Contact Form


Email *

Message *

Friday, September 28, 2012

Anti-zionist Facebook Page

Ever wonder what those who hate Israel are saying?  Here is a Facebook site that will give you some insight.

It is not a pretty site, it is not pro anyone, it is anti-US, anti-Israel.  It is a hate spewing, gutter site but one that we are sure that many American hating people will visit.

We hesitated to publish the address however, we feel that it is better to expose this hate to the light of day. They say that light cleanses, we will see.

Tell us what your opinion is. 

Conservative Tom

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Signs That Attack on Iran Is Near

The following blog discusses the signs that Israel is close to a showdown with Iran. Add to this Netanyahu's speech at the UN today and it appears as if things are definitely heating up.  What do you think?

Conservative Tom

4 signs that Israel's showdown with Iran is almost here

The Week's Editorial Staff - The Week,  September 17th, 2012

Israel warns that the clock is ticking, and that Iran is dangerously close to acquiring nuclear weapons. Is a long-feared military clash looking more and more likely?
Over the last several days, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has loudly and repeatedly urged that President Obama draw a “red line” that Iran's nuclear program can't cross, warning that without such a line, the Islamic Republic will likely be within reach of building its first atomic bomb in six or seven months. Obama administration officials say Netanyahu's timetable is wrong, and that Tehran will need at least a year to gather the nuclear fuel it would need, and even longer to fit a warhead onto a missile. Is a violent showdown between Iran and Israel nearly here? Many analysts see Netanyahu's increasingly vocal demands as proof that conflict is looming. Here, four other signs that the clock might really be running out:
1. Iran is getting more and more belligerent
Tehran hasn't exactly been mending its ways in the face of aggressive warnings and tightening sanctions, says Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge. In fact, Iran's Revolutionary Guard recently stoked tensions even further by admitting that “its troops are now on the ground in Syria,” helping the embattled regime in its effort to wipe out the pro-democracy opposition. Of all the disturbing developments surrounding Iran's refusal to curb its nuclear program, that could be the one “to light this whole mess on fire.”
2. And accusing nuclear inspectors of sabotage
Iran's nuclear program chief, Fereydoon Abbasi-Davani, says “only mutual trust” will allow his country to soothe the West's fears about his country's nuclear program, say Najmeh Bozorgmehr and James Blitz in Britain's Financial Times, which Iran insists is for peaceful purposes. But it's becoming pretty clear that neither side believes a word the other says. This week, Abbasi-Davani even accused International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors of having been infiltrated by “terrorists and saboteurs” who in August used explosives to knock out power to one of Iran's uranium enrichment facilities. The IAEA, of course, denies the charge, and says Iran is simply unwilling to cooperate to provide “credible assurance” that it's not trying to build a bomb.
3. The West is gathering an armada off  Iran
If you need proof that Western leaders think Israel is getting ready to strike Iran, take a look at the Persian Gulf, says Sean Rayment at Britain'sTelegraph. The U.S. and Britain are massing an armada of warships because they believe that Tehran would respond to an attack on its nuclear facilities by mining or blockading the Strait of Hormuz, a shipping lane that handles 35 percent of the world's oil distributed by sea. This “unprecedented show of force” is a clear sign that the long-feared showdown might be near. 
4. Diplomacy is going nowhere
“There is still time” to work out a negotiated solution and avoid war, Martin Indyk, America's former ambassador to Israel tells CBS News. “I'm pessimistic about that,” though, as Iran hasn't budged. If nothing changes, “then I am afraid that 2013 is going to be a year in which we're going to have a military confrontation with Iran.”

Game Plan For Victory Or Defeat

The attacks that the United States has "accepted" in the past years, only shows how weak we have become. Every couple years, we sustain another attack, the most devastating was 9/11. However on the anniversary of that tragic date, our Ambassador is killed along with three others in Libya. The attacks have not stopped and they never will until we get some intestinal fortitude and decide that we have reached the end of our rope. When will that occur? We don't know but one thing is for sure, it will not happen until Obama is no longer President.

