Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Netanyahu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Netanyahu. Show all posts

Thursday, January 2, 2020

Sanders--Now What He Tries To Sell

The Hypocrisy of Senator Bernie Sanders

Political News and Analysis    
The Hypocrisy of Senator Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders Condemns Anti-Semitism in Iowa Menorah Ceremony
December 30, 2019
The presiding Rabbi Yossi Jacobson at the ceremony asked Sanders why he rarely discussed his Judaism while on the campaign trail and reluctantly participated in the Chanukah Menorah lighting ceremony. Sanders dodged the question and for good reason.
One can only smell a rat in the hypocrisy in Sander’s condemnation of rising Anti-semitism. His own actions belie any genuine concern. Sanders in his role in the Senate has most often taken anti-Israel positions and anti-American positions that contradict  his usual populous meaningless platitudes of supposed Israel support.
What are Bernie Sander’s stands on issues that matter to Jewish voters
At the recent Democratic debate on December 19, Vermont senator Bernie Sanders said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was “racist,” and called for a US policy toward Israel that makes space for both Israeli security and a “pro-Palestinian” perspective.
Sanders said, “Israel has — and I say this as somebody who lived in Israel as a kid, proudly Jewish – Israel has the right to exist, not only to exist but to exist in peace and security. But what US foreign policy must be about is not just being pro-Israel. We must be pro-Palestinian as well.” 
“We must understand that right now in Israel we have leadership under Netanyahu, who has recently, as you know, been indicted for bribery, who, in my view, is a racist. 
What we need is a level playing field in terms of the Middle East, which addresses the terrible crisis in Gaza, where 60 percent or 70% of the young people are unemployed,” he added.
Additional Commentary by Jerome S. Kaufman
One must fact check check Sander’s blanket statements along with their crowd pleasing meaningless platitudes. There is absolutely no evidence that Netanyahu is “racist”  He is simply defending a very small portion of the land that was given to the Jewish people by G-d in the first place and, in a far less significant temporal way, the League of Nations and the British Mandate.  
As to Gaza, the mess in Gaza is entirely the problem of Hamas who wrested all the territory away from the Palestinian Authority after Israel PM  Ariel Sharon unilaterally relinquished Israel’s jurisdiction over Gaza in a misguided gesture of “peace” in August 2005. 
Sharon had the Israel Defense  Forces forcibly remove 8600 well established Israeli residents of a thriving community of productive green houses, which the Arabs promptly destroyed when given the land and against their own financial self interests.
It is often said that one can be judged by the company one keeps. In Sander’s case, that concept is an absolute road map.
Sanders has allied with surrogates like Linda Sarsour, a vehement anti- Jewish anti-Israel activist, and Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan congresswoman, who are harshly critical of Israel — not just because of its policies, but of its status as a Jewish state.
He has also enthusiastically  teamed up with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
the millennial “it girl” of modern progressivism who is he hopes propping up the septuagenarian socialist senator  “This is not just about running for president,” she said in a video announcing her support. “This is about creating a mass movement.” Whatever that means.
Ocasio-Cortez was joined in her endorsement by Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar. “Proud to endorse @SenSanders for President, glad that @AOC and @RashidaTlaib are on board too,” she tweeted. “It’s time.”
You may remember In February, Omar responded to a tweet from journalist Glenn Greenwald, who posted about House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy threatening to punish Omar and another congresswoman for being critical of Israel.
Omar wrote back, “It’s all about the Benjamins baby,” a line about $100 bills from a Puff Daddy song. Critics jumped on the tweet and said Omar was calling up a negative and harmful stereotype of Jewish Americans.
In another tweet soon after, Omar named the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, saying it was funding Republican support for Israel, which is another complete lie. This tweet received bipartisan backlash, and Omar was widely accused of anti-Semitic speech.
Rashida Tlaib (MI Rep) also dived into the hate speech There was this headline back in January from a New York Post editorial: “Rashida Tlaib casually dives into anti-Semitism”
The focus of the editorial was Tlaib’s remark in support of the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement and her criticism of colleagues who supported Israel. Tlaib said: “They forgot what country they represent.” 
This drew an immediate rebuke from the Jewish Democratic Council of America and the Anti-Defamation League. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) said this: “This ‘dual loyalty’ canard is a typical anti-Semitic line. BDS isn’t about freedom & equality, it’s about destroying Israel.”
You may also remember the charade Rashida Tlaib pulled pretending to want to visit her aged, sick grandmother in Israel. Her real mission was of course to thickly spread anti-Israel hatred in the country. PM Netanyahu opposed the visit for awhile but then under US administrative pressure okayed it with the proviso that Tlaib could not travel around the country spewing her poison. At that point Tlaib suddenly lost interest in visiting her sick grandmother.
Then there was Sanders confusing equivocal position on BDS (Boycott, Divest and Sanction Israel)
Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and James Risch, R-Idaho introduced the first bill to be considered in the Republican-led Senate, consolidating four bills that languished in the last Congress: One codifies into law $38 billion in defense assistance for Israel over 10 years; another protects states that pass laws against the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting Israel, including states that ban contracts with Israel boycotters.
Bernie Sanders quickly reacted and blasted the introduction of anti-BDS bill as ‘absurd’
WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 – “While I do not support the BDS movement, we must defend every American’s constitutional right to engage in political activity. It is clear to me that this bill would violate Americans’ First Amendment rights.  
Although Sanders has grandstanded his opposition to BDS, especially before Jewish audience, when push came to shove, he voted against the Marco Rubio/James Risch legislation which put teeth into the States ability to act against BDS. Just another example of  Sander’s hypocrisy and sham support of Israel and Jewish causes.  
In summary, those who say you are known by the bedfellows you keep are dead right. A golf buddy savant of mine said it a little differently. He always reminded his daughters that “When you lie down with dogs, you get fleas.”  I guess Sander’s father forgot to remind him of that. Maybe it is time the voters of this beautiful country did?
Jerome S. Kaufman, Publisher/Editor Sande 

