A Hero Responds To A Liberal Uninformed Teacher

AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. SALCIDO OF

 EL RANCHO HIGH SCHOOL FROM THE 

MILITARY/VETERAN COMMUNITY

HOME » SAMPLE BLOG » AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. SALCIDO OF EL RANCHO HIGH SCHOOL FROM THE MILITARY/VETERAN COMMUNITY

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. SALCIDO OF 

EL RANCHO HIGH SCHOOL FROM THE MILITARY/VETERAN COMMUNITY

By Rick Ferran

  Posted January 29, 2018 

 In opinion

 15

 4

FacebookTwitter

An Open Letter to Mr. Salcido of El Rancho High School in Pico Rivera, California, from the Military and the Veteran Community.

Is Mr. Salcido partly right?

Could it be that a 1% of the population is stupid by joining the military and serving a nation that places overpaid celebrities and Hollywood pedophiles on a pedestal? Are we really stupid by going through the most hardened physical and mental anguish to be part of the few and the proud to be part of something greater than one self? Even though all the cards are lined up against us? When we know that the VA is killing us every day.

How many Vietnam Veterans have died from Agent Orange? Where is the outrage? How many die from Gulf War Syndrome? How many from PTSD? Why are veterans more likely to die from cancer? The liberals love making movies about us with actors who have never served in the military or seen the light of combat, yet they disrespect our veterans and military any chance they get.

But not just the liberals, there are many companies who abuse the Veteran’s status by using wounded or combat veterans as props to sell their products and services, making millions of dollars and not paying those veterans what they deserve or anything at all. Are we too humble to stand up for ourselves or too stupid to think for ourselves?

What is it about our breed that continues to stand up for the weak and the cowards against enemies foreign and domestic, when a large portion of our population would rather we wouldn’t exist? Should I have to remind everyone that Mr. Salcido is just one voice out of thousands of teachers across America who think the same way? Teachers who day by day preach their poison to our children? Should I be angry with Mr. Salcido?

No, I am not angry, or at the students who laughed and agreed with his ignorant statement in the class. I am not angry at all, not anymore, not when our Veterans are being systematically killed at the VA.

Tell me, is Mr. Salcido partly right, that only a stupid person would give up his life for a society that breeds the type of parasite individuals like Mr. Salcido. Is it dumb or unintelligent to fight for people who piss on and burn the flag you sworn to protect? Yes, I know we fight for the men and the women next to us but what will happen to people like Mr. Salcido when the “stupid and dumb” military people, as Mr Salcido called us, no longer want to protect the oath of our constitution? What happens when the military no longer decides to protect anyone in the nation, or people like Mr. Salcido?

Tell me again why we protect such scum when our brothers and sisters die in foreign lands or come home with combat wounds, only to be overtaken by them years later in veteran suicide? What would Mr. Salcido know about courage? About selfless acts? He doesn’t even love himself let alone his own country or countrymen. He speaks like a true coward, selfish to the core, a student of the indoctrination, never risking anything for something greater when it’s easily handed to him.

See, not everyone person in America has the opportunity to go to free college. If you are black or brown and if you are illegal, it’s a plus… no whites allowed. Even then our military is filled with minorities but why is that? I suppose only a madman or a stupid man would escape the democratic slave plantation to go join the military.

The only way out of the liberal slums created by the Democrats, the pits of hell in Chicago ghettos or South LA, is to fight or die defending something greater than one self. Yes, I suppose only a madman, or a stupid man would place their lives first before a stranger like Mr. Salcido or others like him. The military isn’t for everyone, it’s for a few misguided children of Uncle Sam’s who don’t want to fit in a box.

I may not speak for everyone, but for me as a Cuban Communism survivor, it was a way for me to give something back to the country that has given me so many opportunities. Call me stupid all you want, but not every day a Cuban Communism survivor can stand tall and call himself proudly a US Marine by earning the title so many have failed to do, even by those who are born in this great country.

The military community is a brotherhood, a family, it is the very heart of our nation and why we exist as the #1 country of the world. Nothing is more stupid and ignorant than a man who’s unwilling to fight. Those kind of people would rather live in the chains of imprisonment than to risk a single day as free men.

Our Military gets to guard our president and every American Embassy around the world – an honor no one should take lightly. Our Marines, Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Guardsmen, and Coasties work tirelessly everyday to make sure we don’t turn into a shithole country. That’s an intelligent and smart undertaking… to guard the best country of the world from dumb stupid people like Mr. Salcido whose ignorance flourished under the Obama administration.

