Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Showing posts with label welfare reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label welfare reform. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

50 Years Of Liberal Programs Have Proven That Feel Good Programs ALWAYS Fail.

Gingrich: Liberal 'War on Poverty' Has Failed

Wednesday, 08 Jan 2014 02:25 PM
By Melanie Batley and John Bachman
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
The liberal approach to the "war on poverty" has been a resounding failure, and successful conservative solutions over the last 50 years have proven that Republicans are best placed to tackle poverty, says former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax TV, the former 2012 Republican presidential candidate says that during the half-century after President Lyndon Johnson famously declared a war on poverty, it is precisely because liberals have presided over a massive expansion of the welfare bureaucracy that America still has not won the war.

"When [Republicans] followed principles of hard work, low taxes, limited regulation, encouraging small business, encouraging people to learn and to get a job, it's worked dramatically," said Gingrich, author of the new book "Breakout: Pioneers of the Future, Prison Guards of the Past, and the Epic Battle That Will Decide America's Fate."


"During the years that the Republicans were actively involved when I first became speaker, we worked on things like welfare reform, capital-gains tax cuts, economic growth. We actually had 5.5 million people leave poverty in that period while under Obama; 3 million additional people moved into poverty. So what we learned is that big government can't solve the problem of poverty because it has exactly the wrong tools and exactly the wrong principles."

Gingrich goes on to say that conservatives, with their track record of successful policies, are uniquely placed and therefore obligated to take up the gauntlet to tackle the problem.

"It's important for conservatives to be actively involved in trying to find ways that work to help Americans — all Americans — have the right to pursue happiness, and it's important for us to take the moral responsibility of arguing on behalf of the poor that there's a courage to stand up to the left and insist that we look at why, after 50 years and $16 trillion, did big government fail?"

Gingrich said that New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio's education proposals are another example of how liberal attempts at tackling inequality are misguided, after de Blasio announced a tax hike on the wealthy — equivalent to what he said would be "a small soy latte" from Starbucks per day — to pay for full-day universal prekindergarten and after-school programs for every middle-school student.

"We know that school choice, the charter schools, that opportunities for parents to have a role in their children's education is working ... Mayor de Blasio is paying off his teachers' union allies, he's going to adopt a very strong anti-parental choice, anti-charter school position, exactly the wrong decision if you want to help poor children learn."

Gingrich also welcomed recent comments by GOP Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida about the importance of tackling poverty, and said that addressing the issue is in keeping with the philosophical basis of American conservatism.

"We're the ones who say, and the tea partiers are the strongest, that our Declaration of Independence says we're endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. So we're the ones who said every American has the right to pursue happiness," he said.

"Well if they're trapped in poverty, if they're trapped in ignorance, if they're trapped without a job, if they're trapped in a dangerous neighborhood, they don't have their rights as Americans.

"We should be the leaders, the champions, of helping every American rise, helping every American have a better future, and we should say the answer to inequality is to level up by having everybody get a better job, a better income, a better future," Gingrich said.

He added, "The left wants to level down by taking away from one group to give to another."

Gingrich said that it will be important for conservatives to clearly explain to voters how they will help improve people's lives, adding that they must stand for a lower cost of living combined with a higher take-home pay, while promoting small businesses.

He pointed out that one of the reasons the cost of living is so high in major cities is because of the cost of big-government unions.

Gingrich said that one of the big side effects of the expansion of government programs such as the Food Stamp program, Medicaid and Medicare is that they are "trapping people in poverty, creating barriers to their rising by giving them just enough things to be dependent on that it's very expensive for them to give that up."

"That's a huge disincentive to people learning to work and learning to rise," he said.

Gingrich added, however, that he is in favor of extending unemployment insurance if it was tied to a work training program, and pointed to the availability of a number of new online learning programs aimed at helping people develop their skills and marketability.

"It seems to me that unemployment compensation could become the largest worker training program in the world if we redesign it. So I'm willing to help people, but I want to help people in such a way that they end up helping themselves," he said.

"That's a very important part of how we could approach this and how Republicans should think about it."



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Why Are There Not Stings For Welfare Fraud Rather Than Other Crime? At Least One Florida Sheriff Is Doing His Job, However Billions Are Being Stolen Across The State

Florida Sheriff Targets Dozens in $2.8M Welfare Fraud Scheme

Tuesday, 17 Dec 2013 11:25 PM
By Todd Beamon
Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
A $2.8 million fraud by Florida welfare recipients was busted in a two-year sting by authorities that is expected to bring more than 60 arrests, the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office said on Tuesday.
"We aren't going to bark a lot, but we are going to bite and bite hard," Sheriff Ric Bradshaw told local television station WPTV.

"I'm going to bite them in the butt as far as I can and take everything that we got from them to teach them a lesson that this is not going to be tolerated."

Sixty-one arrest warrants were issued on Monday, with 21 people arrested so far and facing federal charges, Bradshaw said.

The sting — called "Operation Money Tree" — started after a grandmother called authorities when she learned that the father of her granddaughter traded his electronic food stamp card for money instead of buying groceries for her granddaughter, authorities said.

The cards were allegedly traded at a small grocery store in Palm Springs, authorities told WPTV.

The clerks at the store, however, would give the suspects cash and keep half the profits for themselves.

