Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, May 21, 2015

Will Obama Administration Allow Major Arms Deal With Israel Or Will We Find Obama Stepping Into The Breach Again?


Pentagon Approves Whopping $1.9 Billion Arms Deal with Israel


“Blessed be the Lord, my rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle.” (Psalm 144:1)
The US State Department approved a massive arms deal with Israel worth a whopping $1.9 billion, it was announced on Tuesday.
The details of the sale, which are pending congressional review after being approved by the Pentagon, will add thousands of air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles as well as bombs to Jerusalem’s arsenal for “self-defense” needs.
If finalized and approved, Israel will receive a range of precision-guided munitions consisting of 3,000 Hellfire missiles, 750 bunker buster bombs, 4,100 glide bombs, and 250 medium-range air-to-air missiles.
In addition, 14,500 missile guidance systems, also known as tail kits for Joint Direct Attack Munitions, which adapt unguided missiles into GPS guided bombs, are to be shipped to Israel as well.
The deal is worth $1.879 billion and will greatly enhance the military capabilities and defense of the Jewish state.
“The proposed sale of this equipment will provide Israel the ability to support its self-defense needs,” a statement by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency reads. “These munitions will enable Israel to maintain operational capability of its existing systems and will enhance Israel’s operational interoperability with the United States.”
“The United States is committed to the security of Israel, and it is vital to US national interests to assist Israel to develop and maintain a strong and ready self-defense capability.”
According to the statement, the sale was requested by Israel and only includes weapons that Israel already has in its arsenal.
Each year, Israel receives $3 billion in military aid from the US, of which most of the funds must be spent on American-made arms. The $1.9 billion deal comes on the heels of another military aid package to Israel approved by the US House of Representatives Armed Services Committee earlier this month.
The $474 million arms deal will bolster Israel’s anti-missile defense systems and include funding for the short-range Iron Dome and David’s Sling missile defense systems, the longer-range Arrow III missile defense system, and millions of dollars in development and funding.

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/40900/pentagon-approves-1-9-billion-arms-deal-with-israel-jerusalem/#4qgBEjDTzoKQ8uYJ.99

Can The Clinton Crime Family Do Anything Legit?

NEW YORK – Why does the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., registered as an Arkansas non-profit corporation, continue to list its principal business address in Massachusetts, where its registration was revoked under a previous name, the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative?
While the foundation has provided no explanation, after meticulous examination, Wall Street financial analyst and investor Charles Ortel believes he can demonstrate material irregularities in the state registrations and federal filings of what today is known as the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., or CHAI.
“These irregularities are of sufficient magnitude that if any of the 50 state attorneys general should present the evidence to a federal district judge, I believe an injunction would be ordered, shutting down the Clinton Foundation and placing the organization in receivership,” he said.
Ortel has documented the Clinton Foundation used the initial IRS tax-exempt determination letter that was limited to raising funds for the Clinton presidential library to actively solicit tax-exempt charitable donations to combat HIV/AIDS for some eight years before applying for and receiving authorization for the new purpose.