 We seem to be deathly afraid of upsetting the "religion of peace" that sends children with bombs around their waists and preaches that they will go to heaven if they kill an infidel. Whether our President was Reagan, Bush or Obama, we do not want to take it to those who cause us harm.

We have mighty weapons and brave soldiers, airmen, sailors and marines, however they cannot win a war our leaders have decided is un-winnable. If the current attitude (that has existed since WWII) continues, we might as well fold up our tent and sue for peace, now. 

Weakness only encourages more aggression. We saw that in WWII where Hitler thought he do anything he wanted as the governments around the world did not stand up on the rear haunches and demand he return Poland after his invasion.  He also broke his treaty with the Soviet Union and invaded that country and only the Russian winter and over-extended supply lines defeated him, not any military force. 

Once an aggressor thinks he can get away with his aggression, he will continue until stopped or he achieves his goals. We MUST stop Muslims now. We must stop being "kind and understanding" and trying not to hurt their feelings.  They view this as weakness and it only encourages them.

Conservative Tom

Share This Post
Redacted from an extensive article by Dr. Mordechai Kedar, 
Ph.D. Bar Ilan University
21 September 2012
In the past, the United States was the “glory of the world” mainly after it came to the aid of Europe in the Second World War, the victory over Germany and Japan in 1945, and the American success in establishing a democratic state in South Korea (1953) following the war against the communists, who were allied with China and the USSR. However, the glory of the United States has faded during the last generation. Historians point to Vietnam as the beginning of the process of decline; the war lasted 16 years (1959-1975), cost the lives of almost 60,000 American soldiers and ended in a disastrous American rout and Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam, falling to the Vietcong, the militia of communist North Vietnam.
The Vietnam War left parts of American society with a lack of will to fight for the values of freedom and democracy, especially if it’s a question of fighting in countries outside of the United States.
In 1973 the American ambassador, his deputy and the deputy ambassador of Belgium were kidnapped in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan by the Palestinian organization “Black September”, and were executed on the personally telephoned orders of Yasir Arafat.
In April 1983 Hizb’Allah – the long arm of Iran in Lebanon – blew up the embassy of the United States, in another breach of its sovereignty, and killed 63 people and in October of that same year demolished Marine headquarters in Beirut killing 241 American soldiers and citizens. The American reaction was to flee from Lebanon, which very much encouraged Hizb’Allah and its patrons in Iran and Syria, and caused the United States to appear as a country without a backbone.
A month before this, in March of 1983, Hizb’Allah attacked the United States embassy in Kuwait, and in June, 1985 Hizb’Allah organized the hijacking of an American passenger jet of TWA.
In June, 1996 Hizb’Allah carried out an attack on an American military base in Saudi Arabia, and all of these attacks carried out by Shi’ite Hizb’Allah with Iranian inspiration were left unanswered by the Americans.
Qadhaffi’s Libya also contributed its part in aggression against the U.S. with the attack on the disco in Berlin where a number of American soldiers were killed as they were enjoying a night out in 1986. The aggression was answered with an attack on Qadhaffi’s palace, and although his adopted daughter was killed, he did not stand down.
In 1988 he organized a revenge attack on a Pan Am jet over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing almost 300 people. What was his punishment? Nothing, until 2011, when the United States was dragged into attacking Libya, almost reluctantly.
August, 1990, Saddam Hussein disregarded the warnings of the United States and invaded Kuwait, one of the West’s main suppliers of oil, claiming that Kuwait is a province of Iraq. In this case, the West became outraged, and led by the US in January, 1991, entered a war that successfully liberated Kuwait, but did not liberate Iraq and the world from Saddam Hussein.
In March 1991 the Shi’ite rebellion against Saddam (who had been vanquished in Kuwait) began, but he put down the rebellion with great cruelty, costing the lives of tens of thousands of Shi’ites, and the United States did not lift a finger.
