Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts

Friday, June 7, 2019

Nothing Is Free But It Sure Sounds Good, Until You Realize You Have Given Away Your Freedom


Voters should ask, What exactly is the cost of “Free” under Socialism?


The GOP’s Duty: Explain the Cost of ‘Free’
Republicans can’t outbid Santa Claus, but they can make the case for honesty, liberty and aspiration.
www.israel-commentary.org
Redacted from article by Bobby Jindal
Wall Street Journal May 30, 2019
Progressives are changing the Democratic Party’s focus from building stronger safety nets for the disadvantaged to subsidizing everything for everybody. Whereas Barack Obama once appeared radical for subsidizing health-care costs for the middle class as well as the poor, Democrats now promise free college, free health care and more—for everyone. 
Republicans can’t outspend Democrats, but they can make the case for freedom and against the idea that everything is “free” without sounding like Scrooge.
The Republican ideal isn’t penny-pinching but an aspirational society. The American Dream is to get a good job and live better than one’s parents; becoming dependent on government is the American nightmare. Even Howard Schultz, the man who brought America $5 coffee, realizes promises like Medicare for All are unrealistic and too expensive.
Yet Republicans have to do more than mock the Green New Deal’s bans on air travel, targeting of flatulent cows and subsidies for those unwilling to work if they want to persuade young voters of the case for limited government and personal freedom. Many Americans remember the Great Recession but not the Reagan Revolution, and they may find the false promise of government-provided economic security tempting, not having seen a better alternative.
In reality, “free” means more government control at the expense of consumer autonomy. When progressives promise government will pay for health care and college, they are really saying government will run medicine and higher education. Medicare for All explicitly calls for the abolition of private health insurance. Whereas Mr. Obama falsely promised that Americans who liked their plans could keep them, progressives now say if you like your plans, too bad.
Progressive health, education and energy policies would result in government interference in larger parts of the economy, affecting more people’s lives in profound ways. Consumers have a hundred choices of coffee but won’t be able to choose their health plans. Government paying for college would result in even more political interference with academic freedom. Progressives admit they want government to take ownership stakes in the projects mandated by their energy plan.
pastedGraphic.pngpastedGraphic.pngIt is one thing for Ford to tell consumers they could have any color Model T, as long as it was black, and quite another for government to tell citizens they cannot choose their health plans. Consumers and workers rightfully resent their decreasing bargaining power against large, sometimes oligopolistic companies, but the answer is not to consolidate power further in the hands of an even less responsive government bureaucracy. 
The correct response to reduced competition is more capitalism, not less. The way to resist consolidation in corporate America is to enforce existing antitrust laws and, especially, to reduce the regulatory pressures that cause consolidation in the first place.
“Free” means less efficiency, more expense and lower quality. While progressives highlight the unpopular aspects of private insurance, they won’t tell voters the private sector is more likely to promote innovation without concern for lobbyist-armed special interests and rent-seekers. Think of how long it took for the federal government, via Medicare, to pay for prescription drugs, ambulatory surgery and other outpatient services. It already takes tens of thousands of pages of regulations to administer Medicare, whereby the government sets thousands of prices in thousands of counties for millions of beneficiaries.
The top-down, one-size-fits-all Industrial Age approach is especially ill-suited to the constantly changing health care and education sectors. Hence the popular support for Medicare Advantage, charter schools, Veterans Choice and other programs that empower consumers with more control and harness the efficiency and creativity of the private economy to deliver public benefits.
“Free” means robbing from America’s children. It is one thing to take money from the present-day wealthy. It’s another to take it from future generations. Despite proposed marginal rates as high as 70% or even 90%, none of the tax plans Democrats have put forward would raise nearly enough revenue to pay for the promised spending. It is immoral for adults to force their children to sacrifice their quality of life and pay higher taxes to subsidize today’s spending. Good parents sacrifice to give their children more opportunities. This is the opposite.
Progressives aren’t willing to let America’s $22 trillion debt slow them down. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez objected to Congress’s pay-as-you-go rule, already honored more in the breach than in the observance; and progressives have conveniently discovered a monetary theory that allows them to ignore deficits and simply print whatever they want to spend.
Republicans have lost credibility on fiscal responsibility. Spending vastly increased on their watch. Even so, Medicare for All’s $32 trillion price tag makes even today’s appropriators look miserly. Republicans must remind voters—and themselves—that deficits are a drag on the economy, with interest payments crowding out private investment and government spending. It wouldn’t hurt for the GOP to act as if deficits matter when they govern, not merely when they’re in the minority.
Republicans can’t outbid Santa Claus. Americans are willing to work hard and sacrifice for a better life but need to know how pro-growth policies benefit them. Voters may be tempted by progressives’ crazy plans because they desperately want more affordable health care, reasonable tuition costs and a sustainable environment. They will embrace effective market-based solutions that promote freedom if Republicans offer them, but voters will only wait so long.
Mr. Jindal served as governor of Louisiana, 2008-16, and was a candidate for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.