Ortel says: “The public record of state and federal registrations are sufficient to justify a federal judge firing the current board of directors in order to prevent additional donors from being defrauded in what appears to an inurement scheme designed to divert charitable funds to personal financial gain.”
Inurement is the crime of personally enriching oneself from a non-profit organization, or taking more from it than is contributed.
Ortel found that the HIV/AIDS Initiative conducted “substantial and significant activities in numerous countries, operating from a headquarters in Massachusetts in close cooperation with at least one for-profit enterprise before it was officially approved by the IRS as a tax-exempt organization.”
Tom Fitton, president of Washington-based Judicial Watch told WND that Ortel is “raising questions that scream out for further investigation.”
“What Ortel is revealing has all the hallmarks of a shell game in which criminals structure financial transactions to shield assets and confuse both regulators and the general public regarding how they are getting money for charitable purposes but keeping it for themselves personally,” Fitton said.
Attorney Cleta Mitchell, a partner in the Washington-based law firm Foley & Lardner LLP, concurred.
“The research that Charles Ortel has conducted is extremely disturbing,” Mitchell told WND. “The irregularities and false statements he has documented evidence a consistent pattern of failure to comply with the laws that govern charitable organizations.”
Mitchell is well-known for representing several prominent tea party groups in their litigation against the IRS for denying or delaying their applications for tax-exempt status.
She said the problems with the Clinton Foundation raised by Ortel “are matters of black letter state and federal law.”
“I believe that one or more state attorneys general should actively review whether or not the Clinton Foundation in its various incarnations and filings has violated the laws of their state,” Mitchell said.
Ortel writes in his second report on the Clinton Foundation, an advance copy of which was shared with WND, that a preliminary review of the pre-2010 Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS activities – before an application was filed with the IRS to create the Clinton Health Access Initiative as a corporate entity separate from the Clinton Foundation – indicates that for approximately 90 months Bill Clinton, Ira Magaziner, and other individuals associated with the Clintons were “engaged in numerous foreign countries soliciting charitable contributions and grants whose proceeds were supposed to flow into destitute nations ravaged by HIV/AIDS and by other structural as well as local afflictions.”
Ortel said activities of these individuals “under the mantle of the Clinton Foundation never were fully, fairly, and comprehensively disclosed in the public domain as was, and is, required by domestic and foreign laws.”
WND reported Monday that before Hillary Clinton completed her first year as President Obama’s secretary of state in 2010, Ortel calculates $17 million went missing from Clinton Foundation financial reports.
WND reported May 14 Ortel has concluded that while Hillary Clinton was appointed to the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation in 2013, after she had resigned as secretary of state, she is complicit in what he has described as systematic financial fraud warranting a criminal investigation. WND reported May 13 that Ortel found the Clinton Foundation’s explanation for why it was divided into three, legally separate tax-exempt organizations to be “misleading and false.” As WND reported May 12, based on Ortel’s findings, a prominent lawyer and a top government watchdog in the nation’s capital are calling for the Clinton Foundation to be shut down. In his first report, Ortel found what he characterizes as an elaborate system devised by the Clintons to enrich themselves through schemes such as skimming tens of millions of dollars from U.N. levies imposed on airline travelers.
‘Tax exempt’ HIV/AIDS donations solicited in 2002
As WND reported, the Clinton Foundation’s IRS determination letter dating back to the foundation’s creation in 2001 is not archived on the Clinton Foundation website. The Clinton Foundation’s 2002 IRS Form 990, Part III filing lists the organization’s “primary exempt purpose” in narrowly defined terms. It specifies the Clinton Foundation was created “to design, construct, and initially endow a presidential archival depository to house and preserve the books, correspondence, documents, papers, pictures, and other memorability of President Clinton.”
The Clinton Foundation website clearly documents that the HIV/AIDS charity began in 2002, noting: “When the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) was founded in 2002, only 200,000 people were receiving treatment for HIV/AIDS in low and middle income countries, with medicines that cost over $10,000 per person per year.”
The Clinton Foundation’s 2004 IRS Form 990, Part III expanded the organization’s “primary exempt purpose” to include HIV/AIDS fundraising:
President Clinton established the William J. Clinton Foundation (the foundation’s original name in 2001) with the dual missions of constructing and endowing the Clinton Presidential Center and Park in Little Rock, Arkansas and continuing the work of his presidency to strengthen the capacity of people in the United States and throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence. To advance the mission the foundation has developed programs and partnerships in the following areas: economic empowerment; health security with an emphasis on HIV/AIDS; racial, ethnic and religious reconciliation; leadership development and citizen service.
Ortel traced the origin of the idea to create CHAI to a conversation Bill Clinton had with Nelson Mandela that Clinton relates in his 2007 bestselling book, “Giving: How Each of Us Can Change the World.”
There, Clinton wrote:
After Nelson Mandela and I closed the World AIDS conference in Barcelona in [July] 2002, Prime Minister Denzil Douglas of St. Kitts and Nevis asked me to help the Caribbean nations establish and fund systems for the prevention, care, and treatment of HIV/AIDS. I agreed to do what I could, but with limited staffing in Harlem and Little Rock and an already crowded list of commitments, I needed some help. I called Ira Magaziner, who had spearheaded our efforts in healthcare and e-commerce in the White House, and asked him to organize and lead the project.
In his second report, Ortel concluded the AIDS work wasn’t tax exempt.
“While clearly a laudable proposition, arresting lethal devastation of the scourge of HIV/AIDS was certainly not a legally authorized tax-exempt purpose of the Clinton Foundation by July 2002, according to public records that should tell the complete story regarding a public charity.”
Ortel was able to document that on Dec. 31, 2009, the Clinton Foundation filed with the IRS an application to form a new tax-exempt organization called Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. that he terms “New CHAI” to distinguish it from the initiative formed within the Clinton Foundation in 2002, which he terms “Old CHAI.”
Ortel reported, however, that after extensive research on the Clinton Foundation website and various government websites, he was able only to find for the document dated Dec. 31, 2009, “an incomplete version of the application lacking attachments that should have amplified answers to key questions.”