Undermining the awesomeness of military power will be a complete and unremarkable stupidity, which many of our enemies have learned the hard way. I suppose it is easier to plant the seed of ignorance to naïve children who don’t know better. We do not defend our military from Mr. Salcido’s remarks but instead are contributing to the debate.

I don’t need to defend myself from being a US Marine to Mr. Salcido or anyone else for that matter. As Ronald Reagan stated “Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they’ve made a difference. The Marines don’t have that problem.” As to our Veterans and our military, let Mr. Salcido’s remarks paint you a picture of what progressive liberalism and the Democrats think of our brotherhood and come election time, make sure you vote red and red only for those who support DONALD J TRUMP!

Rick Ferran
US Marine 3/7 Lima Co , 0311, CPL, 93-97

De Blasio Wants To End Private Property

NYC MAYOR GOES FULL COMMIE, CALLS FOR END OF PRIVATE PROPERTY

Bill De Blasio channels Karl Marx in a recent interview

Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 51 Comments 

47

0

0

In an interview with New York Magazine, NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio revealed his distaste for one of America’s oldest institutions of freedom… private property.

When Chris Smith asked De Blasio about reducing income inequality in New York City, he said this.

What’s been hardest is the way our legal system is structured to favor private property. I think people all over this city, of every background, would like to have the city government be able to determine which building goes where, how high it will be, who gets to live in it, what the rent will be. I think there’s a socialistic impulse, which I hear every day, in every kind of community, that they would like things to be planned in accordance to their needs. And I would, too. Unfortunately, what stands in the way of that is hundreds of years of history that have elevated property rights and wealth to the point that that’s the reality that calls the tune on a lot of development.

The comments clearly advocate a Communist-style, government-controlled private property system.

The Daily Wire accurately compared the quote to the teachings of Karl Marx, specifically an excerpt from the 1875 essay “Critique of the Gotha Program,” which can be seen below.

In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life’s prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly—only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

This is not the first time De Blasio has showed sympathy for Communist ideology.

In May of this year, De Blasio was blasted for marching in a NYC parade with Communist Puerto Rican terrorist Oscar López Rivera, and then months later marching alongside Antifa in an anti-Trump protest.

In 2016, De Blasio also gave a half million dollars to Sharia Law supporter and anti-Trump activist, Linda Sarsour.

Is US Heading Toward Communism? Totalitarianism?

DEATH OF A NATION

US in midst of violent communist revolution

James George Jatras | Strategic Culture Foundation - AUGUST 18, 2017 800 Comments 

IMAGE CREDITS: WIKI.

Share314

Tweet1

+1

Pin

Email

SHARES315

Every living nation needs symbols. They tell us who we are as one people, in what we believe, and on what basis we organize our common life.

This fact seems to be very clear to the current leadership in Russia, particularly to President Vladimir Putin, in restoring and reunifying a country rent by three generations of Red and White enmity to achieve a national synthesis. With regard to things spiritual, this meant first of all the world-historic reunification of the Russian Orthodox Church, between the Moscow Patriarchate and the New York-based Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia. It also meant the rebuilding of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior dynamited by the communists 1931, not coincidentally the recent target for desecration by degenerates hailed by western «democracy» advocates.

Civic and military symbols matter as well. After 1991 there were those who wanted landmarks of the communist era to be ruthlessly expunged the way the Bolsheviks had themselves sought (in Solzhenitsyn’s description) to rub off the age-old face of Russia and to replace it with a new, ersatz Soviet image. Instead, wisdom prevailed. The national anthem adopted in 2001 retains the Soviet melody but with new lyrics (written by Sergey Mikhalkov, who with Gabriel El-Registan had penned the original lyrics in 1944!) – Lenin and Stalin are out, God is in. The old capital is again Saint Petersburg, but the surrounding district still bears the name Leningrad. The red star marks Russia’s military aircraft and vehicles, while the blue Saint Andrew’s cross flies over the fleet. The red stars likewise are still atop the Kremlin towers while the Smolensk icon of Christ once again graces the Savior Gate. The red banner that was hoisted triumphantly on the Reichstag in 1945 is carried on Victory Day. The remains of exiled White commanders like Anton Denikin and Vladimir Kappel were repatriated and reburied at home with honor.

