Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Soleimani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soleimani. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

If True, Biden Could Be Finished

During Obama Years, Biden Reportedly Helped Soleimani, Iran Gain More Power in Middle East

Print
Following the targeted airstrike to take out top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, prominent Democrats and establishment media figures criticized President Donald Trump for ordering the strike.
One of those critics of Trump’s justifiable killing of Soleimani was former Vice President Joe Biden, a top 2020 presidential candidate, who said in a statement that the president’s decision was akin to having “tossed a stick of dynamite into a tinderbox,” a move that threatened to escalate conflict and chaos in an already chaotic environment.
Obviously left unmentioned in Biden’s statement, however, was the particular role that he himself had played in helping to create the chaotic “tinderbox” that is Iraq, as reported by the Washington Free Beacon.
As it turns out, Biden played a significant role in the process that allowed Iran to more fully exert its influence on the Iraqi government and render that nation something of a puppet state to the Iranian regime in Tehran, which occurred around the time that then-President Barack Obama was precipitously withdrawing all U.S. forces from Iraq.
Biden is alleged to have urged a secular pro-America politician at the time to step aside and allow somebody else, a more religious and pro-Iran leader, to step up in his place.
TRENDING: Comedian George Lopez on Iran's 'Bounty' on Trump: 'We'll Do It for Half'
That revelation was included in a lengthy and admittedly fascinating profile of Soleimani from 2013 in The New Yorker — which has received renewed attention in the wake of his death — that documented the Iranian general’s rise to power and the scope of his control over the broader Middle East through a host of interviews with a variety of current and former top officials in a number of different countries.
In 2010, pro-American Iraqi politician Ayad Allawi helped his party win a majority of seats in the Iraqi Parliament, but was forced to step down from a bid to become prime minister after allegedly being told to do so by Biden.
Allawi told The New Yorker that he would have had no problems building a majority government and being prime minister if he’d had the backing of the U.S. government. He claims that he was instead informed directly by Biden that “you can’t form a government” and was pushed aside in favor of Nuri Al-Maliki, who had essentially been handpicked during behind-the-scenes negotiations involving Soleimani.
A key sticking point of Soleimani’s negotiations that involved Iraqi Shiites and the Kurds was that “no Americans” could remain in the country. One unnamed former Iraqi politician told The New Yorker that Soleimani “completely outmaneuvered” the Americans, while “in public they were congratulating themselves for putting the government together.”

Do you think the Obama administration is responsible for the problems our nation faces in the Middle East today?

 
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
According to Allawi, the Americans only wanted to stay in Iraq if their involvement could be kept to a minimum, and the moves by Soleimani to install Maliki over Allawi seemed to provide an easy out for the Obama administration.
“I needed American support,” Allawi recalled. “But they wanted to leave, and they handed the country to the Iranians. Iraq is a failed state now, an Iranian colony.”
Which brings us back full-circle to today. Iraq became a puppet state of Iran in large part because of Biden and Obama’s refusal to back a pro-American leader, mostly because they didn’t want to deal with any potential trouble they might have encountered from continued Iranian-backed resistance from the Soleimani-organized Shiite militias.
Bear in mind also that all of this was occurring while the Obama administration was secretly negotiating the eventual Iran nuclear deal. Staying in Iraq and supporting a pro-America Iraqi leader would undoubtedly have made those negotiations far more difficult, if not impossible to advance to a conclusion.
In other words, this alleged instance of Biden and Obama bowing to the whims of the Iranian regime is but one example of many of how the last administration ceded influence and power to Iran.
RELATED: Young Man Scorches Biden on Obamacare, Publicly Asks, 'Were You Lying to My Dad?
Now that Iran has tacitly taken over Iraq, thanks in part to Biden and Obama, Biden wants to complain about how Trump has taken action to reduce that influence and power and protect our nation’s substantial investment in Iraq.
Don’t think for one moment that Trump will let this pass if Biden ultimately wins his party’s nomination in 2020, as what Biden and Obama did — and more to the point, did not do — in Iraq will become a weapon in Trump’s favor to be used against the former vice president.