In October 1993 an American commando force entering the city by helicopter, tried to capture two terrorists in Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia. The helicopter was shot down by the Somalis, who then killed 18 American soldiers and defiled their bodies. All of this was recorded on camera without fear of enraging the Americans.
Bin Laden, after his mujahedin succeeded in throwing out the Soviets from Afghanistan and accelerating the collapse of the Soviet Union, decided to turn the American weapons against the United States, “the world leader of heresy, permissiveness and materialistic culture” according to bin Laden’s description of the U.S. In December 1992 jihadists attacked hotels near the port of Aden where soldiers of the United States were housed.
In February 1993 the first attempt to collapse the twin towers was carried out in New York.
In August 1998 the United States embassies in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya, and Dar as-Salam the capital of Tanzania, were blown up, killing 224 and leaving thousands of wounded.
In 2000 al-Qaeda attacked the frigate USS Cole off the coast of Yemen, killing 17 soldiers. On September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda organized a series of attacks in the United States on symbols of commerce and government, which caused about 3000 fatalities.
In the aura of the beginning years of the 2000′s in which the United States was perceived as vulnerable despite its great strength, Islamist terrorists did not hesitate to slaughter American citizens and soldiers on camera, for example Daniel Pearl in 2002; Nick Berg, Eugene Armstrong and Jack Hensley in 2004.
As a result of the attacks of September 11, 2001 the United States entered into an all-out war against al-Qaeda and the Taliban regime of Afghanistan, which sponsored the organization. A blitz war brought the collapse of the regime and the dismantling of hundreds of al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan. The coalition led by the United States achieved total control of the entire area of Afghanistan within months, but today – after more than eleven years of Sisyphean (Greek Mythology – relating to Sisyphus – Endlessly laborious or futile fighting, and at the cost of much blood and treasure) the soldiers of the United States and their allies control only about 5 percent of the area of the state. It seems that Afghanistan is about to become the second Vietnam.
Later, an international coalition led by the United States conquered Iraq in 2003, but since then, organizations who adopted the ideology of al-Qaeda, challenged the stability that the United States tried to create in Iraq, by carrying out hundreds of attacks that killed thousands of American soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
Iran, its eastern neighbor, also entered into the Iraqi turmoil, training, arming and financing Shi’ites who remembered well the American betrayal of March 1991, and between the years 2003 and 2008, caused many American fatalities. American intelligence had innumerable proofs of Iranian involvement in the killing of American soldiers, but the United States never ventured to even the account with Iran for this, because of the fear that it would have to open a new front, in addition to those of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Over all, American taxpayers poured into Iraq more than a trillion (a thousand billion) dollars. President Obama, as he promised, withdrew the United States soldiers from Iraq in December 2011, and as a result of the American flight, Iraq today is effectively controlled by Iran.
Despite the international ban on Iran to export weapons, and on Syria to import them, Iran supplies the murderous regime in Syria with weapons, ammunition and fighters who are airlifted over the skies of Iraq. The Americans know this and don’t do a thing.
Another American failure, no less important than the failure in Iraq, is the failure to stop the military nuclear program of Iran. The United States under Obama is afraid of drawing red lines for the regime of the Ayatollahs, who are hurtling ahead towards acquisition of the bomb, which may be able to reach as far as New York, not just Tel Aviv.
Thus, in a continual process of declining strength, the United Stated has become a paper tigerin dealing with the Arab and Islamic world. The Islamic bandits draw strength from American weakness, and it is precisely Obama’s attempts to engage the Islamists, beginning with the Cairo speech (June 2009), that increases the Islamists’ demands from him.
On this background of American weakness are additional facts, which the people of the Middle East see well: North Korea does as it pleases with its nuclear plans and missiles, despite Western and Japanese objections. In the past the United States acceded to the nuclearization of India and Pakistan.
