The re-election of Barack Obama in 2012 encouraged his supporters and mystified his detractors. We, at Conservative Musings, knew it was going to occur for a multitude of reasons and wrote about it on the day prior to the election. However, since the election other very disturbing reports have surfaced regarding voter fraud. If true, these set a scenario which so anti-American , most will dismiss as crazy. They would be wrong.
To what are we referring? It is the hundreds of precincts in Pennsylvania and Ohio, to name a couple states, where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. This stretches credibility into insanity. We could buy the fact that across the country there would be a few (count them on your hand) where either candidate might receive 100% of those voting. However, when the number extends into the hundreds, we smell a rat.
Americans have always been proud of their elections and how (with exceptions like Chicago) votes are counted and whomever got the most votes was presumably the winner. There always have been challenges when the vote was close but after the recount was conducted, a winner was announced and the loser conceded.
We have made a turn. Ever since the Bush-Gore contest in 2000 which ended in a Supreme Court decision, the losers (Gore etal) have continued to protest that Bush stole the election. Even today if you ask a Gore supporter, he will lament that their candidate would have been much better and had his election ripped from his hands. The irony is that several news organizations (New York Times for example) did their own re-count of the Florida voting and found that Bush actually did get more votes.
From that contested election in 2000, the losers have decided that winning an election legitimately is old hat and one must insure that their candidate wins regardless of the vote. This brings us to the voting in 2012. It is so clear that even Ray Charles could see that this election smells to high heaven. 100% voting, missing ballots, machines that do not count the ballots correctly and machines that will not allow one to vote for the candidate of your choice is wrong.
We are not in China, Russia, Iran or some third world despot run country that has "elections" and glory be, the heads of the government gets re-elected by 97% of the population. We all laugh at that when we read this in these countries but here in the US we did it even better--100% voting for one candidate!
Without legitimate elections, a constitutionally governed republic fails. Necessary change cannot occur as the cards are stacked against those who wish to upset the status quo.
The US is at a tipping point. Will we have investigations into the precincts that went 100% for EITHER candidate or will we just let it be? We think the latter will be the course of events. If that is so, our country and any hope of changing it for the better is lost.
Add to the voting, the following story by Bob Livingston about roving gangs attacking people in the streets, on subways and in stores and you will begin to see that the collapse is beginning. We won't have to wait long now, the US as we have known it, is soon to be gone.
Conservative Tom
To what are we referring? It is the hundreds of precincts in Pennsylvania and Ohio, to name a couple states, where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. This stretches credibility into insanity. We could buy the fact that across the country there would be a few (count them on your hand) where either candidate might receive 100% of those voting. However, when the number extends into the hundreds, we smell a rat.
Americans have always been proud of their elections and how (with exceptions like Chicago) votes are counted and whomever got the most votes was presumably the winner. There always have been challenges when the vote was close but after the recount was conducted, a winner was announced and the loser conceded.
We have made a turn. Ever since the Bush-Gore contest in 2000 which ended in a Supreme Court decision, the losers (Gore etal) have continued to protest that Bush stole the election. Even today if you ask a Gore supporter, he will lament that their candidate would have been much better and had his election ripped from his hands. The irony is that several news organizations (New York Times for example) did their own re-count of the Florida voting and found that Bush actually did get more votes.
From that contested election in 2000, the losers have decided that winning an election legitimately is old hat and one must insure that their candidate wins regardless of the vote. This brings us to the voting in 2012. It is so clear that even Ray Charles could see that this election smells to high heaven. 100% voting, missing ballots, machines that do not count the ballots correctly and machines that will not allow one to vote for the candidate of your choice is wrong.
We are not in China, Russia, Iran or some third world despot run country that has "elections" and glory be, the heads of the government gets re-elected by 97% of the population. We all laugh at that when we read this in these countries but here in the US we did it even better--100% voting for one candidate!
Without legitimate elections, a constitutionally governed republic fails. Necessary change cannot occur as the cards are stacked against those who wish to upset the status quo.
The US is at a tipping point. Will we have investigations into the precincts that went 100% for EITHER candidate or will we just let it be? We think the latter will be the course of events. If that is so, our country and any hope of changing it for the better is lost.
Add to the voting, the following story by Bob Livingston about roving gangs attacking people in the streets, on subways and in stores and you will begin to see that the collapse is beginning. We won't have to wait long now, the US as we have known it, is soon to be gone.
Conservative Tom
Signs Of Collapse: The Obvious And The Hidden
December 14, 2012 by Bob Livingston
PHOTOS.COM
Societal collapse manifests itself in many ways. The clues are there for the discerning to see.
In America, societal collapse is evident through continued and escalating currency devaluation (quantitative easing to infinity), the collapse and non-recovery of the housing market, the growing number of individual bankruptcies, high unemployment and business failures. These things are at least making news headlines, though in a way that plays down their significance. Other signs — particularly the loss of civility; the glorification beyond all reason of athletic events, athletes and celebrities; and the increase in the “me-first” and entitlement mindset — aren’t discussed in the media.