Friday, May 3, 2019

Blame The Jews--The First Excuse Of Haters


NYT Cartoonist Doubles Down on Anti-Semitic Cartoon, Blames ‘Jewish Propaganda Machine’

NYT Cartoonist Doubles Down On Anti-Semitic Cartoon
Volume 10%

 Print
The cartoonist who created an anti-Semitic cartoon The New York Times apologized for publishing last week blamed the “Jewish propaganda machine” for the backlash his work generated.
António Moreira Antunes told CNN he was surprised by the outrage, saying his cartoon — which depicted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a dog leading a blind President Donald Trump wearing a yarmulke — was not meant to be anti-Semitic, but simply a political statement.
The Portuguese artist, who works for the weekly newspaper Expresso, said the charges were “made through the Jewish propaganda machine — which is, anytime there’s criticism it’s because there’s someone anti-Semitic on the other side, and that’s not the case.”
“The Jewish right doesn’t want to be criticized, and therefore, when criticized they say, ‘We are a persecuted people, we suffered a lot… this is anti-Semitism,'” he argued.
The Times apologized for publishing the cartoon on Sunday, saying it was an “error in judgement.”
TRENDING: Former ICE Director Sounds Off on Border Crisis: ‘Forget About Congress’
“We are deeply sorry for the publication of an anti-Semitic political cartoon last Thursday in the print edition of The New York Times that circulates outside of the United States, and we are committed to making sure nothing like this happens again,” the statement read.
“Such imagery is always dangerous, and at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise worldwide, it’s all the more unacceptable,” it continued.
The Times said one editor, without adequate supervision, made the decision.
“The matter remains under review, and we are evaluating our internal processes and training,” the statement said. “We anticipate significant changes.”

Do you think anti-Semitism is on the rise?

99% (80 Votes)
1% (1 Votes)
The American Jewish Committee responded to an earlier, shorter statement by The Times, tweeting, “Apology not accepted. How many @nytimes editors looked at a cartoon that would not have looked out of place on a white supremacist website and thought it met the paper’s editorial standards? What does this say about your processes or your decision makers? How are you fixing it?”

