Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

ObamaCrapCare Website Has More Problems, Does Not Work and Administration Refuses To Fess Up--So Much For Transparency!

Government Admits Serious Flaws With Obamacare Website

Image: Government Admits Serious Flaws With Obamacare Website
Monday, 07 Oct 2013 11:39 AM
By Melanie Batley
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Federal officials have admitted for the first time that problems with Obamacare's online health insurance exchanges are more significant than the administration previously indicated.

The government is being forced to make changes to both the hardware and software of healthcare.gov, the online marketplace system, following a week in which many consumers were unable to enroll for coverage under the new healthcare law, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

"We can do better and we are working around the clock to do so," Joanne Peters, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, told the Journal.

The Obama administration previously claimed that problems accessing the website, which serves 36 states, were simply due to an overload of Internet traffic because of high demand for insurance coverage.

But a number of different problems have crippled the healthcare website, according to information technology experts consulted by the Journal. For example, the system has had difficulties confirming the identities of people registering, which causes problems when signing up for an account. The site, they say, also appears to have been hastily put together with coding problems and an inadequate software foundation.

Though the government refuses to reveal the total number of people who have successfully signed up for coverage, the web traffic problems have likely reduced the number of enrollments to a tiny proportion of the estimated 9 million visitors to the site, according to the Journal.

Insurance industry advisers estimate the number of people who were able to shop for coverage is likely in the low thousands, while large insurers have seen enrollment figures totaling in the hundreds each, the Journal reports.

The website and enrollment problems don't "matter so much in October, but for the actual enrollment campaign, this needs to get fixed by November or they won't be able to process the volume they're going to get," Jon Kingsdale, a consultant for several state-run exchanges, told the Journal.



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


China and Japan Scared To Death Over Debt Issues However American Should Be Even More Scared As Fed Owns More US Debt Than Both Of These Countries Combined

Big creditors China, Japan press U.S. to resolve debt row

By Ben Blanchard and Tetsushi Kajimoto
BEIJING/TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's finance minister pressed the United States on Tuesday to quickly resolve its political deadlock over government finances to avoid a fiscal crisis that could damage the global economy.
The comment from Taro Aso is the latest sign that Japan and China - the biggest foreign creditors to the United States - are increasingly worried that the U.S. government shutdown and the standoff over the debt ceiling could wreak havoc on their trillions of dollars of investments in U.S. Treasury bonds.
"The U.S. must avoid a situation where it cannot pay (for its debt) and its triple-A ranking plunges all of a sudden," Aso told reporters following a cabinet meeting.
"The U.S. must be fully aware that if that happens the U.S. would fall into fiscal crisis," he said.
Japan's Nikkei financial daily, citing unnamed sources, reported that Japanese officials held several emergency telephone conferences with U.S. Treasury Department officials on Monday.
However, a senior Japanese government official shrugged off the report, suggesting instead that the subject had been discussed only as part of regular contact between the two countries. Similarly, a U.S. Treasury official said the Treasury had no knowledge of emergency calls.
On Monday, Chinese Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao said Beijing had been in touch with Washington over the standoff, in which Republicans in the House of Representatives have refused to increase the $16.7 trillion debt ceiling as they seek changes in President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law.
Unless Congress raises the debt ceiling, the United States would be left on the edge of an unprecedented default, the Treasury has warned.
The political standoff is in its second week, with much of the U.S. federal government closed and no signs of a breakthrough, although some glimmers of hope emerged on Monday as Obama said he would accept a short-term increase in the nation's borrowing authority to avoid a default.
TRILLIONS AT STAKE
As of July 31, China held $1.28 trillion in U.S. Treasury bonds and Japan held $1.14 trillion, Treasury Department data shows.
The last big confrontation over the debt ceiling, in August 2011, ended with an 11th-hour agreement under pressure from shaken markets and warnings of an economic catastrophe if a default were allowed to happen.
China is "naturally concerned about developments in the U.S. fiscal cliff," Zhu told reporters, saying it was Washington's "responsibility" to avoid a debt crisis and ensure the safety of Chinese investments.
Japan has previously expressed its concerns in diplomatic terms. Aso and Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga both said last week that the fiscal standoff was essentially a U.S. domestic problem.
But Aso added the shutdown could push up the yen against the dollar - a concern for Japan's export-reliant economy, which has benefited from a decline in the yen since Prime Minister Shinzo Abe won election in December on a reflationist policy platform.
Should the U.S. default on its debt, which the Treasury Department says could happen as soon as October 17, "there would be a large international impact," Aso said last week. "If there is no prompt resolution, various impacts will emerge."
The yen has been rising this month as investors shed risk and seek the perceived safe haven of the Japanese currency. The dollar slipped on Tuesday to a two-month low of 96.55 yen.
(Additional reporting by Yuko Yoshikawa, Richard Cowan, Mark Felsenthal, Aaron Sheldrick and Kiyoshi Takenaka; Writing by William Mallard; Editing by John Mair and Chizu Nomiyama)

