Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Friday, June 1, 2018

Supposed Peace Loving Liberals Seem To Always Resort To Violence

Liberal Snowflake Convicted

 in Cold-Blooded Attack

  • 06/01/2018 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN
17 19 2  54
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/
aanews/media/picture/59f0/e71b/6970/2d6d/111d/4000/content_Olga_
Alekseenko.JPG?1517324773
Liberal Snowflake Convicted in Cold-Blooded Attack
By Deevrod (Own work) [Public domain or Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Another liberal activist has been arrested for yet another physical attack on
 a conservative, as the progressive movement grows more unstable and violent.

Patricia Hill, an assistant sociology professor at the University of Nebraska,
was convicted in a Virginia court for spraying fake blood on the home of a
 National Rifle Association lobbyist after stalking him and his family for months.

Hill sprayed fake blood on the Alexandria, Virginia home of NRA Institute for
Legislative Action Executive Director Chris Cox in two separate attacks, one
 in January 2018 and one in October 2017.

According to fellow UNL professor Amanda Gailey, who joined Hill in stalking
 Cox; home, Hill targeted Cox, his wife, and his children because “the Cox
 family is getting enough social pressure,” and “people need to stop treating
 these predatory, sick people like they’re just a neighbor.” Hill hoped the
 criminal act would inspire copycat attacks on Cox.

She was convicted of misdemeanor vandalism for the January attack, ordered
 to pay a $500 and further ordered to stay at least 500 feet away from Cox or
 his family. She was specifically ordered to not stalk Cox’s wife. After the verdict
 was handed down, she was served a warrant for the October assault.

Hill was arrested when security personnel matched her face, captured on
security cameras when she picketed Cox’s home in April 2018, to the images
 of a woman who vandalized the home in October 2017 and January 2018.

Hill was involved in a similar incident on the Nebraska campus when she stalked
and harassed students participating in an event for the conservative group
Turning Point USA. Hill and two other professors tried to shut down a campus
sign-up event by screaming obscenities at the students while shooting middle
fingers at them.

When the taunting and cursing caused a female student to begin crying, Hill
and her fellow protesters began mocking her.

Anti-gun lobbyists, despite stating they oppose violence, are supporting Hill’s
history of stalking and vandalism.

“We think this is the NRA using the criminal justice system to rain terror on
 regular people,” said Melody Vaccaro, vice president of Nebraskans Against
Gun Violence, arguing that stalking a wife and children and vandalizing their
home are civil rights.

The conviction comes nearly one year after an avowed anti-gun activist
 showed up, again in Alexandria, Virginia, and opened fire on a group of
 Republican congressman practicing for a charity baseball game. One
 Republican member of Congress, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise,
 nearly died in the mass assassination attempt.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/liberal-snowflake-convicted-in-cold-blooded-attack#dKlVMDGuBv1SmGwK.99

Are You A Free Person Or A Slave? You Might Be Surprised!



When serfs become 'customers'

Are we subjects of political government — or its "consumers" and "customers"?
As the American state at all levels subsumes more industries, everything from providing homes to renting us bicycles and campsites, bureaucrats increasingly refer to those paying their salaries as "customers" or "consumers." For example, the Thieves and Sexual Assailants (TSA) who infest airports dedicate a page of their website to "Customer Service," as if the poor saps waiting in endless lines would rather miss their flights than a good grope.
Ditto for the socialist sewage of Obummercare. Americans are "customers" and "consumers" rather than taxpayers obliged to finance a nationalized insurance scam.
Perhaps most infuriating of all, the IRS speaks of its victims in the same terms. It doesn't hire extortionists and leg-breakers but "Customer Service Representatives."
Such jargon as "customer service" typifies our smarmy culture, one that prefers euphemisms over truth; it's only natural that Leviathan, which lies about everything all the time, would so describe its leeches. Yet the implication that we are government's "customers" ravages not only the English language but liberty as well.
The dictionary defines "customer" as "a person who purchases goods or services from another; buyer; patron," Foundational to that concept is freedom. We obtain hamburgers and haircuts, computers and car-washes because we value and need them, not because someone held a gun to our heads. Indeed, when compulsion corrupts a commercial transaction, such as the Mob's strong-arming a business into hiring it for trash-removal, all of us — including the government — call it a crime. The State even prosecutes it as such.
So how do bureaucrats and politicians get away with coercing our patronage? Simple. As always, political government operates under gargantuan double standards, committing with impunity what it would imprison us for doing. The hypocrisy is so jaw-dropping you'd think that even public-school graduates would notice.


