Another week has passed since the sequester and so has another week of disaster. No more mail delivery, defense has been shut down, borders unguarded, white house closed to visitors, government totally shut down and 30 million people have lost their jobs. It has been terrible--wrong. The only apparent issue has been the shut down of the White House, no other disasters have occurred. So much for the Democrat blame game!
The absolute insincerity of the Democrats and their lack of respect for the truth is very troubling. How can they be only concerned with their political "talking points" and not for the best interests of the country? How can Maxine Waters claim that there would be 30 million more job losses than exist in the country? Even if she was off by 90%, she still would have been wrong. Who elected this idiot?
Then there is the "blamer in change" who has never accepted blame for anything but is able to shovel the crap better than most. Why will no one take him to task? Where is the media? He is not a leader, he is a low level community activist with little future. What a loser.
Conservative Tom
The absolute insincerity of the Democrats and their lack of respect for the truth is very troubling. How can they be only concerned with their political "talking points" and not for the best interests of the country? How can Maxine Waters claim that there would be 30 million more job losses than exist in the country? Even if she was off by 90%, she still would have been wrong. Who elected this idiot?
Then there is the "blamer in change" who has never accepted blame for anything but is able to shovel the crap better than most. Why will no one take him to task? Where is the media? He is not a leader, he is a low level community activist with little future. What a loser.
Conservative Tom
Surviving Obama
March 5, 2013 by Ben Crystal
PHOTOS.COM
If you’re reading this, then you’re one of the blessed few who somehow survived sequestration. By “blessed few,” I mean “everyone on the planet.” And by “sequestration,” I mean “infinitesimally minor reduction in the growth of our already grotesquely obese government.”
So, this is life in post-sequester America. Oddly, it looks remarkably similar to pre-sequester America. Despite dire warnings of horror issued by everyone from sequestration’s creator, President Barack Obama, to such respected Congressional luminaries as Representative Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the world did not end. Our troops from Afghanistan to central Africa (yep, Obama has them there, too) didn’t suddenly find themselves without ammunition. And 170 million Americans didn’t wake up to find themselves unemployed. Highways and bridges didn’t buckle and disintegrate. And the Internal Revenue Service certainly didn’t halt its efforts to extract Uncle Sam’s annual pound of flesh. Hell, the U.S. Postal Service didn’t even stop delivering my Cabelas catalog to the neighbors. Vice President Joe Biden has been downgraded from Air Force to Amtrak on his 120-mile trip from Washington to Wilmington, but that’s mostly because he likes to stick his head out of the window like a Labrador retriever between stops.
I expect a little historical perspective is in order. During the most recent State of the Union, Obama bemoaned what he termed “manufactured crises.” Perhaps that was his motivation in manufacturing the sequester, a silly idea to which Obama finally admitted on Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” when his minion Gene Sperling acknowledged Obama’s duplicity regarding the massively overhyped reduction in the increase in future government spending.
All the shouting about Americans sacrificing security, employment and even food was merely a situation cut from the whole cloth of Obama and the Democrats’ own folly. Evidently, the endless recession, the horde of illegal aliens pouring across our borders, Superstorm Sandy, al-Qaida’s African resurgence, the Benghazi murders and cover-up, Attorney General Eric Holder’s criminal and civil offenses in covering up Operation Fast and Furious and even the skyrocketing violent crime in Obama’s own hometown weren’t enough to keep the Democrats focused on the plight their derelictions have created. And with the public beginning to catch on to the usual phantom horrors like so-called “global warming” (or whatever they’re calling it this week), they invented sequester, blamed it on the Republicans, tried to use it to scare the pants off the public, attacked the credibility of anyone who questioned their narrative and then finally owned up to the whole thing.
Here’s a thought: Perhaps if Obama and the Democrats put the kind of effort into doing something constructive that they put into lying, slander and fearmongering, the bleak future of post-sequester America might be decidedly less gray. Then again, given the trail of crimes and misdemeanors (and bodies) left behind by Obama and the Democrats every time they do something they consider constructive, perhaps we’re better off if they stick to manufacturing crises.
–Ben Crystal
Good post, Tom. Are you now ready to agree with me on the sequester? Neither of us would call it the optimal way to cut spending, but it does cut $1.2 trillion over 10 years, and there is not going to be a disaster for the military. I am still not celebrating, though. This Congress may still find a way to mess it up.
ReplyDelete--David
The damage that is being done to the military is not in the areas that you promote, it is being done to the servicemen and women. A great example is tuition reimbursement. The Army, Air Force and I believe the Marines (or Navy) have stopped this as part of the sequester. These people are defending our country and the first thing that is cut is their educations. Dumb. It is one of those unintended outcomes when Congress does not do its job.
ReplyDeleteProcurement of materiel will continue.
>Procurement of materiel will continue.
ReplyDeleteYes, but with significant cuts across all areas...
http://defense-update.com/20130228_sequestration-and-the-us-defense-industrial-base-dawn-over-doomsday.html
This is the best part of the sequester. A good start.
--David
No mention of cuts to civilian personnel or the cuts to education.
ReplyDeleteWhen we are attacked, you willing to go fight?