In October 2011, Iran attempted to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador in Washington, no less than the capital of the United States. The Iranians have no problem calling the United States “the Great Satan” which has only one meaning: that holy war must be waged against the United States – a jihad for the sake of Allah, which will only end with the destruction of the government of the United States and the conversion of its citizens to Shi’ite Islam.
The murder of the American ambassador in Libya this month was only another link in the chain of American failure to understand the Middle East.
Islamic zealots sense the American weakness and increase their pressure. The Americans have adopted the culture of “political correctness” that makes them “be nice” even if the one they are dealing with is not nice at all. They enable Islamic organizations to act freely in the United States, to establish mosques almost without limitations and preach violence against the “infidel” in these places, under the right of freedom of expression, of course.
People who are identified with radical Islam come and go in the White House and serve as “advisers” to the president and the secretary of state. During the past generation, the State Department has led the conciliatory and defeatist policy of the United States, which has brought the superpower of the past to be only a paper tiger in the eyes of the Arab and Islamic world.
Since last year, by instructions from above, all American investigative authorities – CIA, FBI and others – have been forbidden to ask people whom they are investigating questions about their faith, and all training programs for investigators have undergone censorship by an obscure committee, whose members are not known. Islam, which has an ideological platform for many of the terror activities that were carried out against Americans in the the United States, has ceased to be a matter that can be investigated or to asked about or related to in any way.
Thus – for example – the terrorist event at the Fort Hood base (November 2009) in which Nidal Hasan (a Palestinian Muslim) murdered 13 of his fellow soldiers and wounded 31, has become “violence in the workplace”, and the attempt of a Pakistani to set off a car bomb in Times Square in New York (May 2010) has become a “traffic accident”
The ignorance of the administration in the eyes of the Middle East has been proven over the past three years, when more than once, people of the government issued statements such as, “The Muslim Brotherhood is mainly a secular movement”, “Iran can be persuaded by diplomatic means to stop enriching uranium”, “There is no proof of the existence of a military nuclear program in Iran” and “Islam is a religion of peace”.
When the heads of the American government speak thus, the Muslim Brotherhood on the Sunni side of Islam, and the Iranians on the Shi’a side, know that they have nothing to worry about. The “Great Satan” has lost its teeth and its will to use its horns. The United States is quickly losing its will to defend its values, and in the Middle East this fact is clearly evident.
The conclusion that Israel must draw from all of this is clear: It’s security must not depend on the ever dissipating American determination, because some Americans who determine policy have the tendency to throw their friends – as in the case of Mubarak – under the bus. Therefore, Israel must place before her invading neighbors a real, concrete and credible threat, because in the Middle East peace is given only to those who can not be nvanquished, and freedom is given only to him who is ready to fight for it.
The Middle East is no place for bleeding hearts, and especially those whose glory has passed and is no more. The Arab and Islamic world knows how to appreciate and honor only those who honor themselves, who know how to draw a clear red line and then be willing to battle anyone who desires to harm them, to go to battle in order to guard the freedom of their region and their global glory.
However, the malaise of the United States need not be terminal: In the times of Ronald Reagan, George Bush the father and George W. Bush the son, there was in the United States a different image, because then at least, there was the will to cope with the problem-makers, not to appease them and not to surrender to them. Those were the days and those were the people. Are there any left like these? Where are they?
Mordechai Kedar is an Israeli scholar of Arabic literature and a lecturer at Bar-Ilan University. He holds a Ph.D. from Bar-Ilan University. Kedar is an academic expert on the Israeli Arab population. He served for twenty-five years in IDF Military Intelligence, where he specialized in Islamic groups, the political discourse of Arab countries, the Arabic press and mass media, and the Syrian domestic arena.

