Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Dobbs Has It Right. Unless GOP Decides To Stop Fighting, It Will Lose Both House And Senate Which Will Spell Disaster For US!

Lou Dobbs: GOP Will Win Senate If It Ends Internal Battle

Monday, 06 Jan 2014 09:17 PM
By Cathy Burke and John Bachman
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Republicans have a "unique and historic opportunity" to win back the Senate and bolster the middle class this year — if they stop intra-party fighting and "come together around basic, fundamental national values," Fox Business Network anchor Lou Dobbs says.

"What people want to hear from leaders right now is what we're going to do in foreign policy that secures the interests of this nation . . . what the working man and woman, our middle class . . . will be empowered to do, and whether or not they're going to be treated . . . as first consumers or first citizens, first taxpayers or first citizens," the host of "Lou Dobbs Tonight" told Newsmax TV on Monday in an exclusive interview.

Dobbs, whose new book "Upheaval" will be released Tuesday, said the GOP has a clear message to take into the 2014 midterm elections.

"The Republican Party has a unique and historic opportunity to hold up the standard of the American middle class, the national interest, and free enterprise, and drive those messages to the polls in November of this year and win back the Senate," he said.

"But they've got to stop this nonsense of creating wars within this tent before they can even get the doors open."


Dobbs said party leaders have got to "step aside and acknowledge the breath of fresh air that awaits from the tea party, from the other groups that make up the conservative foundation of the Republican Party," and "come together around basic, fundamental national values and . . . understand this is a battle for survival with the Democratic Party."

Dobbs, who described himself as "an independent, for right now," said he's thinking "very, very hard" about "registering again as a Republican" before the primaries to help "energize" and create a "political force" in Washington, where "we are desperate as a nation for that force to be felt."

"We've got to have a Republican Party, if we are to be successful as a counter-balancing influence in the marketplace and society and amongst the electorate, that celebrates the individual whose self-reliance and independence make the system work and give a foundation to the middle class and the American dream," he said.

Dobbs said House Speaker John Boehner "has it in his hands to either establish the Republican Party as a powerful force that will win the midterm elections, win back the Senate, or assure that the Republican Party will be further diminished and give away control of the House."

But he also praised Republican Virginia Rep. Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, as "intellectually and politically, the man . . . responsible for most of the most important initiatives taking place not only within the House but within the federal government," including immigration reform.

"What we need to do is solve the problem for the illegal immigrants who are here, for business, for the national interest, first and foremost," he said, asserting "the approach taken by Congressman Goodlatte . . . provides legal status, it resolves border security issues, provides a sensible, rational system within the workplace to verify status."

Related Stories:
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


With Cold Snap, What Happened To Global Warming? The Lower Jet Stream Must Be Caused By Global Cooling!

Limbaugh: Polar Vortex a 'Liberal Media Hoax'

Tuesday, 07 Jan 2014 07:45 AM
By Amy Woods
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
The polar vortex is "a hoax" perpetuated by the liberal media to further its agenda of climate change and global warming, Rush Limbaugh told listeners Monday.

According to the radio show's transcript, Limbaugh said that "the left, the media, everybody" is using the Arctic cold front in the Midwest and Northeast as a ploy to lie to the public, Politico first reported.

"[We] are having a record-breaking cold snap in many parts of the country, and right on schedule, the media have to come up with a way to make it sound like it's completely unprecedented," the conservative talker said, "because they've got to find a way to attach this to the global-warming agenda, and they have. It's called the polar vortex. The dreaded polar vortex.

"If you've been watching television, they've created a graphic, all the networks have, and it basically consists of a view of the planet if you are right above the North Pole," Limbaugh said.

"They put this big purple blob, or blue blob or red blob, depending on the network you're looking at, over the entire North Pole, and they call that the polar vortex. It actually sounds like a crappy science-fiction movie to me, but anyway, that's what they're calling it."

Related Stories:
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Strong Warning To Netanyahu Regarding Giving Away Israeli Land. We Agree!

