Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Thursday, September 26, 2013

UN Now In Charge of Gun Trade--Will Our Guns Be Next? Probably

Kerry Signs UN Arms Trade Treaty, Says Won't Harm US Rights

Wednesday, 25 Sep 2013 06:44 PM

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
The United States signed a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty regulating the $70 billion global trade in conventional arms on Wednesday, and the Obama administration sought to allay fears of the powerful U.S. gun lobby, which says the pact would violate the constitutional rights of Americans.The treaty, which relates only to cross-border trade and aims to keep weapons out of the hands of human-rights abusers and criminals, still requires ratification by the U.S. Senate, and has been attacked by the influential gun rights group the National Rifle Association.
Among the NRA's arguments against the treaty are that it undermines U.S. sovereignty and that it disregards the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizens the right to bear arms.

The United States, the world's No. 1 arms exporter, became the 91st country to sign when Secretary of State John Kerry put pen to paper on the sidelines of the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations.
"It's significant that the United States, which accounts for about 80 percent of the world's export in arms, has signed," Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop told a news conference.
Another 16 nations signed on Wednesday, raising the total to 107, and two more countries ratified the treaty, raising that number to six, Bishop said. Fifty countries need to ratify the treaty for it to enter into force.
"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes," Kerry said after signing it.
"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.
Arms control activists and rights groups say one person dies every minute as a result of armed violence, and that the treaty is needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of conventional weapons, ranging from small firearms to tanks and attack helicopters. It would create binding requirements for states to review cross-border contracts to ensure that weapons will not be used in human-rights abuses, terrorism, violations of humanitarian law or organized crime.
The NRA vowed to oppose ratification in the Senate, calling the treaty a threat to individual firearm ownership.
"These are blatant attacks on the constitutional rights and liberties of every law-abiding American. The NRA will continue to fight this assault on our fundamental freedom," said Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action.
The U.N. Office for Disarmament Affairs says the treaty does not "interfere with the domestic arms trade and the way a country regulates civilian possession."The 193-nation U.N. General Assembly approved the treaty on April 2 by a vote of 154-3. Russia, China, India and 20 other countries abstained.
Rights group Amnesty International USA said it hoped the decision by the United States to sign the treaty would send a signal to Moscow, Beijing and the NRA on the commitment of President Barack Obama's administration to the issue.
"The Obama administration is politically committed to ending the unscrupulous trade in deadly weapons used by dictators, war lords and criminal gangs to commit atrocities," said Amnesty International USA deputy executive director, Frank Jannuzi.
Aid group Oxfam welcomed the U.S. signing and called on Washington to live up to the spirit of the treaty by not transferring weapons to countries where there is a risk of rights abuses, such as in the Syrian civil war.
The White House pledged in June to provide military aid to rebels in Syria. The Syrian Coalition of opposition groups said this month that lethal assistance had been received from the United States.


Kerry has said "many items" are reaching the rebels, but declined to say what military items were sent.
© 2013 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for commenting. Your comments are needed for helping to improve the discussion.