Meanwhile, Leviathan's "customers" not only buy under duress, they forego all the market's protections, too. Unhappy with your coverage under Obummercare? Too bad. No refunds — and not even so much as an apology. No switching to the insurer of your choice, either, unless bureaucrats approve of that particular company.
Contrast that with your usual experience in the private market, where most entrepreneurs work overtime to keep us happy. Their fate depends on pleasing us. If they don't, we switch to their competitor, and they go out of business.
I recently called a small business to correct my address on their mailing list; the woman answering the phone was not the one at fault, nor had the mistake caused a monumental problem for me — yet she apologized profusely. We've all exchanged clothing that doesn't fit, or perhaps your Aunt Ida's birthday present to you was as well-meaning but useless as her advice. Most returns are effortless; many online retailers even pay for shipping the item back to their warehouse. In a free market, entrepreneurs strive to please us because they cannot exist without clients.
But government can. It knows our patronage doesn't result from our satisfaction but from laws compelling us to use the State's "services." The bureaucrats running those programs lack any incentive to delight us. Their paychecks depend on our taxes, not on our gratification.
Tragically, the U.S. has never enjoyed a free market. From the beginning, governments have controlled the economy via licensing, chartering, regulations and, of course, taxes.
Those horrors have vastly increased over the last century. Today, Federal, state, and local governments subsidize or otherwise dominate a myriad industries, which then look to politicians, not customers, for their profits. For example, airlines receive a princely chunk of our taxes. That explains their insouciance toward the TSA's abuse of their customers as well as their survival despite passengers' supreme disgust at shoddy service. The less a business cares about catering to you, the more of your taxes it's gobbling.
Even worse than our dismay with the State's services is the blow to liberty. And the terms that describe this economic arrangement aren't good: we call it "fascism," "communism" or "socialism," depending on the degree of governmental oversight. When the State outright manages or owns the "means of production" (such as in constructing and maintaining roads), it's "communism." And when it runs those means "in partnership" with business — akin to an alliance with King Kong, given the imbalance of power — it's "fascism." "Socialism" varies from communism and fascism in a few technical details. But essentially, all three worship government as a god, ceding politicians and bureaucrats unlimited power.
Communism and fascism have murdered millions and impoverished billions everywhere they've prevailed. Their perverse incentives and central planning reduce production so severely that people starve, as is happening in Venezuela. Hunger killed millions in Europe during the Second World War, too, as proponents of these two variations on totalitarianism battled for supremacy. Worse than the material want is the poverty of the human soul under such dictatorship. When a government is strong enough to control supplies of food, it is strong enough to control every aspect of life.
Meanwhile, the notion that government can produce something people value enough to buy, or that it can "partner" with entrepreneurs who do, is as silly as Hillary Clinton's excuses for losing the election. Our interactions in the market, whether buying or selling, are voluntary. But government is force — physical, brutal, lethal force. It may glorify itself with museums and marble monuments while prattling about patriotism, but its essence is raw, physical compulsion. If you don't obey politicians and bureaucrats, if you ignore their diktats, they will arrest you. If you resist that arrest, and continue resisting, they'll increase the volume of force until they ultimately kill you. Behind every law and regulation, no matter how innocuous or beneficial they may seem, lies the same potentially lethal force.
Force always overwhelms free will. We do not voluntarily participate in the market with guns pointed at us: we aren't buying Obummercare because we want insurance but because the government constrains us to.
Which makes us slaves, the antithesis of customers.

Any Journalist Worth Their Salt Should Watch This And Then Act Otherwise Freedom Of Speech And Press Will Soon Evaporate!

