Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Mary Barra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mary Barra. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Recalls Are A Big Headache For Manufacturers.

Era of Big Auto Recalls Emerges as Scrutiny Rises

Wednesday, 09 Apr 2014 09:00 PM

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Recall first, ask questions later.After Toyota Motor Corp. and General Motors Co. — two of the largest carmakers — were criticized for dragging their feet before calling back defective models in recent years, automakers are accelerating safety actions. Recalls recently climbed to records in Japan and China, while in the U.S., the 2014 pace is well ahead of last year’s, when the tally rose to the highest since 2004.
Toyota, roiled by a crisis over unintended acceleration in 2009 and 2010, Wednesday issued its second-biggest recall announcement ever at a time when GM is facing criticism for its handling of faulty ignition switches tied to at least 13 deaths. U.S. regulators are probing GM for the way it dealt with flaws it first saw as far back as 2001, a sign of intensifying scrutiny of safety practices in the auto industry.
“Since the Toyota fiasco in 2009 and 2010, there’s already been a tendency for automakers to be more cautious,” Ashvin Chotai, managing director of Intelligence Automotive Asia, said by telephone. “They are recalling when they previously wouldn’t have — that’s already occurring.”
Toyota stock, which Wednesday saw its steepest drop in two months, was little changed in early Tokyo trading, while the Topix index climbed 1.4 percent.
GM Parallel
Regulators have drawn parallels between GM’s long-delayed actions and Toyota’s recall of 10 million vehicles for unintended acceleration in 2009 and 2010. The Toyota City, Japan-based company in a settlement with the U.S. Justice Department admitted last month that it had concealed information about those defects.
Toyota, the world’s largest automaker, recalled more than 6 million vehicles Wednesday for five potential safety hazards. The problems involved almost 30 models and included cables that could prevent airbags from deploying and windshield-wiper motors that may break down and cause brake lamps to stop working.
Toyota Apology
“We sincerely apologize to our customers for the inconvenience and concern brought by this recall announcement,” the Japanese company said Wednesday in an e-mail. “Toyota has rededicated itself to strengthening its commitment to safety and quality. In part, that means refocusing on putting customers and people first, by listening better and taking appropriate action.”
Some of the 6.39 million vehicles Toyota recalled Wednesday are being called back for more than one fault, pushing the tally to 6.76 million. Some of Toyota’s top sellers — such as its Camry and Corolla sedans and RAV4 sport utility vehicles — were included in the recalls.
U.S. Recall Surge
Total recalls in the U.S. this year through Wednesday, have already exceeded 12 million vehicles — more than half of last year’s 22 million, according to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data.
Toyota surpassed 1 million recalled models in the U.S. this year even before Wednesday’s announcement, as had Nissan Motor Co. Honda Motor Co. is at about 900,000, and Chrysler Group LLC, after an April 2 recall of sport-utility vehicles, is about 738,000, according to the data.
The latest Toyota recall includes 2.3 million in North America, 1.77 million of which were in the U.S., according to company statements.
Last year’s U.S. tally was the most since 2004, when 30.8 million vehicles were recalled, according to NHTSA. In that year, GM recalled 10.7 million vehicles, including 3.66 million pickups for faulty tailgate support cables, according to the Center for Auto Safety.
This year, GM has already recalled more vehicles, 6.07 million, than any other automaker did in the U.S. in all of 2013 or 2012. Toyota recalled the most U.S. vehicles in each of the last two years -- 5.29 million in 2013 and 5.33 million in 2012.
Heightened Sensitivity
“It’s always better to err on the side of caution,” Jessica Caldwell, an analyst with car-shopping site Edmunds.com, said in an e-mailed statement. “Given the sensitivity around auto safety in the last five years, it should be no surprise that we see as many recalls as we do today.”
As large as it was, Wednesday’s recall wasn’t the biggest for Toyota nor the industry. The carmaker called back 7.43 million vehicles in October 2012 to fix power-window switches. Ford Motor Co. called back more than 14 million vehicles in 2009 for a faulty cruise-control switch that could cause a fire, according to the U.S. Transportation Department’s website.
7 Years
Carmakers often take years to recall vehicles. Toyota said it first identified one of the five problems in Wednesday’s recall back in 2007. The one that came to light most recently emerged last year, it said.
