Contact Form


Email *

Message *

Friday, March 22, 2019

Couldn't Happen To A More Deserving Person!

Ocasio-Cortez woke up to TERRIBLE news this morning (ouch!)

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has been slammed by a whirlwind of bad news this week. Friday morning, she received the final blow — because even the mainstream media is sick of her act.
Just how rough was the New York socialist’s week?
It doesn’t get much worse if you’re a politician.
On Monday, it was discovered that Ocasio-Cortez and her chief of staff had been quietly fired from a key position on the board of the activist group, Justice Democrats, The Daily Caller reported. This group was a key political infrastructure for her. She’d previously held complete  “legal control over the entity.”
In other words, her ousting from the far-left organization’s board of directors was both a personal and political blow. Ocasio-Cortez was removed after it was discovered that during her election campaign, her chief of staff had funneled over a million dollars in donations into a private slush fund. Three ethics complaints were officially filed against her in Congressafter the shocking discovery.
But that was just the beginning.
A surprising poll by the Siena College Research Institute found that Ocasio-Cortez’ favorability ratings have plummeted among registered New York voters. In fact, even President Donald Trump has a better approval rating in New York, a deep blue Democratic stronghold.
“While neither politician crossed the 40 favorability percent threshold, Trump had the backing of 36 percent of people surveyed, compared to Ocasio-Cortez’ 31 percent,” The Washington Examiner reported.
Last Friday, Gallup Polling had announced that “41 percent of U.S. adults have an unfavorable view of Ocasio-Cortez, up from 26 percent last September before the 29-year-old was elected to Congress.”
And still, the bad news of Ocasio-Cortez kept coming.
On Wednesday, she was caught lying about her test scores to a New York City panel of far-left activists. The activists had gathered to encourage the boycotting of standardized testing because they’re “racist” and “sexist.”
Ocasio-Cortez couldn’t help but gloat that she’d gotten a “99th percentile” score during one of these so-called sexist “high-stakes test” — but was later called out by her own supporters.
That couldn’t possibly be true, attendee Diane Ravitch later pointed out in her blog.
“It was a bit jarring to hear AOC say that she was [treated in] the Yorktown schools as in need of remedial education because she was Hispanic, not mainstream, but, she said, ‘a-high-stakes standardized Test’ revealed she was in the 99th percentile,” Ravitch wrote. “No one stopped to point out that she could not be referring to any high-stakes test used for accountability purposes because they don’t rank by percentile. They classify students as 1, 2, 3, or 4.”
In other words, she was either flat out wrong, or flat out lied.
Think that’s all? That’s only halfway through the week.
Fox News star Tucker Carlson reported that in just three short months, Ocasio-Cortez had become so divisive and unlikable that she has already become political ammunition for Republicans.
He pointed to a recent GOP congressional candidate’s commercial from North Carolina’s third district as an example.
“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: she has the media, she has the followers, but bless her heart, she has some terrible ideas,” Republican candidate Michele Nix says in her latest campaign ad.
“Guaranteeing government jobs for some, while killing small-town jobs for others,” Nix says. “Her ‘green deal’ is a bad deal for North Carolina.”
You can see the ad here —
The final blow came Friday morning, when NBC News reported that Ocasio-Cortez was under fire for faking an accent.
Just when her credibility is on the brink, pundits are asking if she’s forcing a faked “Obama-like” accent? That’s a rough week.
And it’s not the end — expect more of the same moving forward.
Ocasio-Cortez is so divisive, people can’t stop talking about her.
The more the public finds out about her, the more she’s disliked.
Just three months into her first term in office, Ocasio-Cortez is struggling to keep her head above water.
At this rate, there may not be a second term.

Socialism--What Is It

Wake Up America--Shariah Is Coming And You Better Not Say Anything About It!