Apology not accepted. How many @nytimes editors looked at a cartoon that would not have looked out of place on a white supremacist website and thought it met the paper’s editorial standards? What does this say about your processes or your decision makers? How are you fixing it?

4,957 people are talking about this

The ACJ added, “Naked antisemitism such as in this image is not ‘an error of judgment.’ We have to wonder if the @nytimes editors would’ve published a similar cartoon depicting any other country or people.”
The group’s CEO David Harris tweeted that he was “appalled” by the cartoon, adding, “While #Antisemitism is rising…synagogues are attacked & Jews killed…democratic #Israel is demonized…& Jewish institutions are forced to bolster security…The “paper of record” pours oil on the fire.”
RELATED: Hate Crime Hoax: Canadian Police Say Restaurant Covered in Swastikas Was Staged



The more I think about the @nytimes “cartoon,” the more appalled I am.

While is rising...synagogues are attacked & Jews killed...democratic is demonized...& Jewish institutions are forced to bolster security...

The “paper of record” pours oil on the fire.

628 people are talking about this

Antunes defended and explained the meaning of his cartoon in an email to The Jerusalem Post. “Trump’s erratic, destructive and often blind politics encouraged the expansionist radicalism of Netanyahu,” he wrote.
“To illustrate this situation, an analogy occurred to me with a blind man [Trump] led by a guide dog [Netanyahu] and, to help identify him, little known in Portugal, I added the Star of David, symbol of the State of Israel and central element of its flag.”
Antunes further questioned, “Why I cannot do a critique of Israeli policy without being immediately categorized as antisemitic? I have nothing against the Jews, but I have many things against the politics of Israel.”
In addition to The Times and the ACJ finding the cartoon offensive, so did several members of Congress and media figures, along with Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, according to The Post.
Last week was not the first time that Antunes was accused of producing an anti-Semitic cartoon.



Note that Antonio Antunes Moreira (from NYT antisemitic cartoon fame) was responsible for this cartoon in 1983 comparing treatment of to the Nazis' treatment of Jews - by evoking the iconic Warsaw Ghetto photo

h/t @hmemcpy

78 people are talking about this

According to The Post, in 1983, he drew another work depicting Israeli Defense Forces soldiers as Nazis. The cartoon won him an international prize.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Beto Proves He Is Anti-Israel

BETO O'ROURKE: I DON'T TAKE PRO-ISRAEL MONEY FROM JEWS

 
Hating Israel is the new political purity test among Dems. So I'm utterly unsurprised to see the creepy little nerd who has embraced every lefty trend from the Green New Deal to apologizing for his white privilege, get on board with hating Israel.
The context for Bobby O'Rourke's comments is important here.
O'Rourke was asked if he'd taken pro-Israel lobbyist money during his Senate race. The question has an implicit anti-Semitic edge about Jewish money. Especially after Rep. Omar's anti-Semitic comments, which were defended by many on the Left.
Instead of condemning the question, imagine if Bobby O'Rourke had been asked if he had taken Islamist money, he awkwardly sidestepped it and then launched into an attack on Israel.
O'Rourke claimed that, "We have a prime minister in Israel who has openly sided with racists."
Apparently he couldn't remember Netanyahu's name.
And, he claimed, "And on the Palestinian side, you have an ineffectual leader, in Mahmoud Abbas, who has not been very effective in bringing his side to the table either.” 
Fact check, Abbas has refused to come to the negotiating table, continues to fund terrorism against Israel and said that his movement was no different than that of Hamas.
That means the Democrats insist on ignoring all this and just claiming that he's "ineffective".
O'Rourke, whether he calls himself Bobby or Beto, is free to criticize Netanyahu. Even falsely. Despite the false claims of the anti-Israel left, that does not make one anti-Semitic. 
But repeatedly giving murder a pass on the terrorist side while blasting Israel is ugly. And playing footsie when asked an implicitly anti-Semitic question about Jewish money is ugly.
That ugliness is the new Dem normal.