Democrats Will Disagree But They Could Be In Big Trouble For The Fall

Red State Dems' Approval 

Ratings PLUMMET

• 01/24/2018 
• Source: AAN 
• by: Remington Strelivo

41 28 2  114

image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/59e6/5bac/6970/2d6c/692c/0200/Slideshow_640px-Elephant_in_Nagarhole_National_Park.jpg?1516820012

By Dhruvaraj S - originally posted to Flickr as Elephant in Nagarhole National Park, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7677792

SPECIAL:SAY GOODBYE TO YOUR ED WITH THIS EASY TRICK

Learn More

Could the Democrats' so-called blue wave in 2018 be giving way to a Republican crimson tide?

According to new polls, nine of the most vulnerable Democratic senators up for re-election in 2018 in states won by President Donald Trump have seen their approval ratings plummet in the last year.

Leading the way is Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) who saw his net approval rating collapse by 18 points. At the stat of 2017, Tester's net approval rating was +25 – meaning that his approval rating was 25 percentage points higher than his disapproval rating. Now, it's just +7.

Other Senators received almost as lousy news: Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) dropped 11 points over the same period, from +28 to +17. Sen. Bob Casey in Pennsylvania recorded a 9 point drop, from +20 to +11.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) dipped by 8 points each. Manchin's approval rating declined from +24 to +16 over 2017, and McCaskill's has gone from +8 in the first quarter to zero.

Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-Indiana) and Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisconsin) each saw 6 point drops. Donnelly went from +20 to +14 while Baldwin went from +6 to zero.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) declined 4 points, from +22 to +18, and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Florida) dropped 2 points, from +27 to +25.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Michigan), also regarded as highly vulnerable, managed to buck the trend, but only barely: her net approval rating didn't budge, staying at +9.

Red state Democrats seem more vulnerable than ever, but one politician from a surprising state recorded the sharpest drop of 2017 –Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), who faces renewed charges of public corruption by the Justice Department after his case ended in a mistrial last year. Menendez saw his approval plunge by 20 points, from +4 to -16.

While Democrats remain confident in their ability to win seats in the House, it's clear that the unfavorable Senate map and the tanking approval ratings of incumbent Democrats could result in an even stronger Republican majority in the U.S. Senate.

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/red-state-dems-approval-ratings-plummet#TG0oB1G93wvwvphG.99

Lobbyists Should Never Be Ex-Congressmen/Women. Bill Would Prevent Retiring To Be Lobbyists.

Bill Would Ban Congressmen From Lobbying For Life – But Does It Have A Future?

June 3, 2014 by Ben Bullard 

 10 4

 

 0 25

Two Democratic Senators have introduced a bill that aims to ban, for life, any former member of Congress from serving as a lobbyist once his public service career has ended.

Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and jon Tester (D-Mont.) introduced a bill that, in addition to ending the pathway to lobbying for Congressmen, also would forbid former Congressional staffers who’ve become lobbyists from lobbying Congress for six years (as opposed to the current limitation of one year) after their employment with a Congressional office has ended.

Currently, former House members only have to wait one year after leaving office to enter the lucrative world of Washington, D.C. lobbying. Former Senators must wait two years. But the new bill would place a lifetime ban on Congressional lobbying for any former Congressman. It would also require K Street firms to make known any consulting work done by former Congressional staffers.

Both Senators had attempted in February to attach an amendment with similar intent to the STOCK (Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge) Act, but that effort died with virtually no further action following its draft release.

While the new bill has obvious public appeal, Bennet has been criticized in his home State for reviving these accountability measures in order to score cheap and essentially meaningless political points with voters.

“Bennet’s populist K Street bashing makes good, short-term political sense,” wrote The Colorado Observer in late February. “But his rhetoric doesn’t exactly match up with his fundraising habits.”

Taking potshots at nameless, faceless “lobbyists” and proposing tough sounding “lifetime bans” and draconian penalties (even if you have no real intention of ever putting them to a vote) may seem like a good strategy for papering over tens of thousands in contributions from lobbying interests. And that kind of duplicity may fly in Washington (which Mr. Bennet is fond of railing against), but it is likely to be far less convincing with those of us who live two thousand miles from the DC cocktail circuit.

Indeed, the new legislation may – perhaps intentionally – get lost in the shuffle once its backers have taken their political benefit from a couple of favorable headlines.

“Congress has typically not enacted ethics or lobbying reform legislation unless a major scandal adds momentum,” The Hill observed Tuesday. “At present, Bennet and Tester’s bill is not expected to receive legislative action.”