Unmasking the Muslims

For those of you who do not understand the threats we are facing, this video shot in New York should be enlightening.  Muslims want to control the world, on their terms only! Americans just are not used to people who are not respectful of other's religions or points of view.

Freedom of speech are religion not recognized by Muslims and it is time for those who can see the threat to continually point it out.  Are you with us?

Conservative Tom


A New York state senator walked off the stage in protest during an anti-Semitic speech during the New York Muslim Day parade on Sunday.
When asked by Tom Trento, of The United West organization, why he left the stage, Democratic New York state Senator Tony Avella replied, “I was offended.”
Video Shows Dem. NY State Sen. Tony Avella Walking Off Stage in Protest at NY Muslim Parade
(Source: YouTube/TheUnitedWest)
However, Avella refused to go into greater detail.
“I am not going to get into it,” he said. “I don’t want to ruin the event for somebody else.”
Avella was reportedly asked to be a Marshal at the parade and he marched with Muslims through the streets of Manhattan. He was also reportedly scheduled to speak at the event.
Here’s a portion of the anti-Semitic rant that made Avella leave the stage:
“We have the unborn martyrs in our wombs and drop bombs in here because all that we blow up is minds in the minefields. They (Palestinians) resonate in refugee camps and housed by Zionists Nazis,” a Muslim woman said.
Another Imam from Brooklyn called on the United Nations to create an international law criminalizing “blasphemy.”
“The freedom of speak and freedom of rights our problem starts. So, I would like to demand United Nations to make an international law that would criminalize blasphemy. I again demand to the united nations and this platform please make an international law for the protection of honor of our beloved prophet,” he said.
Calls made to Avella’s office were not immediately returned.
Watch the video via The United West:
As our story earlier today noted, parade participants were carrying black flags commonly used in jihad protests. You can see those pictures here.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Mrs. Obama, She Ain't Your Normal First Lady

Michelle Obama likes to spend our money as if she was something special and in her mind she is!  The trouble is that she does not respect the people of this country nor does she understand the remarkable journey that the country has provided she and Barack.  They want more and more  and like any spoiled child are less and less thankful. Like Eva Peron, Marie Antoinette and Imelda Marcos, these "first ladies" (note the lack of capitalization) wanted all their country could provide and gave little back except outrageous spending.

Maybe it is time for Michelle to live out her life as an average citizen, however, we doubt that will ever happen. We expect that after they leave the office either this year, in four or when Barack is thrown out, we can expect the Obamas to be another divorce statistic when Mrs. Obama finds someone who can more adequately fund her spending.