Share This Post
 9
II Video – The Disengagement from Gush Katif (Israeli developed strip of Gaza) with Ariel Sharon
http://israel-commentary.org/?p=8308
By David Wilder
January 06, 2014
Ariel Sharon is dying. It’s not considered nice to say bad things about dead people, especially immediately after their passing. So I’m writing this while he’s still alive. Barely. When I heard the news I wasn’t sure if I wanted to laugh or cry. Laugh, that finally, he’s leaving us. Or cry, because his ‘this world’ suffering is coming to an end.
That’s how much I like Ariel Sharon. He had many positions, and many titles. I will remember him as a monster. When elected to the office of Prime Minister in March, 2001, the 2nd Intifada, or what we call the Oslo War, was well underway. Terror attacks, shootings, and the like had begun. In Hebron, Arab terrorists had taken positions on the hills surrounding the Jewish neighborhoods and were shooting at us like ducks in a pond. Great for target practice, but not when the targets are men, women and children, in their homes, cars, or just plain walking down the street.
Sharon could have stopped it. He didn’t. It continued for almost a year and a half, here in Hebron. Only after the Passover Massacre in Netanya and the killing of five year old Danielle Shefi at Adura, just outside of Hebron, did he finally put an end to the nightmare. He was Prime Minister when most of the over 1,500 people murdered during that war. He could have stopped it. He didn’t. But that was just the beginning.
The expulsion from Gush Katif (Jewish communities on the coast of Gaza) and the Northern Shomron, abandoning the southern tip of Israel to Hamas, brought over 13,000 rockets into Israel, into Ashkelon, Ashdod and Tel Aviv – to this very day. Actually, it began with Menachem Began. He set the precedent, with Ariel Sharon as his right-hand man, implementing the expulsions from the Sinai, giving it to the Egyptians after the Yom Kippur War in 1973, There Sharon learned that it is possible to forcibly remove Jews from their homes, destroy Jewish communities and abandon land to our enemy (without the Israeli nation executing him as a traitor.)
What then is the punishment of people who remove cities from Israel, abandoning the land, expelling the people, endangering the population? What happened to them, what was their fate: Begin, the hero of Jewish underground, the leader who destroyed the Iraqi nuclear threat, secluded himself for years following his resignation as Prime Minister, unseen until his dying day.
Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated.
Ehud Olmert, one of the primary initiators of the Gush Katif catastrophe, has undergone numerous trials on charges of corruption, facing disgrace.
Katzav, who as President refused to oppose the Gush Katif expulsion, imprisoned following conviction for rape, from the president’s mansion to a jail cell.
Ariel Sharon, suffering the worst kind of hell, neither here nor there, not dead, not alive, for the past eight years. Some 8,600 people were expelled from the Gush, a year for every thousand people. And one can only image what he will face when trying to enter the pearly gates of heaven.
It is written that there is a ‘place’ somewhere between this world and the next, called in Hebrew “Kaf HaKelah.” This is a kind of nether land — not here, not there. It is written that here, such souls who have so sinned in this world, float around, not being in this world, or the next, a kind of horrible limbo. Usually, for such deserving souls, this aspect of punishment happens following a person’s death. In Sharon’s case, it began here in this world.
There is a story, told now for years, about how a famous Rabbi cursed Ariel Sharon, saying he should receive a blow on his head. People approached the Rabbi and expressed their opposition to this curse. So, the Rabbi then blessed Sharon, saying, ‘he should live a long life.’ It seems that both the ‘curse’ and the ‘blessing’ were achieved.
So what (or who) should this come to teach, what is the lesson for the future? This is what I ask the present Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, as he seems to be negotiating away our land, Eretz Yisrael. Be it Hebron or Shilo, Gitit in the Jordan Valley, or the Arab villages of the ‘Mishulash, on the eastern Sharon plain, bordering Samaria. This is all our land.
It is clear that, at present, there are at least two parallel sets of discussions going on; those led by Justice Minister Tzippy Livni and those being led by Netanyahu himself, seemingly with Abbas, aka Abu Mazen. The US is pushing, but Israel doesn’t necessarily have to budge. That’s up to us; it is up to our Prime Minister, Foreign Minister (who today came out publicly in favor of an agreement), and the Defense Minister. And the others.
What will be in store for them, what will be their fate, should they choose to walk in the footsteps of Ariel Sharon?
It is difficult to fathom their blindness, how and why they reach such depths of absurdity — to even speak of such concessions, of such abandonment, of such expulsions, again.
One thing is very clear: the United States, and in this case, the Secretary of State John Kerry, is pushing very hard, harder than any of his predecessors in recent history. We can only imagine the types of pressure he is applying on Netanyahu. However, it should be known, the word ‘Kerry’ in Hebrew has a distinct meaning: impurity. It is a term utilized to express a tainted uncleanness, almost a defilement, of body and soul. This term quite accurately describes the American SOB. Sometimes, such scum can be contagious. It seems that, in this case, it is starting to rub off on others.
I can only say: Bibi beware. Don’t fall into the potholes left to you by Sharon. And to the others, who can join him, or leave him, can support him or bring him down, your fate is too hanging in the balance. Purify yourselves from the contamination of Kerry. Before Sharon’s miserable fate will almost look good to you.
(David Wilder is a US citizen that emigrated to Israel in 1974. He has been the titular head and spokesperson for the brave Israelis that have chosen to live in Hebron and Kiryat Arba protecting the Cave of Machpelah – the biblical piece of land that Abraham bought from Ephron the Hittite as a burying-place for his wife Sarah at the exorbitant price of four hundred silver shekels. The cave became the family burying-place, Sarah being the first to be buried there; later, Abraham, Isaac, Rebekah, Leah, and Jacob, the Patriarchs of the Jewish people, were placed there (Genesis xxiii).
It is the area that PM Netanyahu, in an apparent moment of insanity gave apx 90% over to the Arabs at the tail end of the Oslo Accord agreement in the vain hope that it would bring peace. Peace has not even come close. It has been nothing but another Arab center for terrorism ever since. Now David Wilder rightfully fears that Netanyahu is on the verge of another such gargantuan error giving Arabs more land in Judea and Samaria and allowing them a so-called Palestinian State for which the Arabs have only one goal — the final destruction of the State of Israel.) jsk
II The Disengagement from Gush Katif (Israeli developed strip of Gaza) with Ariel Sharon
- See more at: http://israel-commentary.org/?p=8308#sthash.aZbsic5q.dpuf