Monday, January 7, 2019

Fair Analysis Of The Strikes And Balls Of The Trump Administration

The Promises Trump and Republicans Kept – and Broke

  • 2019-01-07 
  • Source: AAN 
  • by: AAN Staff
0 0 0  1
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/5944/0de8/6970/2d20/326c/0100/Slideshow_Screen_Shot_2017-06-16_at_12.55.54_PM.png?1517240710
The Promises Trump and Republicans Kept – and Broke
White House (Public Domain)
With Washington, D.C. firmly under GOP control – until last week – it's time to see whether or not President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans delivered on their campaign promises.

In November, the Grand Old Party lost 40 seats in the House of Representatives.

As the new power dynamic in Washington becomes the norm, let's review the last year of Republican rule:

CLICK HERE TO BEGIN -->

(H/T Conservative Review)

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/the-promises-trump-and-republicans-kept#czAvCbzvcZAhTRiw.99

Tuesday, November 13, 2018

If You Believed That Democrats Would Like To Govern, You Would Be Mistaken. They Want To Investigate Everyone On The Trump Team And More!


Nancy Pelosi’s hit list revealed (85 targets!)

House Minority Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats have a plan to grind the U.S. government to a screeching halt — and they’re going to do it by launching investigation after investigation into President Donald Trump.
In fact, Democrats have eyed a list of at least 85 subpoenas they’re prepared to issue to Trump and Republican leaders, once Democrats are officially are given control of the House of Representatives.

Doing so would be an unprecedented act of political partisanship that will drive a wedge further through America’s political landscape. And it will start in January, incoming House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff told “Axios on HBO“on Sunday.
It won’t happen all at once, of course. Each Democrat-controlled House subcommittee will prioritize what it views as the most pressing topics, and will put them forward one at a time.
One after another after another after another, until the White House legal team is completely overwhelmed.
A Democratic insider said the party is preparing ammunition for a “subpoena cannon” they’re planning to load and fire at-will.
“We have our boxing gloves on,” incoming House Appropriations Chair Nita said on Sunday, telling the interviewer they’ll investigate “anything” they want.

“I’m ready [to rumble],” a laughing Nita said. “And so is Nancy.”

Here’s a brief list of targets Axios said Democrats have already gotten paperwork lined up and ready for —
  • President Trump’s tax returns
  • Trump family businesses — and whether they comply with the Constitution’s emoluments clause, including the Chinese trademark grant to the Trump Organization
  • Trump’s dealings with Russia, including the president’s preparation for his meeting with Vladimir Putin
  • The payment to Stephanie Clifford — a.k.a. Stormy Daniels
  • James Comey’s firing
  • Trump’s firing of U.S. attorneys
  • Trump’s proposed transgender ban for the military
  • Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s business dealings
  • White House staff’s personal email use
  • Cabinet secretary travel, office expenses, and other misused perks
  • Discussion of classified information at Mar-a-Lago
  • Jared Kushner’s ethics law compliance
  • Dismissal of members of the EPA board of scientific counselors
  • The travel ban
  • Family separation policy
  • Hurricane response in Puerto Rico
  • Election security and hacking attempts
  • White House security clearances
And many, many more.
After the 2018 midterm, Trump warned Democratic leaders that their “warlike” approach to governance will lead to retaliations.

Asked if he’ll launch investigations back at Democrats trying to bog down his administration, Trump said, “Oh yeah. Better than them.”
In a few months, we’ll find out if Pelosi and her Democratic allies are actually interested in governing — or just playing political theater.

FLASHBACK: Nancy Pelosi accused of bribery

— The Horn editorial team

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Vote Republican!

Check out the reasons you should vote Republican!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX-ntYO4INE&feature=youtu.be