Dems Will Crack And Public Is Starting To See Cruz's Strategy Is Working--Ignore The Politically Sponsored Polls--We Need To Keep Up The Pressure

Democratic cracks open in debt-limit fight

Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray are shown. | John Shinkle/POLITICO
The stakes in the debt-ceiling fight couldn’t be higher. | John Shinkle/POLITICO
For the past several weeks, Senate Democrats and the White House have shown a remarkable amount of unity in the controversial fight surrounding the debt ceiling.
Then came shutdown Day Seven.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

Shutdown week 2: Who to watch

Debt ceiling showdown: By the numbers

Just as top Senate Democrats began to lay the groundwork to raise the U.S. government’s borrowing limit through 2014, senior White House officials refused to rule out a short-term increase. The divergent messages caused major heartburn for top Senate Democrats and gave Republicans fresh hope that they could defeat a yearlong debt ceiling hike and win concessions from President Barack Obama in this fall’s fiscal battles.
By late Monday afternoon, nervous Senate Democrats had reached out to the White House to ensure they were on the same page — and the concerns on Capitol Hill seemed to be alleviated after senior administration officials downplayed the idea of a short-term increase.
But the incident underscored the fear among the congressional Democratic leadership that President Barack Obama may eventually back away from the no-negotiation stance he and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) have voiced for weeks in order to avoid a first-ever default. And it raised questions about Senate Democrats’ next step in the debt ceiling debate if Republicans successfully filibuster a bill to increase the $16.7 trillion national debt ceiling.
Democrats began to raise concerns privately that the White House appeared to be softening its iron-clad position.
“This is very disconcerting to us,” a senior Senate Democratic leadership aide said on condition of anonymity, referring to comments by the president’s top economic adviser, Gene Sperling, at POLITICO’S Playbook Breakfast on Monday. “All along, the president and White House have been firm on what they want, both in a [government funding bill] and debt ceiling. So we’re concerned about this.”
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said, “What does short-term buy us? That buys us Thanksgiving in Washington.”
The stakes — both political and economic — in the government funding and debt ceiling fights couldn’t be higher. Obama and Hill Democrats, unwilling to relive the budget and debt fights of 2011-12, have warned Republicans for months that they wanted “clean” government funding and debt ceiling bills.
Yet House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), under heavy pressure from hard-line GOP conservatives, refused to put a funding resolution on the House floor without anti-Obamacare language. When Reid and his fellow Democrats refused to accept it, the now weeklong government shutdown ensued. That shutdown shows no sign of ending soon.
The debt-ceiling fight is lining up the same way. Boehner has already said he will not put a clean debt ceiling bill on the House floor. In fact, there’s no current plan for House Republicans to move on anything debt-related. Obama and Reid have so far refused to accept anything other than a long-term debt bill with no preconditions.
The Democratic discord started Monday morning when Sperling said the White House would be open to a two- to three-week increase to avert the Oct. 17 deadline when the U.S. government may begin to default on its $16.7 trillion debt. The comments were a shift from the position the White House took in the 2011 debt fight, when it demanded that Congress extend the debt ceiling through the 2012 elections.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/democrats-debt-limit-fight-97955.html#ixzz2h8cwSDj8

If Your Boss Found Out You Were Using Unauthorized Email To Conduct Business, What Would Happen? Most Companies Would Fire You, Not The US Government

Issa: IRS Officials Used Private Email to Do Official Business

Monday, 07 Oct 2013 06:12 PM
By Cathy Burke
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Top IRS officials repeatedly used private email to do official business, including sending classified documents to non-agency email addresses, U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa says.

Issa, a California Republican and chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, wrote a letter to IRS Acting Commissioner Daniel Werfel outlining a "troubling pattern" involving at least four senior officials — including now-retired official Lois Lerner, who's at the center of a tea party groups' targeting scandal.


The Washington Examiner, which broke the story Monday, quoted from a copy of the letter it had obtained.

"This not only raises the prospect of violations of the Federal Records Act, but it also raises data security concerns and violates internal IRS policies," Issa wrote.

Issa wrote that he discovered the unsecure emails while investigating the agency's targeting of tea party and conservative groups during the 2012 election season.

Issa's investigation accuses Lerner of producing more than 1,600 pages of emails and documents housed in a nonofficial email account related to official business, including almost 30 pages of confidential taxpayer information, The Examiner reported.

The cache included a summary of an application for tax-exempt status the IRS instructed Lerner's legal counsel to redact because the information was prohibited from being disclosed, it reported.

Lerner retired in September amid an internal probe of the scandal.