Friday, January 3, 2020

Democrat Proves He Is A Fraud

Democrat Chris Murphy Complains About Soleimani Attack 2 Days After Calling Trump ‘Impotent’ on Iran

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 30: U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) (L) speaks as Sen. Robert Casey (D-PA) listens during a news conference on healthcare April 30, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The Senate Democrats held the news conference to call on protecting Medicaid. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Alex Wong/Getty Images
1:45
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) is complaining about President Donald Trump’s attack Thursday on Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in Iraq — just two days after complaining that Trump was “impotent” to respond to Iranian attacks.
Murphy, who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, tweeted on Tuesday: “The attack on our embassy in Baghdad is horrifying but predictable. Trump has rendered America impotent in the Middle East. No one fears us, no one listens to us. America has been reduced to huddling in safe rooms, hoping the bad guys will go away. What a disgrace.”
On Thursday evening, after Trump’s successful attack, Murphy tweeted that the problem was actually that Trump was being too aggressive: “Soleimani was an enemy of the United States. That’s not a question. The question is this – as reports suggest, did America just assassinate, without any congressional authorization, the second most powerful person in Iran, knowingly setting off a potential massive regional war?”
Murphy also called the killing of Soleimani an assassination, warning against “neocons thumping their chest” [sic].

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Middle East Will Be A Powderkeg Armed With Nuclear Weapons

McCain: Iran Deal Will 'Nuclearize the Middle East'

Image: McCain: Iran Deal Will 'Nuclearize the Middle East'(Alex Wong/Getty Images)
By Sandy Fitzgerald   |   

The deal that's been reached with Iran will "nuclearize the Middle East," Sen. John McCain said Monday, but he also doesn't believe Congress will approve it in the first round.

"I think it's not going to get through the first round, as you know, but the president's already said he would veto and then the question is, are there sufficient votes to override a veto?" the Arizona senator told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program.

Story continues below video.


But meanwhile, McCain said he's talked to Middle East leaders who are "deeply concerned" about the agreement.

"They are moving in a direction of acquiring nuclear weapons, because they see this five-year, eight-year, 10-year window that they're going to have to, as Iran nuclearizes, acquires nuclear weapons after 10 years."

But he is also worried about the promise to relieve sanctions against Iran, and in particular, Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

"Gen. [Joseph] Dunford said that the copper-tipped IEDs [improvised explosive devices] killed at least 500 [in the] Army and Marines, and they're lifting the sanctions against him?" said McCain. "Someone's going to have to explain that to me."

Soleimani's name is included in an annex of the Iran agreement, even though he is blamed for helping Shiite militias kill American soldiers in Iraq, and also for assisting Syria's Bashar al-Assad, reports The Daily Beast.
"Soleimani is the guy that sent the copper-tipped IEDs into Iraq," McCain, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee told The Daily Beast.

But on Monday, McCain told "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough that at this point, "it's almost a take it or leave it" situation because it's an agreement.

"But I also think we should be deeply concerned about continued Iranian aggression," McCain said. "They're now controlling four countries. We just found out when I was in Afghanistan over the Fourth of July. They're now providing weapons to the Taliban. Everywhere they're on the move, and they're succeeding and still the chief state sponsor of terror. Now I understand the other argument."

Meanwhile, McCain said there was "very little doubt" in Iran's mind that the United States wanted the agreement more than they did, "and that's how you got somehow an agreement on conventional weapons crept into this, when Secretary [John] Kerry had assured us time after time after time that this was only nuclear."

There is also "great concern" about Iran's plans for the "tens of billions of dollars that are now going to be freed up," and McCain said he is looking forward to the briefings and debate on the agreement.

"And, frankly, I'm on the side of Bibi [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu]," said McCain, stating his alliance with the leader and his fears about the future of Israel following the agreement.

Related Stories:

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

America, The Paper Tiger, Shows It Has No Will To Stop ISIS In Ramadi

What will it take to awaken America from its sleep in the Middle East? A bomb in New York? An EMP attack in Chicago, ISIS taking over Europe? Rome falling to ISIS?

Our belief is that neither of the two latter options will sufficiently motivate the US government to react.  The politicians will all say "that is their fight, not ours." An attack on US soil might be enough to get Americans to react, for a while. You see the once strongest nation in the world is a paper tiger. We roar but nothing happens. We have forgotten Teddy Roosevelt's mantra, "speak softly and carry a big stick..."  

