Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label new america foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new america foundation. Show all posts

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Elimination Of US Passport Would Put The Nail In The Coffin Of America. Mexicans And Other Currently Illegals Could Come And Go (But Mostly Come) Obtain Benefits Of All Stripes, Vote And Destroy The Country. Terrible Idea!

passport
NEW YORK – A Soros-funded group arguing to replace the U.S. passport with a North American passport appears ready to take up the mantle of championing the concept of a European Union-style regional government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, Mexico and Canada, fulfilling the dream of the late American University professor Robert Pastor.
The future of the U.S. lies in North America, not in the United States as a sovereign nation, contends the New America Foundation, a Washington-based leftist think-tank with ties to Jonathan Soros, son of famed leftist billionaire George Soros.
Appropriately named “New America,” the foundation believes the U.S. passport should soon become obsolete and replaced with a European Union-style passport issued for all citizens of the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Citizens would be redefined by their regional identity as “North Americans,” echoing President Obama’s claim in Spanish in his Dec. 17, 2014, announcement of his executive actions to re-establish diplomatic relations with Cuba, “Todos Somos Americanos,” or, “We are all Americans.
“The United States, Canada and Mexico are bound by a shared economic, environmental, demographic and cultural destiny. How we move forward together is key to our success,” wrote AndrĂ© Martinez, an editor with New America and a professor at the Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University; and Daniel Kurtz-Phelan, a fellow at New America and a former adviser on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s policy planning staff, in an article titled “Why we need a North American Passport,” published by CNN.com.
“In recognition of our shared destiny, the three countries should create a North American passport that would, over time, allow their citizens to travel, work, invest, learn and innovate anywhere in North America. Work, tourist and student visas are necessities in the modern world to regulate the flow of people between sovereign states,” Martinez and Kurtz-Phelan declared.
“In the North American context, much like within the European Union, our economies and societies are far more integrated than our immigration system recognizes – and a North American passport, much like the EU passport, would align our laws with reality.”
The article authored by Martinez and Kurtz-Phelan provides additional support for the argument reported by WND for the past decade that globalists seeking to create a “North American Union” realized the EU stealth model could be replicated in North America. It can be accomplished, they believe, through establishing free-trade agreements such as NAFTA and transforming them incrementally into a regional government.
In Europe, the European Coal and Steel Agreement – signed as a treaty in Paris on April 18, 1951, and put into force on July 23, 1952 – evolved into the European Common market. The EC was created by the Treaty of Rome March 25, 1957, and ultimately became the European Union, a regional government.
“The inception of NAFTA marked an important step toward leveraging these geographic realities for a shared North American success,” Martinez and Kurtz-Phelan noted.
“NAFTA has been a boon to our growth and competitiveness. Integrated production platforms, sometimes spanning all three countries, have helped draw manufacturing back from competitors across the Pacific.”
They said, however, “the promise of NAFTA has fallen short in a critical respect.”
While trade and investment have grown, “the barriers to movement have remained too high for the people who help drive and stand to benefit from that growth.”
“As evidenced by the recent political firestorm over President Obama’s executive move to allow more undocumented workers to avoid deportation, it would take farsighted and courageous political leadership in all three countries to press for a North American passport,” Martinez and Kurtz-Phelan stressed. “But the fact is that allowing North Americans to move more effortlessly across the borders would help alleviate our contentious domestic immigration battles.”
The New America Foundation boasts millions of dollars in funding by a blue-chip list of leftist donors along with government funding in the form of a seven-figure grant from the State Department and a six-figure grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Prominent among a list of nearly 150 different funding sources is Google Inc., reflecting the participation of Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, on the New American Foundation’s board of trustees.
Also on the board is Jonathan Soros, CEO of JS Capital Management LLC, a private investment firm, also credited on the New American Foundation website as holding several board positions affiliated with the George Soros Open Society Foundations.
The president and CEO of the New American Foundation is Anne-Marie Slaughter, who previously served as the director of policy planning in the State Department, where she worked for Hillary Clinton from January 2009 through February 2011.
Slaughter is the author of the 2005 book “A New World Order,” in which she argued the structure of global governance is already in place, through international organizations and agreements, broad networks of economic markets, travel and information flow.
One year ago, WND reported Robert Pastor, a longtime proponent of North American integration, died at the age of 66 after a three-year battle with cancer. He was a professor of international relations and the director of the Center for North American Studies at American University in Washington, D.C.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/u-s-passports-on-verge-of-elimination/#dkX58OO8LQZxARdY.99