In March 2010, the IRS apparently issued a new determination letter approving the New CHAI as a separate tax-exempt organization, giving for the first time the Clinton Foundation the authorization to extend tax-exempt status to donors to the charity to combat HIV/AIDS.
What appears clear is that the Clinton Foundation, despite lacking IRS authorization, told the public from July 2002 through March 2010 that donations to the charity to combat HIV/AIDS would be tax-exempt, in apparent disregard of IRS rules and regulations.
No documentation of flow of AIDS money
The first filing to incorporate the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative, as it was then known, occurred in 2004, at least two years after the Clinton Foundation began soliciting and potentially receiving donations and grants in the United States and from foreign sources for HIV/AIDS charitable work.
The documentation can be found in a registration for a foreign corporation certificate that the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative filed with Massachusetts on March 25, 2004, noting that the corporation was organized under the laws of Arkansas, two days earlier, on March 23, 2004.
The document said the resident Massachusetts agent for the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative was Ira Magaziner, listed as the corporation’s chairman, with his residence at 200 Dudley Lane in Milton, Massachusetts, and the corporation’s office at 225 Water Street in Quincy, Massachusetts.
In his second report, Ortel said that while there are “numerous press releases and other accounts of extensive global activity by the Clinton Foundation fighting HIV/AIDS from July 2002 onward, companion financial disclosures filed for 2002 and 2003 do not explicitly document related inflows and outflows of the HIV/AIDS initiatives.”
“Filings from 2004 through 2009 start to disclose some aspects of these activities but certainly do not constitute complete, full, and fair disclosure,” Ortel said. “Moreover, Clinton Foundation filings from 2002 through 2009 do not explain how Ira Magaziner and his for-profit business interests may have been compensated, or precisely how Magaziner and the Clinton Foundation may have collaborated anywhere in the world, at any time.”
From 1993 through 1998, Magaziner served as a senior advisor to President Clinton for policy development at the White House, where he worked with Hillary Clinton on the development of the President’s Health Reform Initiative that became popularly known as “HillaryCare.”
The address at 225 Water Street that Magaziner used as the principal business address of the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative when filing in Massachusetts in March 2004 as a foreign corporation is the same address he used as the principal office of Massachusetts-registered consulting firm, SJS Privacy Inc., which was registered in Massachusetts as a foreign corporation on Nov. 15, 2000.
In other words, the Clinton Foundation did not establish a separate corporate structure, CHAI, to solicit tax-exempt donations to combat HIV/AIDS until 2004, some two years after the Clinton Foundation launched the HIV/AIDS initiative.
Massachusetts shuts down Clinton non-profit
On March 31, 2008, Massachusetts issued an “involuntary revocation” of both the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative and Magaziner’s SJS Privacy Inc., effectively shutting down both corporations from doing business in Massachusetts.
Screen shots from the Massachusetts Corporate Division’s registry document the involuntary revocation of each corporation’s authorization to do business in the state.
The Massachusetts filing documentation explaining why the involuntary revocations were put in place is not available for download on the Massachusetts Corporation Division Registry website.
SJS Inc., Magaziner’s other consulting firm registered on Nov. 5, 2001, as a foreign corporation, was withdrawn on Jan. 11, 2008, from doing business in Massachusetts.
Again, documentation explaining why Magaziner withdrew SJS Inc. from doing business in Massachusetts on Jan. 11, 2008, is not available for download on the Massachusetts Corporation Division Registry website.
Magaziner apparently named his consulting firms “SJS” using the initials of the first names of his three children – Seth, Jonathan and Sarah.
Additional documentation
Further documentation that the original Clinton HIV/AIDS charity was shut down by Massachusetts can be found on an undated renewal United Registration Statement (URS) for Charitable Organizations that the Clinton Foundation filed on a 2006 standard form for the year ending Dec. 31, 2005.
There, in answer to question 7A, the Clinton Foundation answers “yes” to the question whether the organization, or any of its officers, directors, employees or fund raisers have ever been enjoined or otherwise prohibited by a government agency/court from soliciting.
But then, in response to 7B, the Clinton Foundation answers “no” to the question “whether the organization, or any of its officers, directors, employees or fund raisers had its registration denied or revoked.”
Ortel terms the response “a blatant lie,” given the documentation on the Massachusetts Secretary of State website of the 2008 involuntary revocation of registration.
In subsequent questions, the Clinton Foundation goes on to admit the charity has been “the subject of a proceeding regarding any solicitation or registry” and that it has “entered into a voluntary agreement of compliance with any government agency or in a case before a court or administrative agency.”
Exhibit A, a form designed to explain affirmative answers to any of the questions from 7A through 7E, is missing from the relevant Clinton Foundation-filed URS that WND was able to locate, despite the fact the Clinton Foundation admitted it had encountered various unspecified legal problems that included revocation of operating licenses and suspensions of state authority to solicit donations.
The URS document references an IRS determination letter May 21, 2002, that appears to be the initial IRS approval to raise money for the Clinton Foundation, not for HIV/AIDS charitable purposes.
Strangely, the URS for the Clinton Foundation filed for the year ending Dec. 31, 2005 does not evidence the required notary public seal or signature, casting doubt on the acceptability of the document as a legal statement sworn to be true under penalty of perjury, as the printed form demands.
New CHAI formed
The Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative incorporated in the state of Arkansas in 2004 to do business in Arkansas as a non-profit corporation is no longer found on the Arkansas secretary of state’s corporation registry website.
In its place is a registration for the newly named entity, the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc., filed in Arkansas on Sept. 29, 2009. It’s registered as a nonprofit corporation domiciled in Arkansas, with Magaziner as the corporation’s principal officer and as a director. The corporation’s principal address is listed as 383 Dorchester Avenue, Suite 400, in Boston, Massachusetts.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/clinton-aids-charity-was-shut-down-in-massachusetts/#hDsBQ4L5pyZJtUIC.99