Monday, January 6, 2014

Lies About Israel--They All Will Be Used By Obama-Kerry Against Israel

  Nine common myths about Israel

Moshe Dann - Jan 17, 2013 
Canada Free Press

1. The international community opposes Israel because it is an “ethnic nation-state.”

A cover for Jew-hatred, this argument is applied only against Israel and the Jewish people.

2. Judea and Samaria (the “West Bank” of the Jordan River) belong to the “Palestinians.”

By history and law (San Remo agreements, League of Nations’ decisions, British Mandate and the UN Charter (Article 80) “Palestine” – as it was then called – is the Jewish national home and belongs to the Jewish people. Arabs and the PLO also claim this territory but in the Oslo Agreements (1993) they agreed to accept part of the area in return for ending the conflict, recognizing Israel, and peace. That was supposed to be the deal.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) changed international law by interpreting the Fourth Geneva Convention (GC IV) as applicable to the territories which Israel acquired as a result of the 1967 Six Day War. Arbitrarily and unilaterally, the ICRC declared Israel’s presence in these areas as “occupation in violation of GC IV” and has promoted this canard, especially via the UN.

During the late 1990s, the ICRC added a further onus, declaring Judea and Samaria to be “occupied Palestinian territory,” thus designating presumptive ownership.

Because the ICRC is the official “guardian” of GC IV, its decisions are considered authoritative.

Their protocols, however, are not public, and therefore there is no way of knowing who made this decision, or on what basis.

The entire legal case against Israel rests on decisions made by the ICRC in secret, without transparency, and apparently, without evidence.

3. American Jews – especially those in college – are disaffected from Israel because of the conflict with the Palestinians.

There is no basis for such a statement, and certainly no reason for Israel to consider it in policy decisions. This myth is used to pressure Israel into making more concessions, to encourage withdrawal from Judea and Samaria, and to create another Palestinian state.

4. The Palestinians deserve a state, just like Israel.

No one “deserves” a state; it is earned, based on commitments to peace and security for its neighbors, freedom, democracy, and an honest and open system of government.

Comparing Israel’s raison d’etre with that of Arab Palestinians is absurd. Moreover, Arab Palestinians are unable to define their own identity.

5. Palestinians lack political/national self-determination.

But, Jordan was created as a Palestinian state by the British in 1921, albeit ruled by a Saudi tribe, and two-thirds of its population is considered Palestinian. Palestinians rejected many offers by Israel to achieve statehood. They don’t want to live alongside Israel; they want to replace Israel. A two-state solution will not resolve the problem of millions of so-called Arab Palestinian refugees living in the region under UNRWA auspice.

6. Adopting the Edmund Levy Commission report (which presents Israel’s legitimate rights in Judea and Samaria) would make it impossible for Israel to argue that it is the Palestinians who refuse to negotiate.

The Palestinians have already refused to negotiate and seek recognition unilaterally by the UN; adopting the Levy report won’t change their goal. Those who oppose the report do so because they oppose settlements, not because it will deflect criticism.