Issa's investigation also showed former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, who stepped down after the November election, also received emails related to official business on a nonofficial email account, The Examiner reported.

Other IRS officials reportedly targeted are Judith Kindell, senior technical adviser of the Exempt Organization Division, and Nikole Flax, chief of staff of the Office of the Commissioner.

"This rampant use of nonofficial email by four IRS officials to conduct official business suggests that such use is a systemic problem throughout the IRS," Issa wrote. "This is also a concern to the committee because federal taxpayer information cannot be shared on nonsecure, nonofficial systems."

Issa has asked Werfel to brief the committee about the handling of emails at the agency, but no spokesperson has commented, The Examiner said, citing the government shutdown.

The Environmental Protection Agency has also come under fire for using private email accounts for official business. The agency's inspector general last month cleared top-level employees of intentionally trying to hide information, saying the problem was a failure to  train employees on properly storing records.

Meanwhile, Issa has warned there's reason for citizens to "fear" the government.


“Right now, there’s a reason to fear the IRS and other agencies, including the EPA, who are loaded with people who feel empowered to bend the rules against those they disagree with,” he said, The Daily Caller reported Sunday.



© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Monday, October 7, 2013

Inflation Explained

The Insidious, Hidden Nature Of Theft By Government

October 7, 2013 by  
The Insidious, Hidden Nature Of Theft By Government
PHOTOS.COM
When it comes to the economy, most Americans are functionally illiterate and lost in a fog of frivolity and ignorance. How else to explain their continued advocacy for and support of policies detrimental to their economic interests?
For instance: Conventional wisdom holds that the Federal Reserve is essential to sound monetary policy and that its activities ensure that inflation and unemployment are kept in check. Conventional wisdom also holds that the United States is in debt and you should pay your “fair share” of tax dollars — as determined by a group of collectivists — into the U.S. Treasury in order to keep government functioning and pay off that debt. Neither could be further from the truth.
Look at the dollars in your pocket. They are nowhere near the value of the dollars that you had as a child or that you may have stored under your mattress.
Most people think that a dollar is a dollar. Not so. Today’s dollars (nominal dollars) are quicksand money that destroys financially all who trust it.
We have had fiat paper money since 1913, and most of that time it was being debased (inflated). Now it’s at a 96 percent loss. A 1913 dollar is now worth only 4 cents. What cost $1 in 1913 now costs almost $23. How did this happen?
It happened through inflation — which is not rising prices, as most have been lead to believe. Inflation is an increase in the supply of money, i.e., money printing by the Federal Reserve. The increase in the amount of money in circulation causes prices to rise as more money chases fewer goods.
We are only as rich or as poor as the purchasing power of our money. Have you ever wondered why banks and politicians love paper money? Because they profit from it!
Some of you who are readers of The Bob Livingston Letter™ (subscription required) may remember we predicted that the money printers would pull us out of the 2008 financial collapse at least one more time. Well, the indicators put forth by government and the mainstream media propagandists tell us that they are doing it, but it comes at great cost to the value of your dollars and to the detriment of the middle class.
In this inflating economy we have the stock market hitting all-time highs, but in nominal dollars it is creating deceptive losses.
Nominal dollars are the everyday paper dollars that we think of and call money. These dollars change every day (depreciate). The value of these dollars goes down constantly as the money printers continue to debase our currency.
Now the point is that Americans don’t know the difference. They don’t know that depreciating or nominal dollars by debasement is destroying their savings, their retirement and systematically impoverishing them. If this is not all important, I don’t know what is!
Nominal dollars, or depreciating currency, is destroying America. America is a giant Ponzi scheme no different from the one pulled off by Bernie Madoff. Madoff’s scheme collapsed because he became locked into an economic death spiral of moving dollars from one pile to another. That is the case of the U.S. economy.
Nominal depreciating paper money dollars is default headed for the trash heap of all the unfunded paper money in history. The few who wake up to the real world begin exchanging their depreciating paper money for gold, silver and Swiss annuities (Swiss francs).
Those unaware of the inflating debasing nature of nominal dollars live in a fickle and imaginary world. They believe that all is well and all is safe. They are further deceived by rising stock prices in nominal dollars. One can be up 100 percent in a stock portfolio but still be losing in real dollars. It’s very deceptive!
How many investors in Warren Buffet’s famous Berkshire Hathaway realize that they have been losing in real dollars for years? I don’t believe they mention this in their sensational annual reports.
All modern money is nominal dollars. Look at the money in your pocket or your savings account or your retirement. You are being deceptively impoverished and the fact that you are unaware of it makes your eventual impoverishment certain.
As to whether Federal Reserve or a central bank is necessary, one need only look at the 100 years prior to the creation of the Fed in 1913 (a period that also included Civil War inflation and its destruction of the U.S. economy). An item that cost $1 in 1814 cost only 47 cents in 1913. That’s almost completely the reverse of the past 100 years. (For further explanation of the Fed and inflation, go here, here and here.)
Now to the “crisis” in the Washington, D.C., cesspool and the ongoing debate over government funding and the debt ceiling. First, understand this: The U.S. national debt will never be paid off. There is in fact no debt. It is all an illusion of political doublespeak.
How can there be a “debt” if there is money printing to infinity? Ask yourself another question: If you had a printing press that could print all the money you wanted, would you have any debt? Of course not, and neither does the U.S. government (but State and local governments do have debt).
So if there is no debt, why must you pay your “fair share” of taxes? The truth is there is no need, because as I’ve demonstrated, your taxes do not go to pay U.S. debt. Taxes are merely a means of redistributing wealth and compiling an informational dossier on all Americans.
The key word to describe fiat non-substance is infinity. This imaginary money system can be created to infinity and indeed is on its way. The American people (and the world) believe that this non-substance is real money. This is an exercise in an unbelievable and unimaginable delusion that is accepted by the mind as real.
This is socialism at its most perfect creation and it is doing exactly socialism’s work of transferring the wealth and savings of the American people to the State without payment.
Debt implies that there are limits to money and spending. Debt is not a concept that can be applied to Federal government so-called accounting. This is one of the system’s deep dark secrets and proof the whole Federal System is a fiat paper Ponzi.
My friends, you may have title to your home, your savings and your accumulated wealth, but the State is the owner without compensation to you.
Why? Everything that you “own” is denominated in fiat U.S. dollars. As the Fed creates fiat to buy up America (euphemism for bailout), the nominal dollar ownership of your property diminishes. This system allows no escape from its fiat.
So what should you do? First, stop thinking conventional thoughts. They are not your own.
If you will digest completely what I write, you will be catapulted into the real world. You will not spend your life frivolously and off point.
Preserve your labor, your savings and retirement with gold and silver in your possession. You will know what to do with your precious metals when the time comes — and it will come.
Precious metals don’t pay interest, you say? This is conventional thinking backed by the paper money myth. Gold and silver are the only real money in existence. They are real money as well as intrinsic wealth. Moreover, gold and silver appreciate in purchasing power as paper money depreciates. That is your real interest. All understanding of hard money has been lost down the memory hole of the fiat paper world money regime.
I am proud to be an American, but I know that my government and my country have been stolen by the money creators.