Conservative Tom
Share This Post
From: The Amateur by Edward Klein
If Michelle ever had any reservations about Barack’s grandiose political dreams, they didn’t come from her qualms about politics, but from her belief that he wasn’t aiming high enough. For example, when he ran for a seat in the Illinois State legislature, Michelle told him that it was “too small time.”
For the first several years of their marriage, Michelle and Barack lived in a flat in a lower-middle-class neighborhood. But after Barack’s memoir Dreams from My Father hit the bestseller lists and he joined the United States Senate, the couple moved to a million-dollar mansion, and Michelle landed a cushy job at the University of Chicago Medical Center with a salary of $317,000 a year. It hardly seemed a coincidence that Valerie Jarrett was the medical center’s chairwoman, and that a hospital board member, Kelly R. Welsh, was an executive vice president at Northern Trust Company, which had extended the Obamas a $1.3 million home mortgage.
Chicago-style cronyism marked Michelle’s tenure at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Given all her righteous talk about “fundamental change,” “access,” “opportunity,” and “fairness,” everyone expected Michelle to promote programs to assist the underprivileged denizens of the black South Side. Instead, she helped launch a program, dubbed the South Side Health Collaborative, to save the hospital millions of dollars by redirecting poor and uninsured patients from its emergency room to surrounding community hospitals in the South Side. The University of Chicago’s Medical Center beds were reserved for prosperous patients who used profitable procedures.
The president of the American College of Emergency Physicians, Dr. Nick Jouriles, released a statement saying Michelle’s program came “dangerously close to ‘patient dumping,’ a practice made illegal by the emergency Medical Labor and Treatment Act, and reflected an effort to ‘cherry pick’ wealthy patients over poor.”
Michelle’s actual annual salary, between the university and serving on six boards of directors, including Walmart, approached $500,000.
On February 18, 2008, upon the nomination of her husband, Michelle blurted out her true beliefs about the country that had treated her and her husband so well. Speaking in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, would-be First Lady Michelle Obama said, “For the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”
Another example of Michelle’s impulsive, narcissistic nature was her decision to go on a lavish vacation to Spain even though practically her entire staff advised against it. She overruled them and flew off on an Air Force 757 along with three shifts of uniformed plainclothes agents and military personnel Her security entourage numbered seventy people. Her vast army of support personnel checked into the Villa Padierna Palace Hotel in Marbella, a five-star resort on the Spanish Costa del Sol.
The trip cost American taxpayers several hundred thousand dollars, and the backlash was harsh and immediate. A column by Andrea Tantaros in the New York Daily News was headlined: Material Girl Michelle Obama Is a Modern-Day Marie Antoinette on a Glitzy Spanish Vacation.”
Though the trip to Spain garnered most of the publicity, it was hardly Michelle’s only foray into expensive vacations. Between August 2010 and August 2011, she spent a total of forty-two days on vacation – or one out of every nine days. (During the same period of time, the number of Americans on food stamps increased from thirty-two to forty-six million.)
In February 2012, just weeks after a seventeen-day Christmas vacation in Hawaii, Michelle decided she needed another break With gas prices at an historic winter high, the government struggling to cut the federal deficit and many American families forgoing their annual holiday vacations. Michelle thumbed her nose at political convention and jetted off with Sasha and Malia on Presidents’ Day weekend for the upmarket ski slopes of Aspen, Colorado.
“Several people had known about the ‘low-key’ vacation with the Secret Service in town for the past few days scoping out places for the family to relax and enjoy what the resort has to offer” wrote Aspen Daily News columnist Carolyn Sackariason . Pritkin County Sheriff Joe DiSalvo confirmed that he had met with the Secret Service and had loaned seven deputies to help protect the first lady and her family.
The question naturally arises: Why would someone who is as politically savvy as Michelle Obama do such foolish things? The answer seems to lie in Michelle’s personality, which is acquisitive and materialistic by nature. For her forty-fourth birthday, Obama bought his wife something she had long coveted—a set of diamond stud earrings. He spent $5,000. She promptly returned them in exchange for bigger diamonds that cost $12,000.
“Michelle has expensive tastes,” writes Carol Felsenthal in “It was she who wanted to trade up from their two-bedroom condominium on the first floor of a three-story walkup, for which they had paid $277,500 in 1993, to the $1.65 million six-bedroom Georgian revival Kenwood mansion that landed them in a deal with the wife of Tony Rezko, the convicted felon and fundraiser/fixer….”
I guess for our own Marie Antoinette, it is now not such a bad country after all.

Is Libya A Trial Run To An Attack of Israel?

For those of us who love Israel,  the following article should send your "fear meter" through the roof. Could this really happen?  Would Obama really allow American troops to invade Israel? Or is this just fear mongering?

We would not put anything beyond the pale when it comes to this President. He has proved that nothing is an impediment to his goal to become an Imperial President whose term never expires. He will not retire and go back to Chicago, Hawaii or Indonesia.  If it takes extra-ordinary conditions, he will make it so.

So, be prepared for our troops to storm into Jerusalem and Tel Aviv to protect the Palestinians.

Conservative Tom

September 25, 2012

Was Obama's Illegal War in Libya A Trial Run to Attack Israel?