Adopting the report will refute the lie that “settlements are illegal.”

7. The occupation (of all areas claimed by Arabs) is a “moral disaster” that numbs our moral sensibilities.

Over 95 percent of Arab Palestinians live under PA control and carry passports issued by the PA or Jordan, and can exercise political rights and limited self-determination.

Due to terrorism, missile attacks from Gaza, and ongoing incitement, offering sovereignty to another probable terrorist entity is suicidal and immoral.

8. The Levy report does not serve Israel’s interests; Zionism should aspire to greater social equality, including a Palestinian state.

Ideally, perhaps, one might argue that a Palestinian state dedicated to peace with Israel would be welcome. In the absence of this possibility, however, and in view of regional turmoil and the rise of radical Islamism, it is not in Israel’s national interest to promote Palestinian statehood or to postpone its own development and national interests.

9. Israelis (Jews) steal private Palestinian land.

This canard has not been proven. Evidence brought by Arab claimants against Jews has not been adjudicated properly in courts. The Civil Administration, Prosecutors’ Office and other state institutions often mistakenly, or ignorantly, sign-off on Arab claims, and Israel’s High Court accepts these documents as valid.

These claims, however, have not been examined by authorized courts and therefore lack authenticity.

Moshe Dann was an Assisant Professor of History at CUNY and other institutions in the NYC area before moving to Israel 30 years ago. Moshe is a writer and journalist living in Jerusalem. Moshe can be reached at: moshedan@netvision.net.il 

Iran Gained Time To Create Nukes And Biological Bombs. Obama's Success?

 Obama's Engagement with Mullahs Has Only Bought Them Time

Reza Kahlili - Jan 11, 2013 
Family Security Matters

Almost four years after President Obama tried to engage the radical leaders of Iran, it is too late to stop the Islamic regime from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Now we have a more immediate crisis to worry about: a biological attack on the United States, which Iran is preparing.

A highly credible source within the supreme leader's office has said the regime is actively working on its nuclear bomb program from three secret sites besides those already known to the International Atomic Energy Agency, and it has enough weaponized-grade uranium and, through North Korea, plutonium, for three nuclear bombs. It also has produced several extremely dangerous viral and bacterial weapons.

As of several months ago, the regime was working on arming its missiles with nuclear warheads. It has armed 37 ballistic missiles and many cluster bombs with microbial weapons.

The Iranian government thinks the Obama administration's efforts to reach a negotiated solution with Iran and normalize relations have bought it time to reach the nuclear capability it has today.

The Kuwaiti newspaper Alrai last week reported that Mr. Obama has stated his willingness to travel to Iran and meet with the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to open the doors of America and the West to Iran and recognize its role in the region if the Iranians would agree to a negotiated solution over their nuclear program.

While Mr. Obama pushed his agenda, Russia and North Korea helped the regime with its nuclear and biological programs. With more than 1,000 ballistic missiles in the nation's inventory, the radicals ruling Iran are able to target not only Israel and all U.S. bases in the Middle East, but also capitals in Europe. Iran soon will have the capability, with North Korea's help, to target any point on the planet as it completes its intercontinental ballistic missile program. That was underscored recently by North Korea's successful test of a three-stage rocket, showing its ability to build an ICBM.

The lure of negotiations gave the Islamic regime exactly what it was looking for -- time -- something that still haunts the West as it pushes for further dialogue, knowing full well that Iran indeed has crossed the red line. Yet, weary of war, the West has allowed a much more dangerous situation to take place in which any confrontation now will be much more devastating than before.

The source also provided valuable information on terrorist teams that have infiltrated America, France and Germany, getting ready for attacks on the scale of Sept. 11, 2001, if not greater, should the West further increase sanctions or gear up for confrontation with Iran over its illicit nuclear program.

The information, which has been passed on to U.S. officials, is being taken seriously, and it is clear that there is a good understanding of the threat Iran poses to America and world stability.

What makes it worse is that Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist proxies of the Iranian government have been armed with microbial weapons. Chemical and microbial weapons have been transferred to Iran's proxies in the region. However, Iranian scientists, with the help of Russia, are working on 18 biological agents and already have developed several, including anthrax, encephalitis, SARS, Ebola, cholera, smallpox and the plague.

Most disturbing, though, is that with the help of North Korea, Iran has managed to genetically alter smallpox so Western vaccines will be worthless against it. Iran is working out of several sites on projects to make insects the carriers of diseases such as the plague, the "Black Death" that killed one-third of Europe's population during the Middle Ages.

