Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Sixth amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sixth amendment. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Trump's Lawyer Office Raided--Is This The End Of The Rule Of Law?

Dershowitz: Targeting Trump's lawyer should worry us all






FBI raids Trump lawyer's office

Autoplay: On | Off
There is much speculation as to the significance of the search of the offices and hotel room of President Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen. To obtain a search warrant, prosecutors must demonstrate to a judge that they have probable cause to believe that the premises to be searched contain evidence of crime. They must also specify the area to be searched, the items to be seized and, in searches of computers, the word searches to be used.
At least that’s the constitutional requirement in theory, especially where the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is involved, in addition to the general Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches. Yet, in practice, judges often give the FBI considerable latitude, relying on the “firewalls” and “taint teams” they set up to protect the subject of the search from violation of his or her constitutional rights.
But the firewalls and taint teams are comprised of government agents who themselves may not be entitled to read or review many of the items seized. It is an imperfect protection of important constitutional rights. That’s why Justice Department officials must be careful to limit the searching of lawyers’ offices to compelling cases involving serious crimes. We don’t know at this point what the prosecutors are looking for but, if it relates to payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels, that would not seem to justify so potentially intrusive a search of Cohen’s confidential lawyer-client files.
There are, of course, exceptions to the lawyer-client privilege. First, the lawyer must be acting as a lawyer, not as a friend or business associate. But the scope of a lawyer’s work is quite broad, encompassing much more than merely giving legal advice. It includes settling cases by making payments to potential litigants. Second, the lawyer must be engaged in lawful activities on behalf of the clients. Illegal or fraudulent activities are not covered by the privilege. Nor are communications with third persons, such as the lawyer for the other side, though such communications may be covered by the much weaker “settlement privilege.”
Civil libertarians should be concerned whenever the government interferes with the lawyer-client relationship. Clients should be able to rely on confidentiality when they disclose their most intimate secrets in an effort to secure their legal rights. A highly publicized raid on the president’s lawyer will surely shake the confidence of many clients in promises of confidentiality by their lawyers. They will not necessarily understand the nuances of the confidentiality rules and their exceptions. They will see a lawyer’s office being raided and all his files seized.
I believe we would have been hearing more from civil libertarians — the American Civil Liberties Union, attorney groups and privacy advocates — if the raid had been on Hillary Clinton’s lawyer. Many civil libertarians have remained silent about potential violations of President Trump’s rights because they strongly disapprove of him and his policies. That is a serious mistake, because these violations establish precedents that lie around like loaded guns capable of being aimed at other targets.
I have been widely attacked for defending the constitutional rights of a president I voted against. In our hyperpartisan age, everyone is expected to choose a side, either for or against Trump. But the essence of civil liberties is that they must be equally applicable to all. The silence among most civil libertarians regarding the recent raid shows that we are losing that valuable neutrality.

Friday, March 25, 2016

Law In The US Today, Becoming A Travesty



Habeas denied in Faire murder case; judge rules no attorney for 6 months ‘OK’


Judge at bench signing paper
OKANOGAN, Washington — Back in June of 2015, the US~Observer began an investigation into the murder charge (and other charges) filed against James “Strat” Faire. In October of 2015, I reported on the blatant injustice that was occurring in this case with respect to the evidence being ignored by Prosecutor Karl Sloan, evidence that clearly shows Faire acted in self-defense while a felony assault was in progress against Faire and Angela Nobilis at Richard Finegold’s Sourdough property, located in Tonasket, Washington.
Faire supporters were able to hire Attorney Stephen Pidgeon to represent Faire. On February 10, 2016, Pidgeon filed a writ of habeas corpus demanding that the court drop Faire’s charges because of violations of his Constitutional rights. Pidgeon also filed a motion for bail reduction.
After eight long and torturous months of incarceration, most of them spent without an attorney representing him, Faire walked out of the Okanogan County Jail on the afternoon of February 19, 2016. Judge Christopher Culp granted bail reduction from $750,000 to $150,000.
In a memorandum of law to the Okanogan Superior Court for the State of Washington, Attorney Stephen Pidgeon, Faire’s counsel of record states:
… his [James Faire’s] restraint was made illegal upon his first presentation in court on September 14, 2015 without benefit of counsel, and that the incarceration continued in violation of the Sixth Amendment rights as made applicable to the state under the Fourteenth Amendment, and in violation of Article I, Section 3 of the Washington Constitution.
In responding to Pidgeon’s motion, Prosecutor Karl Sloan had the gall to attempt to deceive the court by stating that a public defender appeared at each of Faire’s hearings after his original attorney Nicholas Blount withdrew from the case, including, on two occasions, Melissa MacDougall. MacDougall already “represented” Angela Nobilis (Faire’s co-defendant on two charges) and was barred by the Rules of Professional Conduct from participating in a co-defendant’s defense!
On March 7, 2016, Judge Christopher Culp denied Faire’s writ of habeas corpus, however, he removed illegal restrictions on Faire’s freedom before trial such as drug testing, etc. In essence, Culp condoned the fact that a defendant can sit in jail for months and months and appear at numerous hearings without an attorney – I vehemently disagree with him.
Attorney Pidgeon has stated that he is preparing an interlocutory appeal to the Washington Court of appeals regarding the habeas motion that Culp denied.
Prosecutor Sloan was almost venomous at the hearing, as he attempted to defeat the motions. Amazing, given the fact that this out of control prosecutor has absolutely no evidence against Faire. And what’s worse, is that he is factually protecting proven criminals and their well-documented crimes in this case.