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Islam, The Kind, Open, Accepting Religion---Wrong! If You Disagree With Shariah, With Muhammad's Teachings Or G-d Forbid, Draw A Cartoon, It Is A Death Sentence!

  • Forty-seven percent of Bangladeshi Muslims said that suicide bombing and other forms of violence against civilian targets could be justified to defend Islam from an enemy (compared to Malaysia at 18%, Indonesia at 9% and Pakistan at 3%).
  • It seems clear, therefore, why the dissidents, atheists and secularists in Bangladesh remain unassisted by the society and the government.
A third brilliant blogger has been hacked to death in Bangladesh since February. On May 9,Ananta Bijoy Das, a banker by profession, and a blogger, was murdered, apparently by Islamist extremists.
Das was murdered in broad daylight on a busy street in the country's fifth largest city, Sylhet. He had written for Mukto-Mona (Free Mind), a website with which the Bangladeshi-American blogger, Abhijit Roy, had worked before being hacked to death himself in February by machete-wielding assailants.
Five weeks after Roy's death, yet another blogger, Oyasiqur Rahman, was also brutally murdered by three men in Dhaka.
Their deaths echoed the murder of Ahmed Rajib Haider on February 15, 2013, and the stabbing in Bangladesh of Asif Mahiuddin in January 2013.
Ansarullah Bangla Team, one of the Islamist groups operating in Bangladesh, claimed all three killings of recent months. The group, also known as Ansar Bangla 8, tweeted within hours of Das's murder: "Alhamdulillah [Arabic for 'praise God'], all the brothers of Operation team are safe." An hour later, the group said that Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) claimed responsibility for killing Das. Detectives suspect that the Ansarullah Bangla team maintains contact with Al-Qaeda.
Recently, the leader of AQIS, Asim Umar, also claimed responsibility for the murder of six people, who according to him, were blasphemers. One included Avijit Roy, a Bangladeshi-American science writer.
In addition to Roy, AQIS heralded its Jihadists as responsible for killing:
  • Ahmed Rajib Haider (Bangladeshi blogger)
  • Shafiul Islam (a university professor killed in September 2014)
  • Oyasiqur Rahman (Bangladeshi blogger)
  • Muhammad Shakil Auj (Dean of Islamic studies at Karachi University in Pakistan)
  • Aniqa Naz (Pakistani blogger)
"Praise be to Allah," Umar said. "These assassinations are part of a series of operations initiated by the different branches of Al Qaeda on the orders of our respected leader, Sheikh Ayman Al Zawahiri (may Allah protect him). It is equally part of our commitment to fulfill the oath Sheikh Osama [bin Laden] (may Allah have mercy on him)."
BBC reported that "[a]ll these killings were carried out in near identical fashion. ... This pattern has convinced observers that the killers, even if they are from different parts of the country, as being advised or trained by one group."