The regime also knows that once its medium-range ballistic missiles and ICBMs armed with nuclear warheads are operational, the U.S. deterrent umbrella in the region will be undermined, as America itself could become a target.

More important, Iran will become the domino player in the stability of the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than 20 percent of the world's petroleum passes. Knowing quite well that a full-blown war and a nuclear exchange in the oil-rich region could collapse the global economy, sending the world into the greatest depression it has seen, the world will become hostage to the goals of the radicals ruling Iran, who already are threatening the existence of Israel and inciting rebellion against U.S.-friendly governments in the region. Moreover, Iran has terror cells on the world stage, with a big presence in Africa and Latin America, that threaten the stability of Western countries.

In recent days, the media of the Islamic regime have been celebrating the probable new appointees in Mr. Obama's second term, calling John F. Kerry and Chuck Hagel Iran-friendly and stating that the president will continue his policy of dialogue rather than confrontation with Iran.

Washington must recognize that the lure of negotiations can no longer serve our national interests and that our security is on the line. It must act immediately with our European allies to drastically increase pressure on the regime politically and economically, while at the same time through various means help the Iranian people, the majority of whom resent their radical rulers, in their fight for change from within.

Mr. Obama must realize that negotiations and sanctions will not lead the Islamists to change course. It is not about the economy -- it is the ideology. Now more than ever, the president must accept and act on this fact, as millions of lives are on the line.

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for an ex-CIA spy who requires anonymity for safety reasons.  He is a senior fellow with EMPact America and the author of A Time to Betray, a book about his double-life as a CIA agent in Iran's Revolutionary Guards, published by Threshold Editions, Simon & Schuster, April 2010.  A Time to Betray was the winner of the 2010 National Best Book Award and the 2011 International Best Book 

Kerry Amping Up The Pressure; Israelis Object



Israeli hardliners object to Kerry pressure

Sunday, January 5th 2014, 9:13 am


Benjamin Netanyahu's hardline coalition partners on Sunday stepped up pressure on the Israeli prime minister, threatening to topple the government if he caves in to American pressure to accept a key Palestinian territorial demand in U.S.-backed peace talks.
The warnings came as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry took a brief break after three days of talks with Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, jetting off to the Arab world to discuss his efforts before an expected return to Jerusalem later Sunday.
In a sign that Kerry is intensifying the pressure, a Palestinian official confirmed that the secretary asked Abbas to recognize Israel as the Jewish homeland. Abbas has repeatedly rejected this Israeli demand, saying it would compromise the rights of Palestinian refugees and Israel's Arab minority. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because Kerry has barred the sides from discussing the negotiations in public.
Kerry was meeting with the leaders of Jordan and Saudi Arabia on Sunday, possibly to win Arab backing for any Palestinian concessions.
Before departing, Kerry told reporters that had he made some progress in his marathon talks over the weekend. He praised both Abbas and Netanyahu for making "difficult decisions."
"You can see in the press and you see in the public debate that the choices they're making elicit strong responses from their people. And I understand that very, very well," Kerry said.
Under heavy U.S. pressure, Israel and the Palestinians agreed last July to relaunch their first substantive talks in nearly five years. With an April target date for an agreement looming, Kerry has increased his involvement by presenting bridging proposals on this trip to try to reach a framework agreement that would spell out the terms for a final peace deal.
Kerry has refused to discuss substance with reporters. However, the apparent trade-off is Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish homeland, in exchange for Israel's acceptance of its pre-1967 frontier as the baseline for border talks.
The Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem, lands Israel captured in 1967, but would accept minor land swaps to allow Israel to keep some Jewish settlements. So far, Netanyahu has refused to commit to the pre-1967 war lines as the starting point, at least in public.
Netanyahu, in turn, demands Palestinian recognition of Israel as the Jewish homeland, a condition he says must be met to ensure the conflict is ended once and for all.
"Opposition to recognizing the Jewish state and our right to be here is continuing," Netanyahu told his Cabinet on Sunday. He said the Jewish people are "not foreigners" in the Holy Land. "I reiterate that in my view, this is the root of both the conflict and the incitement, the non-recognition of this basic fact."
Kerry has refused to discuss the details of his proposals, but noted Sunday that all of the core issues of the conflict fit together like a "mosaic."
"It's a puzzle, and you can't separate out one piece or another. Because what a leader might be willing to do with respect to a compromise on one particular piece is dependent on what the other leader might be willing to do with respect to a different particular piece," he said.
Such talk has begun to unnerve Israeli hardliners, who oppose a pullback to the 1967 lines on both security and ideological grounds.
The Jewish Home, a hardline party affiliated with the Jewish settler movement in the West Bank, threatened to pull out of the coalition if Netanyahu accepts the 1967 borders as the baseline for talks.
"A government that accepts the 1967 lines is committing national suicide. We will not be part of it and will try to replace it," said Ayelet Shaked, the party's faction chairwoman.
Netanyahu's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, said any final peace deal would have to redraw the borders to place large chunks of Israel's Arab minority on the Palestinian side.
"Without swapping territory and populations, Yisrael Beitenu will not support an agreement," he told a group of diplomats.
Lieberman's Yisrael Beitenu Party formed a joint list with Netanyahu's Likud before parliamentary elections last year. The union makes up the largest faction in parliament, and Lieberman's withdrawal from the coalition would rob Netanyahu of his parliamentary majority.
Lieberman insisted his proposal would not uproot anyone from their homes. Instead, he said the border would be moved.
"There is no reason why they shouldn't join their brothers the Palestinians under full Palestinian sovereignty and become citizens of the future Palestinian state, which they yearn for so much," Lieberman said.
Both the Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, who make up about 20 percent of Israel's population, oppose the plan, saying it would undermine the rights of Israel's Arab minority.
If either hardline partner bolts from Netanyahu's coalition, dovish opposition parties have said they would provide Netanyahu with the support he needs to keep his parliamentary majority.