Toyota last month admitted wrongdoing and agreed to an independent monitor who will assess its safety reporting practices as part of a $1.2 billion settlement related to its handling of the unintended-acceleration problems. Attorney General Eric Holder said it was the largest criminal penalty ever imposed in the U.S. on an automaker.
For Akio Toyoda, president of the company and grandson of its founder, persistent recalls are a setback to his efforts to restore the company’s once-sterling reputation for quality. He’s pledged to improve and speed up the company’s processes, forming a global quality group that he chairs. The automaker said previous decision-making related to safety was too dependent on executives in Japan and that it has given regional operations more autonomy to make fixes.
Barra Grilling
Lawmakers last week brought up Toyota’s shortcomings during its unintended-acceleration crisis as they pressed GM Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra on the company’s handling of flawed ignition switches. The largest U.S. automaker is being fined $7,000 a day for failing to fully answer NHTSA’s questions about the flawed part in cars including the Chevrolet Cobalt.
Toyota and GM aren’t alone in facing challenges with cars in need of fixes. A surge in new models, increasingly complex technology and heightened regulatory scrutiny are behind the increase, according to a study released last month by financial advisory firm Stout Risius Ross Inc.
Recalls Abound
Automakers’ issues extend beyond the U.S. market. In Japan, auto recalls reached a record of almost 8 million vehicles in the fiscal year that ended March, the nation’s Transport Ministry said Wednesday in a statement. They climbed to a record in China after the country introduced recall laws.
The increasing use of standardized parts across vehicle lineups also raises the risk of larger recalls. Carmakers including Toyota also are pressing suppliers to make common components that they can put into various models.
Denso Corp., Japan’s largest parts maker, for example, has developed air-conditioner units that it says go into compacts and luxury cars. Volkswagen AG, Europe’s biggest automaker, uses standardized components such as electronic systems and axles as part of its plan to base Audi, Skoda and Seat vehicles on a common platform it calls MQB.
Spiral Cables
“The scale of one component has become much larger, and that means one incident could result in huge impact,” Masahiro Akita, an analyst with Credit Suisse Group AG in Tokyo, said by telephone. “There is some conflict because the more scale you have, the more difficult it is to control the quality.”
In Wednesday’s Toyota recall, about 3.5 million of the vehicles — more than half in North America — were called back to replace spiral cables that may prevent driver’s-side airbags from deploying. Models involved include RAV4, Corolla, Yaris, Highlander, Tacoma and Camry that were produced from April 2004 to December 2010.
Toyota is also recalling 2.32 million vehicles to inspect and, if needed, replace the front seat rails on three-door models. Toyota will also fix noisy and potentially unstable steering column brackets, replace windshield wiper motors and engine starters.
Market Cheerleaders
Takaki Nakanishi, a Tokyo-based analyst for Jefferies Group LLC, lauded Toyota for getting ahead of a problem.
“This is Toyota being more active in calling back vehicles to ensure quality,” said Nakanishi, who has a hold rating on the company’s shares. “The number is big, but the faults are minor and not critical.”
Toyoda, 57, has instituted a three-year freeze on new car plants to tilt the company’s priorities to quality and efficiency after the 2009-2010 recalls.
Still, Wednesday’s recall was the second major safety- related campaign by Toyota this year. A recall of 1.9 million Prius hybrids in February covered more than half of the models sold since it debuted 17 years ago. The company said it would update software to fix glitches that could cause the cars to lose power or shut down and stop.
Earnings Climb
Recalls have done little damage to Toyota’s earnings. The company has forecast that profit for the year ending March 31 will surge to a record 1.9 trillion yen ($18.6 billion). Toyota also has set a target of selling an unprecedented 10.32 million vehicles in 2014 after leading GM and Volkswagen AG in global auto deliveries for a second straight year in 2013.
“The carmakers have set the bar much lower to announce recalls,” Credit Suisse’s Akita said. “Rather than hiding it and creating problems later on, it’s much better to announce at earlier stage and deal with it properly. Compared to 20 to 30 years ago, they are getting more and more serious.”
© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.



