Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Who Is Uncle Omar?

When you hear the name, Uncle Omar, of whom do you think?  A friendly, gray haired brother of your mother? Well,  America's favorite Uncle Omar is President Obama's uncle who also is an illegal immigrant. However, it even gets better, this is the second relative that came to this country and overstayed their visit. The President's aunt  is here without permission.  Now we know why there is no attention to the immigration problem by this administration, it would mean deporting two relatives!

We are not responsible for our relatives (thankfully) but somehow this strikes me as immoral.  If we had an administration which was driven by a moral code, we would not have these type of issues. The lawbreakers would be deported, regardless of their family name.

I call on the Administration to deport President Obama's Aunt and Uncle as a prelude to deporting all other illegal immigrants.  They came here and violated our laws, they should be deported immediately. Illegal is illegal and no one should get a break.

Here is Michelle Malkin's information on America's favorite uncle:

Malkin: America's Uncle Omar Problem

By Michelle Malkin 
"Always remember. Never forget." The phrase is now emblazoned in red across the U.S. Department of Homeland Security website. But as the Obama administration disseminates its talking points to mark the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 jihadist attacks, the White House remains stone-silent about the president's Uncle Omar problem.
The refusal to deal with Uncle Omar tells you everything you need to know about the emptiness and impotence of Washington's 9/11 platitudes.
"Omar" is Onyango Obama, the illegal alien deportation fugitive who is the long-lost Kenyan half-brother of President Obama's father. The president mentioned him in his best-selling book, "Dreams from My Father." But these days, he'd undoubtedly prefer to whitewash him out of the public eye. Last week, Uncle Omar was arrested for drunk driving in Framingham, Mass., and held on an immigration detainer.
The liquor store employee -- yes, he was apparently drinking the inventory that legal Americans weren't drinking -- nearly crashed into a police car and belligerently demanded to ring up the White House. Few in the neighborhood are laughing it off. Just two weeks ago, an illegal alien drunk driver with a mile-long rap sheet mowed down and killed a 23-year-old Milford, Mass., man.
Open-borders advocates will call Uncle Omar "harmless." But it turns out he's not only a repeat deportation absconder who has ignored two court orders to leave the country, but he is also a deadbeat who owes thousands in back taxes and a fraudulent Social Security card-holder who has managed to evade authorities for half a century.
The policy that allowed Omar to disappear is "voluntary departure" -- a security-undermining mechanism that allows illegal alien border-jumpers and visa-overstayers to simply deport themselves after going through the federal immigration court system. Omar lost his first case to stay in the country in 1989; he lost a second bid with the Board of Immigration Appeals in 1992.
Then, as 400,000 to 700,000 illegal alien deportation absconders have done over the past two decades, Omar simply thumbed his nose at the law again and treated his entry into America as an entitlement instead of a privilege.
Omar will now appeal any deportation proceedings a third time with the help of the same Ohio law firm that represented his illegal alien deportation fugitive sister, Zeituni Onyango. Aunt Zeituni arrived in the U.S. in 2000 on a temporary visa. Her asylum request was rejected in 2004. She defied the immigration court order to go back to Kenya, moved into Boston public housing, and hid with relatives for years before winning a second bid to stay in the country she's since trashed publicly numerous times.
As I reported exclusively in November 2008, when Aunt Zeituni's case exploded before Election Day, sympathetic Bush administration officials ordered immigration authorities across the country to halt all deportation enforcement actions until after the campaign season was over. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) source familiar with Western field offices told me at the time: "The ICE fugitive operations group throughout the U.S. was told to stand down until after the election from arresting or transporting anyone out of the U.S. This was done to avoid any mistakes of deporting or arresting anyone who could have a connection to the election, i.e., anyone from Kenya who could be a relative. The decision was election-driven."
Now, we know there was at least one other Obama deportation fugitive hiding in plain view who benefited from the freeze.
More damningly, we know that both Republican and Democratic administrations continue to play politics with homeland security while paying lip service to the 9/11 dead.
After the attacks, DHS officials discovered the full danger that the vast ocean of deportation fugitives posed. Consider the case of Gazi Ibrahim Abu Mezer, a Palestinian bomb-builder who entered the U.S. illegally through Canada in 1996 and 1997. He claimed political asylum based on alleged persecution by Israelis, was released on a reduced $5,000 bond posted by a man who was himself an illegal alien, and then skipped his asylum hearing after calling his attorney and lying about his whereabouts. In June 1997, after his lawyer withdrew Mezer's asylum claim, a federal immigration judge ordered Mezer to leave the country on a "voluntary departure order." Mezer ignored the useless piece of paper. He joined a New York City bombing plot before being arrested in July 1997 after a roommate tipped off local police.
Countless jihadistsRamzi Yousef and Mir Aimal Kansi also exploited our catch-and-release system by invoking asylum and evading swamped authorities before plotting and executing jihadist attacks.
The post-9/11 absconder apprehension initiative has been decimated. The total number of apprehensions of illegal aliens by immigration enforcement agencies is less than half of what it was five years ago, according to the Center for Immigration Studies. And the White House is dispensing deportation waivers like Pez candy en masse.
"Always remember. Never forget." Words, just words.
---
Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010).
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