Okanogan citizenry speaks out

The US~Observer has received in excess of 40 calls from Okanogan residents with complaints of abuse, negligence and unethical actions pertaining to Prosecutor Karl Sloan, the Okanogan County Sheriff’s Office and the Okanogan County Public Defender’s Office (OCPDO).

State violates constitutional rights (in work)

Former investigators and public defenders who served in the county’s criminal justice system have come forward with information indicating just how allegedly corrupt, incompetent and ruthless the OCDPO is and how MacDougall works in perfect tandem with Okanogan County Prosecutor Sloan. One complainant states, “Public defenders are overworked and underpaid.” Another states, “Melissa MacDougall [the public defender contract pool administrator] has no time to oversee the PD system. This has led to a massive turnover of the lawyers under her.” Another told us, “James Faire will never get a fair trial in Okanogan County if he is represented by a public defender.” Another credible caller informed us that, “MacDougall and Sloan actually work together. When Karl was running against Judge Rawson for his seat on the Superior Court in 2012, she had campaign posters in her public defender’s office backing Sloan. She has openly showed disdain for Rawson more than once.” And yet another person states, “MacDougall and Michael Prince work together. They were both sued in Grant County for not representing their clients, then they migrated to Okanogan where they have continued the same practices that they were sued for in Grant County.”Attorney Melissa MacDougall is the administrator of the OCPDO pool. MacDougall’s responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the assignment of appropriate counsel to accused individuals.
These claims are validated in part by the fact that MacDougall was appointed to represent Faire’s co-defendant Nobilis and MacDougall recused Judge Rawson from Nobilis’ case. After firing MacDougall weeks ago, Nobilis stated, “I don’t know anything negative about Judge Rawson and I had no idea that my own attorney had worked with the prosecutor in my case to unseat Judge Rawson until I was informed by the US~Observer.”
According to the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Standards for Indigent Defense Services:
The caseload of public defense attorneys shall allow each lawyer to give each client the time and effort necessary to ensure effective representation. Neither defender organizations, county offices, contract attorneys nor assigned counsel should accept workloads that, by reason of their excessive size, interfere with the rendering of quality representation. As used in this Standard, “quality representation” is intended to describe the minimum level of attention, care and skill that Washington citizens would expect of their state’s criminal justice system.
Under the “oversight” of MacDougall, court records show Faire was without the benefit of counsel between August 18, 2015 and January 11, 2016. Regardless of the lack of legal representation, Faire was consistently brought before the court, a clear violation of his state and federal constitutional rights.
Faire’s only recourse to address the fact that he did not have legal counsel was to write a letter to the court. Public defenders Michael Prince, Myles Johnson (no longer with the public defender contract pool) and Kelly Seago failed to file “notices of appearances” on Faire’s behalf, signaling a refusal to take the case. Court audio captures the fact that Seago was scolded by Superior Court Judge Henry Rawson during three separate hearings which occurred between October and December of 2015. Seago spluttered out a series of excuses month after month until finally Faire was forced to hire private counsel. On January 11, 2016, Seago blurted out yet another ill-thought-out excuse (she blamed the court clerk) on her failure to file the “notice of appearance,” this time before Superior Court Judge Christopher Culp.
With so much on the line, one has to ask, where is the oversight of MacDougall and the public defenders? The county commissioners are responsible for awarding public defense contracts. According to the Okanogan County Commissioners website, the Okanogan County Commission derives its legislative powers directly from Washington State statutes:
The primary legislative powers of the board of commissioners are found in RCW 36.32.120. The powers include: construction and maintenance of public buildings; granting licenses; fixing the tax levies for the county and having the same collected; authorizing payments owed by the county and auditing all officers having control of county monies; managing county property and county funds; prosecuting and defending all actions for and against the county; and making and enforcing by appropriate resolutions and ordinances and all such police and sanitary regulations not in conflict with state law.
In 2012, MacDougall openly campaigned on behalf of Sloan who sought a seat as a superior court judge. What would you do if you walked into your attorney’s office and found out he/she was campaigning for the corrupt prosecutor who was intent on falsely convicting you?
Sources state “it is well known that within the community, Attorney Melissa MacDougall and Prosecutor Karl Sloan are good friends and their families have been known to spend the holidays together.”
By now, I’m sure you have the same question we have: have MacDougall and Sloan also violated the professional code of conduct by divulging information about cases to one another? Worse yet, has McDougall colluded with Sloan, in a spirit of friendship, to allow false convictions? Some of our readers in Okanogan have alleged exactly that.
Regarding this case, three things are quite clear:
  1. Okanogan County’s supposed justice system has completely violated the constitutional rights of Faire and Nobilis;
  2. This same corrupted justice system is factually headed for a train-wreck and;
  3. The members of this abusive Okanogan County Cabal will, without question be held accountable before this case is over.
— Kelly Stone
Investigative Reporter