Thursday, April 3, 2014

Barra Is Not Telling The Legislature The Real Reason Nothing Was Done On These Cars As It Would Not Go Over Well. The Short Answer Is That Those Cars Were Manufactured Under "Old GM" Whose Liabilities Were Wiped Out When They Went Bankrupt!

Senators: GM Had 'Culture of Cover-Up' That Led to 13 Deaths

Image: Senators: GM Had 'Culture of Cover-Up' That Led to 13 DeathsGeneral Motors CEO Mary Barra testifies before the Senate Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Insurance subcommittee.
Wednesday, 02 Apr 2014 03:05 PM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
General Motors had a "culture of cover-up" over a dangerous ignition switch flaw that led to the deaths of 13 people, and there is no justification for CEO Mary Barra to separate herself from decisions made before she took the company's helm a year ago, members of a Senate subcommittee say.

Barra was on Capitol Hill for a second day Wednesday, after a hearing in the House on Tuesday in which lawmakers grilled her over GM's recall of more than 1 million of its small vehicles, including the popular Chevrolet Cobalt, because of the ignition switch problems, reports The Hill.

But while Barra delivered virtually the same responses to the Senate subcommittee that she did in the House, the senators she faced were tougher on her.

GM had "a culture of cover-up that allowed an engineer to lie under oath repeatedly," said Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, who chairs the subcommittee. "We don't know how many people crashed as a result of this cover-up," McCaskill said. "We do know many died."

The automaker has recalled more than 1.6 million cars that have defective switches, which can cause the cars to shut off abruptly or disable their airbags. On Wednesday,  families of the 13 people said to be involved in fatal accidents linked to the GM part attended the Senate hearing.

While Barra attempted to separate herself from decisions that were made before she became GM's CEO and the first woman to be placed in charge of a major U.S. automaker, the senators weren't accepting excuses.

"You're new at your job, but you've been at GM for how many years?" Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Califronia Democrat, asked Barra, who has worked for the automaker for 33 years. "You're a really important person to this company. Something is very strange that such a top employee would know nothing."

The ignition switch problem is not a new one. In some cases, the cars involved were more than a decade old, and lawmakers from both parties and from both the House and Senate say GM took too long to notify drivers of the dangers.

When pressed on whether Cobalts are now safe, Barra said GM's testing shows that the vehicles are safe if drivers use only a single car key on their key rings, and she'd let her own son drive one if he only used the single key, reports The Wall Street Journal. 

GM is under investigation not only by Congress but by a federal prosecutor and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which regulates U.S. auto safety.

Barra apologized to victims' families, but subcommittee members were not supportive of her explanations.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, told Barra that if she wants to break with GM's old culture she should agree to compensate the families of victims killed before the company's bankruptcy.

Also, Blumenthal noted, GM should warn owners that they should not drive cars with suspected ignition switch issues until they are fixed because they are not safe.

Boxer told her she was disappointed, "woman to woman," by Barra's lack of answers.

"If this is the new GM, it is sorely lacking in leadership," Boxer told her. "You don't know anything about anything," Boxer told her, after earlier in the day mocking her for trying to separate herself from other GM decisions.

"What about 2005? Is that the new GM or the old GM?" Boxer asked. "Yesterday, I did some things that I'm accountable for."

Barra said that as soon as she learned there was a problem, GM "acted without hesitation," revealing the issue and announcing a recall.

"We did so because whatever mistakes were made in the past, we will not shirk from our responsibilities now and in the future," said Barra.

Barra told The Wall Street Journal in a separate interview that GM's senior executives will now be informed of vehicle safety issues when they are first reported, and that they should be expected to expand recalls if necessary.

"The executive team can only expand, they can never make it smaller," Barra said. "I am trying really hard to communicate that we have made great strides to reduce the bureaucracy within GM."

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


\

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

GM Definitely On The Hot Seat Over Ignition Switches. Was It Malfeasance? Why Did The Government Not Know Until Now?

House Probe of Deadly Defect in GM Cars Expands

Image: House Probe of Deadly Defect in GM Cars Expands
Tuesday, 11 Mar 2014 04:43 PM

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Congress's investigation of a deadly defect in some General Motors cars widened on Tuesday, and a House committee led by Republican Fred Upton ordered the automaker and a federal regulator to provide details on steps they took to get unsafe cars off the road.In another development, federal prosecutors in New York are examining whether GM is criminally liable for failing to properly disclose the defect, according to a source familiar with that investigation.
The malfunction, which first came to light a decade ago and involves more than 1.6 million GM vehicles, has been linked to 13 deaths and prompted a recent recall by the automaker. The defect, a problem with the ignition switch in some GM cars, could cause cars to stall, airbags to fail and other problems while moving at high speeds.
The supplier of the ignition switch, Delphi Automotive Plc , said in a statement on Tuesday that the part had not been provided to any other automaker.
The congressional inquiry expanded to the Senate as Commerce Committee Chairman John Rockefeller moved to launch hearings about the issue.
In the House, the Energy and Commerce Committee sent letters to GM CEO Mary Barra and National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration Acting Administrator David Friedman seeking information on their responses to consumers' complaints about the problem. They set a deadline of March 25 for the information.
Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, said there were several questions surrounding the suspected malfunctioning ignition switches in the GM cars.
"We are just looking for answers to determine what the company and NHTSA knew about these problems, when they knew it, and what they did about it," Upton said.
The senior Democrat on the panel, Representative Henry Waxman, said the committee will look at whether GM "knowingly allowed faulty and dangerous cars to remain on the road." Waxman added that lawmakers also will gauge whether NHTSA "has all the tools the agency needs to keep drivers safe."
Congress' investigation into automobile safety issues is the latest in a string of high-profile problems plaguing the industry. In 2009-11, Toyota recalled automobiles in the United States after consumers complained about uncontrolled acceleration.
In 2000, Upton spearheaded an investigation into Firestone tire failures on Ford Motor Co vehicles, which resulted in federal legislation requiring better industry reporting on consumer complaints about defects.
Neither the House nor Senate panels has yet announced when hearings would be held or who would be called to testify.
White House spokesman Jay Carney sidestepped a question at a daily briefing about whether the White House was satisfied with how the NHTSA has handled the GM matter.
"Well, I can tell you that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a formal investigation into whether GM shared the information they had about this issue as quickly as they should have," Carney said.
He referred further questions about the recall to the agency.
Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the watchdog group the Center for Auto Safety, said NHTSA had more than enough data about the defect to order a recall by early 2007.
"It's absolutely egregious," he said.
"NHTSA has become too cozy with the auto industry," Ditlow said.
GM spokesman Greg Martin noted that the company on Monday said that it will cooperate with Congress as it looks into how GM and the federal government responded to the safety problem.
GM officials no doubt will be called to testify in any House or Senate hearings in coming weeks.
But the company is no stranger to Capitol Hill where it has a strong lobbying presence.
Last year, GM spent $8.8 million on lobbying activities, earning it a ranking of 42nd out of 2,900 organizations tracked by the Center for Responsive Politics. The expenditures were double those of rival Toyota for that year, according to Senate lobbying records.
© 2014 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.