Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz has been all over the media speaking about the travesty that was the Zimmerman trial. He has made many points among those the Florida State Prosecutor should be disbarred after going in front of the media and saying that the former neighborhood watchman was a "murderer."
Additionally, the 50 year professor has made it clear that the case should NEVER been brought to trial as there was no evidence to justify any of the charges. All of this goes back to Angela Corey, the state prosecutor.
When the government trumps up charges against a citizen, do we any longer have the rule of law? How long will it be before you, replace Zimmerman?
Conservative Tom
Dershowitz: Zimmerman Has Defamation Case Against Florida Prosecutor
Monday, 15 Jul 2013 05:21 PM
Outrage is growing over the jaw-dropping statement by Florida state prosecutor Angela Corey that George Zimmerman, acquitted of murder and manslaughter in the death of Trayvon Martin, is still a "murderer."
Renowned civil-rights lawyer Alan Dershowitz told "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV that Zimmerman has reason to launch a defamation of character case against Corey.
"Clearly he is somebody who was acquitted by a jury on the grounds of self-defense and she shouldn’t be going around second-guessing the jury verdict and calling him a murderer," the veteran Harvard Law professor said.
"He probably has a defamation action against her. She has no immunity as a prosecutor for appearing on television and if I were his lawyer I would think seriously about bringing a defamation lawsuit against her."
On an interview taped after Zimmerman's acquittal Saturday and airing Monday night on CNN's Headline News program "HLN After Dark," Corey is asked for a word that comes to mind for the former neighborhood-watch volunteer.
"Murderer," she says after several seconds of silence.
Other noted legal experts also expressed their disgust at Corey’s remark, agreeing with Dershowitz that it could spur legal action by Zimmerman.
“That is shockingly inappropriate, unethical conduct by a prosecutor. And frankly, she might very well be sued for it — and properly so,” noted criminal attorney and CNN legal analyst Paul Callan told Steve Malzberg.
“Prosecutors get immunity when they’re acting within the scope of their employment as prosecutors. But appearing on a TV show doing a word association game is not going to give her immunity. Now that’s really stunning.”
Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy said the “murderer” crack was “disgraceful … a reprehensible thing to do.”
Callan added he was surprised at the “sour grapes press conference” Florida prosecutors held after the acquittal.
“Usually, prosecutors are very dignified and they say we disagree with the jury, we’re disappointed in the verdict, but we respect the process. They did a very extensive press conference in which they really went after Zimmerman quite personally.”
Dershowitz, who has defended such clients as Claus von Bulow, Mike Tyson, Patricia Hearst and Jim Bakker, said the violence-free response to the verdict was thanks to the “really excellent behavior” of the Martin family.
But, he added, that if it had gone the other way, Corey would have to be blamed.
“If there had been violence, she would be responsible for it because she raised expectations,” he said.
“She got a second-degree murder charge, she basically told the judge that there was a case here for second-degree murder and there was never a chance of getting a verdict in this case.”
Dershowitz, who has been extremely critical of Corey throughout the Zimmerman case, added:
"I’ve seen plenty of bad prosecutors, very good prosecutors. I’ve never encountered a prosecutor quite like her. … This is a woman who has still, as far as I know, still not yet spoken to the family of the Martins, still never given them any solace. ...
"All she does is go on television and try to justify her conduct and try to attack Zimmerman, knowing that she has people out there who she's pandering to."
He said the Justice Department and Attorney General Eric Holder should not pursue a federal civil-rights violations case against Zimmerman.
"This is not an appropriate use of Justice Department authority. It's now been turned into a political football," Dershowitz said.
"The NAACP is objecting to the verdict. Where do they come off objecting to the verdict in a case? And they’re joined by the Arab American Anti-Defamation League who’s partnering with them on this issue.
"You would think that these organizations, really, had more appropriate issues to focus on."
"The Task Force recommends the Legislature review applicable standards for
ReplyDeleterecognized neighborhood watch groups, as defined in Section 30.60 and
Section 166.0485, Florida Statutes, to define the role of neighborhood watch
participants as limited to observing, watching, and reporting potential criminal
activity to law enforcement. The participant’s purpose is not to pursue,
confront, or provoke potential suspects."
This is one of the changes in the stand your ground law recommended by the Task Force appointed by Scott. Maybe now they MIGHT actually do something about it, but I doubt it. As the law stands, you can follow somebody, curse him, start a fight with him by throwing the first punch, and then kill him and claim self-defense when you start losing the fight. So, under Florida law, it really doesn't matter whether Martin or Zimmerman started the fight or made no effort to avoid it so far as the self-defense case is concerned. Every Republican-controlled state in the country now has a stand your ground law.
--David
I think you are wrong when appointing all the blame on Zimmerman. He did follow Martin but that is part of the observing, otherwise when the police arrive in 5, 20 or 60 minutes, you can tell them where the suspect is. If not, when the police come and you say,"well, he was going that way...." will not really help prevent crime. Police also will stop responding if the information a neighborhood watchman calls them with is incomplete, dated or worthless.
ReplyDelete"I think you are wrong when appointing all the blame on Zimmerman."
ReplyDeleteWhere do you get that Idea? I don't know who provoked the fight or threw the first punch. We do know that Zimmerman got out of his car and followed Martin. If he had stayed in his car, Martin would be alive today and Zimmerman would not have been facing murder charges.
When the watchman follows the suspect, it risks exactly what happened between Martin and Zimmerman, especially when one or both of them are carrying guns. The police don't want citizens shooting it out on the street before they get to the scene.
Martin knew Zimmerman was following him, and took retaliatory action. That would happen often if watchmen aggressively track suspects the way Zimmerman did to Martin (who said something on the phone like "I have a creep-looking cracker following me"). I believe that is why the Task Force recommended that the watch people stay in their cars.
--David