One clue being missed by the masses is the growing lawlessness of the Nation’s youth — particularly black youth. That is by design. The whore media is intentionally overlooking, if not suppressing, the growing incidences of youth mob violence, particularly in cases of black-on-white crime.
But mobs, like the 44th Street Crew in Southeast Washington, D.C., are becoming more prevalent and more dangerous. They and others are terrorizing riders of the Metro, and posting it to social media for all to see.
Just another isolated incident? Hardly. According to the Website UnsuckDCMetro (a blog dedicated to covering Metro events), reports of violence rarely make it to The Washington Post, even though they are occurring and have been for some time. One anonymous readerposted his experience in witnessing a group of six to eight teenagers assaulting a lone teenage girl. He said he called 911; less than a minute later, another girl was being assaulted. Other reports are here, here and here.
When these websites post details of the incidents, commenters follow up with their own experiences. Sometimes these are as bad as or worse than the original incident.
Thomas Sowell writes that there is an uncensored race war in America and that incidents that are occurring across the country are being ignored or suppressed.
“What the authorities and the media seem determined to suppress is that the hoodlum elements in many ghettoes launch coordinated attacks on whites in public places. If there is anything worse than a one-sided race war, it is a two-sided race war, especially when one of the races outnumbers the other several times over,” he wrote last summer.
Black mobs are taking over stores, overwhelming them with sheer numbers and walking out with all the merchandise they can carry. They are engaging in uprovoked violence called “knockout games” where they calmly approach an unwary victim and cold cock him or her in an effort to render the victim unconscious.
Walter E. Williams writes that in addition to a growing number of black-on-white incidents, there are also an increasing number of black-on-Asian attacks. But also being ignored by the media is black-on-black crime.
This shouldn’t be surprising. Blacks are suffering disproportionally in the President Barack Obama economy. According to official (and doctored) unemployment numbers put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment in the black community is above 13 percent, almost twice the rate of all unemployment. For blacks under the age of 20, the official rate is 39.4 percent. Since real unemployment is above 22 percent (when all unemployed workers are counted), black unemployment may be near 40 percent and black under 20 unemployment is, no doubt, much worse.
As the collapse continues and escalates, look for violence to also escalate. People get more desperate as they get hungrier. Desperate people do desperate things. Arab spring was just a picnic.
Fact-checking …
ReplyDeleteThe FBI statistics are the most reliable source available for studying trends in violent crime. Are you now going to tell me they rig the data? I hope not.
Violent crime has declined nearly every year for the last 20 years….
Murder/manslaughter (number per 100,000 population):
1992…. 23,760
2011…. 14,612
Forcible rape:
1992…. 109,062
2011…. 83,425
Robbery:
1992…. 672,478
2011…. 354,396
Aggravated assault:
1992…. 1,126,974
2011…. 751,131
Property crime:
1992…. 12,505,917
2011…. 9,063,173
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-1
--David
Sorry, I gave you the raw numbers, not the rates, in my last note. But you can see the rate/100,000 population in the same table.
ReplyDelete--David
David, are you just playing with me or are you that naive? I don't care if the numbers are being manufactured or real, the real issue is that America is in decline and unless people realize it and realize it now, it will be too late!
ReplyDeleteI was responding to the article you posted. We can agree that the U.S. is on decline in several respects, but violent crime rates is not one of them.
ReplyDeleteI just do fact-checking on some of these articles you cite so that readers can get accurate information. Sometimes, I am not sure whether these guys are plain ignorant, or deliberately putting out misinformation for political motives.
--David
Can you really believe the numbers that you quoted when we read every day of murders up each month on the streets of Chicago and Detroit?
ReplyDeleteWhat about the "flash-crowds" which invade stores and steal them blind?
Is the answer that the Press covers these crimes more?
I am giving you the national statistics. Detroit is an exception to the national trend. New York city, on the other hand, is about to set a record for the lowest homicide rate in city history, I believe.
ReplyDeleteIt is hard to prevent a "flash-crowd," because they come and go, well, in a flash.
If anything, media coverage would only inspire more of the same. For this same reason, I am strongly opposed to media giving all-day national coverage of school mass murders. It should be covered as a local news story. I realize I am in the minority opinion here, but that's fine.
--David
The Connecticut killings are an example of us looking at the wrong things. Most people are now focused on the gun issue, when the real issue is mental health and making sure that those who have problems are off the streets. If this kid had been hospitalized, drugged out of his mind, these kids still would be alive. But that would be going back into the 1900's and we don't do that type of stuff now!
ReplyDeleteHere is more on NY crime--pay special attention to the last para.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_New_York_City
In 2010 the New York Post reported that NYPD supervisors were under increased pressure to "fudge" crime stats by downgrading major crimes to minor offenses. However, the same researchers that provided the evidence "acknowledged that major crimes were at a historic low."