Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Adam Lanza. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Adam Lanza. Show all posts

Monday, February 22, 2016

Proper Gun Handling Is Like Any Other Habit, It Is Learned.

Scare report doesn’t want you to pass on firearm traditions

The latest nonsense anti-2nd Amendment propaganda to hit the scene aims to convince Americans that firearm manufacturers are marketing their products directly to children.
The anti-2nd Amendment Violence Policy Center just released a report titled “Start Them Young,” which features as its cover a photograph of unhinged Sandy Hook murderer Adam Lanza as a child and surrounded by firearm paraphernalia.
An “About the Cover” section in the report is pulled from a 2013 report in The Telegraph: “A chilling photograph of a small boy, gnawing on a pistol clutched in his tiny hands, dressed in camouflage and with a grenade and ammunition belt in his lap, was recovered from the weapon-filled home of Sandy Hook school gunman Adam Lanza….A family friend said that Lanza and his older brother were taught to shoot almost as soon as they could hold a weapon by their mother Nancy, a gun fanatic. But a spokesman for Mrs. Lanza’s ex-husband, Peter, last night denied that the child in the uncaptioned photograph was either son.”
The report goes on to list several quotes from the firearms industry and various outdoors groups about the joys of getting young Americans involved in the shooting sports and the importance of raising a new generation of responsible gun owners.
Here’s one such statement from the Shooting Sports Retailer’s publication in 2007: “If we don’t improve at cultivating new hunters and shooters, the sport we love and industry we work in will eventually die away. That’s a strong diagnosis, but a realistic one. Like many enthusiast sports in this busy, competitive world, people are leaving faster than new ones are coming in — and this is a recipe for industry-wide trouble down the road.”
Over the course of its 46 page report, the Violence Policy Center goes on to surmise that gun manufacturers, sporting groups and parents interested in getting American youngsters involved in hunting and shooting sports are raising a generation of future mass shooters.
At one point, the organization relays the tragic story of two-year-old killed in Kentucky in 2013 when her 5-year-old brother got ahold of an unattended and loaded .22 caliber rifle. Because the rifle was a youth model, the report seeks to use the tragedy as proof that gun manufacturers are marketing to children and parents are handing deadly weapons to youngsters all over the country.
“The gun, a Crickett rifle manufactured by Keystone Sporting Arms, the self-proclaimed ‘leading rifle supplier in the youth market,’ is specially designed for children,” the report said.
Obviously, the report’s intended audience is not an intelligent one.
I told you about the tragic event in Kentucky the month after it happened. Headlines about what had happened caught my eye after Keystone Sporting Arms came under fire by liberals attempting the exact same smear campaign the Violence Policy Center is attempting against the entire firearm industry today.
You see, I was given one of their rifles as a child—though back then they were manufactured under a different name.
Here’s what I wrote in 2013:
This author is a literal lifelong gun owner and, incidentally, I was given a .22 caliber Chipmunk rifle — a product similar to the .22 Crickett rifle central to tragic Kentucky happenings — by my grandfather in the days after my birth. Chipmunk Rifles has since been bought by Bill (father) and Steve (son) McNeal, the founders of Keystone Sporting Arms, and the guns are sold alongside a growing line of small-stature .22s.
I remember long, fun-filled afternoons shooting that rifle with my dad and younger brother (who was later also the proud owner of a Chipmunk) from a young age, always adhering to strict safety rules. My brother and I learned to respect the rifle for what it is, a deadly machine capable of taking life but also a tool that could be used to protect life, sustain life if need be or add a little joy to life on a Saturday afternoon shooting old cans and bottles for sport or hunting squirrels.
We learned the process of properly loading, handling, firing and checking the rifle, which sports a manually cocking single-shot bolt action. And when Dad felt comfortable that my brother and I had reached the age where we understood what an extreme responsibility that firearm was (around the age of 8 or so), he would leave us to practice all afternoon on the small range fashioned near the house. It was not unusual for my brother and me to plink through a 500 round box of .22 cartridges on a nice weekend afternoon, one carefully aimed shot after the next.
There was never an accident, never a bolt closed when someone was down range or when we headed back to the house to clean the rifles. And even with those bolts open, the Chipmunks were never pointed in the direction of anything that wasn’t intended to be shot.
I carry that same respect today for every firearm that I come into contact with.
What happened in Kentucky was a tragedy and should have never occurred. But it had nothing to do with the firearm industry. The gun should have been unloaded and locked away.
But reports like this ridiculous tripe out from the Violence Policy Center do deserve some attention from gun owners. As I noted in the excerpt above, I will always be grateful that I was introduced to shooting at a young age. So if you have children, grandchildren or other youngsters around, here are a few things I propose in response to the alarmist report:
  • Introduce them to NRA’s Eddie Eagle
  • Check out some of the awesome youth shooting programs available
  • Head to the range and teach some safe shooting yourself
And, heck, if there’s a birthday or another gifting opportunity coming up, I still can’t recommend Keystone’s rifles (pictured above) enough.
The bottom line is this: As a responsible 2nd Amendment supporter, it’s your responsibility to teach coming generations the importance and the great responsibility of gun ownership.

