Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, June 24, 2013

Is IRS Still Using Lists?

One only has to wonder--is the IRS still using the lists or are the orders from the new chief enough to stop the practice? We would guess that there still are vestiges of the lists to be found in staffer's desks or under their keyboards.  Just because the new head said they were disposed of, does not mean they are. In fact, the Inspector General for the IRS said they were gone last year! So it is not impossible to believe that the lists still exist.


The only way to root out the problems with the agency is to eliminate it just like we did with health care. We need a new agency. But wait, probably most of those same out of control freelancers will just move to the new agency and the problem will remain. Darn, thought we had an answer.

If we are going to get rid of these problems, we need to bring charges against those who fail to protect our rights. Yes, that would mean charging civil servants for not doing their work, wouldn't that be a novel idea? 

We are skeptical about the success of getting to the bottom of this sewer. Government agencies protect themselves and the IRS does not like to be questioned on anything. It is going to be a hard trip and we wonder if Danny Werfel will have the horsepower to get it done?

Hopefully he can, but chances, in our so modest opinion, are poor at best.

Conservative Tom

IRS Chief Admits Improper Screening Went on Until Last Month

Image: IRS Chief Admits Improper Screening Went on Until Last Month
Monday, 24 Jun 2013 03:37 PM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The Internal Revenue Service's screening of groups seeking tax-exempt status was broader and lasted longer than has been previously disclosed, the new head of the agency said Monday.



An internal IRS document obtained by The Associated Press said that besides "tea party," lists used by screeners to pick groups for close examination also included the terms "Israel," ''Progressive" and "Occupy." The document said an investigation into why specific terms were included was still underway.

In a conference call with reporters, Danny Werfel said that after becoming acting IRS chief last month, he discovered wide-ranging and improper terms on the lists and said screeners were still using them. He did not specify what terms were on the lists, but said he suspended the use of all such lists immediately.

"There was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum" on the lists, Werfel said. He added that his aides found those lists contained "inappropriate criteria that was in use."

Werfel's comments suggest the IRS may have been targeting groups other than tea party and other conservative organizations for tough examinations to see if they qualify. The agency has been under fire since last month for targeting those groups.

His comments also indicate that the use of inappropriate terms on such lists lasted longer than has been revealed previously. A report last month by a Treasury Department inspector general said agency officials abolished targeting of conservative groups with those lists in May 2012.

Werfel said preliminary results of an examination he has conducted of his agency have so far found no indication of improper screening beyond the IRS offices that examines groups seeking tax-exempt status.

He said he believes there was "insufficient action" by IRS managers to prevent and disclose the problem involving the screening of certain groups, but has discovered no specific clues of misconduct.

"We have not found evidence of intentional wrongdoing by anyone in the IRS or involvement in these matters by anyone outside the IRS," he told reporters.

Werfel's comments came as he released an 83-page report containing his assessments of the embattled agency and initial steps he is taking to make improvements.

The report describes several new procedures the agency is installing to prevent unfair treatment of taxpayers in the future. They include a fast-track process for groups seeking tax-exempt status that have yet to get a response from the IRS within 120 days of applying.

In addition, the top five people in the agency responsible for the tax-exempt status of organizations have been removed, including the former acting commissioner, Steven Miller, whom President Barack Obama replaced with Werfel.

"The IRS is committed to correcting its mistakes, holding individuals accountable as appropriate" and establishing new controls to reduce potential future problems, Werfel told reporters.

Werfel's comments and report drew negative reviews from one of the IRS's chief critics in Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Issa said the review "fails to meaningfully answer the largest outstanding questions about inappropriate inquiries and indefensible delays. As investigations by Congress and the Justice Department are still ongoing, Mr. Werfel's assertion that he has found no evidence that anyone at IRS intentionally did anything wrong can only be called premature."



The IRS has provided congressional committees investigating the agency documents related to the screening problems. He said work was continuing on removing sensitive taxpayer information from those documents, and he said he expects them to be released soon.

Werfel had promised to produce a report within a month of taking over the embattled agency.

Werfel said he briefed Obama and Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew on the report earlier Monday.
© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/US-IRS-Political-Groups/2013/06/24/id/511588?s=al&promo_code=13EF6-1#ixzz2XAxcB1DC
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

1 comment:

  1. Werfel was not involved in this, so he has nothing to protect in the IRS or loyalty to any of their top managers, which is why top 5 IRS managers are all gone. His incentive is to get this cleaned up. I see that one of the documents released to the committee used word "progressive" as a screening target. That's new.

    --David

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.