6 comments:

  1. This might become the only issue since 2008 that Obama outsmarts the Republicans. I expect he will sit back and do nothing, as the immigration service deals with uncle. Meanwhile, his new deportation policy (which focuses on drug smugglers and such) is a trap for Republicans who oppose it, demanding that the government find a way to deport 12 million people. The political scientists have said that Republicans will need 40% of the Latino vote to beat Obama in 2012. By 2050, whites will be a minority group in this country.

    Meanwhile, I watched the debate. As you might predict, I thought Ron Paul got the better of Perry on Paul's support of Reagan and Perry's support of Al Gore. As Ron said, he was loyal to Reagan until Reagan's spending tripled the national debt. Paul is a reliable fiscal conservative. I think it is only his foreign policy on wars and militarism that is holding him back.

    --David

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, immigration is an issue that smart Latinos will have no problem with deportion. The problem is that it will be demogoged and the non-thinkers will react negatively.

    David, I missed the debate and but would have believed that you would see Dr.Paul as the winner!

    I do admire him for his steadfast adhearence to his opinions. I sure do wish others would do the same.

    I am concerned about Perry and his change of parties? His truth telling about Social security is going to be a hard sale for some americans.

    It also concerns me that Romney ran a very bad campaign last time and he has not explained his support for MassCare to my satisfaction.

    Bachman has made too many stupid gaffs to be a President.

    Unfortunately, Paul could not get elected as he would be painted as a "wacko" by the press regardless of his ideas.

    So I don't know what to do for a candidate at this time.

    What do you think about the candidates?

    ReplyDelete
  3. David, I think you are right that immigration might become an issue that Obama could exploit, not because it is right, but because most people in this country could not think themselves out of a paperbag. The issue will be demogoged and the non-thinkers will react negatively.

    Regarding the political candidates, my opinions are:

    Perry: My concern is his change from Democrat; his characterization of Social Security as a Ponzi scheme will be demogoged; his Texas drawl will be "Bushized".

    Romney: My concern in MassCare and the poor way that he ran his last campaign.

    Bachman: She made too many gaffes, misspoken information to be a serious candidate. Additionally, I have found a surprising number of women who say they would never vote for a woman and these are conservative women.

    Paul: Even though he has nto changed his ideas over the years, he would be painted as a "flake' by the MSM. He would be a great Secretary of the Treasury.

    ReplyDelete
  4. David, I think you are right that immigration might become an issue that Obama could exploit, not because it is right, but because most people in this country could not think themselves out of a paperbag. The issue will be demogoged and the non-thinkers will react negatively.

    Regarding the political candidates, my opinions are:

    Perry: My concern is his change from Democrat; his characterization of Social Security as a Ponzi scheme will be demogoged; his Texas drawl will be "Bushized".

    Romney: My concern in MassCare and the poor way that he ran his last campaign.

    Bachman: She made too many gaffes, misspoken information to be a serious candidate. Additionally, I have found a surprising number of women who say they would never vote for a woman and these are conservative women.

    Paul: Even though he has nto changed his ideas over the years, he would be painted as a "flake' by the MSM. He would be a great Secretary of the Treasury.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Perry's immigration policy…

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/09/13/perry.immigration/

    This differs considerably from your proposal.

    The MSM doesn't treat Ron Paul as a flake. They just basically ignore him.

    --David

    ReplyDelete
  6. I stand by my proposal and my call on Obama to deport his illegal immigrant relatives.

    I disagree with Perry's immigration proposal. In Iran, just cross the border and you go to jail. Same goes for Korea. Once a country cannot control its borders, it loses its identity. America is there.

    My point on Ron Paul was based upon the assertion that he was the candidate. They would treat him like a flake and condemn him at every turn. Now they just ignore him, in hopes that he will just go away.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.