Friday, December 4, 2015

The Farook Spin Starts




  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger

Attorney Muhammad Abuershaid (Photo: CNN screenshot)
Attorney Muhammad Abuershaid (Photo: CNN screenshot)
Eyewitnesses, crime-scene evidence and helicopter footage of Syed Rizwan Farook’s Tashfeen Malik’s demise aren’t enough to convince the family’s attorneys of their guilt.
Attorneys representing the Farook family, David S. Chesley and Muhammad Abuershaid, hinted at a possible conspiracy surrounding the husband and wife team of terrorists who killed 14 and wounded 21 in San Bernardino, California, Wednesday.

“There’s a lot of things that, quite frankly, don’t add up or seem implausible,” Chesley said during a CNN interview with Chris Cuomo on Friday, Mediaite reported. “She was never involved in shooting. She’s probably about 90 pounds, so it’s unlikely she could even carry a weapon or wear some type of a vest or do any of this. … It just doesn’t make sense for these two to be able to act like some kind of Bonnie and Clyde or something. It’s just ridiculous. It doesn’t add up. It doesn’t add up, the military skills to carry out something like this, really. I’m just telling you straight out – it doesn’t make sense.”
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/12/Malik-e1449275967118.png
Syed Farook (left) and wife, Tashfeen Malik (right)
Syed Farook (left) and wife, Tashfeen Malik (right)
David Bowdich, from the FBI’s Los Angeles office, said on Friday the agency designated its investigation into couple as terrorism-related. The couple, who attacked the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, used body armor, AR-15s, pistols, and improvised explosive devices during Wednesday’s rampage.
Thousands of rounds of ammunition and pipe bombs were found in the couple’s home, and three officials close to the investigation told CNN Malik had used a registered Facebook account to pledge allegiance to the Islamic State group. The two were killed less than three miles from the crime scene during a shootout with police.
“There were a lot of questions drawn with Sandy Hook and whether or not that was a real incident or not,” Chelsey said, referencing the Dec. 14, 2012, shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, by 20-year-old Adam Lanza.
Lanza killed his mother at their home before heading to the Sandy Hook Elementary School and executing six adults and 20 children inside. He then committed suicide.
Cuomo asked associate attorney Mohammad Abuershaid if he felt the same way.
“There was nothing to show that [Malik] was extreme at all, and [Farook] was a normal guy, in every sense of the word,” Abuershaid said.
Both attorneys said the families of Farook and Malik have “come to terms” with the evidence shown to them “through the media.”
Abuershaid concluded the interview by saying he needed to receive more information before reaching a definitive conclusion regarding the terrorists’ guilt.
“I don’t know what can come in, but there’s more information we haven’t received yet,” Abuershaid said.
Copyright 2015 WND

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/farook-family-lawyers-hint-at-false-flag-talk-sandy-hook/#CeV6xQLPpC3YAzqP.99

Monday, July 27, 2015

We Have Found The Answer To Gun Deaths

       
           Guns - The solution...
 
 
 In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United
 States.
 In 1881 a leftwing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the
United States - who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy,
President of the United States.
 
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of
the United States.
 
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of
the United States.
 
In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a
McDonalds restaurant.
 
In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people
in an Oklahoma post office.
  
In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a
GMAC office.
  
In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people
in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX.
 
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5
coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a
church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a
failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US
In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people
at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32
people at Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee
Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater
and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people
in Minneapolis.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in
a school in Newtown , CT.
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a
Navy ship yard.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member,or Republican conservative was
involved in any of these shootings andmurders.
SOLUTION:  It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Adam Lanza Not Responsible For His Killing Spree, It Was Home Schooling! Stupid!

