You have to see how Congressman Chaffetz reacts to
hearing what the EPA did when they discovered that they
had a child molester for an employee.
hearing what the EPA did when they discovered that they
had a child molester for an employee.
It happens early on in this questioning at a Congressional
hearing:
hearing:
Yup!! Because of the insane rules that the public employee
unions have put in place, instead of just firing this
scumbag, they had TO GIVE HIM $55,000 TO
LEAVE!!
unions have put in place, instead of just firing this
scumbag, they had TO GIVE HIM $55,000 TO
LEAVE!!
Unbelievable.
Here’s more from Fox News:
The Environmental Protection Agency was forced to
pay $55,000 to get an employee to retire because the
EPA was unable to fire him, even though he was a
convicted child molester who also imitated a police
officer, officials testified Wednesday.
pay $55,000 to get an employee to retire because the
EPA was unable to fire him, even though he was a
convicted child molester who also imitated a police
officer, officials testified Wednesday.
The settlement was discussed at a House Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform hearing on
EPA employee misconduct Wednesday. Chairman
Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that was one of the most
egregious cases of employee misconduct and misuse
of taxpayer dollars.
on Oversight and Government Reform hearing on
EPA employee misconduct Wednesday. Chairman
Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that was one of the most
egregious cases of employee misconduct and misuse
of taxpayer dollars.
Stan Meiburg, acting deputy administrator at the
EPA, said the agency attempted to fire the employee
but the Merit Systems Protection Board — an
independent agency that acts as an appeals board
for employees across the federal government and
adjudicates personnel decisions — overturned the
decision. Instead, the agency paid the employee
$55,000 to retire and leave the agency, he said. That
shocked Chaffetz.
EPA, said the agency attempted to fire the employee
but the Merit Systems Protection Board — an
independent agency that acts as an appeals board
for employees across the federal government and
adjudicates personnel decisions — overturned the
decision. Instead, the agency paid the employee
$55,000 to retire and leave the agency, he said. That
shocked Chaffetz.
“It’s just pretty stunning,” he said. “How do we need
to change the Merit Systems Protection Board,
because we’re not protecting the American taxpayer
and we’re not protecting the employees who have to
sit next to this freak of a pervert.”
to change the Merit Systems Protection Board,
because we’re not protecting the American taxpayer
and we’re not protecting the employees who have to
sit next to this freak of a pervert.”
Isn’t it great to hear a public official say, “we agree
with you but we can’t do anything about it!”
with you but we can’t do anything about it!”
And they wonder why people despise the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.