Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label Tea Party Investigations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tea Party Investigations. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Could The Obama Administration Trying To Send A Message To The FBI On The IRS Scandal. If So, FBI Should Ignore It And Proceed With The Investigation Wherever It Goes!

Rove: Someone's Hiding Something About FBI Probe of IRS

Tuesday, 14 Jan 2014 08:16 PM
By Greg Richter
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
Karl Rove doesn't think the FBI's probe of the IRS has been settled yet, but he suspects someone may have told the press that it has as a signal to quash it.

The FBI doesn't comment on ongoing investigations, Rove said Tuesday on Fox News Channel's "On the Record With Greta Van Susteren." 

Yet a Wall Street Journal story on Monday quoted "law enforcement officials" as saying that no charges are expected to be filed unless more evidence turns up.


Rove noted that the story did not not say the officials were with the FBI, and that "law enforcement officials" could cover the Department of Justice.

FBI director James B. Comey has said within the past week that the investigation is ongoing and is important to the agency, Rove said.

"I doubt that within a matter of days, what he said was an important ongoing investigation has come to a conclusion," he said.

Rove suspects ulterior motives are behind the announcement.

"I think that somebody's trying to send a message to the FBI or somebody's trying to dampen down the temperature on this," he told Van Susteren.

The probe involves IRS targeting of tea party and other conservative groups leading up to the 2012 presidential election. The groups had trouble getting their tax-exempt status approved, making them unable to participate in educating voters about their side of the issues.

Most of those groups say they have not been contacted by the FBI about the investigation.

"So, how do you conduct an investigation if you're not talking to the people who were abused by the IRS?" Rove asked.

Jenny Beth Martin of Tea Party Patriots called the lack of action "outrageous."

"If they don't truly do a real investigation of this, there are always going to be doubts," she told Van Susteren.

Van Susteren said DOJ trial lawyer Barbara Bosserman should have declined the job of leading the IRS investigation because she donated $6,000 to President Barack Obama's election campaign.




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Wednesday, March 7, 2012

First It Was The Catholics Now It Is The Tea Party

We all remember the saying "first they came for....", well, it is happening here in the good ole USA.  The Obama Administration started with the requirement that all hospitals, universities, and employers provide abortions and contraceptives to their employees, which caused Catholics around the country to react in horror.


Now we read about the IRS going after Tea Party Organizations, questioning them on who their members are, how they raise money and other questions which have never been before asked of other 501c3 (charitable) organizations.  Obviously, this is an effort to intimidate these groups and their members.  It should have a chilling effect on all patriots.


The issue that irritates us the most is that there is not the same investigation into the Occupy Movement, the Labor Unions, Planned Parenthood or any other left leaning charitable organization. This makes the whole issue a bald faced political move not unlike abuses that occurred during the Civil Rights Movement.  This too must be stopped.


If we do not stop this Administration now (in an election year), what will they do next year and the years thereafter when they do not need to get votes?  This is very scary and we should not stand for it!


We are looking for ideas as to how we can get the word out and to demand that the IRS investigations and the ObamaCare stop immediately. What do you think we should do?


Conservative Tom








IRS Accused of 'Intimidation Campaign' Against Tea Party Groups

(CNSNews.com) - A conservative civil liberties group accuses the Internal Revenue Service of attempting to "intimidate and silence" a number of tea party groups that have applied for tax-exempt status.

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) says IRS requests for information about the groups included "probing questions" that violate the free speech and freedom of association rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.

"This appears to be a coordinated attempt to intimidate Tea Party organizations by demanding information that is outside the scope of legitimate inquiry and violates the First Amendment," said Jay Sekulow, ACLJ's chief counsel.

"These organizations have followed the law and applied for tax exempt status for their activities as Americans have done for decades. The problem here is the IRS has gone beyond legitimate inquiries and is demanding that these organizations answer questions that actually violate the First Amendment rights of our clients."

Among other things, ACLJ complains that the IRS is demanding that the tea party groups reveal the internal workings of their organizations, including the identification of members, how they are selected, who they associate with, and even what they discuss.

"This intimidation campaign is as onerous as what the IRS did to the NAACP in the 1950's and is simply unacceptable. We will aggressively defend our clients and are prepared to take the IRS to court if necessary," ACLJ said Wednesday in a news release.

The ACLJ says the IRS information demands sent to the Tea Party groups (almost 20 groups) are not in response to complaints of wrongdoing, but instead in response to applications by the organizations for 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) tax exempt status.

Sekulow, who served as a trial lawyer with the Office of the Chief Counsel for the IRS earlier in his career, said many of the questions are simply inappropriate and fall well outside the scope of legitimate IRS inquiry. (See following examples)

The ACLJ also is calling for Congressional oversight hearings on the matter.

What follows is an incomplete list of some questions the ACLJ finds overly burdensome and inappropriate:

-- How many members do you have currently?

-- Provide member application/registration form

-- Provide membership agreement and rules that governs members.

-- Provide copies of your website that your members can only access.

-- The names of the donors, contributors, and grantors.

-- The amounts of each of the donations, contributions, and grants and the dates you received them.

-- How did you use these donations, contributions, and grants? Provide the details.

-- The amounts of fundraising income received for each year.

-- Do you have a close relationship with any candidate for public office or political party? If so describe fully the nature of that relationship.

-- Submit the following information relating to your past and present directors, officers, and key employees:
a) Provide a resume for each.
b) Indicate the number of hours per month each individual has provided or is providing services to you.
e) Provide a description of all the services each individual provides or has provided to you.
d) Indicate the total compensation provided to each individual.
e) Describe how each compensation package was determined.
f) Indicate if any of your current and former officers, directors, and key employees are related to each other (include family and business relationships) and describe the nature of the relationship.

-- Have you sold or will you sell merchandise? If yes, provide the following:
a) A vendor list. Indicate if the vendor is a related party.
b) A list of items sold.
c) Your cost for each item.
d) The selling price of each item.

-- Have you conducted or will you conduct voter education activities (voter registration drive, get out the vote drives, publishing voter guides, distributing voter guides, etc.) If so:
a) provide the Location, date and time of the events.



-- Have you conducted or will you conduct candidate forums or other events at which candidates running for public offices are invited to speak? If so, provide the following details and nature of the forum including:
a. The names of candidates invited to participate
b. The names of the candidates who did participate
c. The issues that were discussed
d. The time and location of the event
e. Copies of all handouts provided and distributed at the forum,
f. Indicate the percentage of time and resources you have spent or will spend conducting these activities...

-- Have you attempted or will you attempt to influence the outcome of specific legislation? If so, provide the following:
a. Provide copies of all communications, pamphlets, advertisements, and other materials distributed by the organization regarding the legislation.
b. Provide copies of any radio, television, or internet advertisements relating to your lobbying activities
C. Please indicate the percentage of time and resources you have spent or will spend conducting these activities...

-- Do you directly or indirectly communicate with members of legislative bodies? If so, provide copies of the written communications and contents of other form of
communications.

-- Please provide the following information for your board of directors and officers:
a) Provide all copies of your corporate minutes from inception to the present.
b) Provide the titles, duties, work hours, and compensation amounts of your board members, officers, and employees. If they only work for a certain time yearly, bi-yearly, or quad-yearly, please provide the periods they had (have) worked and will work. Please identify your volunteers.
c) If you nave a board member or officer who has run or will run for a public office in the near future, please describe fully