For instance, if a suspect sought $100, the clerk would charge $150 to the card — handing the cash over the suspect, authorities said.

In March, Florida welfare officials announced a crackdown on fraud in the state, which cost taxpayers $1.35 billion last year, the Orlando Sentinel reports.

The effort partnered the Florida Department of Children and Families with LexisNexis to use an identity-authentication process similar to what banks and other financial institutions employ.

The agency processes most of the applications for those seeking food stamps, cash to needy families, and Medicaid benefits.

The technology by the data-services company requires welfare recipients to answer personal questions that identity thieves would not be able to answer, the Sentinel reports.

The change was expected to save $60 million a year, the report says. About 90 percent of the state's welfare recipients complete their benefit applications online.

"Florida ranks No. 1 in the nation for identity theft, and for far too long criminals have been gaming our systems and stealing from taxpayers and Floridians who are truly in need," DCF Secretary David Wilkins told the Sentinel when the program was announced in March.

"Implementing technology that has been successfully used in the private sector will allow us to catch more of these cheats on the front end."




© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Monday, July 16, 2012

Good Bye Work Requirements for Welfare


Sebelius Claims Power to Gut Welfare Reform, Contrary to Law

HHS Sebelius at HRC event
HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius speaks at the release of the HRC’s Healthcare Equality Index 2012. (Photo by Judy Rolfe/HRC)
(CNSNews.com) – In a bid to expand federal welfare rolls, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius claimed on Thursday that HHS had the authority to waive the key requirement in President Clinton’s welfare reform law – the requirement that beneficiaries find and maintain a job.
A plain reading of the law, however, does not seem to support this claim.
On Thursday, HHS issued what it called guidance to state welfare agencies, claiming that it could absolve states of the requirement that some welfare recipients work in order to continue receiving benefits.
HHS claimed that its authority to approve innovative state experiments – known as demonstration projects – by issuing waivers of certain welfare requirements empowered it to waive the work requirements as well.
At issue are several sections of the Social Security Act, which governs federal welfare programs.
The waiver authority is found in Section 1115 of the law and grants Sebelius the power to issue waivers to certain welfare requirements so a state may conduct its welfare experiment. State experimentation was another key component of Clinton’s welfare reform.
“The Secretary may waive compliance with any of the requirements of section 2, 402, 454, 1002, 1402, 1602, or 1902, as the case may be, to the extent and for the period he finds necessary to enable such State or States to carry out such project,” the law reads.
In its memo, HHS claimed that a provision of Section 402 – one of the sections Sebelius has the power to waive – granted it power to get rid of work requirements.
Section 402 requires states to submit an administrative plan to the federal government, outlining how it will spend federal welfare funds and how its plan complies with the law – including the work requirement.
“While the TANF work participation requirements are contained in section 407, section 402(a)(1)(A)(iii) requires that the state plan “[e]nsure that parents and caretakers receiving assistance under the program engage in work activities in accordance with section 407.” Thus, HHS has authority to waive compliance with this 402 requirement and authorize a state to test approaches and methods other than those set forth in section 407, including definitions of work activities and engagement,” HHS said in its memo.
In other words, HHS claims that because it can relieve states of the requirement to submit a welfare spending plan to the government. It can also relieve them of the requirement that some welfare recipients must work.
However, federal law does not say this. In fact, it says exactly the opposite of what HHS claims it says.
While the law does empower Sebelius to relieve a state of the burden of providing the government a written plan, it does not empower her to waive the work requirements.
Specifically, the section of the law that governs those waivers clearly states that the waivers do not absolve states of the work requirements.
“[A] waiver granted under section 1115 or otherwise … shall not affect the applicability of section 407 to the State,” the law reads.
Section 407 is the requirement that some welfare recipients work in order to receive benefits.
The move is designed to expand welfare rolls, as HHS made clear in its memo – saying it would only issue waivers to states that planned to expand their welfare rolls.
“The Secretary will not approve a waiver for an initiative that appears substantially likely to reduce access to assistance or employment for needy families,” HHS said.
In practice, the waivers would allegedly relieve states of the requirement that certain percentages of welfare recipients work in order to remain on a state’s welfare rolls, allowing states to essentially cook their books by coming up with new ways to count people as employed who are not actually employed.
HHS lists several things states could do to earn a waiver, including counting those in vocational or other post-secondary education as working, counting people working in welfare-subsidized jobs but who are no longer receiving welfare benefits, and inventing different ways to count the disabled as working.
The proposal was met with opposition from two top congressional Republicans – Rep. Dave Camp (R-Mich.) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah.). Camp chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, and Hatch is ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee – the committees that have jurisdiction over welfare.
Hatch and Camp sent a letter to Sebelius on Thursday demanding to know why she thinks she has the legal authority to waive welfare work requirements.
“We request that you provide a detailed explanation of your Department’s legal reasoning behind the guidance released today, as we believe it is deeply flawed and specifically contradicted by TANF (welfare) and related statutory language,” they wrote.
“Simply put, if Congress had intended to allow waivers of TANF work requirements, it would have said so in the statute,” Hatch and Camp said. “Instead, Congress did the exact opposite and explicitly prohibited waivers to section 407 work requirements among other sections of the Social Security Act.”