By Stella Paul
Hey, Obama Lovers, now that our Ambassador is dead, our Benghazi consulate is a smoldering ruin, and its top secret documents have been snatched by Al Qaeda, do you still think your hero's Libyan war is a smashing success?
Because I sure do. Not from America's point of view, of course; it's a nightmare for our national security.
But from the perspective of Obama's biggest donor, the convicted felon and renowned Israel-hater George Soros, the Libyan War is a triumph.  Why? Because Obama waged it illegally and without the consent of Congress. And he did it in the name of the political philosophy that Soros bought and paid for: Responsibility to Protect, or, as it's so zippily dubbed by our global elites, R2P.
Let's lay the big facts on the table: Soros paid a flame-haired foreign policy vixen named Samantha Power to develop and popularize Responsibility to Protect (R2P) as a catchy tool to invade countries that he feels like invading.
See for yourself: Soros's Open Society Institute is a major donor of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, a terribly high-minded international institute of terribly high-minded people pledging terribly high-minded interventions with our military.       
Despite her busy schedule of posing provocatively for Men's Vogue, Samantha Power found the time to serve as Obama's top policy advisor on Libya. And in that glorious capacity, she persuaded him to send our military to Libya for the first self-proclaimed R2P intervention.
Before I go much farther into our Libyan disaster, I want to tell you some pertinent facts about Samantha Power, a.k.a. Mrs. Cass ("The Most Dangerous Man in America") Sunstein.
Samantha Power doesn't like Jews very much, and she really doesn't like Israel, probably because so many Jews live there. Like Stephen Walt, her anti-Semitic colleague at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Power regards American Jews as a subversive element pushing America to side with its enemy, Israel.
Chillingly, in 2002, Ms. Power told a television interviewer that America should use its military to invade Israel to protect the Palestinians. Alas, said Ms. Power with a rueful chuckle, that would require "alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import" - i.e., Jews.

You see where this is going, right? Ms. Power proposes that America invade Israel on humanitarian grounds.  Soros then pays her to develop this insanity into the benign-sounding "Responsibility to Protect," and creates a lofty international institute to promote it.  Obama then hires Power to try out R2P in Libya and, thereby get everybody desensitized to the concept. 
Here are the monumentally terrifying words that Obama said, as he sent our forces to Libya:
"And that's why building this international coalition has been so important because it means that the United States is not bearing all the cost. It means that we have confidence that we are not going in alone, and it is our military that is being volunteered by others to carry out missions that are important not only to us, but are important internationally."
Dear George Washington, will you ever forgive us? In her infinite wisdom, America elected Commander-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama, who offers up our best and bravest to be "volunteered by others." And Obama got away with it.
Sure, a few editorials squawked about Obama waging war illegally, on the basis of a United Nations Security Council Resolution, instead of a Congressional vote. The New York Times even scolded him for "legal machinations" that "set a troubling precedent that could allow future administrations to wage war at their convenience -- free of legislative checks and balances."
I'm sure Obama was quaking in his golf shoes when he read those words -- not.  He was too busy plunging ahead in the next phase of his attack on Israel: unleashing his bare-fanged, unconcealed hatred.
Nobody can accuse Obama of pandering for Jewish seniors' votes in Florida this time round. He refuses to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, and denigrates Israel's concerns about Iranian threats of nuclear annihilation as "noise." (Perhaps Obama and Ahmadinejad share the same press agent, because, oddly, that's what the Nazi dwarf called it, too.)
Obama's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey even proclaimed he doesn't want to be "complicit" in an Israeli strike on Iran, equating Israel's potential self-defense against genocide with a crime.
Meanwhile, the "international community," of which Obama is so fond, continues its ceaseless work of demonizing Israel. If Obama gets a second term with "more flexibility," it's not much of a stretch to imagine the day when the United Nations and its assorted culture warriors screech that the poor Palestinians need R2P! And whether the American people want it or not, Obama will eagerly offer up our military "to be volunteered by others" to attack Israel.
As the "catastrophic intelligence loss" of our Benghazi assets reverberates, it's clear that Obama wasn't defending American interests in Libya. His "responsibility to protect" didn't even extend to our Ambassador. Even now, two weeks after the attacks, Obama hasn't bothered to secure the consulate.
But, Allah be praised, Obama still scored big in Libya. He and Soros are significantly closer to creating a United States of Islam to encircle Israel, and they're armed with a proven doctrine to get America in for the kill

Read more: