UN Report Says Chemical Weapons Were Used, Does Not Address Who Did Use Them

The UN report is in and it confirms what we already knew, chemical weapons had been used in Syria. It leaves out the very important fact of --who used them.  Obama will say that the rebels do not have the means (surface to surface missiles) to deliver the weapons.  We are still on the fence when it comes to  this very important fact.  Before we punish any independent nation with destruction, as we had Syria, we need to know that our facts on which are actions are based are completely accurate. Otherwise, to overthrow Assad over bad information would be a travesty, of course, we have done that before and it does not seem to change the calculus by this Administration. Once we know the real facts, we need to act and not before.
As far as the protocol to destroy the weapons that has been negotiated, one can only wonder how they are planning to locate and destroy all these weapons by next year while the country is in the middle of a civil war.  If this was not so serious, it would be humorous. We fear the the crews moving the weapons will be hijacked and these weapons will fall into really bad actors.  This operation can only go bad. There is absolutely no possibility that it will successfully complete its job in the time allocated and without any mishaps.
Conservative Tom

UN: 'Convincing evidence' chemical weapons used in Syria

By Rebecca Shabad - 09/16/13 02:14 PM ET

  

United Nations inspectors have concluded there is "clear and convincing evidence" sarin gas was used in a large-scale chemical weapons attack in Syria on Aug. 21.  

“The environment, chemical and medical samples we have collected provide clear and convincing evidence that surface-to-surface rockets containing the nerve agent sarin were used ... in the Ghouta area of Damascus,” the U.N. says in a 41-page report.

U.N. inspectors were not tasked with determining who was responsible for the attack, which killed more than 1,400 people. 

The White House on Monday said an initial review of the report bolstered the case that the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad launched the chemical weapons attack. Press secretary Jay Carney said blood samples with sarin, as well as evidence that surface-to-surface missiles were used, backed up the findings of the U.S. intelligence community.

"The only group capable of delivering that attack both in the means that it was delivered, through surface to surface missiles, and the agent that was used, was the Assad regime," Carney said.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon presented the report to the U.N. Security Council Monday morning, which he said describes inspectors’ interviews with more than 50 survivors, medical personnel and first responders.

“Over fifty interviews given by survivors and health care workers provided ample corroboration of the medical and scientific results,” the report says. 

Victims of the attack experienced symptoms including “shortness of breath, disorientation, eye irritation, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting and general weakness.” Many of them, he said, eventually lost consciousness. 

Thirty-four victims had their blood, urine, and hair samples drawn, which all showed signs of contamination, inspectors found. 

Inspectors also determined the weather in Damascus that day maximized the impact of an attack involving heavy gases. 

“The downward movement of air would have allowed the gas to easily penetrate the basements and lower levels of buildings and other structures where many people were seeking shelter,” the report says.  

The August attack, Ban said, was the most significant weapons attack against civilians since Saddam Hussein used them in Halabja in 1988. 

“The United Nations Mission has now confirmed, unequivocally and objectively, that chemical weapons have been used in Syria. This is a war crime and a grave violation of the 1925 Protocol and other rules of customary international law,” he told Security Council members. “I trust all can join me in condemning this despicable crime.”

It’s now up to the Security Council to formally craft a resolution that would hold those who used the chemical weapons accountable through diplomatic means. 

Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov agreed on a framework in Geneva Saturday that sets a tentative timeline for Syria to get rid of its chemical arsenal. 

Within one week, Syria must submit a comprehensive list of its stockpile, and international inspectors would be required to be on the ground in Syria by November to inspect the weapons sites. 

All of the chemical weapons must be eliminated by mid-2014, the plan says. 

Ban said he endorses the plan, and hopes the Security Council moves “quickly to consider and implement” it. However, he also emphasized it could be difficult to enforce in the midst of a civil war. 

More than 100,000 people have been killed since the war erupted in early 2011.   

Obama administration officials have reiterated that if Syria does not meet the resolution’s requirements, the U.S. may have to resort to military action. 

President Obama, in his weekly radio and Internet address Saturday, said the U.S. would still maintain military pressure on Syria. 

"Since this plan emerged only with a credible threat of U.S. military action, we will maintain our military posture in the region to keep the pressure on the Assad regime," Obama said. 

"And if diplomacy fails, the United States and the international community must remain prepared to act."

— Justin Sink contributed.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/322381-un-has-qclear-and-convincing-evidenceq-chemical-weapons-used-in-syria-#ixzz2f6YUXJ5G 
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Americans Vastly Against Any Syria Action

Poll: Most want Congress to rebuff Obama on Syria

By Rebecca Shabad - 09/09/13 10:17 AM ET

  

More than two-thirds of people in the United States want Congress to reject military action against Syria, according to a new poll.

While CNN/ORC International found that 80 percent of people believe Syrian President Bashar Assad gassed his own people, about 70 percent say a strike would not achieve U.S. goals or serve the national interest.

And even if Congress were to give President Obama the green light to launch an attack, 55 percent of Americans would still oppose it.

“Congressional approval would help Obama a little, but a majority would still oppose airstrikes against military targets in Syria,” said Keating Holland, CNN’s polling director.  

With approval from Congress, 51 percent of Democrats and 47 percent of Republicans would favor military action, the CNN poll found.

Most of the 1,022 people surveyed said their votes in future elections would not be influenced by their congressional representative’s stance on the resolution.

But by a 3-1 ratio, people who said it would influence their votes said they’d be more likely to vote against lawmakers who support strikes.

Several polls last week also found most Americans oppose intervention. Gallup found that 51 percent opposed a strike, and 13 percent were undecided. A Washington Post/ABC News poll found 59 percent opposed a strike. And Pew’s survey showed 48 percent disapproved.

Many lawmakers who have come out against attacking Syria have said they are being overwhelmed with calls from constituents who want them to vote “no.”

The Senate is likely to hold a procedural vote on Wednesday to move toward a final vote on Syria strikes, perhaps by the end of the week.

The House’s schedule is unclear. The lower chamber may vote late this week or sometime next week.