When serfs
become 'customers'
Are
we subjects of political government — or its "consumers" and
"customers"?
As the
American state at all levels subsumes more industries, everything from providing homes to renting us bicycles and campsites, bureaucrats increasingly
refer to those paying their salaries as "customers" or
"consumers." For example, the Thieves and Sexual Assailants (TSA)
who infest airports dedicate a page of their website to "Customer Service,"
as if the poor saps waiting in endless lines would rather miss their
flights than a good grope.
Ditto
for the socialist sewage of Obummercare. Americans are "customers" and "consumers" rather than taxpayers
obliged to finance a nationalized insurance scam.
Perhaps
most infuriating of all, the IRS speaks of its victims in the same terms.
It doesn't hire extortionists and leg-breakers but "Customer Service Representatives."
Such
jargon as "customer service" typifies our smarmy culture, one
that prefers euphemisms over truth; it's only natural that Leviathan, which
lies about everything all the time, would so describe its leeches. Yet the
implication that we are government's "customers" ravages not only
the English language but liberty as well.
The
dictionary defines "customer" as "a person who purchases goods or services
from another; buyer; patron," Foundational to that concept is
freedom. We obtain hamburgers and haircuts, computers and car-washes
because we value and need them, not because someone held a gun to our
heads. Indeed, when compulsion corrupts a commercial transaction, such as
the Mob's strong-arming a business into hiring it for trash-removal, all of us
— including the government — call it a crime. The State even prosecutes it
as such.
So how
do bureaucrats and politicians get away with coercing our patronage?
Simple. As always, political government operates under gargantuan double
standards, committing with impunity what it would imprison us for doing.
The hypocrisy is so jaw-dropping you'd think that even public-school
graduates would notice.
Meanwhile,
Leviathan's "customers" not only buy under duress, they forego
all the market's protections, too. Unhappy with your coverage under
Obummercare? Too bad. No refunds — and not even so much as an apology. No
switching to the insurer of your choice, either, unless bureaucrats approve
of that particular company.
Contrast
that with your usual experience in the private market, where most
entrepreneurs work overtime to keep us happy. Their fate depends on
pleasing us. If they don't, we switch to their competitor, and they go out
of business.
I
recently called a small business to correct my address on their mailing
list; the woman answering the phone was not the one at fault, nor had the
mistake caused a monumental problem for me — yet she apologized profusely.
We've all exchanged clothing that doesn't fit, or perhaps your Aunt Ida's
birthday present to you was as well-meaning but useless as her advice. Most
returns are effortless; many online retailers even pay for shipping the
item back to their warehouse. In a free market, entrepreneurs strive to
please us because they cannot exist without clients.
But
government can. It knows our patronage doesn't result from our satisfaction
but from laws compelling us to use the State's "services." The
bureaucrats running those programs lack any incentive to delight us. Their
paychecks depend on our taxes, not on our gratification.
Tragically,
the U.S. has never enjoyed a free market. From the beginning, governments have controlled the economy
via licensing, chartering, regulations and, of course, taxes.
Those
horrors have vastly increased over the last century. Today, Federal, state,
and local governments subsidize or otherwise dominate a myriad industries,
which then look to politicians, not customers, for their profits. For example,
airlines receive a princely chunk of our taxes. That
explains their insouciance toward the TSA's abuse of their customers as
well as their survival despite passengers' supreme disgust at shoddy service. The less a business
cares about catering to you, the more of your taxes it's gobbling.
Even
worse than our dismay with the State's services is the blow to liberty. And
the terms that describe this economic arrangement aren't good: we call it "fascism,"
"communism" or "socialism," depending on the degree
of governmental oversight. When the State outright manages or owns the
"means of production" (such as in constructing and maintaining
roads), it's "communism." And when it runs those means "in
partnership" with business — akin to an alliance with King Kong, given
the imbalance of power — it's "fascism." "Socialism"
varies from communism and fascism in a few technical details. But
essentially, all three worship government as a god, ceding politicians and
bureaucrats unlimited power.
Communism
and fascism have murdered millions and impoverished billions everywhere
they've prevailed. Their perverse incentives and central planning reduce
production so severely that people starve, as is happening in Venezuela. Hunger killed
millions in Europe during the Second World War, too, as proponents of these
two variations on totalitarianism battled for supremacy. Worse than the
material want is the poverty of the human soul under such dictatorship.
When a government is strong enough to control supplies of food, it is
strong enough to control every aspect of life.
Meanwhile,
the notion that government can produce something people value enough to
buy, or that it can "partner" with entrepreneurs who do, is as
silly as Hillary Clinton's excuses for losing the
election. Our interactions in the market, whether buying or selling,
are voluntary. But government is force — physical, brutal, lethal force. It
may glorify itself with museums and marble monuments while prattling about
patriotism, but its essence is raw, physical compulsion. If you don't obey
politicians and bureaucrats, if you ignore their diktats, they will arrest
you. If you resist that arrest, and continue resisting, they'll increase
the volume of force until they ultimately kill you. Behind every law and
regulation, no matter how innocuous or beneficial they may seem, lies the
same potentially lethal force.
Force
always overwhelms free will. We do not voluntarily participate in the
market with guns pointed at us: we aren't buying Obummercare because we
want insurance but because the government constrains us to.
Which
makes us slaves, the antithesis of customers.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.