Man Who Threw Bacon at Mosque Found Dead in Prison Cell

Freshman Congresswomen Rep Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) have certainly made a splash in the three months since they took office. In that short amount of time both have been accused of making anti-American, anti-Semitic statements. Both Congresswomen have refused to apologize for their words and actions.
Despite Nancy Pelosi and Democrats refusal to reign in their hate spewing colleagues, some people have expressed fear that the changes both women are proposing in Congress are a veiled attempt to implement Sharia law and to force non-Muslims in America to submit to their religious demands.
Let’s start with Fox News host Jeanine Pirro…Judge Pirro has been taken off the air for statements that harmed the feelings of Muslims – a key tenet of Sharia law. Perhaps we should ask Kevin Crehan of Great Britain this question. Unfortunately, we can’t ask him, because Kevin was found dead in his prison cell.
For those who don’t remember, Kevin Crehan was the vile criminal who carried out the most vicious attack on a mosque in Great Britain’s entire history. Crehan and three additional white nationalist terrorist cohorts carried out their premeditated attack on the Jamia Mosque in Bristol. It was a date that will live in infamy in Great Britain. In fact, it was an attack on all of Britain itself.
Following the attack, Crehan and his co-terrorists were spotted drunkenly walking down the street and laughing as they headed to the next pub. Those cold-hearted bastards.
Crehan later admitted to police that he alone launched the attack against the mosque, and that his three accomplices merely stood by and laughed. The British courts threw the book at Crehan. He got a year in prison for the assault, followed by 10 years of probation in which he is not allowed to approach within 330 feet of a mosque, to prevent him from assaulting any Muslims in the same fashion ever again.
The “racist attack” – as it was dubbed by the British press – consisted of Kevin Crehan throwing two bacon sandwiches on the doors of the mosque as he walked by. Not BLTs. Just plain old fatback on white bread. The vicious terrorist Crehan didn’t even have the decency to put mustard on the sandwiches, which proves that the attack was premeditated.
Kevin Crehan made it more than half way through his prison sentence for “terrorism” before he was discovered dead in his cell. Kevin is dead because Great Britain has completely succumbed to Sharia speech codes under the guise of political correctness.
He played a childish prank while he was drunk and on a double date with his girlfriend and another couple. Absolutely no one was harmed by the bacon jihadi’s “attack” – yet it cost him his life after the British authorities imprisoned him.
You probably know about the recent “anti-hate” resolution passed by Pelosi’s House. It started out as a condemnation of Rep. Ilhan Omar for her anti-Semitic Twitter feed but ended as a watered-down resolution condemning “all forms of hate” (but especially the Orange Bad Man white nationalist kind of hate).
Behind the scenes, there’s a different battle going on in the Democrat Party. According to the Washington Post, a group of Democrats met blocks away from the Capitol a few days ago, to try to “heal the wounds” between the Muslim Democrats and the Jewish Democrats. The little Maoist struggle session didn’t go very well, according to the paper.
To this date, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has never apologized in any believable way for her anti-Semitic rants. During the private meeting, Jewish freshman Rep. Dean Phillips – also from Minnesota – asked Omar to finally apologize, and for the Muslim Democrats to verbally consent to the fact that Israel has a right to exist and protect itself. That went over about as well as cow flatulence at an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rally.
The meeting evaporated in a big huffy meltdown after some shouting and accusations. Rep. Rashida “Impeach the Motherf***er” Tlaib left the meeting crying. Apparently, any speech questioning the validity of her religion is a “racist hate crime” in her eyes.
Freedom of speech? Forget about it. Leftist ideals like political correctness are a means to an end for them. Instead of “Give me liberty, or give me death,” their motto is “Sharia for everyone, like it or not.”
Kevin Crehan can’t answer the big question of whether we are better or worse for importing this problem. For the moment, Judge Jeanine Pirro doesn’t have a platform to weigh in on it, either. Will anyone in power eventually say the “unspeakable truth” about this problem?

If You Think That This Could Not Happen In The US, You Are Fooling Yourself!

At 2:59 PM Guns Were Legal in NZ. At 3:00 PM a Massive Gun Ban Began with Promise of Prison or Fines for Anyone Who Wouldn’t Comply

At 2:59 PM Guns Were Legal in NZ. At 3:00 PM a Massive Gun Ban Began with Promise of Prison or Fines for Anyone Who Wouldn't Comply
Volume 10%
Terrorism is defined as the use of violence to push political change — and sadly, a terrorist in New Zealand has been able to do just that, rapidly changing the country’s laws in less than a week and possibly getting exactly what he wanted.
Last Friday, a man walked into two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, and killed dozens of people. The tragic crime was carried out with what that nation’s government is now calling “military-style semi-automatic weapons,” which are, in fact, some of the most common types of rifles owned by civilians today.
But with almost zero debate and not even an official vote by its House of Representatives, the country’s government has pushed through sweeping gun bans in record time. That executive action essentially turns previously law-abiding citizens into criminals in an afternoon unless they comply and turn in their firearms to the police.