Ananta Bijoy Das (left) was hacked to death on May 9 in Bangladesh, with Islamist extremists taking credit for the attack. At right, police collect evidence at the murder scene.

In an editorial after the latest murder, the Guardian wrote, "Like Raif Badawi, imprisoned and flogged in Saudi Arabia, the brave men who have been murdered are guilty of nothing more than honesty and integrity. Those are virtues that fundamentalists and fanatics cannot stand."
In January 2014, As-Sahab Media released a video message from al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, entitled "Bangladesh: A Massacre Behind a Wall of Silence." Zawahiri said,
My Muslim brothers in Bangladesh, I invite you to confront this crusaders' onslaught against Islam, being orchestrated by the leading criminals in the Sub-continent and the West against Islam, the Prophet of Islam and the Islamic creed, so that they may turn you into slaves of a despotic and disbelieving system. ... I invite you to launch a massive public uprising in defense of Islam, against the enemies of Islam. I invite the leading scholars of Bangladesh to fulfill the role Islam has given them.
...
I invite you [Bangladeshi Islamic scholars] to firmly hold on to the principle of the supreme authority of the Shariah, and its primacy over man-made constitutions and laws, so that it governs the will of the masses, rather than being governed by their will, or by any other authority. I invite you to lead the masses to lead the masses in a vast and... popular uprising (intifada) whose tide does not recede, nor its dynamism subside, until the Shariah of Islam governs the land of Islam.
...
The reality of democracy is that it knows no religion, values or principles. Everything is right as long as it gets the majority of votes. It was a democratic Britain that occupied Muslim lands, killed millions, and robbed its resources for centuries. It was a democratic Britain that promised Palestine to the Jews. It was the democratic Britain that handed over Palestine to the Zionists before withdrawing from Palestine.
Zawahiri's call went viral among Muslims in Bangladesh, where they constitute approximately 90.4% of the population.
In 2014, when Asian and African Muslims were asked in a Pew survey whether suicide bombing or other forms of violence against civilian targets could be justified to defend Islam from an enemy, 47% percent of Bangladeshi Muslims said yes. They represented the highest number, after Gaza (62%). The number of those who those justified suicide bombings and other violence is far higher than those in Malaysia (18%), Indonesia (9%) and Pakistan (3%).
Imran H. Sarker, spokesman for Gonojagorn Manch, a secular movement in Bangladesh, has accused the government of trying to cover up the murder of bloggers for its political gain.
It seems clear, therefore, why the dissidents, atheists and secularists in Bangladesh remain unassisted by the society and the government.