No longer is American power feared. Angering us used to mean something, it no longer does.  

It does not help that our President is, if not a believer in ISIS, he definitely is a fellow traveler of ISIS.  He will not allow any department of  the US government call this demonic group of radical Islamists, what it really is. That is a threat to all western democracies. When you cannot identify your enemy, you lose.
Additionally, we are importing Muslims into this country as fast as we can. They are being spread through out the country from large cities to rural areas. Now before you start hyperventilating, understand that not all Muslims will become Jihadists and most are looking for a better life. However, if only 10% do, this is a major problem. Remember the Tsarnov brothers, look at the damage they did to Boston and they were only two. Multiply that by a thousand or ten thousand and the problem becomes clear.

Already Somali immigrants who were settled in Minnesota are heading to ISIS to be trained and then presumably will come back here to cause damage. What happens to us then?

The US is not the country of forty years ago where immigrants had to have a sponsor who would promise that they would take care of the individuals, would get them a job and would make sure that they did not become a burden to the state. That time has passed and now most immigrants are a "burden to the state."  It is time to reverse the trend and we need to start with the Muslim immigrants who are coming here and due to ISIS present a current and present danger.

Conservative Tom





US Didn’t Do “Damn Thing” to Stop ISIS in Ramadi, Says Iranian Commander

“Behold, the day of the LORD cometh, cruel, and full of wrath and fierce anger; to make the earth a desolation, and to destroy the sinners thereof out of it.” (Isaiah 13:9)
The head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s (IRGC) al-Quds force declared Monday that American forces have “no will” to fight the Islamic State (ISIS), leaving only the Islamic Republic to take on the task, Iranian media reported.
General Qassem Soleimani leveled the accusation against the US in the wake of the fall of Ramadi, one day after US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter made similar comments regarding Iraqi forces. It is unclear whether Soleimani was responding to Carter’s comments directly.
“Obama has not done a damn thing so far to confront [ISIS],” said Soleimani, according to Iranian paper Javan, considered close to the Iranian Guard. “Doesn’t that show that there is no will in America to confront it? How is it that America claims to be protecting the Iraqi government, when a few kilometers away in Ramadi killings and war crimes are taking place and they are doing nothing?”
According to Soleimani, only Iran is standing up to ISIS. “Today, there is nobody in confrontation with (the Islamic State group) except the Islamic Republic of Iran” and its allies, he said.
Ramadi is the capital of Iraq’s Anbar province, not far from the capital of Baghdad, captured just over a week ago by ISIS forces. According to BBC, heavy-handed scare tactics were used to frighten off the overworked Iraqi forces stationed there.
Since then, Iraq has rallied in an effort to take back the province. Iraqi officials announced Tuesday a new operation was being launched, expected to retake the city in just days. Iraqi parliamentarian Ahmed al-Assadi told the Associated Press the operation would “not last for a long time” and that Iraqi forces were using new weapons “that will surprise the enemy.”
Although any attempt to diminish ISIS’s foothold in Iraq is welcome, concerns have been raised in Washington regarding claims by an Iraqi Shi’ite militia, Hashid Shaabi, that it is spearheading the operation. That, along with the highly sectarian name assigned to the effort, may ruffle the feathers of the mostly Sunni local population, sending them into the open arms of the Islamic State. ISIS has billed itself as the only force working to protect Sunnis from Shi’ites.
“The Labaik Ya Hussein operation is led by the Hashid Shaabi in cooperation and coordination with the armed forces there,” Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar Assadi said at a televised news conference. The name of the operation is taken from a slogan honouring the grandson of the prophet Muhammad who fell in the battle which divided Sunnis and Shi’ites in the 7th century.
“We believe that liberating Ramadi will not take long,” he added.
Ramadi is not the only place to have fallen recently into ISIS hands. Palmyra, in Syria, was captured by ISIS only days later. Hundreds have been slaughtered there, including women and children, and concerns have been raised that the various ancient archaeological treasures of the city will be destroyed by ISIS, as has happened in the past in Mosul and Nimrud in Iraq. Syria has since launched air strikes against ISIS fighters in Palmyra.

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/41375/us-didnt-do-damn-thing-to-stop-isis-in-ramadi-says-iranian-commander-middle-east/#C0rjaHy4FWP1EJH8.99