daily Caller reports:
If Trump and Republicans follow through, a number of top Democrats

will find they inadvertently handed Trump the border wall they

now oppose. Their only option to block the construction would be

to shut down the government over the matter by blocking the

spending bill, a strategy they have consistently mocked and

derided Republicans for using in the past.

In addition to then Sens. Obama, Biden and Clinton, 64 House

Democrats and 23 Senate Democrats voted for the wall in 2006.

Many of them are still in Congress, including newly-established

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Other Democrats in the Senate who voted for the wall in 2006

are Sens. Barbara Boxer (CA), Sherrod Brown (OH — then in

the House), Tom Carper (DE), Dianne Feinstein (CA), Barbara

Mikulski (MD), Bill Nelson (FL), Debbie Stabenow (MI), and Ron

Wyden (OR).

There are also a number of Democrat representatives still in

the House who voted for the bill: Sanford Bishop (GA), Michael

Capuano (MA), Jim Cooper (TN), Jim Costa (CA), Peter DeFazio (OR),

Steve Israel (NY), Ron Kind (WI), Daniel Lipinski (IL),

Stephen Lynch (MA), Carolyn Maloney (NY), Bill Pascrell Jr. (NJ),

Collin Peterson (MN), C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger (MD),

Tim Ryan (OH), and Adam Smith (WA).
If Team Trump is smart, they'll ask these people to explain why
 they no longer think securing our southern border is a priority. 
Their constituents should too.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/flashback-these-top-trump-critics-all-voted-for-a-wall-in-2008#3VGZeDow6Pvepkzi.99

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Farm Bill Far From The Farm

Farm Bill: Is Today’s GOP to the Left of Bush?

It’s widely accepted that George W. Bush was a big-spending president. He was a social conservative, but not a fiscal one. To his credit, however, even Bush recognized how wasteful and unfair farm subsidies are, and he vetoed the last major farm bill in 2008.
That bill “would needlessly expand the size and scope of government,” he said in his veto message. Unfortunately, Congress overrode Bush’s veto and the 2008 farm bill became law at an estimated taxpayer cost of $640 billion over 10 years.
Congress is moving ahead on another farm bill this year, with the Senate recently passing its version and the House to take up a bill shortly. The Senate-passed bill would spend $955 billion over 10 years—49 percent more than the 2008 bill that was too expensive even for Bush.
Four-fifths of the spending in this year’s farm bill is for food stamps, yet 18 Republican senators still voted for it. Perhaps those members hadn’t noticed that the cost of food stamps has quadrupled over the last decade. Perhaps they hadn’t noticed that federal government debt has doubled since 2008. To members who see themselves as fiscal conservatives, it should be obvious that a less expensive bill this time around is appropriate, rather than one that is far more expensive.
The farm bill to be considered by the House would spend $940 billion over 10 years, and thus is almost as irresponsible as the Senate version. Despite what farm bill supporters are saying, this year’s bill represents a huge spending increase, not a cut.
In his 2008 veto message, Bush noted that the farm bill “continues subsidies for the wealthy,” and he pointed to the high and rising incomes enjoyed by farmers. Farmers are doing even better today, with theirincomes soaring over the last five years.
Today’s Republicans often admit that federal spending got out of control under President Bush. But now John Boehner is saying that he will support the new House farm bill that spends 47 percent more than the one Bush vetoed.