I may be wrong, but I would like to think that perhaps Russia took a lesson from what until recently had been the American example. In his Second Inaugural Address in March 1865, as the «brothers’ war« was drawing to a close, Abraham Lincoln spoke of the need to «bind up the nation’s wounds». In striving to do so, nothing was more important than our honoring the heroes of both the Blue and the Gray, perhaps most poignantly demonstrated decades later in the veterans’ reunions at Gettysburg. «Unconditional Surrender» Grant and «Marse Bobby» Lee, «Uncle Billy» Sherman and «Stonewall» Jackson, naval legends David «Damn the torpedoes» Farragut and Raphael «Nelson of the Confederacy» Semmes, cavalrymen «Fightin’ Phil» Sheridan and J.E.B. Stuart, and many, many others – these names belong to all of us. As Americans.

To say this is not to avoid the centrality of slavery in the southerners’ attempted secession or to address the constitutional question of whether they were legally entitled to do so. (Maybe California will have better luck heading for the exit. ¡Adios, amigos!) Nor does it sugarcoat white southerners’ perception of Reconstruction as a hostile, armed occupation or of the institution of Jim Crow racial segregation after federal troops were withdrawn and the Democratic Party assumed power. But the fact is that the mythos of North-South reconciliation in a reunited American nation was a foundation of our becoming an economic giant by the late 19th century, a world power at the beginning of the 20th (at the expense of the decrepit Spanish empire, with the celebrated military participation of former Confederates), and a dominant power after two victorious world wars.

That America may soon be gone with the wind. The violence at Charlottesville, the pulling down of a Confederate memorial by a mob in Durham, the removal of four monuments from Baltimore (which has one of America’s highest homicide rates) under the cowardly cloak of night, and calls for getting rid of many more are simultaneously the death throes of the old America built on one national concept and the birth pangs of a new, borderless, multiethnic, multilingual, multireligious, multisexual, ahistorical, fake «America» now aborning in violence and lawlessness.

He who says A must say B. When one accepts demonization of part of our history and placing those who defend it beyond the pale of legitimate discourse, one should hardly be surprised when the arrogant fury of the victors is unleashed. That takes two forms: the nihilist street thugs of «Antifa» and «Black Lives Matter», and the authorities (both governmental and media, a/k/a the Swamp) who confer on them immunity for violent, criminal behavior. The former are the shock troops of the latter.

They’ve been at it for months, well before Charlottesville, across the country, with nary a peep from the party that supposedly has uniform control over the federal government. Our First Amendment rights as Americans end where a black-clad masked thug chooses to put his (or her or indeterminate «gender») fist or club. To paraphrase U.S. Chief Justice Roger Taney in Dred Scott, loyalists of the old America have no rights which the partisans of the new one are bound to respect. Where’s the Justice Department probe of civil rights violations by this organized, directed brutality? (Or maybe there will be one, including looking into George Soros’s connection. If not, what’s the point of having RICO?)

To be sure, the spectacle of genuine racists on display in Charlottesville provided the perfect pretext for these people, but they’re not the cause. Far from forestalling the violent, revolutionary abolition of the historic America (definitively described by Pat Buchanan) by inciting some kind of white backlash – perhaps in the form of a race war as some of them despicably hope – the «Unite the Right» organizers at Charlottesville have accelerated the revolution. It’s a revolution that dovetails with the anti-constitutional «RussiaGate» coup in progress against President Trump, who is the last hope for preserving the historic American nation. If he is removed (is he the only one, even in his own Administration, fighting back?) and the nice respectable anti-Trump Republican party is restored, they’ll gladly join hands with their Democratic and media Swamp buddies in dragging what remains of America down.

If anyone is tempted to think that the new America will be more peaceful in world affairs, think again. It’s no coincidence that the same forces that want to bring Trump down and also redefine our country’s identity coincide almost entirely with those who want America aggressively to impose «our values« – meaning their values – on the globe. As I put it almost 20 years ago in a somewhat different context, this fake «America» is the vanguard of Rainbow Fascism, at home and abroad.

No doubt the same terrible sense of foreboding, even worse, must have occurred to Russians in 1920, when they saw their country bloodily sacrificed on the altar of a crazed, internationalist ideology. Somehow, after paying an unimaginable price in war and repression, they emerged three quarters of a century later still remembering how (as the late General Aleksandr Lebed put it) «to feel like Russians again».

If we fail to avoid the impending long night, will we Americans be so lucky?