“Cabinet agreed to overhaul the law when it met on Monday, 72 hours after the horrific terrorism act in Christchurch,” the government’s official website reported in a news releaseon Thursday. “Now, six days after this attack, we are announcing a ban on all military-style semi-automatics (MSSA) and assault rifles in New Zealand.”
TRENDING: Prof. Busts AOC’s Cocky Claim About Extremely High Test Score in High School
It must be stressed that the governmental body that supposedly represents citizens, New Zealand’s House of Representatives, hasn’t even voted on the measure. The massive ban was done with a  signature at the capital, with officials promising that actual legislation would be passed at a later time.

“Earlier this afternoon, an Order in Council under section 74A(c) of the Arms Act was signed by the Governor-General to reclassify a wider range of semi-automatic weapons under the Act,” the government news site reported. “It came into effect at 3pm today.”
And what exactly are those “military style semi-automatics” that were made instantly illegal? It turns out that the term is pretty deceptive: A huge swath of firearms are now being called MSSAs, even though many have absolutely nothing to do with the military.
Any “semi-automatic firearm capable of being used with a detachable magazine which holds more than five cartridges” is now being called a military-style gun and is essentially illegal, although small .22 caliber rifles are exempt.
That means that your grandfather’s vintage M1 Garand with its eight-round clip would likely be illegal under the new ban, as would any number of common sporting rifles.

Residents are being told to surrender their previously legal firearms to the police as part of an involuntary buyback program. If they decline or try to safeguard their arms from government officials, they’ll be treated as criminals.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, according to NPR, said “ownership of firearms is a privilege in New Zealand and not a right.” That is exactly why the government was able to move so fast to begin rounding up guns and threatening citizens with criminal penalties if they don’t comply.
RELATED: CNN Anchor’s Lie About Trump & New Zealand Is So Huge She Shouldn’t Even Be a Fake Journalist

Do you think New Zealand-style gun confiscation plans could come to America soon?

40% (84 Votes)
60% (123 Votes)
There are a few key points here. First, of course, is just how fortunate Americans are to have the Second Amendment, which embeds the right to bear arms in the Constitution itself.

Even so, this should be a wake-up call to the United States: Bureaucrats will do everything they can to end civilian gun ownership for almost any reason. History has shown the dark path where that leads.
Second, it seems almost laughable that this massive gun seizure will have any impact on real criminals. If right now a terrorist is planning a copycat attack in New Zealand, will he shrug and turn over his semi-automatic firearms to the police? Only the naive would think so.
Meanwhile, it’s the law-abiding citizens — such as the victims who were targeted during their worship — who are left defenseless. Police took over half an hour to actually engage and stop the terrorist’s rampage in Christchurch.
Meanwhile, victims who were attacked in their place of worship were forced to defend themselves with makeshift objects including a credit card machine. Yet the government thinks disarming citizens even further will somehow help them.

“To owners who have legitimate uses for their guns, I want to reiterate that the actions being announced today are not because of you, and are not directed at you,” Prime Minster Ardern said, according to the government news release.
But that statement is both hollow and ridiculous. The new bans are directed at law-abiding citizens, without question. It is they, not determined criminals, who will be disarmed.
Finally, the elephant in the room is that the attacker who carried out these acts of terrorism most likely wanted to impact New Zealand’s politics. That is, again, the very definition of terrorism.
A rambling manifesto attributed to the mass shooter made it clear that he definitely had an agenda, bizarre and twisted as it may be. The document he allegedly emailed to many before the attacks openly admits that he wanted to affect public policy and stir up division, sometimes with misdirection.

“Significant portions of the manifesto appear to be an elaborate troll, written to prey on the mainstream media’s worst tendencies,” The Atlantic reported.
Is not one of those worst tendencies to jump to conclusions based on hot takes — the very thing that New Zealand just did?
“This manifesto is a trap,” warned journalist Robert Evans, noting that at “multiple points in the manifesto the author expresses the hope that his massacre will spark further attempts at gun control in the United States which he believes will lead to gun confiscation and a civil war.”
So, in at least one sense, the Christchurch killer set a trap … and New Zealand may have fallen for it.