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

In Less Than 2% Of Cases, NSA Data Was Used To Successfully Find Terror Suspects.

Report: NSA Bulk Data Collection Has Had No Real Impact On Terror Prevention

January 14, 2014 by  

Report: NSA Bulk Data Collection Has Had No Real Impact On Terror Prevention
PHOTOS.COM

Based on an analysis of 225 al-Qaida-linked people charged with terrorism in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001, a public policy nonprofit contends that the embattled National Security Agency’s bulk collection of digital communications data has done little to protect the Nation from terrorists.
A report released Monday by the Washington-based New America Foundation details how a majority of the 225 terror cases were sparked by more traditional investigative assets, including “informants, tips from local communities, and targeted intelligence operations.”
In a press release accompanying the report, titled “Do NSA’s Bulk Surveillance Programs Stop Terrorists?,” the foundation acknowledges the few cases in which the bulk collection of so-called metadata hasprevented terrorism.
“Indeed, the controversial bulk collection of American telephone metadata, which includes the telephone numbers that originate and receive calls, as well as the time and date of those calls but not their content, under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, appears to have played an identifiable role in initiating, at most, 1.8 percent of these cases,” the foundation notes. “NSA programs involving the surveillance of non-U.S. persons outside of the United States under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act played a role in 4.4 percent of the terrorism cases we examined, and NSA surveillance under an unidentified authority played a role in 1.3 percent of the cases we examined.”
But the according to the overall findings of their analysis, there is little benefit to the NSA’s mass privacy invasions, which have made American citizens and their foreign counterparts equally uncomfortable with the government’s spying power.
The bottom line, according to the report, is that good old-fashioned police work is still providing the government the most benefit in its pursuit of terror suspects.
“Regular FISA warrants not issued in connection with Section 215 or Section 702, which are the traditional means for investigating foreign persons, were used in at least 48 (21 percent) of the cases we looked at, although it’s unclear whether these warrants played an initiating role or were used at a later point in the investigation.”
The New American report goes on to explain a number of instances where U.S. officials have exaggerated the usefulness of bulk collection of digital communications data in an effort to justify the program’s existence.
The organization carefully examined the case of Basaaly Moalina, a San Diego cab driver who in 2007 and 2008 provided $8,500 to an al-Qaida affiliate, which is the main case government officials have repeatedly used to justify the NSA’s phone records collection.
From the New American Foundation:
According to the government, the database of American phone metadata allows intelligence authorities to quickly circumvent the traditional burden of proof associated with criminal warrants, thus allowing them to “connect the dots” faster and prevent future 9/11-scale attacks. Yet in the Moalin case, after using the NSA’s phone database to link a number in Somalia to Moalin, the FBI waited two months to begin an investigation and wiretap his phone. Although it’s unclear why there was a delay between the NSA tip and the FBI wiretapping, court documents show there was a two-month period in which the FBI was not monitoring Moalin’s calls, despite official statements that the bureau had Moalin’s phone number and had identified him. ,  This undercuts the government’s theory that the database of Americans’ telephone metadata is necessary to expedite the investigative process, since it clearly didn’t expedite the process in the single case the government uses to extol its virtues.
The foundation also points out three other terror cases in which the government has overhyped the role of bulk surveillance in the apprehension of dangerous suspects.
The New America report comes just days before President Barack Obama’s planned Jan. 17 announcement about whether he plans to use the power of the executive to alter the NSA’s spy programs based on the findings of a Dec. 18 report produced by a White House advisory panel.