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
lanza
Adam Lanza, 20, has been described as being “dark and disturbed” before his death. He coldly murdered his own mother in their expensive home near Newtown, Connecticut. Then he took her legally registered guns to the nearby Sandy Hook Elementary School and shot and killed 20 children and six adults. Then he took a handgun and shot himself.
Reports say he suffered from Asperger’s syndrome, “or a personality disorder.” And he “had a tortured mind.”
The New York Daily News said he exhibited “strange behavior” and his “antics irked several residents.”
Now a state commission of 16 educators, local and state officials and behavioral experts assembled by Gov. Dannel Malloy after the tragedy has a game plan to prevent future occurrences.
Monitor homeschoolers.
The report’s “chief recommendation” is “tighter scrutiny of homeschoolers … to prevent an incident such as the December 2012 slaughter of 20 first-graders and six adults at Sandy Elementary School in Newtown,” EAG said.
The New Haven Register said while the final report isn’t expected for a few weeks yet, the “draft proposals call for individual educational plans for students with “significant emotional or behavioral problems.”
“The group is backing extending those requirements to troubled youths, whose parents have chosen to homeschool,” the report said.
The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission was created by Malloy 18 months ago following the Newtown tragedy. He said the education, mental health, law enforcement and other experts were supposed to recommend changes that would help prevent future outbreaks of violence.
This week members reviewed their “likely” recommendations in a meeting in Hartford.
Susan Schmeiser, a mental health law professor at the University of Connecticut, said, “Continuation of homeschooling should be contingent upon approval of [individualized education plans] and adequate progress as documented’ in progress reports.”
The basis for the decision to pin a target on homeschoolers is the fact that Lanza was withdrawn from public schools apparently during his 10th grade, and his mother, Nancy, 52, reportedly homeschooled him, for a time.
That’s from Marsha Lanza, Adam’s aunt and Nancy’s former sister-in-law.
She said, “She mentioned she wound up homeschooling him because she battled with the school district.”
However, details of his homeschooling were not available.
Homeschool experts from the Home School Legal Defense Association, the world’s premiere group advocating for home education, could not be reached immediately.
But in a report on an earlier Connecticut plan that was related – a proposal to require all homeschooled children ages 12, 14 and 17 to “undergo a behavioral health assessment, the group said that was no more than an “unwarranted invasion of family privacy.”
The group noted the state’s plan included “a review of physical and mental health, intelligence, school performance, employment, level of function in different domains including family situation, and behavior in the community.”
“The bill states that the results of the assessments are to be disclosed only to the child’s parent or guardian, but that the health-care provider must submit a form to the state Board of Education verifying that the child has received the assessment.”
Kyle Olson, writing at EAG, noted commissioner Harold Schwartz said, “I think we have thought this issue out at some length and we believe it is very germane and that the actual facts leading up to this incident support the notion of the risk in not addressing social and emotional learning needs of children who may have significant needs in that area who are homeschooled.”
Olson noted that while there are references to “problems” and “behavioral disabilities” there is no word on who would be making such judgments.
“The purpose of this recommendation is to make sure that kids get what kids need. If they have needs that aren’t being addressed, just because the parent has chosen to remove them from the school setting … their needs are still going to be met,” Kathleen Flaherty, of Statewide Legal Services, said in a report by the CTnewsjunkie.
Olson noted that the commission’s logic doesn’t follow, since public school students repeatedly have caused significant violence.
He cited Red Lake Senior student Jeffrey Weise, who in 2005 killed five students, a teacher, a security guard, and them himself. Or Columbine students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who killed 13 and wounded 21 before killing themselves in Colorado in 1999. Or Californian Charles Andrew Williams, who killed two in 2001.
“The examples go on and they all point back to a failed government bureaucracy that apparently didn’t adequately address the ‘behavioral and emotional disabilities’ of the students in its care,” he wrote.
Some homeschool experts also pointed out that Lanza likely was “homeschooled” for maybe a year and a half, making him more a product of the public school system he spent the first 10 years of his education in.
The commission also is talking about risk assessment teams in schools “to intervene” when a student “appears to be at risk.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/sandy-hook-commission-blames-homeschooling/#2VeCA5XrDJhVdBIc.99