WATCH: “The country is on a knife edge” — Katie Hopkins shocks Tucker Carlson with the facts about Tommy Robinson's case

KATIE HOPKINSSHILLMAN FELLOW
  •  
  •  
  •  

Last night, I told Tucker Carlson on Fox News that I don't see how the UK is any different from the Russians at this point, if we are going to lock up Tommy Robinson for reporting on rape squads — while letting those very grooming gangs victimize our children for decades at a stretch.
Being American, Tucker couldn't wrap his mind around the UK's publication ban on reporting Tommy's arrest, asking why the country's media didn't just violate the gag order. 
As I did in my column this week, we address the fact that many people, even on the right, simply don't like Tommy or his "methods" and are glad he's been jailed. 
But as Tucker said:
"I don't really know anything about Tommy Robinson. And I don't care. This is horrifying."

Are The Democrats Going To Be Disappointed In The Fall?

Does Everything Have To Be Political?

 Mike Lester 6/1/2018

Should Anyone Be Surprised?



Chilling #MeToo Scandal

 ROCKS Planned Parenthood

5 7 0  18
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/5968/cc1d/6970/2d2e/b610/0b00/content_1024px-Planned_Parenthood_HCR.jpg?1500040248
Chilling #MeToo Scandal ROCKS Planned Parenthood
By ProgressOhio (Flickr: June 2009: Protect Women's Health!) [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Planned Parenthood is very thankful for Samantha Bee and Roseanne this week. The controversies surrounding both women have managed to overshadow, even among conservative pundits and publications, the news that the abortion giant has been aiding and abetting child rapists and sexual abusers for decades.

In a damning report published by Live Action, citing eye witness accounts, court cases, video footage, and the testimony of victims, it was revealed that the tax-funded abortion corporation has been engaged in a criminal conspiracy to cover up sex crimes. The specific cases mentioned in the report are downright chilling.

A woman named Denise Fairbanks says she was raped and impregnated by her father at the age of 13. He took her to Planned Parenthood and forced her to get an abortion. She told the clinic staff that she was being abused, but they refused to alert the authorities. Instead, they simply performed the abortion and sent her home with her father, who continued to rape her for another year and a half.

In another case, a man named George Savannah raped and impregnated his daughter three times. Each time, he brought her to Planned Parenthood so that the evidence of his crime could be destroyed. The fact that a man kept returning to the clinic year after year to get abortions for his young daughter apparently never raised any red flags. None of the incidents were reported, so the abuse continued.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/chilling-metoo-scandal-rocks-planned-parenthood#HSMmW5XCUEDZbMlx.99

"Spy" Makes FBI Officicals Uncomfortable

Retired FBI Officials Claim Halper’s ‘Highly Irregular’ Media Contacts Pose Major Problem