Another Example Of Obama Being Taken In By Iran


Share This Post
 9
Experts: Iranian Decree Cited by Obama ‘Does Not Exist’
Insider Report from Newsmax.com, October 6, 2013

http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7633

Iranian officials have occasionally cited an alleged fatwa — Islamic religious ruling — by supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declaring that the use of nuclear weapons is forbidden under Islamic law.
President Barack Obama evidently believes the fatwa exists. Others disagree.
In a September 2005 letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Iranian government stated: “The Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Khamenei, has issued the fatwa that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that the Islamic Republic shall never acquire these weapons.”
Several months later Khamenei was quoted as saying in a speech that “using nuclear weapons is against Islamic rules.”
Obama seems to have bought into the fatwa claim, telling the U.N. General Assembly in September: “The supreme leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons.”
He told reporters three days later after a phone conversation with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani: “Iran’s supreme leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons.”
But American Enterprise Institute scholar Michael Rubin said: “While Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s nuclear fatwa has been the stuff of diplomatic gossip for years, no one citing it has ever actually seen it. Khamenei lists all of his fatwas on his webpage, but the nuclear fatwa isn’t among them.”
The Middle East Media Research Institute, which translates documents from Farsi and other languages, declared: “Such a fatwa was never issued by Supreme Leader Khamenei and does not exist. The Iranian regime apparently believes that its frequent repetition of the fatwa lie will make it accepted as truth.”
In referring to the fatwa, Iranian officials have given at least three different years of issue, 2004, 2005, and 2012, CNS News reported.
The fatwa cannot be found on the websites of the supreme leader, the presidency, foreign ministry, or permanent mission to the United Nations in Vienna.
The website of the permanent mission to the U.N. in New York does carry a link to a page where what it calls a fatwa appears, dated Feb. 19, 2012.
It reads in part: “The Iranian nation has never pursued and will never pursue nuclear weapons” and the Islamic Republic “considers the possession of nuclear weapons a grave sin.”
But “if this is the definitive fatwa,” CNS News observed, “it’s not clear why Iranian officials have at other times said it was issued in 2004 or 2005.”
Rouhani himself said in May that the fatwa was issued in November 2004.
Tariq Alhomayed, erstwhile editor in chief of the London-based daily Asharq Al-Awsat, wrote last year that trusting Iran on the basis of a religious ruling was “truly absurd.”
- See more at: http://israel-commentary.org/?p=7633#sthash.g7auMIki.dpuf