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

The Left Becomes More Unhinged By The Day

Washington Post's E.J. Dionne Urges Rage and Revenge over Kavanaugh

Vengeance is mine sayeth the horde!
Washington Post columnist is in such a rage over what he calls the "coup" of confirming Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice on the Supreme court that it caused his mind overload to the extent of forgetting about the federal system of government established by the Constitution. In addition, he is now out for revenge against conservatives by packing the Supreme Court chock full of additional seats occupied by liberals. 
Let us now join E.J. Dionne on his Vendetta Ride against Republicans in his furious column in Monday's newspaper, "We need to stay angry about Kavanaugh".
The Supreme Court’s legitimacy is in tatters. Conservative forces in the country, led by the Republican Party, have completed a judicial coup, decades in the making.
He is just getting warmed up. More outrage to come.
Democracy is all that opponents of the coup have left. In next month’s elections, the party responsible for this travesty must be punished. The idea that “both parties are equally to blame” is an unadulterated falsehood.
Guess who is going to be Rubber Room ready if the much vaunted "Blue Wave" fails to materialize?
The undemocratic nature of representation in the Senate is unlikely to be remedied anytime soon, so progressives and Democrats need to organize far more effectively in the low-population red states. Critics of the judicial right need to remind voters that conservative judges regularly serve the interests of the wealthy and the powerful, not those of the heartland.
I guess Dionne missed or forgot that part about federalism as established in the Constitution in his high school civics class. If he paid attention he would have found out that the Senate was not supposed to be "democratic" in its representation. It was supposed to represent the states so that even a low population state would have the same representation as the big states in the Senate. However, Dionne's fury over Kavanaugh seems to have blocked that concept from his mind. Oh, and there is no remedy for this unless you want to get rid of the Constitution, which many liberals would love to do but rarely admit in public.
And there should now be no squeamishness about the urgency of enlarging the Supreme Court if Democrats have the power to do so after the 2020 elections. The current majority on the court was created through illegitimate means. Changing that majority would not constitute politicizing the court because conservatives have already done this without apology.
Packing the Supreme Court with liberal seats in order to change the majority is somehow NOT politicizing it? What's the punchline?
...we need a considered two-year debate over changing the number of justices — it was done seven times during the 19th century — as the only plausible response to the conservative court-packing project that reached fruition on Saturday.
When did conservatives PACK the Supreme Court? Nominating justices to the High Court is not packing. However, what you are proposing, adding seats to the court so you can fill them with liberals, is most definitely packing.
Its foes need to stay angry. But even more, they need to vote, organize and think boldly. Democracy itself is at stake.
Yeah, this columnist will most definitely be in need of the white-coated fellows to strap him down to a gurney if no Blue Wave next month. 

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Americans Are "Constitutionally Ignorant"

Shock poll: A stunning number of Americans cannot name even one First Amendment right

Shock poll: A stunning number of Americans cannot name even one First Amendment right
A recent survey reveals that a shocking number of Americans value the First Amendment but cannot correctly name a single right it guarantees. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Americans cherish exercising their constitutional rights: The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech and freedom of religion, the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms, among the dozens of others.
But how well do Americans truly know their constitutional rights? According to a recent survey on the First Amendment, not well.

What did the survey show?

The annual survey from the Freedom Forum Institute found that 23 percent of Americans believe the First Amendment “goes too far” but 74 percent of Americans disagreed  — yet 40 percent could not name even one right First Amendment protects.
In fact, the First Amendment guarantees Americans five explicit rights:
  • free exercise of religion,
  • freedom of speech,
  • freedom to assemble,
  • freedom of the press, and
  • freedom to petition the government.
Of the 1,009 American adults surveyed, only 36 percent could correctly name one First Amendment right, only 12 percent could name two, and all five? Just one respondent correctly recalled each of the five rights protected by the First Amendment.
Meanwhile, the incorrect answer respondents recalled most was the right to bear arms, which is protected by the Second Amendment. Others cited the “right to vote,” which numerous constitutional amendments guarantee for different classes of people, but isn’t included in the First Amendment.

What else did the poll say?

Other interesting facts from the poll include:
  • 70 percent said colleges should remove invited speakers whose remarks might incite violent protests or threaten public safety.
  • Democrats are more likely than Republicans to support the removal of campus speakers.
  • 72 percent said social media companies should censor “hate speech,” but an overwhelming minority said the government should oversee such a process.
  • The majority of respondents believe the First Amendment protects a baker from forcibly baking a cake with a message he or she disagrees with.
The survey comes at a time when America’s younger generations are rethinking free speech and what the First Amendment should protect. An increasing number of people believe “hate speech” should be censored, violence is OK to use when protesting “offensive” college speakers, and religious protections don’t cover people who “discriminate” against the LGBT community.

Monday, July 23, 2018

Democrats Should Push The Kavanaugh Vote To Just Before The November Elections. This Will Guarantee A Republican Landslide!

McConnell Issues Supreme Court Ultimatum

20 19 4  61
image: https://aanews-structure-psyclone.netdna-ssl.com/client_assets/aanews/media/picture/5898/b799/6970/2d19/6ae6/0000/content_mitchapalooza.jpg?1525186622
McConnell Issues Supreme Court Ultimatum
Photo Credit: Flickr- Gage Skidmore

GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has a sharp warning for
 Democrats, according to a new report from Politico:

The Senate majority leader privately told senior Republicans on Wednesday

that if Democrats keep pushing for access to upwards of a million pages in

records from President Donald Trump’s high court pick, he’s prepared to let

Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote slip until just before November’s midterm

elections, according to multiple sources.

Delaying the vote past September would serve a dual purpose for McConnell,

keeping vulnerable red-state Democrats off the campaign trail while potentially

forcing anti-Kavanaugh liberals to swallow a demoralizing defeat just ahead

of the midterms. Senators said McConnell believes the Democratic base will

be “deflated” if they raise hopes of defeating Kavanaugh only to lose just

days before the election.

Democrats have no intention of backing down in their call for maximum

transparency about Kavanaugh’s record, but the GOP is betting that they’ll

start to sweat the Supreme Court timeline as the summer wears on.

Do you think the Senate will confirm Kavanuagh?

Read more at http://americanactionnews.com/articles/mcconnell-issues-supreme-court-ultimatum#p57LzqBKYlps10q2.99