 Print
While working as a spy for the FBI, Stefan Halper interacted on multiple occasions with the media, both on the record and, according to a University of Cambridge researcher, as an anonymous background source.
Those media interactions, which occurred between December 2016 and March 2017, could be cause for concern for the FBI, according to two retired senior bureau officials who worked closely with confidential informants during their careers.
“This is something that is highly irregular and not something that I would have ever tolerated with any of the folks working for me,” retired FBI investigator and CNN analyst James Gagliano told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “The road is fraught with peril when somebody is speaking off the cuff or speaking to the media and putting themselves in a position where that can then be used as discovery material when we do bring a case.”
Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund President Ron Hosko, a former assistant director of the FBI’s criminal investigative division, added that an informant’s interactions with the press could create circular reporting that would serve to make their information “appear more valuable or more true” than it actually is.
Halper, a former professor at Cambridge with extensive ties to the CIA and MI6, was quoted on the record for a Dec.16, 2016 article at the Financial Times about alleged Russian infiltration of the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar, a forum that convenes academics and current and former spies to discuss intelligence issues.
TRENDING: Dick Morris: Trump Set To Float Insurance 1/2 the Cost of Obamacare
Halper, 73, told the Financial Times that he resigned from the organization due to “unacceptable Russian influence on the group.” But the evidence of Russian penetration was thin, and another Cambridge professor, Christopher Andrew, dismissed Halper’s complaints as “absurd.”
Halper was also an unnamed source for allegations about former national security adviser Michael Flynn, according to a Russian-British researcher at Cambridge, Svetlana Lokhova.
Lokhova, who studies the history of Russian intelligence, said multiple reporters have told her Halper was behind allegations that she and Flynn had an improper relationship when he visited Cambridge in February 2014. Flynn served at the time as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
“‘FBI confidential informant’ Halper invented a false story which he passed on to official channels & Press, in full knowledge [sic] his personal attack was going to cause me, an innocent party, enormous harm,” Lokhova wrote on Twitter.
She also told The (London) Times that “Halper told reporters he had seen me leaving the dinner with Flynn.”
Reporters from three newspapers, The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, approached Lokhova at around the same time in February and March 2016 with allegations related to her interaction with Flynn.
According to The Journal, which was the only newspaper to publish a story on the matter, Lokhova sat next to Flynn at the dinner and showed him an erotic postcard that Joseph Stalin sent in 1912. The Journal reported that American authorities had been alerted to Flynn’s interactions with Lokhova and that Flynn had failed to disclose his contact with the researcher to the Defense Intelligence Agency.
DIA official Dan O’Neil, who accompanied Flynn to and from the event, said he saw nothing at the dinner that warranted Flynn’s disclosure of the interaction with Lokhova.
DIA spokesman James Kudla told The DCNF this week that officials are required to disclose contact with a foreign national that is of a “close and continuing nature,” but “casual contact” does not need to be reported to the agency.
RELATED: Mueller’s Investigation Racks Up $17 Million Bill
It has since been revealed that Halper, a veteran of three Republican administrations, first raised concerns about Flynn and Lokhova’s interactions at the Cambridge event.
The New York Times reported on May 18 that the FBI spy — which the newspaper did not identify but who is now known to be Halper — “was alarmed” by Flynn’s “apparent closeness with a Russian woman who was also in attendance” at the Cambridge seminar.
Lokhova denies any impropriety between her and Flynn.
“They were throwing all sorts of things at me — love, sex, money. Obviously, I reject them all,” Lokhova told The (London) Times about her interactions with reporters chasing the Flynn story. “I just want to add that I’ve never been interviewed by any authorities and clearly if there were any doubts about who I am and what I do, I would have been [interrogated].”
Lokhova said that reporters with The New York Times and The Washington Post declined to run stories about her and Flynn for lack of evidence.
The University of Cambridge has not responded to numerous requests for comment about Halper, Flynn or Lokhova. But it appears that the university is not overly concerned that Lokhova is a Russian agent, as Halper initially feared.
On May 18, Lokhova gave a presentation for her forthcoming book, “The Spy Who Changed History,” at the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar. Former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, a close associate of Halper’s, convened the event, though he did not personally attend.
At the same time he was in contact with the media, Halper was also working as a spy for the FBI as part of its investigation of possible Russian infiltration of the Trump campaign.
As part of that operation, Halper was in contact with three Trump campaign associates: Carter Page, Sam Clovis and George Papadopoulos. The relationship with Page began in July 2016 and lasted through September 2017.
Halper met Clovis once on Sept. 1, 2016. The next day, Halper reached out to Papadopoulos and offered to fly the young Trump campaign aide to London to discuss work on an academic paper dealing with energy issues. Halper paid Papadopoulos $3,000 for the report.
Papadopoulos has told associates that during one dinner they had in London, Halper randomly asked whether he was involved in Russia’s efforts to steal Democrats’ emails.
Halper also attempted to join the Trump administration. Axios reported on May 21 that Halper convinced White House trade czar Peter Navarro to submit his name for consideration for an ambassadorship to an unidentified Asian country.
Navarro said Wednesday he felt “duped” by Halper, who is considered an expert on China.
Halper’s contacts with the press while working as an FBI spy could be problematic for the bureau for several reasons, according to Hosko, a 30-year FBI veteran.
“The handling agents should be alert to actions by a source that indicate they are trying to influence FBI credibility [and] veracity assessments by engaging in acts that multiply their reporting,” Hosko told TheDCNF.
Hosko said that in some cases, confidential sources could meet with the press if the topic is unrelated to their work for the FBI.
“But, if the [confidential human source] is meeting with the media in a manner that raises questions about their motivation or about their credibility (they fail to disclose same to the handling agent) then the FBI should be reassessing the relationship.”
It is not known whether the FBI was aware of Halper’s media contacts. The bureau declined to comment, and Halper could not be reached for comment.
Gagliano, the CNN analyst and 25-year FBI veteran, told TheDCNF that he would not “in a million years … agree to allow a source, an asset, cooperating witness to speak in the media.”
Halper is not the only FBI source who worked on the Russia investigation to have contact with the press. Former British spy Christopher Steele had multiple meetings and conversations with reporters about the infamous anti-Trump dossier he wrote during the campaign.
At the direction of opposition research firm Fusion GPS, Steele met with reporters from The Washington Post, The New York Times, The New Yorker, Yahoo! News and Mother Jones.
According to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the FBI severed its relationship with Steele just before the election after finding out about his unauthorized contacts with the media. Despite cutting ties, a Department of Justice official named Bruce Ohr met numerous times with Steele to discuss his reporting on Trump.

