There are doubting Thomas' out there who did not believe that the IRS would target Tea Party and other conservative groups when the story broke over one year ago. Now that the IRS has admitted their mis-deeds, those same people minimize the damage. "It was only "X" number of groups", is one comment we have heard.
In our opinion, it does not matter if it was one or a million groups were targeted. It is an abuse by an agency that should not be partisan. Even the ACLU agrees with our assessment.
The IRS agents, supervisors and heads of the agency who participated in this abuse, should be punished severely. Without letting those in government know that abuse of our freedoms is a serious matter, we invite others to do even worse things.
Conservative Tom
IRS kept shifting targets in tax-exempt groups scrutiny: report
Reuters – 5 hours agoRELATED CONTENT
View PhotoThe National Debt Clock hangs on a wall next to an office for the Internal Revenue Service near Times Square in New York May 16, 2011. REUTERS/Chip East
By Kevin Drawbaugh and Kim Dixon
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - When tax agents started singling out non-profit groups for extra scrutiny in 2010, they looked at first only for key words such as 'Tea Party,' but later they focused on criticisms by groups of "how the country is being run," according to investigative findings reviewed by Reuters on Sunday.
Over two years, IRS field office agents repeatedly changed their criteria while sifting through thousands of applications from groups seeking tax-exempt status to select ones for possible closer examination, the findings showed.
At one point, the agents chose to screen applications from groups focused on making "America a better place to live."
Exactly who at the IRS made the decisions to start applying extra scrutiny was not clear from the findings, which were contained in portions of an investigative report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).
Expected to be made public this week, the report was obtained in part by Reuters over the weekend as a full-blown scandal involving the IRS scrutiny widened, embarrassing the agency and distracting the Obama administration.
In one part of the report, TIGTA officials observed that the application screening effort showed "confusion about how to process the applications, delays in the processing of the applications, and a lack of management oversight and guidance."
After brewing for months, the IRS effort exploded into wider view on Friday when Lois Lerner, director of exempt organizations for the IRS, apologized for what she called the "inappropriate" targeting of conservative groups for closer scrutiny, something the agency had long denied.
At a legal conference in Washington, while taking questions from the audience, Lerner said the agency was sorry.
She said the screening practice was confined to an IRS office in Cincinnati; that it was "absolutely not" influenced by the Obama administration; and that none of the targeted groups was denied tax-free status.
It is clear from the TIGTA findings that Lerner was informed in June 2011 that the extra scrutiny was occurring. Key words in the names of groups - including 'Tea Party,' "Patriot' and '9/12' - were being used to choose applications, TIGTA found.
"Issues" criteria were also used, TIGTA found. Scrutiny was being given to references to "Government spending, Government debt, or taxes; Education of the public via advocacy/lobbying to 'make America a better place to live;' and Statements in the case file (that) criticize how the country is being run."
Under these early criteria, more than 100 tax-exempt applications had been identified, according to TIGTA.
Briefed on the practice, Lerner ordered changes.
CONSTANTLY SHIFTING CRITERIA
By July 2011, the IRS was no longer targeting just groups with certain key words in their names. Rather, the screening criteria had changed to "organizations involved with political, lobbying, or advocacy."
But then it changed again in January 2012 to cover "political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding government, educating on the constitution and bill of rights, social economic reform/movement," according to the findings contained in a Treasury Department watchdog report.
In March 2012, after Tea Party groups complained about delays in processing of their applications, then-IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman was called to testify by a congressional committee. He denied that the IRS was targeting tax-exempt groups based on their politics.
The IRS said on Saturday that senior IRS executives were not aware of the screening process. The documents reviewed by Reuters do not show that Shulman had any role.
In May 2012, the criteria for scrutiny were revised again to cover a variety of tax-exempt groups "with indicators of significant amounts of political campaign intervention (raising questions as to exempt purpose and/or excess private benefit)," according to a TIGTA timeline included in the findings.
THOUSANDS OF APPLICATIONS
Each year the IRS reviews as many as 60,000 applications from groups ranging from charities to labor unions that want to be classified as tax-exempt. "Social welfare" groups dedicated to the general good can be tax-exempt under tax law 501(c)4.
These groups do not have to disclose the identities of their donors and they can spend money on advertising for general issues, but they may not endorse specific candidates or parties.
The U.S. Supreme Court's January 2010 "Citizens United" ruling unleashed a torrent of new political spending and 501(c)4 groups became a popular conduit for some of it, on both ends of the political spectrum, but especially for conservatives.
The number of applications sent to the IRS by groups seeking 501(c)4 status rose to 3,400 in 2012 from 1,500 in 2010. As money poured into 501(c)4 groups, campaign finance activists began to raise questions and demanded a crackdown by the IRS.
(Reporting by Kevin Drawbaugh, Kim Dixon and Patrick Temple-West; Editing by Eric Walsh)
"The IRS said on Saturday that senior IRS executives were not aware of the screening process. The documents reviewed by Reuters do not show that Shulman had any role."
ReplyDeleteSo, if Shulman had no role, who did? The investigation should focus on who and how this policy originated. Then, heads should roll.
There should be a serious IRS investigation on how many of these organizations (both liberal and conservatives) are in legal compliance with the requirements to remain tax-exempt. I find it VERY hard to believe that there are thousands of them and zero violations. So far, however, none of them has lost its tax-exempt status, but any whose ONLY activity is funding smear ads against political candidates should lose it. Do you have an opinion on that subject?
--David
Yesterday and today's news says that ALL execs at IRS knew! We have not seen the report and it might not name names. The information that the IRS was "over the top" like asking for home addresses of all donors, names of businesses that donors, listing all contributions to any charity and more and more. It WAS and IS a witch hunt!
ReplyDeleteAs far as auditing these charities, one has to have very strict guidelines on what can and cannot be done by these groups. If a group produces an ad that is favorable to Obama is that ok while one that produces an ad that is unfavorable to obama is not? A smear to one political party is a great ad for another.
They can legally run as many smear ads as they want against either party. Citizens United assured that. However, it is not supposed to be tax-exempt if the ONLY activity of the organization is to run political ads. That is what I propose should be investigated. As I said, I find it hard to believe that there are thousands of these organizations and none of them has ever violated the requirements.
ReplyDeleteNone of the stories says ALL. They are all vague. All we have at the moment are unnamed sources claiming unnamed "officials" and "managers" originated the policy. We need names and job titles.
--David
The acting commissioner of the IRS was fired today. That is a good start, but the Lerner woman should also go. I heard today that Shulman was actually appointed by George W. Bush, and he was head of IRS while all this was happening. They can't fire him, though, because he's already gone.
ReplyDelete--David