Will Congress Lose Its ObamaCrapCare Subsidy? It Should!

Sen. Ron Johnson Files Suit Over Obamacare Subsidy for Congress

Image: Sen. Ron Johnson Files Suit Over Obamacare Subsidy for Congress
Monday, 06 Jan 2014 02:46 PM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson has followed through with his threats to sue the Obama administration over the federal funds lawmakers and their staff get to subsidize their healthcare coverage.

Johnson filed his suit against U.S. Office of Personnel Management Director Katherine Archuleta and her department, in federal court on Monday, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Joining Johnson in his legal effort will be Paul Clement, an ex-solicitor general who argued about Obamacare's constitutionality before the Supreme Court, and Rick Esenberg of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, reports The Hill. 



In October, Johnson told Newsmax of his plan to sue, warning that the real concern, above and beyond the dysfunctional HealthCare.gov website, is the damage Obamacare will do to the country's healthcare system and personal freedoms.

The Affordable Care Act includes a provision that requires lawmakers and their aides to purchase insurance plans that are created by the law or through the Obamacare exchanges, and the Office of Personnel Management said last year the government will keep helping Congress and staff members offset the plans costs, just like for other federal employees.

Johnson and other Republicans though, say the assistance gives the lawmakers and their aides special treatment. Last week, Johnson said he believes the rule breaks the law, and his lawsuit will help rein in President Barack Obama's executive overreach.

The subsidies are far different from the ones everyday Americans can qualify for, reports the Oshkosh Northwestern, Johnson's hometown newspaper.

According to the ACA provisions, Americans who make less than $45,000 annually qualify for federal subsidies, but members of Congress are paid $175,000 per year, far above the act's subsidy cutoff.

"The American people have an expectation — Wisconsinites have an expectation — that members of Congress should be subjected to the letter of the law just like they’re held to the letter of the law," Johnson said Sunday. "In this case, members of Congress now are not being held to the letter of the law, and that creates an alienation. It creates a wedge between a member of Congress and their constituents."

Johnson, a businessman, was elected in 2010, defeating three-term Democrat Russ Feingold. He is a member of the Budget, Foreign Relations, Commerce, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees.

Even aside from the lawsuit, Johnson believes that Obamacare will cause great damages to the United States.

"The real harm of Obamacare once it becomes fully implemented is the damage it'll cause to our healthcare system, to our federal budget, to our personal freedoms," he told Newsmax in October, when discussing the potential for a lawsuit. "So they may fix the website, but there's no way they can fix the harm if Obamacare actually takes permanent root."

Johnson has also, in recent months, called Obamacare "a political fraud," and said President Barack Obama's repeated promise, echoed by other Democrats, that Americans can keep their healthcare plans was "fully vetted, coldly calculated and carefully crafted" to sell Obamacare.

"Those assurances weren't slight exaggerations or innocent shadings of the truth," Johnson said. "It was a political fraud echoed relentlessly by House and Senate Democrats who should be held accountable for the disastrous consequences of their grand deception."




Related stories:

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.