Chicago--Is This What America Will Look Like In 20 Years?

 Michael Ramirez for 5/31/2018

Democracy Dies One Step At A Time

The Suicide Of Europe

Photo by Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images
On Friday, the British police arrested Tommy Robinson, founder and former leader of the English Defence League, a far-right anti-Islam group. Robinson is a controversial character, to be sure, a sort of Milo Yiannopoulos lite. His chief focus is on the threat of radical Islam, which he believes threatens the integrity of the British system.
You don't have to like Robinson. But whatever you think of him, his arrest is absurd by any measure. You see, Robinson was arrested for standing outside a court building and reporting on a trial involving the alleged grooming of young girls for sexual assault by radical Muslims.
Now, what would be illegal about that, you ask? It turns out that Robinson was given a suspended sentence last year for filming outside another court building, where a trial for alleged gang rape by radical Muslims was taking place. He wasn't inside the courtroom. Nonetheless, the judge believed he was somehow biasing the jurors. According to the judge, Robinson was sentenced thanks to "pejorative language which prejudges the case, and it is language and reporting ... that could have had the effect of substantially derailing the trial."
This time, Robinson was again arrested for prejudicing a case, only he wasn't inside the court building. He was outside. And the media were originally banned from reporting on his arrest so that his trial wouldn't be biased. In other words, Britain has now effectively banned reporting that actually mentions the Islamic nature of criminal defendants for fear of stirring up bigotry — and has banned reporting on reporting on such defendants. It's an infinite regress of suicidal political correctness.
But at least the Europeans have their priorities straight: While it's perfectly legal to lock up a provocateur covering a trial involving Muslims, the European Union is now considering a ban on products like cotton buds, straws and other plastics for fear of marine litter. And just as importantly, it's now perfectly legal to kill unborn children again in Ireland, where voters — with the help of a cheering press — decided to lift the ban on abortions until the 20th week, condemning thousands of children to death.
This is how the West dies: with a tut-tut, not with a bang. The same civilization that sees it as a fundamental right to kill a child in the womb thinks it is utterly out of bounds to film outside a trial involving the abuse of children, so long as the defendants are radical Muslims. The Europeans have elevated the right to not be offended above the right to life; they've elevated the right to not be offended above the right to free speech, all in the name of some utopian vision of a society without standards.
Discarding those standards was supposed to make Europeans more free; it was supposed to allow Europeans to feel more comfortable. But the sad truth is that no society exists without certain standards and Europe has a new standard: enforcement of its "tolerance" via jail sentence, combined with tolerance of multiculturalism that sees tolerance itself as a Trojan horse. The notion of individual rights sprang from European soil. Now they're beginning to die there.